Google executives have argued that free speech would have “disastrous practical consequences” for society, in a stunning court document filed with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
In their statement, Google makes it clear they do not want to be held to the standard of the First Amendment. Google refuses to change for its users; Google refuses to guarantee users an equal platform for freedom of speech.
Google is not a neutral platform, so search results are engineered to highlight the viewpoints that matter most to Google executives and their cult culture. Rich and influential people, emboldened by their special interests, practically lobby Google to push their agendas while suppressing any dissent or competition on the web. While some ideologies are popularized by Google, others are pushed to the shadows, de-monetized and mocked.
The anti-American behemoth refuses to enforce the First Amendment across their services because this “would undermine important content regulation.”
Google stated, “If they are bound by the same First Amendment rules that apply to the government, YouTube and other service providers would lose much of their ability to protect their users against offensive or objectionable content — including pornography, hate speech, personal attacks, and terrorist propaganda.”
Google should still remain in control over its own content regulation, but the United States should appoint a third party commission to review Google’s actions when complaints of political, business, and ideological censorship are brought forth.
According to their legal statement, Google still believes their company can discriminate on the basis of political viewpoints, because they “can’t be forced to change.”
They aren't going to "bust" Jack shit. Both political parties are bought out and payed for, they know what they are doing.
All mainstream political solutions are now false hopes designed to siphon off your hope and funnel it into fruitless endeavours that will never seriously challenge the (((elites))).
>wont happen It's hilarious how much you shills are overusing this talking point these days. It's because you're scared.
Charles Perez
>Free speech is fine > >anti-Semitism is bad you pigfucking goy > >kys Fuck you kike
Noah Edwards
You say that, but will your politicians listen?
Elijah Wood
But isn’t Dennis Prager Jewish?
I thought all Jews were evil and a part of muh hivemind.
Carson Russell
If all mainstream political solution are false hope then why don't you kill yourself or go out in a blaze of glory. You won't because defeatist like most of us are part of the problem we are to comfortable to ever rise up and fight and the Jew knows it.
Alexander Nelson
>irrelevant beaver posting >retarded blackpill when Silicon Valley is literally on the verge of regulation due to the case which just hit the Supreme Court Shoo shoo shill
Henry Lopez
They need to die
Jace Reyes
I'm the OP of this thread you dullard. I'm not saying that it can't happen, I'm just saying that (((they))) will make sure that no politicians will vote in favor of it.
Cable companies are a perfect example of state-protected monopolies.
Austin Scott
Both Sanders and Trump have it out for Bezos, so it's not impossible to take down Amazon first as a warning shot
Ian Watson
You're forgetting that these companies are complicit in the treasonous conspiracy to overthrow the duly elected President and the crimes against humanity that they are also guilty of. Mueller has subpeonad all these tech companies and the executives know they're oging to be hanged if the hammer drops. That's why they have been ignoring laws left and right recently.
Alexander Morgan
They are, they're just doing damage control.
Prager is Jewish controlled opposition that promotes (((libertarianism))), an ideology that is just as degenerate and destructive towards nation states as liberalism/multiculturalism.
Politicians listen to everyone and everything but how they pick a position is less about what the majority wants and more about what will either preserve or increase their own power. In the case of Alphabet, the company is attempting to shift power from political to economic interests, which has historically been a failing proposition. When threatened, the political elite of both parties will act together in mutual self interest even if ideologically one or both sides agree with their position. The government basically always wins.
It's funny, cuz Prager U is anti racist, anti anti-Semitism, and so on. Total Civic nationalism, and Ben Shapiro tier conservativism. These people are either stupid, because censoring civ nat stuff won't make people more leftist, it'll drive civ nats further to the right. Or they're very smart, if it's really a civil war they want to start.
Since Blacks are inferior to Whites, can genetic inferiority and incompatibilty with White civilization/expectations be a criminal defense or provide a case for African repatriation?
