But why did wildfires not happen in anywhere of USA but California?

But why did wildfires not happen in anywhere of USA but California?

Attached: 181108-camp-fire-ew-922p_87a7fed8d3072f66530328cbaca817ec.fit-760w.jpg (760x507, 138K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrophyte
iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-wildfires#Wildfires By State, 2017
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

because california unleashed the beast in the 70s.

California is home to plants that spread their seeds more effectively when they burn. Having a dry environment with plants that like fire is grounds for terrible forest fires. Also they have bushes that explode when exposed to fire.

Democrats vote against bills that would allow for proper brush burning and forestry work to be done

>muh wildlife
>muh animals

Nowhere else in the US was dumb enough to allow Australia to Jew them into importing whole forests of Eucalyptus trees.

Attached: 1541973559227.jpg (1936x1452, 399K)

Because they are inept at fire management and misuse federal budgets. Keep up.

hold up what
bushes that explode?
or just violently ignite?

PART AND PARCEL

Lack of regular rain (like in the east coast) browns the vegetation.

They do, it's just that a billion people live in the path of them in CA because it's so fucking overpopulated.

Surely other areas of the USA have massive forest fires. What those other areas probably don't have is multi-millionaires scattered among those fires areas.

2spoopy!

Attached: screenshot-www.bbc.co.uk-2018.11.12-19-56-18.png (641x410, 309K)

PART AND PARCEL
THIS IS WHAT THOSE FAGS GET
CHECKED FOR MALIBU BURNING DOWN!!!!

Muh wildlife diversity.

Because everywhere else in the USA, you're allowed to clear the trees and underbrush away from your home. It's illegal to disturb 'habitat' like that in California

checked and brown is a fucking retard

We are witnessing California turn into a desert. It just gets dryer and deader every year. The state is just a pile of fuel by now. CA is surrounded by desert it's just leaving a historicaly unique period where its been wet.

I never heard of an exploding bush either. A "burning bush" is something I have in my backyard.

Attached: burning-bush-transplant-400x445.jpg (400x445, 66K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrophyte

Attached: hereyougo.jpg (359x600, 118K)

Checked and verified.

California is a desert. It's not uncommon to go 9 months without a drop of rain. In Southern California we get the Santa Ana winds which are hot and dry (often less than 20% relative humidity). Basically, the whole state is kindling. Also, in some areas clearing brush is forbidden due to environmentalists concerned about animal habitats being destroyed. So, there's that aspect of stupidity thrown in for good measure.

Checked, and keked

>Surely other areas of the USA have massive forest fires

Not that I'm aware of.

My house burned down in 2011. I rebuilt it. Now I have aspens instead of pine trees. Don't see what tbe big deal is. If you want to live in a forest... it's gonna burn eventually. Maybe tomorrow, maybe in 2250. Who knows.

You can thank the Euroshits for that, back in ye old times it was popular for the wealthy to bring in non-native plant species to california for their botanic gardens.
That shit got out of control. In fact, there’s African grass here and that shit burns like crazy

>But why did wildfires not happen in anywhere of USA but California?

They do; but California is the most prone to it. It has a naturally arid environment and since its so heavily populated fires are regularly suppressed to keep them from destroying homes or killing people. This results in more fuel (trees, underbrush, etc,) building up then would normally occur in nature. Basically periodic burning is natural and the more you fight it the worse it is when it gets out of hand.

Attached: Kill it with fire.webm (768x576, 1M)

In Michigan its so wet that in my backyard, when you walk the water comes up from the ground and squishes out from between your toes.

Our weather sucks though. I just drove home from work through wet snow.

actually lots of other states do have massive wildfires, even on a similar order to commiefornia. but they're in the wilderness and not consuming millionaire houses, let alone entire cities.

checked
classic dem
> watcha gonna do

I live in Western North Carolina (pic related) on the east coast. Two years ago I had to evacuate my house because of a forest fire a mile from my home. We'd had a really terrible drought that year and so we were vulnerable.

