So it seems (((JewTube))) are trying to smear RT by having a message below their videos that cannot be removed. I have never seen anything like this for any other videos, nothing on the BBC for instance that relies on the UK government for instance.
They probably don't like what they broadcast, link to video: youtu.be
They put the same shit for PBS and BBC you brainlet.
Just checked the BBC youtube channel and I don't see anything there
It pops up on mine...to lazy to get a screenshot tho....
how empty of a statement is "in whole or in part"
well which fucking is it? Is it entirely funded or only partly funded? why say "in whole or in part"
it doesnt mean anything
just fucking publish the percentage if it matters so much
its been that way for over a decade you fucking newfag
I don't get it, have never got it; and think you cunts are editing photos.
I get it, and there is one station in Canada I get a notification of it being funded, it's highly selective and honestly I think it only shows for some people, like how if you are in the States and search for anti-sematic things it'll pop up spin results and how the jews are not a threat etc.
Who funds CNN???
Al jazeera YT has nothing about it being Qatar funded
They do it for all European government funded channels
It's on mine.
You have to ask?
Not on mine either.
Fucking filthy shills
I see the message pop on both RT and BBC videos, on their official channels. But not all the time. It appears to be selective, depending on the video uploaded.
Why isn't their a disclaimer on every video letting people know that YouTube is funded partly by the US government?
Because thats not how you spell Israel
Why is the wording different for RT and AJ?
You're a bad, bad goy for even suggesting this. Oy vey...
A friend made a YTP that used footage of the WTC 1 getting hit by a plane and the video automatically loaded with a link to the wiki article on 9/11 without his approval. I thought that was pretty fucking weird. Not sure if he can remove it.
Nice try Ivan, but the BBC is funded by the license fee, which means it is funded by public commission. It even has a public comittee.
While the British government have a say in how much the license fee is and how much goes to the BBC, Channel 4 and the maintenance of broadcasting infrastructure in the UK in exchange for making it illegal to watch live TV without a license, none of the money is actually raised by tax or given to the BBC by the government itself.
In this way the BBC remains independent of the government and can say what it pleases as long as it balances out political coverage. In practice that doesn't exactly mean ballened news because it usually does some great chearleading for whoever is the Tory of the month while saying "Boo, aren't labour horribly antisemitic?" then saying "What? both reports were on screen for the same amount of time".
Flawed system, but better than Russia Today that gets direct funding from their government and has to really get their tongue far up Putin's shit-tube if they want more money.