>climate change bad
why is everyone opposed to climate change? It will effectively ensure supremacy of Europeans over the world
Climate change bad
Elijah Bennett
Ian Richardson
The right doesn't believe in climate change, because
>Chromosomes chromosomes chromosomes KEK you will never be a real girl
>Don't blame me, the geneticists agree
but also
>Tonnes of verifiable scientific data that says my jew/shitskin oil won't last forever and is destroying the planet?
>Fuck you, libtard; the data must be faked. Look at this one study by an oil company! NASA BTFO!
Adrian Myers
there will be an ice age and civilization will colapse after fossil fuels are over
John Russell
>The right doesn't believe in climate change
Nice strawman faggot. The right doesn't believe in man made climate change that's going to destroy the species and can only be fixed with heavy taxation and economy-destroying regulations.
Ian Stewart
>1 post by this id
Eli White
here have another post
Nathaniel Morales
Hi leftypol.
Noah Moore
and another
Ryan Morgan
give me the link faggot
Aaron Young
and another
rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org
In mid and high latitudes, the suitability and productivity of crops are projected to increase and extend northwards, especially for cereals and cool season seed crops (Maracchi et al. 2005; Tuck et al. 2006; Olesen et al. 2007). Crops prevalent in southern Europe such as maize, sunflower and soya beans could also become viable further north and at higher altitudes (Hildén et al. 2005; Audsley et al. 2006; Olesen et al. 2007). Here, yields could increase by as much as 30 per cent by the 2050s, dependent on crop (Alexandrov et al. 2002; Ewert et al. 2005; Richter & Semenov 2005; Audsley et al. 2006; Olesen et al. 2007). For the coming century, Fisher et al. (2005) simulated large gains in potential agricultural land for the regions such as the Russian Federation, owing to longer planting windows and generally more favourable growing conditions under warming, amounting to a 64 per cent increase over 245 million hectares by the 2080s. However, technological development could outweigh these effects, resulting in combined wheat yield increases of 37–101% by the 2050s (Ewert et al. 2005)
Noah Morales
>Canada and Russia will rule the world
David Taylor
there you go
Hudson White
But it fucking is going to lmao
Xavier Rogers
>climate change bad
It's literally a made up scheme to impose more taxes (e.g. carbon taxes, home energy use taxes) and globalization
>(((science)))
>muh always showing just the last 100 years of data to scare the brainwashed zombies
global warming/climate change is an industry unto itself and they want worldwide "carbon taxes" on top of that. it is an insidious thing far beyond that even.
did you know having an ice cap is an anomaly? did you know that the earth has been ice cap free for ~90% of its existence? did you know by definition ice caps only exist during ice ages? did you know we are at the tail end of a CURRENT ice age now? did you know the caps extended as far down as missouri/kentucky just 20,000 years ago and have been receding ever since that peak? did you know the caps are going bye-bye even if every person on the planet disappeared 20,000 years ago?
THE OCEAN'S CO2 RELEASE *ALL ON ITS OWN* IS FAR LARGER AND MORE IMPORTANTLY *OUT ACCELERATING* MANS CONTRIBUTION
THE OCEAN IS RELEASING MORE CO2 DUE TO WARMER TEMPS (WARMER WATER = IT'S A FAR LESS EFFECTIVE C02 SINK)
IF HUMANS NEVER AROSE CO2 WOULD BE INCREASING AT ALMOST THE EXACT SAME RATE AS IT IS RIGHT NOW
THIS HAPPENS AT THE END OF EVERY ICE AGE
STOP BEING SO FUCKING GULLIBLE AND LAZY
LOOK INTO THINGS FOR YOURSELF AND STOP TAKING WHAT THE MSM, EPA.GOV AND NASA.GOV ETC. TELL YOU AT FACE VALUE, YOU LAZY SHITS. IT IS ABOUT POWER AND CONTROL.
ICE AGES AND PERMANENT ICE *ARE AN ANOMALY*
BY DEFINITION AN "ICE AGE" IS WHEN THE EARTH HAS PERMANENT ICE SHELVES
WE HAD ICE A MILE THINK IN CINCINNATI JUST 20,000 YEARS AGO
THE PLANET IS WARMING AND THE CAPS ARE MELTING
THAT MEANS = MORE CO2, SEA RISE AND WEATHER PATTERN CHANGES
WE CAN'T STOP OR ALTER IT, WE WILL ADAPT JUST FINE
STOP BEING SCARED INTO TAX SCHEMES AND GLOBALIST POWER PLAYS YOU DUMBED DOWN ZOMBIES
Logan Nelson
Note increasing CO2 FOLLOWS increased temps... NOT vice versa
Jace Stewart
>muh man made CO2
Isaac Hernandez
Bentley Baker
you forgot about Poland
Kevin Murphy
Parker Bennett
my apologies
Nathan Reed
Jacob Foster
(((climate change))) is a great to starve off the niggers, sand niggers, and spics than with bullets or chemical weapons
Angel Lopez
1. climate change is a real science. Let me pose you an honest question: by denying climate change, you are not only denying the business that supposedly profit it their credibility (effectively saying they're all working, knowing that they're fooling you), but you are also discrediting every single international university that studies climate change.
