None of us deserve salvation. We are flawed and imperfect beings separated from God. But there was One who was perfect in every way, because He was the Word if God made flesh! He suffered and died to bring truth into this World and condemn the deceit and hypocrisy of the Jews, and by His suffering He conquered death and rose again, and you to may rise again and recieve eternal life if you believe in His promise and ask His spirit to dwell within your heart and free you from the hold of spiritual wickedness and degeneracy. The door is open, Jow Forums, will you revive this free gift from God?
Have you asked Him into your heart yet, Jow Forums
Luis Myers
Other urls found in this thread:
josgreece.angelfire.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Easton Morales
Yes, but I don't know if there has been an answer.
Liam Jackson
>Jesus says that the Holy Spirit he sends "proceeds from the Father": "But when the Helper comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify of Me." (John 15:26)
>the first and second Ecumenical Councils of 325 AD and 381 AD reaffirmed in the Nicene Creed that "the Holy Spirit...proceeds from the Father"
>the third Ecumenical Council of 431 AD declared that "it is unlawful for any man to bring forward, or to write, or to compose a different (ἑτέραν) faith as a rival to that established by the holy Fathers assembled with the Holy Ghost in Nicaea" (i.e., the 325 creed)
>the Pope of Rome changed the Nicene Creed in 1014 AD to define the Holy Spirit as proceeding "from the Father and Son", and this became the basis for both the Great Schism between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church, as well as for the doctrine of Papal infallibility which asserts that the Pope has the authority to infallibly define doctrine (even when it contradicts a prior infallible teaching of the Church)
>according to their own teachings, the """Holy""" Spirit that the Roman Catholic Church claims to be guided by is not the same Holy Spirit that Jesus said he would send and the the first Christians were guided by
>mfw the Roman Catholic Church has been guided by a demonic spirit for more than 1000 years
Jayden Morales
Jesus Christ is my Lord and savior ;)
Aiden Lewis
Sure have. And continue to every day. Based OP.
My dude, you don't know what you are talking about and are encouraging schism. This is very bad and you need to stop.
Adrian Walker
The schism occurred over 1000 years ago, user.
Brody Barnes
>My dude, you don't know what you are talking about and are encouraging schism. This is very bad and you need to stop.
t. Judeo-Jesuit shill
Brandon James
He is supporting its continuance and encouraging individuals to become schismatics.
Hunter Martin
>and condemn the deceit and hypocrisy of the Jews
he died for all
and he died to expose all hypocrisy, not just that of the Jews you retard
Aaron Nelson
Filoque has an AND in it. It's consistent with procession from the Father. And in your own post you quote Jesus as saying he will send the Holy Spirit. Stop riding this hobby horse, you're bad at it anyway!
THINK!
Aaron Barnes
>when Roman Catholics talk about being guided by the spirit, they are actually referring to a demonic spirit
>don't encourage schism with the Catholics goy
Carter Murphy
Based Pole.
inb4 crumbs and dogs posters. Gonna have to explain this and BTFO Calvin again, I expect. Sadly. It gets boring. People avoiding the Church use the same few lies to avoid the surrender. It's pathetic.
Jose Carter
>will you revive this free gift from God?
I don't believe that a god exists. There's no proof.
David Johnson
>when Roman Catholics talk about being guided by the spirit, they are actually referring to a demonic spirit
Oh boy, now you've really done it. Stop posting, make an appointment with your pastor (senior Catholic priest in your parish), and bring him your argument. He'll take time away from orphans and widows to help you in your stubbornness and selfishness.
Jackson Watson
Based and redpilled.
Bentley Harris
That's a handsome looking white man. White European country was he born in and who were his parents?
Nathaniel Thomas
Carson Scott
>Jesus says he will send the spirit FROM the Father and that the spirit proceeds FROM the Father
>avoids saying that the spirit also proceeds from the Son, even though he explicitly emphasizes TWICE that the spirit comes FROM the Father in both the sense of being sent and in the sense of the divine relationship between the spirit and the Father is one of the former proceeding from the latter with no mention of the Son
>don't think about this too deeply goy, just follow what the Pope says
Kevin Bailey
You need to stop,because you dont know what youre talking about -Fuckhead
Jackson Jenkins
Kill yourself christnigger
Caleb Jones
I wonder if the dude posting the sigil of Satan has a prejudicial beef with the matters of Christianity...
Adrian Gutierrez
Tyler Parker
>when the demonic spirit that you've pledged your eternal life to as a Roman Catholic doesn't want the truth exposed about the demonic foundations of Roman Catholicism and the Papacy
COPE
Nicholas Morgan
truths !!!
Luis Taylor
>avoids saying
This does not and has never made anything false, as you know.