That's why Pragur is taking them to court. Leftist radical Jews are Google are interfering with their backlash herding, false conservatism op. They want that to stop because it's radicalizing the goy puppets.
Kayden Rivera
>censorship of conservative website PragerU wow they squashed him too? hes about the most spineless cuck on radio
Xavier Perez
>provide a case for African repatriation? Would quickly be offset by the care and advances gifted.
John Baker
It's a Jew, so you fight with your wallet. Dodge taxes and hide your real assets at all times.
Nolan Cooper
Just remember, RUPERT MURDOCH HATES ALL OF YOU. Not just Jewgle.
they are to late if they wanted to achieve that, they had to do that about 15 years ago, no matter what they do now, to many people by now don't need the internet anymore to know that with jews you lose.
You are an idiot or a shill. Both political parties serve the sane agenda, they just pretend to be in conflict to divide and conquer The goyim hordes. The left vs right paradigm is one of the greatest shams of our age.
The only reason our sham of a republic exists is to prevent the poor from killing the rich and the goyim from killing the Tribe. It's designed to placate, provide false hope for, and pacify genuine resistance against the (((rich))).
Elijah Gray
They are going to be hanging you. These are very dangerous evil people.
Robert Rogers
>It's a Jew, so you fight with your wallet.
No, with Jews the only way to get rid of them is a ruthless wave of force.
Name the advances of technology that were being held in black Africa that were stolen by the Europeans in the 400 years that we were trading with the Muslims to buy blacks? I can wait. Plants aren't technology.
Ethan Lopez
Their videos are mostly cuckservative republican propaganda so whatever. NPCs don't know about the actual subversive material on the internet.
I recognize it's not the same level of censorship, MTV was a feed line from Jewlywood down, but at the time it appeared at peace with the US and was simply playing lots of really awesome music with amazing art and good looking women. When it switched over to all Reality TV all the time, sometime after it went all hip-hop all the time, it really killed an innovation and cultural touch stone.
Thomas Howard
Google can't censor the memes, that's why.
Hudson Bailey
>to prevent the poor from killing the rich I reject the political theory of Marxist class warfare. >>>/leftypol/
Zachary Brooks
You're welcome. But you might consider it could help you explain your position to xoomers, maybe even younger boomers.
Ayden Reyes
Murdoch wants the censorship, he started all the push to get Youtube shamed in the commercials department.
James King
they are anathema to our civilization. they need to be purged.
But you have more guns than people, re you waiting for godot?
Isaiah Allen
>NPCs don't know about the actual subversive material on the internet. a handfull autistic nerds that play that shit since 1986 true, almost nobody knows them
So is Rupert Murdoch and Disney and TimeWarner and ATT.
Cameron Morales
Don't get angry bud, just comply.
>put your left leg behind your head, now roll over, now repeat the latin alphabet backwards.
Different styles of Freedom TM, innit.
Ayden Brown
If you sensor one set of ideologies and suppress another set and those sets just happen to correlate with two different political parties.... doesn't that make google almost a PAC?
Nolan Thomas
So google is overtly anti constitutional, acting as a literal subversive agent trying to deconstruct the foundation of the nation to remake it in a contradicting image. How are they able to operate freely? It's like letting ISIS set up shop, start making profits and start pushing their anti western destruction ideology through court and media, while holding a monopoly on public discourse It's insanity
Gavin Wood
What are you even on about? Blacks are inferior to Whites so how do we get this turned into a Back-ToAfrica 2018-2019 trip thing?
Ethan Evans
Maybe, but don't tell me you're falling for the >give me government oversight to help keep political issues from being unfairly unbalanced... That's just nufag thinking.
Josiah Peterson
>MSM is Anti-Trust
Alexander Harris
These companies are going to be broken up for more reasons than one.
Owen Lewis
They're right. Why should google protect the speech of racist who just want to demonize blacks? I don't get it?