You are telling me that every student, teacher, professor, and researcher are faking their results so they can increase taxes.
If you aren't an idiot American idk who is.
Hunter Richardson
> nigs hear europe is still livable
>zergrush.thankyoumerkel
Matthew Phillips
Read this
theatlantic.com
If a primary impact of an artificially warmed world is to make land in Canada, Greenland, Russia, Scandinavia, and the United States more valuable, this could have three powerful effects on the 21st-century global situation.
First, historically privileged northern societies might not decline geopolitically, as many commentators have predicted. Indeed, the great age of northern power may lie ahead, if Earth’s very climate is on the verge of conferring boons to that part of the world. Should it turn out that headlong fossil-fuel combustion by northern nations has set in motion climate change that strengthens the relative world position of those same nations, future essayists will have a field day. But the prospect is serious. By the middle of the 21st century, a new global balance of power may emerge in which Russia and America are once again the world’s paired superpowers—only this time during a Warming War instead of a Cold War.
Carter Cook
How do dummies like you even manage to find this place?
Mason Morales
Someone skipped primary school geology
The way both the left and right think everything revolves around their shitty opinions is the primary reason I support all decisions being made based on compelling evidence.
Landon Williams
behold this then
Michael Perry
>Someone skipped primary school geology
Is that what they're teaching kinds nowadays alongside there being more than two genders and diversity being our strength?
Robert Smith
I don't remember if it was primary school or my textbooks (fiction never engaged me well as a child), but you can track atmospheric CO2 levels throughout the ages based on rock composition. I'll let you guess what was found there.
I also believe you can't change your gender, there are only 2 genders (though we should respect the intersex on an individual basis because it's not their fault they were born fucked over), and meritocracy is the only way. I'm just pointing out how politards shift goalposts to fit their feelings; politics is the polar opposite of science.
Brayden Butler
CO2 and H2O vapour act fundamentally differently at the chemical level in response to heat energy. It isn't just "muh quantities". Don't tell me I need to introduce you to the sigma-pi double bond.
Luke Jenkins
> politics is the polar opposite of science.
Then you should start asking yourself why almost all of the biggest voices for global warming have the political stances, and all shill for the same socialist "solutions"
Bentley Adams
> climate change
> dysgenics
We hit the great filter hard, didn't we?
Colton Jenkins
Like uhh... scientists.
Oh yeah, those... libshill researchers... fucking libtards amirite.
Aaron Peterson
Scientists like Bill Nye, Al Gore and George Soros? Why can't you give an honest answer to that question? Is it because you yourself fall into that category? Really makes me think.
Kayden Brown
Climate change politics is just a kike way to transfer money into social programs and jewish green energy companies
Adam Price
This just means all of Africa and the middle east will be relocated to Europe.
Jaxon Cooper
There is no good evidence for global temperatures rising above medieval climate optimum. Or Roman climate optimum. Or bronze age climate optimum.
The modern era started during little ice age and its prosperity is relatively unusual as normally civilisations peaked during hot periods.
Benjamin Jackson
Scientists like some poor, underpaid fucker in a lab shooting infrared light at CO2 or something (I'm more of a biologist). Ignoring these shills, I'm more willing to trust experts in the field than some political retard who read a few review paper abstracts and something on InfoWars and suddenly thought they understood the entirety of biology, chemistry, and physics as the all intertwine and produce reliable models (and not only that, but claim they have debunked the basis of molecular physics its-fucking-self).
Climate change denial is just a way to hold on to jewish and shitskin oil, rather than look for alternative and renewable fuels.
>But centuries
Reich's gotta last 1000+ years, not 100
Jayden Reed
>Scientists like some poor, underpaid fucker in a lab
The sort who you might be able to pay off to shill fake science and build false consensus? How do you explain and how many people actually understand the science well enough to be critical of their work? You put your faith in these lab men no different than if it were a religion.
You know as well as everyone else in this thread that climate change is just as political as "gender science".
Isaac Morris
wtf i love being oppressed and controlled by a global banker-run carbon tax scam now
Andrew Diaz
That data in that infograph
>could be faked for all I know; none of it has sources (and a lot looks VERY unprofessional)
>assumes a lot of confounding aspects, assuming causality from correlation as a layman may view it
>is still representative of only an iota of the data out there
And even if it were all true, you didn't just remove the polluting effects of these fuels (c.f. China's air) and make them virtually infinite.
