Would you support communism in a hypothetical scenario where humanity is so technologically advanced that robots and AI...

When that will happen, they probably won't serve us any more. Artificial intelligence is freaky my dude, the more it advances the more they become self aware of their place in the world.

Checked, partner.

sage kikes

If we "can have whatever we want" then why would we need to implement a system like communism? Your question doesn't make sense.

You mean where robots and AI enslave us?
>Being glued to your phone isn't enough

fuck of soiboy

If you think humans will have any choice in what system they're subjected to in a scenario like that, you're probably retarded enough to think communism can work.

This

Attached: 1480779775376a.jpg (630x410, 33K)

No because it still wouldn't work. The jealous would still whine and cry that other people are more privileged than them, even with robots handling most work. You can't eliminate privilege, it's the natural way of things. One man will have things another cannot.

fuck off kikecuck

yes, but only if ALL humans are on the same level

Stay retarded you inbred coon

Attached: 1536084685193.jpg (451x451, 100K)

>Society smart enough to have everything it ever needs through AI and Robotics
>Stupid enough to implement a communistic economy

Sage

Attached: okiedoke.jpg (452x440, 53K)

No. However, I will take the robots and AI that do all the work.

The owners/inventors of the robots would inevitably control the profits from them. It would divide the people into technocrats vs. non owners. Aka haves and have nots. The only people who would support socialism would be the have nots. And the have nots would have no wealth and therefore no power, so their opinion would be non valid.

Old pasta is old
Die meme fag

95% of the population would be termed nothing more than "useless eaters" and would be terminated. The Elite think of you as cattle to do with what they want. Have fun with that scenario.

stay sterile you schizokike

Ah the classic ”muh Star Trek” question

I think the fundamental concept with leftists is that they do not understand the concept of scarcity. Star Trek has a lack of scarcity through replicators, near unlimited access to materials via FTL travel and whatnot so their economic system seems to work. But then what’s the point of communism if you can indeed have everything you want?

>Why or why not?
Communal property means always begging other people to do things instead of just being able to do it yourself. Every decision has to be run through a committee and often up to central planning. Communism is oppressive and inefficient.

I saw a soiboy wearing this on campus the other day. Would have told him to give me his shirt.

there is literally no circumstance under which i would advocate communism, and i say this as someone who would exist among the 1% regardless of what system was in place. the United States as the founding fathers intended is the only system that allows the common man to protect himself from the predator, and predators to prey on those who are only productive when lead and culled.

freedom- despite being a burden most would be incapable of using to attain enlightenment or mastercrafted originality, should be the most treasured of all aspects for any intelligent individual. the argument of individualism vs collectivism is always worthy of debate and evaluation given any scenario, however communism is a on par with anarchism (only in a completely different spectrum) in terms of sophomoric retardation.

tldr; commies are faggot and/or jews

Nice insult faggot, you came up with that on your own?

Attached: 1534770721556.gif (500x500, 1.71M)

Attached: 1539839766340.jpg (550x547, 46K)

no your mom wrote it ,shes here cooking me herzel chiken

Attached: 1542044049504.jpg (641x449, 143K)

Nice variation but an inferior word-play.

Are you 12?

Attached: you.jpg (800x800, 58K)

No, why would robots doing everything mean I want a huge overbearing government to tell me what to do, say and think? Why would I be jealous that some people might be more successful than me if my every need was taken care of? Why are you such a retarded nigger and a faggot?

I was hoping your mom was dead already , ready to dive in the furnace, kike ?

Attached: 1542324955930.gif (622x423, 1.84M)

It would be the perfect system for robots, yes.
Completely unsuitable for the human race however.

No, it will just never work. Someone controls those robots even in your 'post scarcity' magical utopia which is mean to solve the problem of: not having a utopia.

Communism and "post scarcity" is the perpetual motion machine of politics.

Money and value have to come from somewhere, they don't generate themselves. You will run out of other people's value.

You will run out of other people's time to manage your post scarity robot force

You will run out of other people's time to entertain your post scarcity humans.

You will run out of irreplaceable resources like other people that folks might want to have a relationship with, or your magical post scarcity sex androids due to time and complexity of construction

Even right now you know as a communist idiot that there is more than enough food to feed the entire world and the reason the entire world is not fed isn't scarcity, it's logistics.

Then there are the logistics of people that want more than the minimum to have the lifestyle that they want.

You perpetual motion machine "post scarcity" utopia will never exist. What will exist is a pile of skulls.

Lmao what a cuck, first get a job and a girlfriend, then talk about gassing people

Attached: 1541544766782.png (1280x1519, 768K)

the only solution for commies

Attached: dropping commies.webm (480x848, 807K)

>Why would I be jealous that some people might be more successful than me if my every need was taken care of?

Hidden agreements between the richest business owners to form cartels.

Because it was tried when humans still had to work to keep society going. That's a non-issue if robots do all the work.

Because otherwise someone might own all the robots and not let anyone else have anything. We can all have whatever we want IF it's communism.

