Dixie thread

Dixie thread

This is my proclamation! You can’t be a neo Confederate and a Nazi at the same time. Nazism contradicts our libertarian economic system. Also the Nazis are into New Age shit and that’s just fucking weird. Neo Confederates adheres to Jeffersonian idelas which opposes National socialism.

Attached: 0F245194-E163-4CB3-94C3-04A29B566315.jpg (380x370, 28K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffersonian_democracy
thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/114/
takimag.com/article/corruption_of_blood_steve_sailer/print
vdare.com/posts/judah-p-benjamin-the-gay-jewish-confederate-leader-without-a-statue-to-tear-down
archive.fo/waZrA
henrymakow.com/000285.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Jefferson didn't like the British, the confederacy did.

What does that have to do with nazism?

Not much, I'm attacking the
>Neo Confederates adheres to Jeffersonian idelas
Specifically.

Jeffersonian ideals is the belief in a traditional agricultural society. It is not his personal beliefs of other nationalities.

>Jeffersonian ideals is the belief in a traditional agricultural society
That's news to me. What makes an agricultural society traditional compared to an nontraditional one? No fertilizer or GMO crops?

Kek, lolbert ideals are what got the CSA killed the last time around

Attached: 1509062979874.jpg (659x450, 41K)

Traditional in the sense of culture and values.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffersonian_democracy

The auto shop I go to has that picture hanging on their wall Lel

Doesn't sound related to the confederacy. I can see the agriculture connections, but not that other parts.

A lot of time passed between Jefferson and the Confederacy. Not that the Confederacy really followed Jeffersonian ideals to the letter anyway because it had tons of flaws.

>Wanting to seceede so you can make a libertarian "paradise" full of civic nationalists
im going to pass

dude shut the fuck up with this d&c. we want to deport beaners and get niggers under control or out of the country, period.

the CSA was ironically more federal than the US government during the civil war
>higher federal taxes
>instituted marshall law
>instituted the first ever draft (except for the relatives of (((plantation owners))) which was surely not a coincidence)
>any state that thought about drifting during the war was threatened harshly with military occupation

>Wanting to be associated with California

also you can't go back to old age ideals because "you dont understand the new age" post-industral revolution brainlet.

The CSA was just a bunch of elite plantation owners sending Americans to die so they can keep their pet niggers

california(the land, climate, wilderness) is awesome. it just needs to be purged.

It's a dry wasteland on life support and will border mexico for all predictable future.

>(((elites)))

no it isn't you stupid fucking foreigner, it is being mismanaged

Yeah but they also hated tariffs designed to nurture American industry so in terms of trade they were lolberts.
Truly they were a confused people.

Attached: 1541076978769.jpg (470x469, 84K)

Fuck off
You snow hippie

They hated tariffs because it helped the economy of one part of the country at the expense of another.

The Confederacy and Germany were the last chances for the White man to stay in power. All Jews, liberals, niggers and commie Whites need to just die or fucking leave the South for good.

Attached: 1lkgfu.jpg (700x461, 166K)

They hated tariffs because it meant they had to tell cotton to the textile mills in the north for less than they could otherwise sell it to the English for if there weren't any tariffs.

You realize that New York, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts paid about 80% of the tariff directly right? And we purchased about 80% of all the agricultural machinery in the country, so we absorbed 80% of the direct and indirect costs of the tariff. That "muh tariffs" canard neoconfederates like to push so much is just a lie.
thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/114/

Meanwhile in the long run the tariffs would have helped them industrialize as well, and gotten out of their backwards slave economy. They were just pursuing selfish short term regional interests at the expense of the long term national interest.

Attached: 1539309416042.png (430x545, 85K)

>in the long run the tariffs would have helped them industrialize as well
Maybe, if they had any factories. But they didn't and it would only mean that the north got richer and the balance of power/influence would tip even further in favor of the north.
But yeah, of course the solution when you're producing raw materials is to build factories that process this material. The problem is competing with existing factories, which you most likely can't. The north couldn't and that's why they needed tariffs.

