Someone disprove global warming

Why?
I only need to poke holes in anthropogenic warming so that I can keep you stupid fucking commies from destroying the world

Global warming has already occurred at 7 times; see ().

Also, we’re currently living in an Ice Age so it’s not even that hot lol

Same stupid propaganda pic that ends at 2012 and shows an estimation from then on. Heres the actual measure temperature up to 2018.

Attached: UAH_LT_1979_thru_September_2018_v6.jpg (2340x1350, 335K)

in 40 years it's warmed 0.14 deg C. we are doomed.

you should plot the data back to the 1920's if you want to show how big of a crock of shit their arguments are.
the 1930 had some of the hottest temperatures recorded in the United States.

Is climate change something we caused or is it a cycle that has historically happened to the planet many a times before?

Attached: image.jpg (720x960, 211K)

Attached: 1528442598672.jpg (1278x1996, 907K)

What the fuck is the point of faking Earth's average temperature you absolute retard?

Attached: 1424687691453.jpg (210x240, 39K)

Jetwash Warming

Attached: 1508627384847.jpg (1904x8352, 2.28M)

Ask the fakers, retard

Attached: 1564609293365.jpg (665x904, 168K)

Attached: 1537741891692.jpg (1537x2176, 1.09M)

It’s not something we caused, although we may be speeding it up slightly.

Like I said previously, global warming has already happened 7 times before.

Chicago, Milwaukee, New York, San Francisco, Atlanta all gone as well! Yay!

To respond to OP, so what would you like to do? Retard thinks people disagree with the world changing and not that humans (especially US) can alter it's course.

>i don't understand politics in america
i didn't say anything about faking data.
so, just plot it and see the trend for yourself.

Happening!

>someone disprove global warming
Which version? That the entire globe is warming, or that the average temperature measured at ground level is going up? There's a difference.

Attached: temperature_nca-1991-2012_lrg.jpg (3219x1776, 1.44M)

PROTIP: you can't. Inshalla.

The latest meta is not to disprove it, but actually hail it as a good thing.

Pushing the Narrative . The left has politicized climate change .

were about to head into an ice age

>that the average temperature measured at ground level is going up

Also unproven

Attached: 1598265087409.jpg (700x491, 44K)

this is the only graph these cucks need
but math and interpretation is hard, liberals spend too much time in uni smoking pot and playing frisbee to learn basic shit

>trusting anything from Elsevier the most (((profitable))) publication
kek

If you look at it since the ice age then we've REALLY increased!

iceagenow.info/lack-of-sunspots-to-bring-record-cold-warns-nasa-scientist/

I wasn't old enough/politically active when the original "global warming" shit was going down, but from what I understand, most don't deny that climate change exists, only that humans are not entirely responsible. Fuck off

We’re still in the Ice Age right now technically, so if you think it’s hot now you’re in for a surprise

>you should plot the data back to the 1920

To the medieval ages.

Attached: 1503867447732.png (504x248, 63K)

Its fucking cold rn

how did they determine the temperatures from the medieval period?

Not sure but they probably kept record of temperature back then.

well, sure.
but, my question is really one of standards and measures.
what unit of temperature were they even using?!? how in the world did they measure it in the first place?!? where was this information kept?
see what i'm getting at?
it's really strange and interesting.

this

round-earthers btfo

0.8Kelvins only changed in few hundred years. That is super stable. Only 0.1% or so change.
Also it is impossible to measure the average temperature of the Earth. If 10 people are given a thermometer and told to measure the average temp of a relativel large hall, all 10 will get different results. The measuring equipment has changed, the location has changed. There is only 8 or so locations near the poles recording temp. The data collected to draw the graph has not much meaning.

The volume of a liquid (say mercury) is a function of temperature. You measure the volume at a reference temperature, then again at the temperature you want to measure. The change in volume is proportional to the difference in temperature. You may of heard of one these devices before. They are called thermometers. They've been around for about 2000 years now.

wow.
a 'thermometer' you say?
amazing.
what unit of volume were they using to record this change in the 900's?

Also they typically measured temperatures relative to the freezing and boiling points of water. The units don't really matter because conversions are trivial to do. And they usually recorded the measurements by writing them down on paper....

Atlanta wouldn't be gone retard

>the conversions are trivial to do
>without using a base unit as a reference
just stop, user.

>they typically measured temperatures relative to the freezing and boiling points of water.

