Global Warming?

All memes aside, is man made global warming legit? Like is there any truth to it? Because the UN gives us 12 years before climate catastrophe.

Have you seen the timelapse of the glaciers? They are clearly receding. The amount of deadly hurricanes has gone up. 16 of the 17 warmest years have happened since 2000. Californian wildfires are worse than ever. Methane trapped under ice sheets is being released. Massive carbon emissions cause smog over China.

Really guys, can you give me some real scientific evidence? Is global warming real?

Attached: 7ee69387-5c99-40a9-b143-eae6e0f82d7c-large16x9_wildfire_escape_01.jpg (986x555, 222K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
youtube.com/watch?v=G1-EIuat538
breitbart.com/politics/2018/11/14/delingpole-we-really-muffed-it-scientist-admits-error-in-hyped-global-warming-study
electroverse.net/professor-valentina-zharkova-breaks-her-silence-and-confirms-super-grand-solar-minimum/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Nah all those scientists for other subjects like biology and computers and space were right but all those climate scientists just happened to be wrong even though they used the scientific method just like every other scientist.

Climate scientists are worse than vaccine researchers in terms of how trustworthy they are. Them saying something has little bearing on whats true. All of them have no problem buying beach houses at sea level.

The climate changes dramatically. Sometimes the sun does solar flares strong enough to wipe out all satalites.

Here's a climate whitepill, the more CO2 in the atmosphere the more crops and plants grow. It's a significant effect.

For Canada I welcome climate change. If we lose Vancouver so be it if it means the prairies are warmer. It would be a huge economic boom unlocking vast areas of land for habitation.

>Is Global Warming real
Well it had to be rebranded as climate change when all of Gore’s predictions ending up being wrong as fuck so you tell me.

>Climate scientists are worse than vaccine researchers in terms of how trustworthy they are. Them saying something has little bearing on whats true. All of them have no problem buying beach houses at sea level.
Prove it. Show a single shred of evidence for your claims.

Who is Al Gore

You think that Al Gore is a climate scientist? Jesus Fucking Christ user.

Global warming is absolutely real and happening but you idiot Trump NPCs will believe anything he says...literally anything. You even have a meme for it: 4D chess. More like mental gymnastics.

Of course not he just presents their data to the masses but they’ve never protested that so why then were the climate scientists predictions that Gore Gore presented ended up being false? Why haven’t we all been under the sea since the year 2012?

"Global Warming" is 100% hoax.

The argument is that made made CO2 emissions cause warming.

Do you know what the main greenhouse gas is?

IT'S WATER VAPOR. NOT CO2.

CO2 is a very small portion of greenhouse gasses and man made CO2 is a tiny part of all CO2

Attached: Water Vapor.jpg (513x335, 31K)

Every other planet in our solar system continually experiences weather events with violent, unpredictable extremes that make earth's worst weather events seem like gentle showers and nice breezes. Exactly which corporations, polluters, and plastics consumers caused this? Gov't trying to tax on a global scale- for weather. Now, plastics pollution should be cleaned the hell up but if climate taxes altar weather, then pay up so we can enjoy comfy climes on our favorite other planets as a return on our $'s.

Attached: 1541892343327.jpg (630x847, 61K)

Most CO2 does not even come from man.

Main greenhouse gas is not even CO2.

In fact, we're not even sure if CO2 heats the atmosphere or if CO2 increases because of higher temperatures.

The sun is the main contributor to temperature changes on earth.

Attached: Origin of C02.jpg (960x720, 57K)

Oh my god to even be this low effort in your shilling is embarrassing. Climate change skepticism has been a thing since forever it has nothing to do with Trump

I doubt it

Attached: CenozoicTsGlobal-7.5w.600ppi.png (4506x2244, 300K)

>he doesn't know that combustion creates water

Attached: huh.png (949x588, 159K)

Except this isn't what happened.
They caught doctoring data for political purposes.

How can you be ignorant of this?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy

>he doesn't know thermodynamics
Typical medicfagg trying to act smart for taking basic chemistry.

Attached: thermal_eq.jpg (949x541, 83K)

Physics doesn't care about consensus, or how many people are willing to lie to try and seize control over civilization.

Attached: co2-ppm-log-graph-550.jpg (550x338, 691K)

Am I alone in wanting another Ice age ?

>"The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t".[19]This was actually part of a discussion on the need for better monitoring of the energy flows involved in short-term climate variability,[29]but was grossly mischaracterised by critics.

Read your own link fucktard.

If it was a big treat they would do something about it right away, like they did when the ozon layer went to shit. Instead they go the slow road while squeezing every $ out of us. In other words, don't give a fuck about it, things will change when they have to

Technically it's just logarithmic, so getting a linear increase requires repeated doubling.

AGW is just a Global Conspiracy among godless Librul scientists competing for teh Grant Monies
to further finance their lavish élite lifestyles in them palatial research labs, pic related.