>ywn live in a timeline where the South won the Civil War
>the Confederate States Army will never field a modernized version of the famed Columbus Depot Jacket (five/six rows of buttons, gray/jean wool, blue service cuffs and collar)
>the South will never declare war on Nazi Germany after Ribbentrop's repeated insults and lies
>ywn be a Confederate paratrooper fighting in Holland 1945-errr I mean '44 as part of Operation Market Garden
>ywn ambush a German transport truck one morning on a dusty Dutch road
>ywn laugh as you easily slaughter the SS with your BAR, forged by legendary Mormon gunsmiths in Utah, who flee in terror at the sight of Southern valor
>ywn hear banging on the truck door and cautiously open it with weapon at the ready
>ywn be immediately greeted by a nine month pregnant and very horny Anne Frank, who was locked up inside
>Anne will never instantly become enamored with with your Columbus Depot jacket, gray like her eyes, beautiful, yet simple, lacking any of the haughty and frivolous decorations of German uniforms
>Anne will never claim to know a good sniper's spot and offer to lead you to it
>ywn accept, oblivious to what she actually has planned
>Anne will never lead you inside an abandoned windmill and lock the door, saying she's not going to let you out until she's had her way with you

Attached: columbus.jpg (480x640, 126K)

>Anne will never tear open her comically small dress
>ywn become instantly hard at the sight of her massive tits, naked swollen belly, popped navel, and gnarly muff, unshaved for nine whole months
>Anne will never push you down before you have a chance to unbutton your jacket, saying she wants to fuck you with it on
>Anne will never mount you like a pony
>ywn fuck like crazy for what seems hours
>ywn feel the exhiliation of popping your load inside Anne's tight pussy
>Anne will never squeal with joy as you fill her with your hot goo
>Anne will never get get off you, only to climb her way up to your mouth and proceed to face fuck you and until you suck her dry
>ywn get driplets of cum and breastmilk all over your Columbus Depot jacket

Existence is pain

Attached: 1489743887000.jpg (687x1117, 658K)

most "neoconferederates" are just southerners who are slightly edgy but not edgy enough to like the nazis so they go for the next best "controversial" topic to like because they can twist it to be normie ("oh we wont enslave black people this time around, we would be a new south with black people this time!"). its extremely cringey and it just screams 'im only a libertarian because im secretly a fascist-in-denial and i care alot about my optics'

>nazis were into new age stuff
>the occult
>new age

So is this the thread for sub 80 IQ posters?

>but they didn't
That's literally the point of what I was saying. The tariffs were explicitly designed to promote industry throughout America- it's the American system first proposed by Hamilton- use tariff revenue to fund internal improvements and the tariffs themselves to protect industry, which wiill naturally follow the infrastructure. There's a REASON the feds spent a disproportionate amount of money on infrastructure in the south- they wanted to industrialize it.
Pat Buchanan explains it in extensive detail in his book The Great Betrayal, read that if you wanna know more.

This unironically.

Attached: TWocgN_A.png (1200x1235, 462K)

Nazism is for 80 IQ G*rmaniggers, not the good Christian men of the Confederacy

Attached: hitler shitting on europe.jpg (593x559, 56K)

>Nazi Germany
>pro-white

Attached: 1d0ae9ce2eb1caf0ddc8695d39ae14fa.jpg (991x471, 99K)

Southerners didn't care about "America's" industry, they cared about their own state's industry (if they even did that). And a factory in each state wouldn't be profitable as they'd be too small and inefficient, like the ones in the north, but on a much higher level.

>Johnny Reb will never give Anne the baby she needed

It hurts

Attached: 1489993151564.jpg (511x850, 574K)

The Jews were the ones profiting off of slavery the most and generally thrive in libertarian markets so how does the confederacy stop the Jews?

Tariffs on a material that you turn around and make a massive profit on.

>Oy vey! Stop complaining about paying tariffs, were being super generous by preventing you from going to a better trade market!

Why are all (((northerners))) npc slaves to the Jewish agenda?

>southerners didn't care about america's industry
Right, as I said here they were being selfish little brats who want their one marshmallow NOW, not caring to wait for a whole bag of them a bit later.

>wouldn't be profitable as they'd be too small and inefficient
I mean you could have said that about industry as a whole in America in the 1790s, when we were an infant nation. Back then we had no industry whatsoever- the textile industry for example would have been an "unprofitable" investment for Americans at the time because Britain could supply all our needs for dirt cheap. But we chose to develop our own industry and by 1810 we had a thriving textile industry. It took about twenty years but it happened and it was worth it. You're not gonna get instant gratification developing your nation's industry, which the south could not or chose not to grasp despite us explaining it to them on multiple occasions.

Attached: tenor (3).gif (220x189, 23K)

You seem to forget that there's a lack of brotherhood among north and south and the southerners options were to sell to northern factories for less or to british factories for more. When selling to the north they didn't enrich their country, they enriched the country to the north. From their perspective the best way to enrich their own country was to sell their product to the highest bidder.

