Sargon wants to BAN your LOLICON!

>Brit defends banning art and speech
>Art isn't the same thing as speech
>Therefore we should ban "bad" art

youtube.com/watch?v=2gOsGmCuBN4

Well guys, can you even muster a response? Is Sargon the new Destiny?

Attached: sargon1.jpg (1280x720, 132K)

Fuck off, Jim.

>Oi, you got a loicense for that 'art'?

Attached: loicenseloicense.png (940x300, 41K)

>sargoy says something
Wew, stop the presses.

Attached: 1541611217130.jpg (389x550, 31K)

Good gas the anime degenerates all Japanese and those who prop up Japanese culture need to die fuck Japan

Attached: maxresdefault (1).jpg (1280x720, 129K)

Sargon stole my concept

The eternal liberalistian strikes again

>posts picture from china

Attached: leaf flag.gif (310x233, 2.81M)

>China
>Literal insect colony
>Cartoonish hellhole
>"What if a bunch of stone age 'people' got 20th century technology?

Canada is new China it's Chinese clay now

Attached: RTX2NPOG.2e16d0ba.fill-940x627.jpg (940x627, 92K)

on one hand, sargon wants to play the big political game with shit like "it does not make gab look good if lolicon is posted on it" and on the other, he keeps saying nigger

That exactly why we win! insects are fascists and don't care to kill people you white boy's are a bunch of pussys that can't even eat dog without crying. survival of the fittest!

Attached: mao-the-artist-poster.jpg (620x419, 75K)

>Shawn is a fag
>Ass 3:16

Attached: muttley_gq_9mar11_rex_b[1].jpg (365x390, 22K)

Fuck off pedo

sargon isnt as smart as he thinks he is

The eternal brit being a reddit brainlet

Attached: license.gif (940x300, 459K)

>A Brit is a bootlicking cuck
I'm so surprised.

Why shouldnt lolicons be genocided?

Attached: skeletonascends.png (270x270, 156K)

Drawn Girl Bad

Attached: 821D01EF-1366-48EB-B881-51C6DE938439.png (416x435, 114K)

>dogfuckers whining about pedos
pot, meet kettle

What level of art? Shitting chocolate syrup isnt art.

I only like girls that are over the age of $legal_age_of_consent

Attached: npc-gintama.png (400x347, 137K)

I have a good source that tells me when he went to the EU they broke into his hotel room and 20 niggers sodomized him back to back

he hasn't been the same since

So you're saying he's based? Imagine being mad he opposes pedophilia.

Attached: S.png (395x399, 152K)

But pornography of children IS bad. What's wrong with you?

Guess a broken clocks right twice a day.

Gas pedos

All porn should be banned. Only manchild losers addicted to cummies will disagree. Pathetic

Sargon's a sub-90 IQ quadroon who lacks any coherent worldview, and has been sending out his liberalist kekistani children to shill himself on Jow Forums for months. Gas yourself.

Good fuck that pedo shit

>drawings are children
What's wrong with you?

Art is representative, moron. If it wasn't, then propaganda would have no value at all.

>someone getting killed in a movie is just like real murder

>we should ban "bad" art
Fuck off, moralfags.
It's like you WANT actual lolis to get fucked irl.

based.

>movies don't make people feel shock, terror, disgust and pity
wew

How the fuck would you ever find them all?
You've got to get absolutely anyone who'd even like it, period, or it's worse than pointless.

Yeah dude I’m sure when you’re pulling your pecker you’re thinking about how sexy the brush strokes are and not using it to visualize naked kids. Sick fuck. Why is it so important to you that pedo pictures be legal? You attracted to kids?

Why do you care? You jerk off thinking of kids?

>Why is it so important to you that pedo pictures be legal?
Why is it so important to you fucking drawings not be? You worried about how your dick will react?

>muh "homophobia means you're afraid you're a fag" argument
Smegma licker.

