Socialists and Fascists Have Always Been Kissing Cousins

Fascism and communism share much in common:

1) the two ideologies came from identical origins in 19th-century thought

2) both celebrated the peasant revolts of the 1500s as foreshadowing 20th-century uprisings.

3) both claimed to speak in the name of “the people” and “the masses.”

4) both embraced a variety of social sciences and pseudosciences from the 19th century, though the Marxists did it with more finesse.

5) both claimed to be progressing humanity toward some end goal.

6) finally, both accepted moral nihilism.

Read more similarities here
theamericanconservative.com/birzer/socialists-and-fascists-have-always-been-kissing-cousins/

Attached: Hitler-stalin.png (554x352, 212K)

Only true fascism was in Italy and Spain.
Nazi Germany was a bastardization of it.

This is accurate. Nazism took it in a different direction - only reason the Leftist saying "Fascism is a right-wing ideology!" even has a SHRED of truth to it.

>3) both claimed to speak in the name of “the people”

Wrong. Nazis claimed to speak for the Volk. "People" translates to the German word "Pöbel", which is synonymous with rabble, riffraff, human trash. Our social ideals and yours are very different.

>those kind of comments on TAC

Who has shipped all tose neocons over there?

Show your Polish flag you faggot

I mean, its a step-up from "NAZIS ARE THE REAAAAL SOCIALISTS" I guess.

Attached: 1541625115504.jpg (383x383, 21K)

>Spain
no

Nationalism = the strongest nation consumes all the others. Every other definition is dishonest.

>the strongest nation consumes all the others

Go the fuck back to >>>/leftypol/

They did it better than that autistic incestuous spawned artfag.

Where the fuck do you think you are posting from?
I'm just wait for your flag to be permanently change to the EU one.

Cool.

>muh peaceful coexistence is real
>y-you're just a commie
LMAO

>Franco
>Fascist

>socialists and fascists are similar
Fascism was literally communists deciding communism is actually shit.

>>>/leftypol/

>Everyone I don't like is me neocon boogeyman

This is so true, if only the goyim would understand the evils of collectivism then we could have prevented the holocaust.

this is wrong, Musollini calle the masses sheep and had no love for them, he was not a populist.
hitler was a cuck commie

>2 instances of things from the same category share traits that are generally applicable to things from that category

Omg the Jews did this

Nothing /leftypol/ about defining nationalism correctly. If you disagree with the definition, that's alright, it simply means you're not a nationalist.

>>>/leftypol/

>muh evil socialists

how old were you when you grew out of libertarianism, pol? for me it was 15

Attached: vO7lRZ7.png (621x702, 56K)

To hell with Nazism and Communism. They are both oppressive ideologies.

You're literally a communist though. Or even worse a turk.

Capitalism is nihilism incarnate

>if you don't adopt my headcanon definitions of political terms, I will just >>>/leftypol/ you over and over again

Is this about Emmanuel Macaroni calling nationalism unpatriotic? It's not wrong, considering putting your nation on a trajectory for world conquest isn't exactly what you'd do out of love and compassion for them.

>>>/reddit/

>nationalism is wanting world conquest

Literally a boomer

14

7) both are currently being championed by basement dwelling NEETs who produce no value in a capitalist system so they flock to collectivism to give them a sense of worth

Nationalism isn't exclusively agressive militarist conquest though.
He's a retarded leaf, but he's right.

>Italy and Portugal
ftfy

Pictured related, it's you.
That's literally not what nationalism even means you gas lighting mischling even by the current 2k18 cucked and subverted dictionary standards.

Attached: kraut3.jpg (354x512, 23K)

Jews made communism. Chads made fascism.

>nationalism is just border checks and white guys being nice to each other singing folk songs

Delusional cockbags believe this

>French intellectuals
>chads

>honest, no-nonsense, non-ambiguous definition (as all definitions should be)
>subverted dictionary

I see all that frozen tundra and caffeine addiction can't keep anti-German propaganda at bay.
You cannot name an example of peaceful nationalism. That is because conflict is a base ingredient of every nationalism. Having a nation means suppressing and opposing rival nations. Always.

Tell me, Mohammed Bernd Al brandenburg-Goldberg. Are your posts in this thread that famous g*rman humour?

Capitalism degenerates and destroys existing social structures and connections by it's very nature. Is it any surprise that people want to find something else?

Scottish Nationalism?