Ironically the antebellum south was far more welcoming of jews than the North

>The first Jewish governor was David Emanuel in 1801 in Georgia. The first Jewish senator was David Levy Yulee in 1845 in Florida. The second was Judah P. Benjamin in 1853 in Louisiana. Benjamin later filled three top cabinet posts in the Confederacy (Secretary of War, Secretary of State, and Attorney General). Lehman Brothers, the Wall Street firm whose bankruptcy in September 2008 set off the Great Financial Crisis, started in the 1850s as a cotton broker in Montgomery, Alabama.
takimag.com/article/corruption_of_blood_steve_sailer/print

>In general, Jews were more welcomed in the South than in the North because Southern WASP elites saw themselves as an agrarian aristocracy and thus viewed Jews as valued mercantile complements. For example, Birmingham, Alabama had both a German Jewish country club and a Russian Jewish country club.
vdare.com/posts/judah-p-benjamin-the-gay-jewish-confederate-leader-without-a-statue-to-tear-down

>Thus, overwhelmingly, almost unanimously, some with fear and trepidation, others with courage and enthusiasm, some with reservations, others with a firm unflinching resolve, Southern Jewry cast its lot with the Confederate States of America. Many, like “Ike” Hermann, had found the land of Canaan. Others, like Gustavus Poznanski, had found their Jerusalem, their Palestine. Still others, like Marcus Baum, Jacob Samuels, Adolph Proskauer, and Herschell Kempner, had finally found their fatherland.
archive.fo/waZrA

>“They [the Rothschilds] foresaw tremendous booty if they could substitute two feeble democracies indebted to the Jewish financiers for the vigorous republic confident and self providing. Therefore they started their emissaries in order to exploit the question of slavery and thus to dig an abyss between the two parts of the republic.”
-Otto Von Bismarck
henrymakow.com/000285.html

Attached: sarah hawkins.gif (600x357, 1.17M)

some truly autistic faggots

is this shit supposed to be erotic or retarded?

Attached: 1499608960664.jpg (804x743, 93K)

how many world series has your gayass team won?

To compare Yankees to (((them))) is an insult to (((their))) contributions to science, art, and culture.

Yankees on the other hand contribute literally nothing but war, death, degeneracy, and shitty baseball teams.

It's supposed to be erotic af

Attached: tfw no Anne Frank with a Dilly Bar gf.jpg (3118x4160, 1.84M)

Nine actually

Attached: Seinfield Baseball bat.png (600x450, 457K)

And whose fault is it for that lack of brotherhood? Certainly not the North's. As I've explained multiple times now, the federal government was explicitly trying to enrich the WHOLE country, south and north. A disproportionate amount of infrastructure funding went to the south, and by paying slighlty more than 80% of tariffs and purchasing slightly less than 80% of agricultural machinery, the north was actually taking more of a hit to the wallet than the south.

As for selling to British traders vs Northern factories, to quote Andrew Jackson:
>we have been too long subject to the policy of the British merchants. We need to become more AMERICANIZED, and instead of feeding the paupers and laborers of Europe... feed our own, or in short time... we shall all be rendered paupers ourselves. It is my opinion... that a careful and judicious tariff is much wanted.

Regardless of whether or not the south saw northerners as their brothers, the north clearly DID see southerners as fellow countrymen, and acted accordingly. We're not to blame for southerners being selfish cunts.

Attached: tenor.gif (244x330, 448K)

So what, Jews profited off everything, but after 1808 when the US stopped the importation of Jews and Eli Whitney's Cotton Gin made cotton profitable to harvest, the nigger population shot up and prospered. The North hated that we were not working for pennies in factories and started this hypocritical war for freedom. niggers did well on the plantation, many lived to be very old had their own land and belongings and bred like rabbits. The North ended that and the South's agricultural empire why? They didn't like the Southerners station and rich station, they wanted to everyone to be poor, work 6 days a week in a factory and worship a puritan God. Fuck Yankees. We all could have had independence and wealth. Now we have invaders and foreign companies. Whites hate Blacks and I hate fucking Jews no matter what. They destroyed the South. All nogs need to be returned to Africa as the US promised at the end of the war.

Attached: Freedman's_bureau.jpg (1455x1148, 861K)

Like the north wasn't known for being selfish. New England was about to secede when they weren't getting their way and the south controlled the union and would have if not for Andrew Jackson's successes killing public support. New York City considered becoming an independent city-state just to keep doing trade deals with the Confederacy. This idea of the north being benevolent guides for the union is about as ridiculous as the most romanticized tales of the Confederacy.

Didn't say they gave a pass to Commies,

I never said that there was literally no selfish streak ever in any northern state lmao. Of course states can be expected to look after their own interests, but when they do so repeatedly AT THE EXPENSE OF THE NATION AT LARGE, it becomes a problem.
New England, regardless of firebrand rhetoric at the Hartford Convention, wasn't seriously considering secession because they stood far more to lose than to gain (Connecticut in particular had the bonkers idea that they owned everything in a straight line to the Pacific, why would they sacrifice that?) and New York's copperheaded traitor of a mayor floated the idea around but nobody in the city council, or really even the city except for poor immigrants, supported it.