Attached: cooper_divoky_180619.jpg (1024x683, 126K)

>In response to the controversy, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the American Meteorological Society (AMS) and the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) released statements supporting the scientific consensus that the Earth's mean surface temperature had been rising for decades, with the AAAS concluding: "based on multiple lines of scientific evidence that global climate change caused by human activities is now underway... it is a growing threat to society".[14]

>Eight committees investigated the allegations and published reports, finding no evidence of fraud or scientific misconduct.[15] The scientific consensus that global warming is occurring as a result of human activity remained unchanged throughout the investigations.[16]

Are you trying to be retarded?

All you need to know is that no matter how you slice it, the world is ending.
>The inevitability of nuclear war.
>Yellowstone volcanic eruption.
>Transhuman induced human extinction.
>Demographic collapse due to reduced fertility rates
>Arrival of the rest Oumuamua fleet
>Global warming setting off the clathrate gun
>Imminent return of Jesus Christ

Just accept the inevitability of doom.

>based on multiple lines of scientific evidence that global climate change caused by human activities is now underway
Yes.
> it is a growing threat to society
Bullshit. Unless CO2 levels triple there's no cause for concern, and they almost invariably overestimate actual CO2 levels by a lot whenever they make their idiotic predictions. Given the rate at which solar tech is improving the idea that we'll see 1k ppms by 2100 is horseshit.

It is not.
1% of atmosphere is greenhouse gases
3.6% of greenhouse gases is Co2
3.2% of Co2 is from human activity
Conclusion: 0.26% of greenhouse gases are anthropogenic.

Attached: perspective.jpg (386x951, 115K)

You do realize an over abundance of water vapor in the atmosphere contributes to global warming, right? It has a much shorter cycle, yes, but like CO2 it traps in heat.

That same guy audited climate science data as his thesis and found out the absolute joke it was.

Global warming is real, but I do think it isn't man made. I think the earth is simply too big of a system.
The problem to me is that science papers about this should be made public and if they already are analyzed in television by experts to make everyone understand that it is really proven to be real, because if it is man made, it is just too big of a problem to ignore or to have half the population or perhaps more think that it's fake. But of course it will never happen because it's not rigorously proven (to me it is impossible to do so, how do you even make a rough estimate of the pollution we make? It is just an analysis of rising temperatures and the likes correlating it with human pollution and that's all) or our political elite is just too retarded to understand what to do

I don't know why I'm supposed to believe that the introduction of all the cars in the world in the last century (more or less) all pumping millions of tons of what is uncontroversially a greenhouse gas into the atmosphere, and ramping up every year, would have zero effect on the environment, much less all the other industry that burns fossil fuels. They weren't there before, now there's a shit ton. Even before you get into any statistics it seems the case for human-driven climate change is ironclad, and that's before you get into even more obvious examples like damming up rivers and shit.

That we lack the power to seriously harm our environment is a pre-Industrial Revolution delusion. We can change it, we can hurt it, we can destroy it.

I think the only reason there's any debate on this topic is that fear of loss is the strongest human motivator, and merely mentioning cars in my post will drive (ehehe) most of the people who read it to vehemently condemn global warming; because if it's true, the conclusion is that we need to quit doing some stuff, like driving so much. Which it seems would inevitably involve some loss for the person reading.

We can believe anything if we like the conclusions.

Attached: 1485316921560.jpg (489x368, 41K)

There are other, much more powerful greenhouse gasses than co2

>is man made global warming legit?
Prince Charles shills for it, so no it's total bullshit psyops marketing

Yeah but you ought to run the numbers a lot more thoroughly before deciding that it's the end of the world. Glaciation is far more threatening than global warming is, and will continue to be for quite some time yet.

Attached: 450ky_Ice_Age_Temperature[1].png (546x211, 33K)

Medieval apocalyptics were wrong, and so are (You)

Did you not look at the graph or the percentages? Jesus.

> is man made global warming legit

are the jews not parasitic entities?

The scientist are useful idiots, the get off on how ther work gets published and praised internationally.
The money is made by the men behind is, siphoning large amounts of subsidies for totally inefficient forms of energy generation + taxing the customers for shitty ideas.

>the men behind
Anybody in particular, or just a shadow organisation (you) suspect of existing?

>Because the UN gives us 12 years before climate catastrophe.
This is a poison seed. The sun is going into a deep solar minimum as we speak, and crop losses due to changing weather patterns as a result of the sun's cycles already mounting. These shysters and false prophets are seeking to use this very real crisis, which we have no control over whatsoever (all we can do is prepare), in order to gain power. Just like when "witches" were burned at the stake for cursing crops during the mid 1600's, these snakeoil salesmen are already advocating for the modern equivalent of stake burning.

The weather is changing, shit's getting wacky, food shortages will happen, but there's not a single fucking thing we can do to stop it. Curbing CO2 is a fool's errand, a placebo. CO2 is irrelevant in reality.