The difference with Cali is that they're naturally dry to begin with so they have these fires even without extreme droughts. They're also prone to heavy winds.

Attached: Chimney Rock Fall.jpg (1000x666, 154K)

Eucalyptus trees smell nice and grow tall. They are very beautiful. The non-clearing of the under brush and flammable houses are the problem.

Same reason fires happen here.

Dry and hot, lots of trees and brush even though it's hot and dry.

Firebreaks are your friend. As is watering your roof gutters if you're far from the fire. Embers fall in them and set your house on fire.

They don't just happen in California, they just happen more frequently here.

I've heard rumors that CA fires are being started on purpose, possibly for government gain.
-start fires
-burn hundreds of thousands of acres
-destroy thousands of homes
-deny permits to rebuild
-buy up land on the cheap, reneg on government-leased property
-force people living off the grid to move into cities

The government does not like people living self-sufficient lifestyles outside the government eye and off the government dole. Cant have whitey thinking traditionalism is the way to go.

Some are saying it's so that they can put into mass transit. CA has been throwing out mass transit bills and propositions every fucking election. The rich people don't want it because they know it just means Mexicans, Blacks, and homeless people will be pouring into their rich and clean cities and dirtying the place up with literal feces. That's why cities like Gilroy, Cupertino, Los Gatos, etc... don't want mass transit. I believe the city of Novato(?) was literally built to keep the poor people away from the rich city of Marin.

If you literally burn people out, you don't need to worry about buying up their land for the railways.

Remember pol/acks, CA had the Water Wars in the early 1910's. The city of Los Angeles literally shot and killed dozens of farmers around the basin to force them off their land so that they could create reservoirs. All because the city thought they knew how to better use the water than fucking farmers.
It's not the first time nor the last time the government decided to kill citizens because of some (((grand plan))).

Attached: CA - Comfy CA Fire.jpg (1255x2300, 508K)

also, link with proofs
>iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-wildfires#Wildfires By State, 2017

>lose federal funding over sanctuary city politics
>deliberately mismanage fire prevention services
>set fire to own state just to access emergency funding

they happen all over the place all the time but only CA has the pop density for it to matter

right wing terrorists started these fires

Obviously its climate change... moon beam, scientists and other loonies said so so that means it must be true. No way it's just simply poor forest management and neglect to creating proper fire roads and breaks right?

The problem then is that millions of animals die by the uncontrolled fires.

You just need to build proper firebreaks and do some slash and burns of dry brush, and it'll work.

Imagine a child burning an anthill with a magnifying glass, except the child is the god emperor, the anthill is California, and the magnifying glass is a space based laser weapon.

yanks are fucked playing with eucalyptus. that shit is such a problem.

How else would their lawmakers steal taxpayer money from other states. California wildfires is just a profitable con job.

>leb0

Attached: 1538649803019.jpg (641x530, 25K)

good link

I've talked to 3 former Fire Fighters and all 3 told me that there are definitely firebugs in the Fire Fighters Unions. It's like how Al Capone responded to the question, "Why do you rob banks?" "Because that's where the moneys at."

Fire Fighters get paid handsomely for overtime. So if they start a couple of fires, especially towards retirement, they make tons of cash. These sort of shenanigans usually get swept under the rug, or pinned on some unsuspecting patsy. All they have to do is just wait outside a 7-11, eventually someone will throw away a cigarette and a coffee cup. All the fire fighters have to say is that they "found" the "evidence" at the scene of the fire and now they have their patsy. Who is the court going to believe, fire fighters or the average chain-smoking Joe.

Last December 28th, 2017, there were 14 independent fires around LA. Not to mention the three fires around Temecula, or the dozen or so fires around Napa and Northern CA. There is no way that 14 fucking fires "started spontaneously" around LA on their own. Either it's arsonists, copy cats, or the Fire Fighters themselves, or all three...

Don't put it past them.

Attached: CA - Seccession From The Union.png (780x800, 121K)

this. i am a forestry user.

Attached: whole-farm-aerial-looking-south-e1456353869683-1200x700.jpg (1200x700, 250K)