Chase Reyes
>hurrr it's fake data
>durrr you like don't understand how deep the science is even though I don't either
Wow convincing argument my friend. Going to donate $500 to George Soros, Bill gates, and the Clinton Foundation so they can save the world now
Sebastian Fisher
go on show your scientific proof faggot
Ayden Bailey
OK, let's take a rain check
For climate change
>Most scientists (who actually just want to know the truth; we often scoff at political types who hold on to beliefs)
>NASA, ESA, etc.
>Every fucking university's ecology and physical chemistry department in the developed world
Against climate change
>Some unsourced Jow Forums infographics using weirdly inappropriate graph fonts
>CO2 and water behave the same now
>Politics/english/law majors who completely understand the nuances of particle physics, I'm sure
Get the majority of the evidence-based literature to shift in favour of your hypothesis, and then I'll give you some credibility. When the facts change, so shall my opinions; such is the way of science.
Cameron Perry
You... you want me to cite the non-biological equivalent of PubMed?
Adrian Morris
>such is the way of science.
You don't actually understand any of the "science" that you claim is so infallible. If you did you would already be familiar with the raw data posted ITT and have an explanation on hand. You're just a typical middling intellect nu-male "progressive" who Believes in Science™.
Henry Peterson
>all these coastal niggers and 3rd worlders are flipping shit while im chilling next to the great lakes
Brody Kelly
Dumbass why do you think the "migrant" crisis is occuring? Climate change is inevitable and that chart is right it will fuck up africa and south america. The people there will all die.
So they are being re-located.
Carson Perez
Maybe they try to vaccine european about the third world
Luis Nelson
>Dumbass why do you think the "migrant" crisis is occuring?
Luke Baker
Are you making fun of someone who didn't get a primary school education? Privileged scum. Go to hell.
Easton Hill
Interesting post OP, thanks.
Grayson Miller
These are just a few of many possible examples. Climate change could upset the applecarts of real-estate values all over the world, with low-latitude properties tanking while high latitudes become the Sun Belt of the mid-21st century.
Local changes in housing demand are only small beer. To consider the big picture, examine a Mercator projection of our planet, and observe how the Earth’s landmasses spread from the equator to the poles. Assume global warming is reasonably uniform. (Some computer models suggest that warming will vary widely by region; for the purposes of this article, suffice it to say that all predictions regarding an artificial greenhouse effect are extremely uncertain.) The equatorial and low-latitude areas of the world presumably will become hotter and less desirable as places of habitation, plus less valuable in economic terms; with a few exceptions, these areas are home to developing nations where living standards are already low.
Samuel Ortiz
So where is the high-latitude landmass that might grow more valuable in a warming world? By accident of geography, except for Antarctica nearly all such land is in the Northern Hemisphere, whose continents are broad west-to-east. Only a relatively small portion of South America, which narrows as one travels south, is high latitude, and none of Africa or Australia is. (Cape Town is roughly the same distance from the equator as Cape Hatteras; Melbourne is about the same distance from the equator as Manhattan.) More specifically, nearly all the added land-value benefits of a warming world might accrue to Alaska, Canada, Greenland, Russia, and Scandinavia.
This raises the possibility that an artificial greenhouse effect could harm nations that are already hard pressed and benefit nations that are already affluent. If Alaska turned temperate, it would drive conservationists to distraction, but it would also open for development an area more than twice the size of Texas. Rising world temperatures might throw Indonesia, Mexico, Nigeria, and other low-latitude nations into generations of misery, while causing Canada, Greenland, and Scandinavia to experience a rip-roarin’ economic boom. Many Greenlanders are already cheering the retreat of glaciers, since this melting stands to make their vast island far more valuable. Last July, The Wall Street Journal reported that the growing season in the portion of Greenland open to cultivation is already two weeks longer than it was in the 1970s.
Liam Phillips
And Russia! For generations poets have bemoaned this realm as cursed by enormous, foreboding, harsh Siberia. What if the region in question were instead enormous, temperate, inviting Siberia? Climate change could place Russia in possession of the largest new region of pristine, exploitable land since the sailing ships of Europe first spied the shores of what would be called North America. The snows of Siberia cover soils that have never been depleted by controlled agriculture. What’s more, beneath Siberia’s snow may lie geologic formations that hold vast deposits of fossil fuels, as well as mineral resources. When considering ratification of the Kyoto Protocol to regulate greenhouse gases, the Moscow government dragged its feet, though the treaty was worded to offer the Russians extensive favors. Why might this have happened? Perhaps because Russia might be much better off in a warming world: Warming’s benefits to Russia could exceed those to all other nations combined.