GLACIERS HAVE BEEN RECEDING SINCE THE END OF THE LAST MAJOR ICE AGE YOU FUCKING NIGDOLT

FOR OVER A BILLION FUCKING YEARS EARTH WAS A FUCKING ICE WORLD


WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU FUCKING EXPECT YOU DUMB LITTLE PECKER WRECKER? NOW WE ARE ENTERING A GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM FAGGOT

MOVE TO THE COASTS AND GET COMFY FAGGOT 2020 RAISE IT FAGGOT

depends, I mean just look at musk, he rides on the "green" subsidies wave. Also many of the large electricity producer cut in hard.
Hit for every watt of wind/solar power you need a watt of "compensatory power", meaning either pumped storage hydro power station, Gas powered plants or battery banks. hydro power is limited by geography, and batteries are a joke. Only leaving gas power for reliability.

so in the end if you force green energy you force gas power.

With the shitty electric car meme it will get even worse.

found the high-strung Redditard

>musk, he rides on the "green" subsidies wave
I see -- you blame climate scientists for this "wave" that is taking your tax monies, right?

yeah, were fucked

Attached: methaneppb.png (1300x790, 317K)

climate change is quite real.

no it is not legit
global warming means someone says
>I'm a scientist
>I have the data
and DOESN'T GIVE YOU THE DATA
it is a stupid meme
global warming = data cartel

Found the newfag calling people redditors

We're about to enter a mini ice age, faggots who go on about global warming are going to look pretty fucking stupid in a few years. The greenhouse effect is real, but it's not nearly as pronounced as is made out to be. The data was fudged to make global warming seem like an unprecedented effect when in fact it's been much warmer in the past (medieval warm period) and there's been many times more carbon in the air without a runaway Venus effect. I an exaggerated scam designed so the extremely wealthy can stay extremely wealthy by selling carbon credits and the rest of us can have global socialism.

>climate scientists

i blame useful idiots, a serious scientists would spout doomsday nonsense none stop.
how earth is going to turn into venus with just 1°C average more temperature and only use their computer models as means of evidence.

They got constantly btfo the last 30 years with their predictions, and that wont change in the next 30 years.
But of course its all for the "greater good".

>redditors
Redditard: spell it properly, Cadet Capslock.

>useful idiots
You keep using that phrase.

>citing the UN
Fuck yourself to death.

Attached: gonoherpasiphylaids.gif (500x500, 927K)

(You)

Climate change isn't real and heres why I welcome it

lasers, drones & smart meters get real hot.
youtube.com/watch?v=G1-EIuat538

bear in mind this is, in grand scale terms, still one of earth's coldest periods. We're just barely above ice age levels.

Beware of "big green"

Attached: 1453587389930.png (511x857, 214K)

has anyone ever noticed whenever there is a violent hurricane or early snow storm, it's always followed by "we haven't seen one this bad since 19XX"?

sensational news is sensational

doesn't matter if it's real or not. you have zero power to change anything.
rich fucks do whatever they want. even if it's real and we are fucked in 12 years. what are you going to do? mee rothschild and ask him nice if his friends just stop earning money and holding the world hostage? good luck with that dude

>Because the UN gives us 12 years before climate catastrophe
Climate scientists have literally been saying we are "10 years from catastrophe" since the fucking '80s. I have no reason to trust this pseudoscience that has been proven wrong by reality hundreds of times.

yeah, Al Gore basically ran on a campaign of climate dooms day. New York City was supposed to be getting flooded by the ocean about 3 years ago.

"15 years from now" sounds like a long way away but I remember that shit from 1999/2000.

Attached: 1312408325909.jpg (299x264, 15K)

>used the scientific method
Climatologists can't even into the scientific method because they aren't scientists, they're statisticians, and you know what they say about statistics... Climatologists create a synthesis from research done by others like meteorologists and geologists, after Michael Mann and Gavin Schmidt gang bang and bukakke the data.

breitbart.com/politics/2018/11/14/delingpole-we-really-muffed-it-scientist-admits-error-in-hyped-global-warming-study

>peer reviewed climate study turns out to have had bad math all along

>a fucking leaf.
Methane's absorption bands are all covered by water, you ridiculous twat...

Nope, and it looks like we could be getting it.

electroverse.net/professor-valentina-zharkova-breaks-her-silence-and-confirms-super-grand-solar-minimum/

>even though they used the scientific method just like every other scientist.

Yea, so did the scientists who said eggs caused high cholesterol

Millions of dollars on other studies and 3 decades caused that finding to be revised

Science isn't infallible. You can find a study to support pretty much anything. Especially something like global warming which will allow massive tax hikes and more state control of industry.

The chemtrails they grid out over my city seem to keep rain at bay until they want it. Mostly to keep working class scrubs like me working and generating taxes, stopping at red lights and burning gas. Every time the weather says it's going to rain and I get a day off from roofing or waterproofing, the weather pisses off unless it's some tropical storm backlash that btfo of us.
It's obvious to anyone with the wherewithal to just look up once in a while. But what we're going through is some solar shit beyond any means of control. All the co emissions in the world won't matter a lick if the sun dims for a while and well, I have some bad news.