> they typically measured temperatures relative to the freezing and boiling points of water.

stop being retarded and learn to read

>what unit of volume were they using to record this change in the 900's?

You don't even need units bro. All that matters is the percentage change in volume. The units are completely irrelevant.

>relative to the freezing and boiling points of water
yeah... in what units.
just stop. you're embarrassing yourself.
i expressed skepticism in their ability to convert ancient non-standardized units into modern units. part of my skepticism is based in the fact that things like standards and instrument error weren't really medieval ideas.
your here telling me that "everything is based relatively to the freezing and boiling points of water" without understanding that THOSE AREN'T FIXED EXCEPT AT A PARTICULAR ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE which the recorders of the data wouldn't have known either!
just stop, we get that you think you're smart... but you're just shitting up an otherwise good thread.

who cares.
if it is global warming and we fuck up earth we'll always find a way to fix it.
humans are gods when it comes to a crisis.

>THOSE AREN'T FIXED EXCEPT AT A PARTICULAR ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE

Yes. This particular issue was fixed in the 1600 by 2 guys by the name of Celsius and Fahrenheit by sealing the liquids in glass bulbs.

Boy, that was easy...

Attached: gisp-last-10000-new.png (829x493, 156K)

right... in the 1600s.
so, no one knew about that in the 900's... which is what i was expressing skepticism about...
just stop.

Regardless if you are measuring the tempature at the same location with the same elevation then the air pressure isn't going to change all that much. It's also fairly trivial to correct for because if you know the elevation you probably have a pretty good idea of what the air pressure was even 1000+ years ago.

>Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit (1686-1736) was the German physicist who invented the alcohol thermometer in 1709, and the mercury thermometer in 1714.

all of your data analysis before this are moot.
go fuck yourselves liberals

alright, you're trolling... good job.
well done.
no more (you)s for you.

Ok.

Attached: PaleoTemp_EPICA_large.png (1000x650, 47K)

>niggers own beach front property
just kidding the kikes own them

In the United States, not globally

They already changed it to "climate change" because they weren't able to uphold the warming hoax.
Try to keep up, dumb leaf.

How many global warming threads do we need in a day, guys?

Attached: Prickanecal Engiqueer.jpg (640x750, 24K)

Here you go: youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU

Heres an activity for 6 year olds to build there own thermometers. It's really not that hard...

Pour equal amounts of tap water and rubbing alcohol into the bottle until it's a quarter full.
Add a few drops of red food coloring, and shake the bottle to mix it.
Insert the straw into the bottle, not letting it sink to the bottom.
Wrap modeling clay around part of the straw and the opening of the bottle to make it stay. Let part of the straw stick out of the bottle. The clay should be tight around the straw and cover the bottle mouth, but make sure to leave the top opening of the straw uncovered.
Test the thermometer! Have your child put her hands around the bottle. What happens to the mixture when her warm hands are on it?
You can also put the thermometer outside and see how the contraption reacts to the hot or cold temperature. Or, place the thermomter in a bowl of hot water and then put it immediately in the freezer. What happens?

>someone disprove global warming
See that shining ball in the sky? It's called the Sun. Be prepared to freeze your nuts off this winter.

iceagenow.info/lack-of-sunspots-to-bring-record-cold-warns-nasa-scientist/

Attached: Preparation-H.jpg (800x567, 142K)

anyone denying climate change and shilling for oil/coal corporations should be brutally killed

I know the solution for 'global warming'.
Remove the fucking grifters grant $$$.
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed - and hence clamorous to be led to safety - by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." - H. L. Mencken

Attached: world burns.jpg (640x640, 61K)

climate change and global warming are 2 different things. climate change is referring to the climates in the world changing to be different. global warming refers to the overall globe warming up and not just the individual climates changing.

Attached: BC104CAE-F341-4445-A493-DC4AADCF7978.gif (500x331, 52K)

Attached: 5E03B987-2AF9-4016-ACB7-BC559682C3FD.jpg (500x268, 70K)

Attached: 05EE6980-6A34-4F50-979F-7616E34EBC35.png (750x698, 580K)

What are your factors and threshold for your (((Null Hypothesis))) Fagget?
>Tits or GTFO Margie

Literally didn't have regular temp measurment abilities across most of the earth until the 1980's. We literally are just adding more data points.

awww, it's retarded

>pushing the blacks into nice white areas
nice try schlomo

both, but we have caused it to happen faster

spaceweatherarchive.com/2018/09/27/the-chill-of-solar-minimum/

“The sun is entering one of the deepest Solar Minima of the Space Age,” wrote Dr Tony Phillips just six weeks ago, on 27 Sep 2018.