I'm not into this shit personally, I just don't care if some fat loser wants to jerk to it, since it's just a drawing.
If it were real kids I'd be all for hanging the bastard.

>You worried about how your dick will react?
>muh "homophobia means you're afraid you're a fag" argument

Irony.

You didn’t answer my question. Do you get off thinking of kids?

There's NOTHING that signifies someone having no justifiable arguments whatsoever than trying to paint anyone arguing against you as doing so solely because they're actually something abhorrent.

the person doesnt actually die you meme flagging cretin

>if you own an alignment paint blobs or 0's and 1's in a certain way the GOVERNMENT SHOULD KILL YOU!

Attached: twinkiegang.jpg (600x261, 59K)

No, do you? If not, why would you give a fuck unless you were trying to stave off the temptation?

And the sentence for lolicon is not as harsh as the sentence for child molestation. Your point?

Yeah, isn't it?

What does this mean? It’s not exactly a straw man to ask if people spending time posting to defend pedo art are pedos. Does thinking of kids cause you to make cumcums?

Keep deflecting from the fact you're a pedophile and are defending pedophilia.

>It’s not exactly a straw man
It is when you it becomes your sole argument.

>bootlicking intensifies

I didn’t make the thread or defend it. It’s a fair point to assume a dude posting about how weed should be legal likes to smoke pot. Same thing with loser faggots who promote kid porn. Will anyone defending this shit admit “kids get me off” and have an honest discussion?

Will you admit you have zero fucking counterarguments as to WHY it should be made illegal?

My argument is why should we accommodate pedos. Anyone interesting in pedo art is a pedo. Why should I care if pedos are comfortable in society?

It should be made illegal because pedos are shit. Who would care about the freedoms of pedos?

Now why should it be legal? Because it makes your pecker hard?

No we ban everything, we know you libbys hatethe extreme right taking away everyones freedoms.

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAH

>We should legislate based on what people feel
Wew

It's a perfect argument against these fags. They're so much for freedom but the moment you truly find something they see as icky or disgusting they drop the freedom shit real fast.

Why should we accommodate Nazis, FBi? Why should we accommodate anyone doing anything whoever is in charge dislikes even slightly?
Slippery slope is slippery.

we always have.

This. They want all of their own freedoms but the second you touch one of theirs they cry & bitch & moan endlessly.

Bad art should be banned,we should banned bad drawing of the prophet muhammad as well since they are offesinve,also we should ban jokes.

Sargon is such a fucking retard "we should ban art because I dont like it",he gets destroyed in the comments,literally no ones agrees with him.

how can people even watch him when his face and voice are so annoying

>slippery slope
Gotta draw the lines somewhere. I don’t know where exactly the line is, but it’s clearly on the other side of accommodating pedos

Why do you spend so much time defending the rights of people who get off on naked kids? Aren’t there better freedoms to defend?

It should be made illegal because ____ are shit. Who would care about the freedom of ____.

Why should it be legal? Because it makes your pecker hard?

Wow this post would be so easy to steer in any other direction and i know your response will be "well are you comparing "x" to pedos because pedos are way worse!" not an argument.

>HURR WHAT WERE OBSCENITY LAWS
go kill yourself

Attached: 640x65341.jpg (446x640, 73K)

>Aren’t there better freedoms to defend?
When you can take fucking drawn lines to be so terrible, no freedoms are safe.

>HURR WHAT WERE OBSCENITY LAWS
They were absolute bullshit, that's what. "Obscene" can be made to mean fucking anything.

So what your saying is that the righist is really a leftist...
hmm
>Redpilled to fuck..

>Muh rights
>muh freddoms.

Based and redpilled.

>le bootlicker
>communism intensifies

>it’s not an argument because I say it’s not

I’m still gonna advocate for you to hang, pedo. You aren’t changing any minds with abstract le slipper slope le muh freedom arguments. A society has to draw lines somewhere. Who would object to drawing it on the other side of pedophilis other than pedos?