Attached: gwen.gif (465x264, 916K)

Yeah, these clergymen sure do look like Communists to me.

Attached: Execution_in_Piaśnica_forest.jpg (767x556, 294K)

So what. He picked the Jews. We were wrong to fight Germany, should have joined forces with them and wiped out the Soviets. Don't see you whining over North Koreans or North Vietnamese that killed Americans, Don't see you lamenting the millions of slain native Indians in 1862-1891,. just muh holocaust. Fucking Rainbow Cuckfederate. Probably worship Black Troops as well.

>at the expense of the nation at large

So every state in the union then? No one liked the union unless they dominated it. By the Civil War the north was gaining power over it and when more free states would be let in it would ensure the south would've never been politically relevant again. Both sides were guilty of wanting to control the other. Not to mention this idea of "one nation" wasn't mainstream until after the Civil War.

>no one liked the union
>no one nation idea
The North was literally fighting for the sole purpose of preserving the Union you dunce.

Lincoln said the North must prove “that popular government is not an absurdity. We must settle this question now, whether in a free government the minority have the right to break up the government whenever they choose. If we fail it will go far to prove the incapability of the people to govern themselves.”

Agreeing with the president, just two weeks before the first Battle of Bull Run, Congress officially resolved that the war was being fought to preserve the Union and NOT for the purpose of “overthrowing or interfering with the rights or established institutions” of the Confederate states. We explicitly stated our goals multiple times. Even the emancipation proclamation was designed solely to fuck with the southern economy, not because we actually cared about freeing the slaves.

And the rest of the North shared these sentiments. Northerners believed that America was the world's last hope- the last, best hope on earth- for republicanism, and that if we fell the light of liberty would be extinguished forever. We were unwilling to betray what had been so dearly bought in the blood of our ancestors less than a century before; we PRIZED what our forefathers had won and we weren't willing to let ourselves become like the moneyed oligarchs and aristocrats of Europe, the way you southerners were. We did believe in one nation, indivisible. We did believe in eternal Union. I'm just sorry you people were too blinded by your short term profits to see that.

Attached: giphy (9).gif (500x357, 993K)

Yes, the north wanted to preserve a union that they were the rulers of. They got their wish in the end. Neither side were ever interested in running a fair government where every side benefited equally. The rest is a bunch of nonsense. More nations resent America's "best hope" than wanted it even back then and especially now. Slavery was nothing more than the battleground on who would have power over the union and it would've died sooner or later. If the south didn't secede Lincoln would've eventually made a bunch of free states and slavery would've been abolished through a free state dominated Congress.

the south is dead and the US can't be saved

just move on man, i know why you do it and i agree with you. but there's no coming back from this.

Considering that the Northern states were able to fight as a cohesive nation, while the CSA states almost immediately fell into infighting to the point where martial law had to be declared, and considering everything else I've already talked about earlier in the thread, I think it's pretty obvious that the North was fighting with the explicit preservation and prosperity of the Union in mind- ALL PARTS OF IT- while the south was fighting for their "peculiar institution" of slavery. Take off the lost cause glasses sometime and you'll see.
Cheers, and up the republic.

Attached: 2WXN.gif (245x140, 455K)

Its true
The confederacy was right. Not because of slavery, but because of states rights.

So we're just going to ignore Lincoln cracked down and heavily persecuted anyone who was remotely against him? Hell Maryland wanted to join it's southern brothers and Lincoln forcibly stopped it. The disaster that was Reconstruction is more than enough proof that the north was more interested in punishing the south than in remotely making the south an equal part of the union. There's a reason the term carpetbagger exists.

>why didn't this national leader allow part of his country to secede
do you even hear yourself

You bring up cohesion and that cohesion was created by force. The Confederacy also used force to keep as much cohesion as it could. People weren't as gung ho about fighting the Confederacy as you make it sound. Hell the entire reason my state even seceded was because Lincoln demanded us to fight the Confederacy when we wanted to stay neutral. Good thing there were plenty of Irish and Germans. The yankees were shit and just wanted to control the south and destroyed even unionist family farms in the area and the CSA was shit and just wanted to keep the south bound to an outdated system. Far as I'm concerned both were shit for my state.

And look where we are now you fucking clown. Talk about short sighted. Hope it was all worth it. Big gov., free nigs, mindless consumerism.

cuckfederateboi plz

Attached: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!0!!!!34!y3.png (943x2982, 357K)

"Neoconfederate" is a smear word created by neocons to smear libertarians who don't think 600,000 Americans had to die to end slavery. It is a fiction, there are no "neoconfederates".