Isaiah Jones
>rich and poor There are only strong the and weak user, and the weak suffer what they must. Welcome to Jow Forums.
if people back up neo liberal politics and the elite , shit stinks, that so much is true most lefties don't realize that they are nothing more than neo liberal oompa loompas. they are truly lost in the dark void
Been saying it for years... Google is the anti Christ
Eli Young
Ahh, the guarantee so preferred by someone who has lost control of the narrative. Ok, what reasons are those? If they aren't broken up for free speech, why are you involving yourself in private industry?
Justin Reed
>There are only strong the and weak user, and the weak suffer what they must. Welcome to Jow Forums. hurr durr
Here. Use this. brave.com No more google or anybody tracking you and it has a built in vpn and tor browser. Plus you can chose to watch ads to earn BAT tokens soon if you cba, I can’t but the browsers good. Done by the guy who created Firefox and java script. It’s faster than google chrome and you can transfer your bookmarks easily.
>Google Tells Court Free Speech Is Disastrous For Society I fucking hate Google and want them to collapse, but based on what I'm seeing this isn't what they said. Bloomberg, which seems to be the primary source of this because I can't find the original testimony for some dumbass reason (if anyone finds it please link it), said this: >Not only would it be wrong to compel a private company to guarantee free speech in the way that government censorship is forbidden by the Constitution, but it would also have “disastrous practical consequences,” Google said in a court filing. >“The First Amendment appropriately limits the government’s ability to censor speech, but applying those limitations to private online platforms would undermine important content regulation,” So on the subject of free speech being "disastrous", they mean specifically that it would be disastrous for the government to apply a public right to a private company. This is something I personally agree with, I think it's better to focus on antitrust laws so that Google can't just dominate its industry (along with many other industries having the same issue), and let the individual companies regulate what they want.
In any case, I thought this quote was worse: >“If they are bound by the same First Amendment rules that apply to the government, YouTube and other service providers would lose much of their ability to protect their users against offensive or objectionable content -- including pornography, hate speech, personal attacks, and terrorist propaganda.” Essentially "b-but then we wouldn't be able to protect users from wrongthink"
>Google stated, “If they are bound by the same First Amendment rules that apply to the government, YouTube and other service providers would lose much of their ability to protect their users against offensive or objectionable content — including pornography, hate speech, personal attacks, and terrorist propaganda.” Oh they can fuck right off. Youtube had a video of a faggot getting fucked and shit on available for all to see for 2 months and even made front page/trending despite the thousands of reports made.
Evan Phillips
Have you ever seen what God does to those who mock him and use his name to manipulate others. The niggers are waking up to the fact that gentiles dindu nuffin and kikes ran most of the slave trade, plantations and indentured servitude rackets, including modern day neoliberal perfidy and debt slavery.
Have fun catching the landslide of nigger hate alone kikes, house niggers are fed up and so are the ginger "bastard jew" halfkikes, your disposable field overseers.
Every generation of Immigrants has to WANT TO LEARN how this place works, or it won't. The temptation on all sides to censor is the first sensation we reach.
Blake Robinson
>protect their users against offensive or objectionable content including hate speech, personal attacks, and terrorist propaganda >appoint a third party commission to review Google’s actions when complaints of political, business, and ideological censorship Suppressing hate speech and terrorist propaganda ARE political and ideological censorship. How can they pretend to not notice this?
Oliver Smith
They've sealed their own fate at this point, surely this would get the most ardent free market capitalist (Which I count myself among) to support trust busting measures.
Google's become too large and powerful that it now thinks it can ignore the government and not be beholden to the laws of a nation. The control it has over the internet threatens to destroy the free market and free exchange of ideas.
Sebastian Moore
Question: if social media sites insist they are not public forums, why are persons and organizations within the US government allowed to post on them?
Eli Gomez
money is a meme. strength or character is more important.
Gavin Butler
What consequences? Hurt feelings?
Jacob Edwards
Actual critical thinking was happening instead of the destabilizing critical theory the ratfaced bolshevik kikes at the top intended.
