Many women in modern day militaries tend to be incompetent and useless when it comes to actually doing military stuff. They often are also huge sluts and receive a great amount of attention from the thirsty men they are surrounded by.
The obvious solution is, why not have specifically recruited comfort women units to provide services to troops? They will be organizationally supported by the military administration and receive benefits, good pay, healthcare (very important), access to contraceptives, etc.
Seems like a great idea for any modern day military.
That sounds like a great idea that I think society is ready for. You should immediate contact Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and make hey aware of this great plan so that she can implement it when she becomes president.
Lucas Cruz
>Many women in modern day militaries tend to be incompetent and useless when it comes to actually doing military stuff. They often are also huge sluts and receive a great amount of attention from the thirsty men they are surrounded by.
maybe that's because >women are incompetent and useless. They are huge sluts and live for attention from men
>why not have specifically recruited comfort women units to provide services to troops? They will be organizationally supported by the military administration and receive benefits, good pay, healthcare (very important), access to contraceptives, etc. Now why would any government pay for all that? Morale in modern militaries is at an all-time high, in fact many of them are underdeveloped in terms of manpower&equipment. Realistically, the only way this would ever make sense is if the military charged the soldiers in order to turn a profit on the whole affair, and they would have to charge them way more than standard whoring rates to afford all that shit.
Jaxon Kelly
So long as condoms are mandatory for every encounter and they get tested every week, I think it'd be a good way of keeping a lot of guys out of trouble
Gabriel Howard
> women to provide services to troops and receive benefits, good pay, healthcare, access to contraceptives, etc.
sanctioned brothels were the norm in korea until the 1980s, user.
Dylan Bailey
Research the term Hooker
Samuel Hill
>So long as condoms are mandatory wtf is the point of whore-mongering if you have to wrap it? dumbass
Chase Gonzalez
Why do you want pregnancies and STIs running rampant through the ranks?
Xavier Cooper
This is a shit idea and I'll be tell you why this idea is bad. It didn't work in WW2 for the yellow short men, and sure as shit won't work now.
The military's job is to fight for the nation and represent its nation both on the field and in the boardrooms. It is suppose to represent honor, glory, and uphold morale standards. Furthermore, it is expected of troops to maintain health standards, including those regarding venereal disease.
Guess what maintaining comfort women around you does? It decays those values further than the usual war crimes and lack of discipline. The Japanese during WW2 discovered that the hard way.
The Japanese knew the war crimes and war rapes were an issue. With regards to that, they began to keep comfort women. Mainly to reduce rape and STDs floating around. It did the exact opposite, as they found out. All it told the troops was that if it's ok to rape women here, it's ok to rape women outside of the brothels too. The officers were in on this too, and happily enslaved POW and civilians to rape and create war crimes. Furthermore, military discipline fell down following this, with Japanese acting more like bandits rather than actual soldiers.
>Many women in modern day militaries tend to be incompetent and useless when it comes to actually doing military stuff. Then they shouldn't be in there in the first place, incompetence breeds incompetence. Last thing you need is a dumb thot rubbing off on your troops.
>They often are also huge sluts and receive a great amount of attention from the thirsty men they are surrounded by. Which will debase military standards further, encourage hedonistic behavior, exasperate the amount of STDs floating around (STDs are at an all time high in the USA by now), and overall reduce company morale & standard.
>It is suppose to represent honor, glory, and uphold morale standards. >It decays those values further than the usual war crimes and lack of discipline.
Most western militaries are not honorable or glorious. Planning and waging aggressive war is a crime against humanity. Which already makes the US military (and many of our allies) a criminal organization.
Josiah Ross
(2/2) >The obvious solution is, why not have specifically recruited comfort women units to provide services to troops? Because previous reasons stated.
>They will be organizationally supported by the military administration and receive benefits, good pay, healthcare (very important), access to contraceptives, etc. Like the Japanese army did sure. Debasement of military standards and encourage poor behavior. Essentially, it'd be paying people to fuck when they're suppose to be fighting and serving. It looks bad internally, it looks bad externally. What you listed here are things that encourage this behavior further.
>Seems like a great idea for any modern day military. For all reasons listed it isn't. It's poor taste at best, and fraternization and insubordination at worst.
lmao this gay nigger doesn't want to buttfuck china girls
Jaxson Butler
>Most western militaries are not honorable or glorious. Even just trying to maintain the appearance of honorable and disciplined is better than being a fuck gremlin. The job is to serve the military and the country, not fucking thots.
>Planning and waging aggressive war is a crime against humanity. Which already makes the US military (and many of our allies) a criminal organization.
Crime is defined by the countries that do them. You might find the morally bankrupt and undignified, but they are not criminal by the long shot.
In addition, cite "Planning and waging aggressive war is a crime against humanity." Subjectively, it's your own opinion. But point to where there it is in any of the human rights codes who maintain significant influence.
Thomas King
Nigga, you dum if ya think I wanna fuk some thot. Save dis dick for marriage cause muh mamma raised me right, ya fuck boi.
Jace Campbell
>Crime is defined by the countries that do them. Change that crime is defined by countries that maintain their code of laws and judge them. They may do them too, but that's essentially pushing their own boundaries and ignoring inconvenient laws. Ya know, like hillary
Nathaniel Morales
>In addition, cite "Planning and waging aggressive war is a crime against humanity." Subjectively, it's your own opinion. But point to where there it is in any of the human rights codes who maintain significant influence.
A crime against peace, in international law, is "planning, preparation, initiation, or waging of wars of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing".
Hunter Hill
whatabout a crime against penis
Jack Morris
I won't justify the second Iraqi War, however they were able to fudge the laws in their favor. Namely this.
>"Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations." (UN Charter, Article 51)
Technically the US had the right, even if they were running on weak evidence. 9/11 and following terrorist attacks were justifications enough for them to retaliate in the Middle East.
Wyatt Watson
You might be joking but women would probably sign up. It would bring moral up and rape down and STDs among the troops down. Women would probably love a job where she gets to have sex with strong fit men and get paid for it. Also the children born should be property of the estate and should all be soliders but there is a danger that once the war is over some one might pay the women to say how they were forced to do such a thing
Jackson Ward
See It’s counter intitutivs to your goals.
Ryder Hill
Yet another job destined to be lost to robotic automation.