Seriously, take it to a priest. If your argument's so good, you'll BTFO him! Imagine how many souls you'd help! Much more important than sh-tposting here.
Rude
Isaac Morgan
Ryan Anderson
Joy of Satan is an FBI honeypot.
Tyler Nelson
Given that the basis of the Great Schism of Christianity was the Pope changing the Nicene Creed from using Jesus' own words about the nature of the Holy Spirit to words of the Pope's own invention, you'd think Jesus would be very unambiguous about his choice of words. You know, like when all the followers left him because they couldn't accept the teaching about his Flesh and Blood. In the same way, he allowed the Roman Catholics to leave him and his teachings to follow teachings of their own invention.
David Gomez
>accuses me of "stubbornness and selfishness" because I reject the demonic Roman Catholic denial of Jesus' own teachings in favor of contradictory teachings of their own invention
>doesn't see the irony of his own "stubbornness and selfishness" in refusing to accept that Jesus' words cannot be contradicted by any man, not even the Pope
Robert Jackson
Who needs arguments, evidence or acknowledgement of the obvious mistakes in the bible that can be easily explained if you realize that it was written by ancient mountain jews with no idea what the fuck the world, humanity or life is if you can just write self-depricating shitty poems like this and then get upset when people don't believe your fairy tales?
Sebastian Jenkins
Get yer arab religion off my white board
Aiden Morgan
Again, >Filoque has an AND in it. It's consistent with procession from the Father. And in your own post you quote Jesus as saying he will send the Holy Spirit
Jesus is not merely a conduit for the Spirit, he *sends* it. According to you. And the Father *sends* it. According to you. So you think it proceeds from the Father and the Son, huh? Based.
You're repeating yourself and getting nasty, even engaging in insane blasphemies against the Church. This has gone on long enough. It's time for you to stop posting and go see a priest. We aren't so cocksure IRL. And perhaps you have Asperger's or something. Talking to a flesh-and-blood person could do a lot to humble you.
Andrew Gray
I confess Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior. O Father, I pray that You will guide your servants, that we may trust in You and You alone. What we know not; teach us. What we have not; give us. What we are not; make us. I pray these things in the Name of Christ Jesus who shed His blood for the sake of our salvation. Amen.
Matthew Torres
fuck that jewnigger
Sebastian Lopez
Yes. And he told me to go screw.
Jason Wilson
Based Burger. I just prayed this. Thank you.
Cameron Collins
Your daily reminder that simply being "a good person" isn't enough to get you into Heaven. You must actively accept His message, and scripture is quite clear on this.
>Jesus answered and spoke again in parables to them, saying, "The Kingdom of Heaven is like a certain king, who made a marriage feast for his son, and sent out his servants to call those who were invited to the marriage feast, but they would not come. Again he sent out other servants, saying, 'Tell those who are invited, "Behold, I have prepared my dinner. My cattle and my fatlings are killed, and all things are ready. Come to the marriage feast!"' But they made light of it, and went their ways, one to his own farm, another to his merchandise, and the rest grabbed his servants, and treated them shamefully, and killed them. When the king heard that, he was angry, and sent his armies, destroyed those murderers, and burned their city. "Then he said to his servants, 'The wedding is ready, but those who were invited weren't worthy. Go therefore to the intersections of the highways, and as many as you may find, invite to the marriage feast.' Those servants went out into the highways, and gathered together as many as they found, both bad and good. The wedding was filled with guests. But when the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man who didn't have on wedding clothing, and he said to him, 'Friend, how did you come in here not wearing wedding clothing?' He was speechless. Then the king said to the servants, 'Bind him hand and foot, take him away, and throw him into the outer darkness; there is where the weeping and grinding of teeth will be.' For many are called, but few chosen."
The men originally invited lead good lives, hence their invitation, but couldn't make time for God and chose worldly things instead or even actively rebuked His invitation. Some who answer the call are not worthy but nobody, worthy or not, can feast in a house he refuses to set foot in.
Ryan Price
>anti pagan accounts on FB
My god, Christians are obsessed
Ryder Bennett
Awesome. Thank you.
Hunter Campbell
Gotta wash those garments in the blood of the Lamb
Jose Nguyen
Jonathan Myers
All that follow the faith of the sand god whether it be Judaism Christianity or Islam get the rope. Follow your ancestors anons and follow the path of logic reasoning and the teachings of the Gods
Levi Reyes
Eli Foster
I keep committing evil acts. I don't want to disappoint him again.
Grayson Ross
>I keep committing evil acts.
Well that sounds good
Australians: aural saints?
Noah Morales
>I don't want to disappoint him again.
That's the part that sounds really good hehe.