>existing social structures

Nice euphemism for "village of inbreds"

T. Pinko commie faggot

>Austrian Jew uses German people
>Georgian Criminal uses Russian people
>Democratic Jew uses American people

You see where i'm going with this?

Attached: 1523760585439.jpg (267x189, 6K)

I'd put that down to Globalism and immigration. The USA managed fine before the 1965 Immigration Act.

kek
nigger i hope you're not trying to say Hitler was a Jew

Fascism ain’t new kiddo

The germany of today is a global malaise and the faster your present """nation state""" is destroyed the better off the world will be as well as the German people if such a thing even still exists. (90% of scientists have contested that claim).

Naturally your statements (if they can even be considered human communication) in this thread can be considered as purely delusional, deranged and dangerously insane and not worthy of one seconds consideration.

Fascism in the sense of National Socialism is a tribal system that embodies it's people. it emphasizes shared identity and dignity. Communism is a system of jewish slavery that seeks to take away all identity and dignity from the masses it controls.

Attached: Ch06_Image02_large.jpg (1421x2100, 1.28M)

Ancaps are equally as cringe and retarded as any other kind of anarchist.

No it didn't, it was on the path to post-fordism well before that. You need to start looking at history as the inevitable progression of capitalism as opposed to a series of 'social movements' and 'sovereign acts'. Read Nick Land and start accelerating already.

African too from what I've heard. So he's also part nigger.

Attached: 1412049439970.jpg (218x251, 15K)

Neocon!

Alright, any particular book you recommend or should I just watch Youtube videos first?

Attached: 1541112601881.png (554x1307, 385K)

dude you forgot
>he was a meth addict
>he fucked his cousin (or was it sister)
>he was also a homosexual (see night of the long cocks)
>he only had 1 testicle.

Of course he was also an Ethiopian jew.

My statements are unscathed, they haven't been refuted whatsoever. There's one more truth. Nationalism is finished as an ideal, same as republicanism. However improbable it may seem at the moment, global unification will happen.

>he only had 1 testicle.

I FORGOT ABOUT THIS! ROFL! Thanks Finbro.

Attached: 1509806539918.jpg (500x491, 14K)

You forgot
>he had syphilis (or was it parkinsons)
>he wasn't just a jew he was a rothschild

Yes but the Immigration Act is a development that resulted out of a social sentiment.
A system that values individual profit and consumerism above all, of course will suffer a decline in unity, culture and identity.
The results are what we see today.

You're a communist and you don't need refutations you need a bullet

I've got a big list. Definitely start with Fisher's Capitalist realism. It's small, cheap, accessible and gripping. Not really accelerationist but a fantastic description of our system.

>To start
Fisher: Capitalist Realism

>Introductions
Greenspan: Capitalism’s Transcendental Time Machine
Ireland: Poememenon
MacKay & Avanessian: Accelerate reader
Murphy: Ideology, Intelligence and Capital with Nick Land
Overy: Genealogy of Land’s Anti-Anthropocentric Philosophy

>Nick Land
Uncle Nick is the crown prince of acceleration, so you should read pretty much everything he has written, including:
- work published on xenosystems, much of which is compiled in the /lit/ reader
- Teleoplexy: notes on acceleration
- Kant, Capital and Prohibition of Incest
- Circuitries
- Meltdown
- Machinic Desire
- Dark Enlightenment

>Related Philosophy
Althusser: On the Reproduction of Capital
Bataille: Reader
Baudrillard: The System of Objects, Mirror of Production, Symbolic Exchange and Death
Bateson: Steps to an Ecology of Mind
Beer: Platform for Change
Benjamin: On the Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
Bergson: Creative Evolution
Bostrom: Superintelligence
Brassier: Nihil Unbound
CCRU: Writings
Chardin: The Phenomenon of Man
Debord: The Society of the Spectacle
Deleuze: Difference and Repetition
D&G: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, vol I and II, What Is Philosophy
Dupuy: On the Origins of Cognitive Science
Ellul: The Technological Society
Foerster: The Beginning of Heaven and Earth Has No Name
Greer: After Progress
Haraway: Cyborg Manifesto
Heidegger: Being and Time, Basic Writings
Hoppe: Democracy
Kant: Critique of Pure Reason
Marinetti: Futurist Manifesto
Marx: Grundrisse, Capital, Fragment on Machines
Mauss: The Gift
McLuhan: Understanding Media
Mises: Human Action

>Beer: Platform for Change

Go on...