Why won’t pedos admit they’re pedos? At least we could have an honest discussion

pedos get the rope

>Why won’t pedos admit they’re pedos?
>I’m still gonna advocate for you to hang
You are such a huge dumbass.

Attached: 0245356356354.jpg (709x1000, 432K)

>lines are hard to draw
is your position that nothing should be illegal?

>hurr why make driving 81 mph illegal? It’s the same thing as 80 mph!

Gotta draw lines somewhere. Against pedos works.

I mean drawn lines, as in with a fucking pencil or pen. Fucking brainlet.
>why make driving 81 mph illegal? It’s the same thing as 80 mph!
You're confusing real life with thoughtcrime again. Thoughts bad, no have bad thoughts or rope you get.

I stand with this man, even though I think any kind of pornographic degeneracy should be burned like Uncle Adolf did.

Attached: 1522434853753.png (968x695, 136K)

A society has to draw the line somewhere, who would object to drawing it on the other side of ___ other than ____?


You still can't even comprehend how bad your own arguments are and how bad that way of thinking is. Can you even tell me why you harbor such hatred for "x" thing such as pedos. Go on tell me.

As for the other thats moving goalposts and not the argument at question.

but we have always legislaed based on how we feel,and good thing too.

>possessing or distributing pictures of naked kids is a thought crime

You serious? You think we should be able to openly trade plans to break into banks or build nukes too? Only a pedo would be dumb enough to be le edgy anarchist

The only things that should be illegal are things that would cause harm to another person.
Jacking off to drawings is not one of those things.

are you legitimately devoid of distinguishing art
a mere expression of imgination, from reality or are you actually retarded??

Why do you want pictures of naked kids? Put aside le philosophy of liberty. What drives you to get bothered that society won’t let you look at naked kids?

Attached: 1531723225531.png (576x507, 59K)

>The only things that should be illegal are things that would cause harm to another person.
You are stupid if you think this is an accurate measure.

If smoking in all forms were made illegal and anything related to it were illegal and carried a heavy fine would you report me to the police for having this image.

Attached: 300px-MagrittePipe.jpg (300x210, 11K)

>possessing or distributing ACTUAL pictures of ACTUAL naked kids is a thought crime
There's a reason taking a picture of a kid who's naked in your presence is a crime.
FUCKING DRAWING A PICTURE IS NOT THE SAME THING NOR ON THE SAME LEVEL.
Jesus fucking Christ your skull is thick as fuck.

t. White nigger

drug hbk was great

Child porn could harm society. No I don’t have evidence, but the most minuscule risk that it could outweighs the benefits of kiddy porn (there are no benefits).

I mean, I am a libertarian, so I'm basically retarded.

It’s another le epic suit boy thread. Epic. >If you hate suit boy, you’re a suitless fuck.

Attached: 3E6EE89E-612D-4479-9E34-CAA3AB8752C9.gif (648x600, 2.3M)

ALL YOU NEED TO DO IS IMPLEMENT
A WITCH HUNT ON ALL PYSCHO
NARCISSISTS ROUND THEM UP
AND SIMPLY PUT THEM ON MEDS AND PUT THEM THROUGH A TRINING COURSE TO HELP RERELIZE FOR THEY ARE THOSE WHO BEAR A COGNITIVE DISSONANCE OF WHAT ARTFORM
AN EXPRESSION OF IMAGINATION
IS VERSUS ACTUAL REAL LIFE PRONS

PATHETIC.

Attached: 1443653508848.jpg (400x400, 61K)

DRAWINGS. Fuckwad who intentionally is miscategorizing it constantly.
D R A W I N G S.

You want me to keep putting aside everything so you can call me a pedo or whatever you plan so that you get the moral higher ground and then no longer have to have an argument. Not gonna fall for it.

Based and redpilled leaf.