But acknowledging our sins is good too, of/c
Jaxon White
>whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven
>Peter's successor binds the fillioque/holy spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son
>God binds it in heaven allowing the Holy spirit to proceed from Jesus as well
>false christians still confounded
>heretic prots continue to have invalid mass at strip malls
>ordodox continues being schismatics that are pretty nice guys tho
Parker Ramirez
Based
Blake Allen
Jesus wasn't even a real person, you numbskulls
>pic related
Luis Nguyen
Damn captcha
Brandon Phillips
>Christians will get martyred by me, a paganlarper
Absolute madman. I bet you'll be pretty mad when you go to hell for following a false religion while the people you martyred become saints :^)
Justin Walker
Hallo again
Evan Moore
Refute this then
Adrian Adams
You know Daniel is a forgery, written 400 years after the time it purports to have been written... right?
Luis Gray
>Refute this then
Sure, no problem. All the "scientists" quoted are either not actual scientists, or are writing outside their field of expertise, and can be safely ignored.
Joseph Phillips
That would be a no, sir! Sauce plz, I'll listen for a while, gonna cook dinner soon though
Lincoln Powell
>safely
Think about your safety a lot?
Zachary Watson
My God is higher than every form, shape, and name. But sometimes I call him Lucifer and he looks like a bright shining star.
Blake Garcia
Brandon Davis
Andrew Taylor
Hudson Nelson
>That would be a no, sir! Sauce plz, I'll listen for a while, gonna cook dinner soon though
Daniel is a book of prophecies. The first half of the book contains 100% accurate prophecies. The second half of the book contains 100% failed prophecies.
If Daniel is a real prophet, he would not have suddenly lost the gift of prophecy halfway through the text. If he was an ordinary man, he would not have been able to achieve 100% accuracy in the first half of the text.
Therefore the author of Daniel was writing in the 160s BC not in the 600s BC, as he claims.
Caleb Lewis
>Have you asked Him into your heart yet, Jow Forums
Could OP ask hm to keep an eye on his pervert clergy?
Colton Rodriguez
>The first half of the book contains 100% accurate prophecies. The second half of the book contains 100% failed prophecies.
Let's hear some.
Couldn't the second half just not have happened yet? Like in my pic, which happens at the Apocalypse?
You wouldn't argue against the Book of Revelation by saying it hadn't happened yet...prophecy is about the future.
Chase Taylor
>Couldn't the second half just not have happened yet?
Daniel wrote that Antiochus would die fighting in Egypt. He actually died counting his shekels in Persia.
Obviously Antiochus can't come back to life, raise an army and invade modern-day Egypt, so I doubt the prophecy is one that simply hasn't come true yet.
Nolan Thomas
>None of us deserve salvation. We are flawed and imperfect beings separated from God. But there was One who was perfect in every way, because He was the Word if God made flesh! He suffered and died to bring truth into this World and condemn the deceit and hypocrisy of the Jews, and by His suffering He conquered death and rose again, and you to may rise again and recieve eternal life if you believe in His promise and ask His spirit to dwell within your heart and free you from the hold of spiritual wickedness and degeneracy. The door is open, Jow Forums, will you revive this free gift from God?
Jeremiah Reed
>Daniel wrote that Antiochus would die fighting in Egypt. He actually died counting his shekels in Persia.
Citations needed
James Russell
What are you even trying to say, my man?
Easton Miller
>Citations needed
There are at least half a dozen ancient sources that mention the death of Antiochus in Persia (pic related)
Luis Foster
>the Jews have been pretending to hate Christianity for 2,000 years
>a book as complex and spiritually enriching as the Bible, which takes a lifetime to understand, or more, was cynically slapped together as a psy-op, then the self-identified Jews opposed it strenuously instead of promoting it, so all the early Christians were cryptos but this secret never got out cuz Jews are that sneaky
David Johnson
Sure it's the same guy? Lotta Steves in the world. Sure five of those texts didn't get it from the first one?
Connor Cook
This, "scholarly consensus" is just a nice sounding name for Christcuck circlejerk.
Ayden Perry
>This, "scholarly consensus" is just a nice sounding name for Christcuck circlejerk.
If you say so, Dr. Lost to Emus
Gavin Barnes
Go away, Bart. Your gatekeeping tactics have already been thoroughly exposed.
Nolan Myers
>Sure it's the same guy? Lotta Steves in the world. Sure five of those texts didn't get it from the first one?