Sunspots have been absent for most of 2018 and Earth’s upper atmosphere is responding, says Phillips, editor of spaceweather.com."

Good luck paying your heating bills this winter.

Attached: God is a Pol.png (503x281, 267K)

Even if it is, we are not the cause

Attached: climate5.jpg (829x493, 93K)

feel free to use my highly detailed analytical graph for argumentative purposes.

Attached: detailedgraphicalanalysisofglobalwarming.jpg (1268x773, 86K)

strap in it's about to go parabolic boyoz!!

heh.
i love the loop-de-loop.

>someone disprove global warming

someone prove it you mean? all their models are proven wrong year after year. shit for brains faggot

> Send out survey to 10k scientists.
> Only 3k give a fuck and bother to answer.
> Only 77 of the responses are from actual climate scientists.
> 75 say that humans cause global warming.
> 10k climate scientists agree that humans cause global warning!!

Attached: climate4.png (492x457, 28K)

>someone disprove global warming
you can't when it's a fact

Attached: Jo.png (1000x600, 180K)

> One of the two that disagree posts actual data.

Attached: climate1.jpg (1891x4901, 943K)

Attached: 1CF7F0FE-5073-43FB-AE74-E74409A082E9.jpg (1916x904, 230K)

>disprove it.
Kikes push it.
Done.

>muh but technically muh
you are naive user, nobody cares what it's called if you don't see how humans cripple and kill this planet you deserve to get sterilized

Attached: 1D2F0CB2-0C2D-4189-B823-5C8EA97A5786.jpg (570x358, 47K)

>brain

Attached: D29E4547-38BA-4854-B635-7BD5C1DD8C14.jpg (750x600, 103K)

This

what strange cyclic behavior...
does anyone have an explanation for the triangle wave superimposed on the plot?
also, that plot is only plotting CO2 concentration... this proves nothing beyond a short term trend in CO2 concentration.

over a hundred years, average ANOMALY is 1 degree higher. Big fucking whoop.

Found the council estate member

>if you don't see how humans cripple and kill this planet
data and evidence?

The earth has been warming and cooling its entire life, so in that sense it's correct. As far as global warming specifically, many UN scientists have come out and said their computer models were incorrect and we're manipulated to suite their Agenda. How can the earth be warming, if we're currently 190 days this year without sunspots? That's 60% of days, and the Eddy Grand Solar minimum started this year, it will continue to go to 250+ days next year, and the year after that. 2007 saw 152 spotless days (42%) before going to 268 (73%) spotless days in 2008, and that was just a regular solar minima. Predictions for Eddy have been made since at least 2015 and earlier, all expecting it to kick off around 2030-2040. Now ask yourself why the UN have decided now is the best time to push their 2021, 2030 and 2050 agendas? It's all just coincidental right goys?

Well, they aren't hiding it.
americanthinker.com/articles/2018/10/the_un_wants_to_be_our_world_government_by_2030.html
>In 2015, seventy years after their original rights-based document, the UN took a giant step towards the global government that was only hinted at in their first organizing document. They issued a document entitled “Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”

file.scirp.org/Html/2-8302656_61284.htm
>By about 2030-2040, the Sun will experience a new grand solar minimum. This is evident from
multiple studies of quite different characteristics: the phasing of sunspot cycles, the cyclic obser-
vations of North Atlantic behaviour over the past millennium, the cyclic pattern of cosmogenic ra-
dionuclides in natural terrestrial archives, the motions of the Sun with respect to the centre of
mass, the planetary spin-orbit coupling, the planetary conjunction history and the general plane-
tary-solar-terrestrial interaction. During the previous grand solar minima—i.e. the Spörer Mini-
mum (ca 1440-1460), the Maunder Minimum (ca 1687-1703)...

The HadCRUT4 dataset which informs most global warming hysteria studies is a complete piece of trash.

Another was compiled by NASA which has been shit since 1984 and is now completely feminized.

The ipcc which derives all of its information from sourced that use these data isn't worth the paper it's written on.

>this proves nothing beyond a short term trend in CO2 concentration.

Don't know if you shitpost or just retarded