Attached: 1515762788173.jpg (413x395, 67K)

There is no argument to refute mr Hans-Hassan al munich shekelbergblatt.

Considering Mussolini was the editor for a socialist newspaper before developing fascism, its not all that surprising.

Tojo was a Buddist too and the average anime school boy:

>As a boy, Tojo was known for his stubbornness, for having utterly no sense of humor, for being an opinionated and combative youth fond of getting into fights with the other boys and for his tenacious way of pursuing what he wanted.

Oh shit. That's a lot of reading material. More than I was expecting. Thanks Aussie, I'll order Fisher's book now.

Attached: 1508026275718.gif (200x200, 1.82M)

No problem. This ideology is in it's early stages and the more people read it the faster it can be developed.
Good reading and goodnight.

It would be the most un-Aryan thing possible to accept an incorrect definition of a political term. There is one proper perspective to look at Europe, and it is the German one.

>if you disagree it means you're commie

Quote one communist thing I said, anglo.

National Socialism is the only ideology that embraces the truth of the fact that humans are animals, and that the future belongs solely to those who struggle and win in the constant struggle of survival.
Liberal humanism is cancer that is based on the christian notion of sanctity of human soul.
Morals, ideologies and religions are all simply tools that serve a people in the struggle of survival. If your belief system does not support the continued survival of your people it will die out.

Unless white race embraces an ideology that promotes our survival, we will die. Out of the ideologies of the last century, national socialism was most acutely tied to the promotion of our survival.

Wait a second are you actually an Germanic supremacist and Hitlerist proponent? The way you're autistically (supports your claim to your ethnicity) defining nationalism (not by the dictionary definition) might actually on some level be correct.
Tell me Franz, would the world be better off if there were only Germans and their honorary allies?

Attached: 1537208527696.png (499x513, 361K)

But Finn, you make it sound like nationalism is intrinsically violent. Please don't do that. It's for the sharing of folk songs and being neighborly white fellows who are cool with each other and agree about everything but still need a border fence between them.

>global unification will happen

That makes you a george soros goon

>Tell me Franz, would the world be better off if there were only Germans and their honorary allies?

I don't know, but I can guarantee it would be a lot less messy.

There is nothing wrong with violence you fucking cuck.
The question is towards whom the violence is directed.
I want the world cleansed of non-whites.

Communism and anarchy are closer than fascism and communism.

I was being sarcastic. You've had too much coffee again.

We might have talked before once years ago Hans.
If you're sagely knowledgeable about the Reich and what their plans for the future were.
I must beg your pardon in that case, you just came off as strongly as anti-nationalist/trotskyist/internationalist type in your initial obstinacy to sticking to your own definitions.
These globalist communists are trying to destroy every nation and every culture and people after all. You can never be too cautious with calling them out.

And I am being completely serious.
Violence is the root of all authority, civilization and ultimately survival.

>However improbable it may seem at the moment, global unification will happen.
Perhaps, but the question is how and when. If it is by the current standing order then there is no hope for any of us, but there are other possibilities also.

I'm not. But a global dictatorship is where this world - or at least most of it - is gonna end up in.

A Rothschild that kicked out the bankers and other Rothschilds though.

If the western world was ruled by an actual European and jews had nothing to do with it I would be ok with that

Provided all non Europeans were physically removed

What group do you suppose will do the dictating?

>3) both claimed to speak in the name of “the people” and “the masses.”
Wrong. Socialism breaks the nation up into classes and speaks in materialistic terms. Only Fascism truly speaks to the common goal of one People (a nation.)

>4) both embraced a variety of social sciences and pseudosciences from the 19th century, though the Marxists did it with more finesse.
>>racism is bad!!!

>5) both claimed to be progressing humanity toward some end goal.
Ok?

>6) finally, both accepted moral nihilism.
Fascism does not.

...
>www.theamericanconservative.com
Jewish bullshit

Anyone but poland

Fpbp. Nazi Germany was indeed a bastardized version of the true Italian fascism, that is true, not sure about Spain though.

I want to stand on the right. I despise anarchy and romanticism. But nationalism just won't get us far. We'd just end up like Hitler, or worse.

And what alternative is there besides nationalism? Globalism, internationalism and the rampant lysenkoism of today? That will lead to death or worse, slavery of everyone, just later.