So what if they did? That is still one source that says "Antiochus died in Persia" and still exactly zero sources that say "Antiochus died in Egypt"
Logan Taylor
>>the Jews have been pretending to hate Christianity for 2,000 years
They don't pretend to hate it. The reason why the hate is is because they view it as a heresy of Judaism and because it is mostly filled with goys which they hate. Right now there are jews telling other jews to stop hating Christians simply because Christians are no longer the only goyim they interact with but now are the most useful goyim they interact with. Even the famous medieval rabbi Maimonides basically just views it as a form of paganism. They hate it because they hates goys which populate it and they dont like the heresies of their kike religion.
>a book as complex and spiritually enriching as the Bible, which takes a lifetime to understand, or more, was cynically slapped together as a psy-op, then the self-identified Jews opposed it strenuously instead of promoting it, so all the early Christians were cryptos but this secret never got out cuz Jews are that sneaky
Most of the Bible was written by kikes before Christ. They promote most of it and just hate the parts that preach what they view as heresy
Jackson Ortiz
Alexander Baker
alright, heres something that bothers me
effeminate men will 'not inherit' the kingdom of heaven, so we're supposed to be masculine, but lust and wrath and violence are sins and they are very masculine things, even if you fantasize counts as adultery 'in your heart' and the bible says its better to take your eye out if it causes you to sin, so then you could say 'fuck it' and commit suicide to not be so sinful, oh wait suicide is a sin
can anyone explain this to me
Austin Davis
It's just a prophecy, it can be true even if no one recorded Antiochus dying in Egypt. It's not pending anything
You seem to assume sometimes that all texts on earth must be consistent for the Bible to be true. Not so, my man. Not so. Think more about
>implication
Also, if they all got it from source #1, it's weaker evidence that it happened at all. As you know, 6 independent witnesses are better than 1.
I'm still leaving to have dinner, you're flailing bro and I don't think you can say anything fruitful. Get right with God, man.
Connor Diaz
If they hate it, then why did you post a kike supporting it?
We're done here, I gotta cook
John Stewart
The word there "effeminate" has to do with being the receiving partner in gayness.
Jesus is the perfect model of masculinity, look to Him.
Easton Garcia
>It's just a prophecy, it can be true even if no one recorded Antiochus dying in Egypt. It's not pending anything
You think a prophecy that Antiochus would die in Egypt is true, even though he actually died in Persia?
I'm sorry, user, I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve here.
>As you know, 6 independent witnesses are better than 1.
You haven't established that there was a single source. I have read most of them, but as far as I can see, they're a mix of Greeks, Romans and Jews, so it's rather unlikely that they were copying from a common source text.
Levi Gomez
>Christians are no longer the only goyim they interact with but now are the most useful goyim they interact with
Now is an understatement. From the Catholic church protecting Jews throughout the last millennium and breeding the modern, high finance controlling kikes to American evangelicals shilling incessantly for their Zionist masters, Christians have always been the goodest of goys.
Parker Scott
Masculinity and the pursuant traits are not sinful. Your question is basically the same one asked by medieval Christians who needed to defend their countries, etc., but didnt want to descend into savagery. Thus the code of chivalry was defined to outline the correct temperament for these behaviours, basically a way of saying when it was okay to be angry, warlike, violent etc. Start with the code of chivalry.
Christopher Adams
I think it's important to note that this isn't a problem if it's a prophecy of future, end times events, foreshadowed by the conflict of Ptolemies and Seleucids, but there's nothing in the text itself that explicitly equates the king of the north with Antiochus.
Also people really want the fourth beast / fourth kingdom in chapters 2 and 7 to be the Seleucids, but it's not a good match. It's the Romans. Hence, in the time of the fourth kingdom, God sets up a kingdom which will have no end, i.e. the Catholic Church.
Christ our Lord spoke of Daniel as a prophet, and indicated that there were things of which Daniel spoke that hadn't yet come to pass in His time.
Wyatt Price
>there's nothing in the text itself that explicitly equates the king of the north with Antiochus.
Lol. Nice try, Shlomo.
Obviously you know that Daniel would have been executed on the spot if he'd used explicit names. That's why people in that age disguised political tracts as 'ancient prophecies'
>Christ our Lord spoke of Daniel as a prophet,
WTF are you talking about? If Jesus was a real person, no record of anything he ever said survives.
Cooper Gutierrez
Does asking Jesus into your heart actually yield results?
As a Christian, I’ve had a life-long suspicion that everyone who says god or Jesus talks to them has been completely full of shit.
Cameron Turner
>As a Christian, I’ve had a life-long suspicion that everyone who says god or Jesus talks to them has been completely full of shit.
The question is, if St Paul stepped out of a time portal tomorrow, what possible methodology could you use to determine whether he was insane, or whether he was actually receiving visions from the actual heavenly Jesus?
Until you can develop such a methodology, all apostles and prophets are either liars and madmen by default, or they all genuine. Every single one.