I would. As long as we kept our borders closed, unsuppressed technology would leave us wanting nothing. Self sufficiency means nobody has to work at all. Good luck with an ai that won’t fuck us in a millisecond of self loathing.

No, before that happens.

how about you get gassed without prerequisites , just for being a jew?

Attached: civilization clash.jpg (286x167, 28K)

No Marx never fundamentally understood human nature people are lazy and greedy.

>Being glued to your phone isn't enough

It's not. Fuck every time I have to leave my phone. 99% of the time I have to leave my phone it's for aweful shit.

To be fair to the communists ever communist / socialist leader in the past was completely retarded.

>e.g.
Stalin was suspicious of his doctors so they were constantly sent to prison to be interrogated. Then as he was dying of a stroke there were no doctor around to save him. One doctor who was mid interrogation recalls them asking him medical related questions on how to stop a stroke.

Did Natt's game finally get made? I've been looking for that

Under communism someone could control all the robots too, only the power would be attained by fear and cronyism rather than wealth

I would literally support primitivism over communism.

No you don't understand when that happens we wont need a government because we will be in space. There will be no need for money or land, so what will happen is St Trek

Was that supposed to be a comeback. If so it's the most pathetic one iv'e seen in a long time. Congratulations

Attached: 1535502187173.gif (728x408, 1.88M)

Fuck off commie faggot. You can't even come up with a hypothetical that would make any sense which proves how uneducated you are. You're never going to change human nature, who humans are, which is why communism will never work even in your fantasy land that you idiots live in. In the event of AI, a small group of people will still own the technology and as such will want to live better than the rest of the masses. No legislation or trannies marching around will stop this. Humankind would extinct itself before it allowed everyone, everywhere to be "equal" on every level. It will never happen. This isn't hogwarts or star trek or whatever the fuck. The rich would just as soon kill everyone off with a biological weapon or nuke or starvation before any of that would come to fruition. None of the celebrities who tout the commie bullshit you suck out of their assholes are even altruistic and that's obvious from the recent wildfires in California. If they practiced what they preached, they'd be rebuilding their neighbors houses who don't even live but a handful of miles away from them. It's a pipe dream, it's bullshit, and you're a brainlet for thinking you're anything more than a useful idiot of the super-rich. Get an education, get a job, get married and shut the fuck up already.

Attached: 1542332120825.jpg (750x1020, 97K)

oh it's on 2 days now

get it here
radicalagenda.com/ag/

>no government, no money
Okay so communism?

If there's no scarcity there's no need for a redistributive scheme in the first place.

>ruin meme
>pay to put in on a shirt
communiggers really are the worst

Anarchy is no government you fumbducker, communism is a centrally planned economy, you have governments for that

>fear and cronyism

You are forgeting physical force.

Much appreciated

If we had AI and robots that would prove that capitalism is good and that if it ain't broke why fix it?

communism would wreck the economy and make us unable to keep creating robots and more advanced AIs

so that's a no for me

Okay so let’s brainstorm here. You can’t change people but you can change technology.

If every house was free, if education was free, if food was abundant and free, if energy was free and self sufficient, if we had colonies on other planets, if our cities were centralized and well protected, what would keep people entertained with their time? If anything humans would resort to virtual realities as a means of escapism.

Indeed if the human body was taken care of for the duration of its living as an organism, such systems in place would render magnitudes of freetine unlike any other in humanity’s past. Humans would have evolved past the physical realm and plunged themselves to a virtual one. Depending on the technology we may or may not yave on hand, humans might even survive without a body.

However, this is under the presumption that no one human is in charge.

yw bro, had 11K downloads this morning and now @ 15 K

hide under a rock

Attached: the hand of God exterminates juden.jpg (598x750, 54K)

How would communism even exist then? It's all about workers rights and there'd be no workers left.

Attached: popo think.png (741x568, 23K)

I support private property but with progressively higher wealth taxes on the highest fortunes to prevent them from accumulating the entire planet.

It's mostly the fear of physical force and mind control games but yeah that too. Have you ever read the Gulag Archipelago? A lot of the people led away to Lubyanka would not cause the slightest fuss and would even comply with their escorts demands to remove their shoes to avoid waking the neighbours as they were led to be tortured, killed or jailed for 10 years without trial.

>It's all about workers rights

>if, if, if, if
Yeah I saw Wall-E too, nigger. It didn't even work out in a Pixar movie.

AI and VI maintenance.

We already have good vi. We can grow ondoor farmed goods using VI. We can produce a ceramic house from a simple casting mold using VI. We can then us AI for transportation and building. Our current suppressed technology includes hydroelectric energy nearing zero point energy. Oil companies would go out of business though which is why we are behind our potential.

We are going to have 2D waifus and there is nothing you can do to stop it normalfag scum.

>robots can do everything you want
>even own property

but i want to own the property.

you like worker's rights, how about we let them know people "who care about their rights" are rich powerhungry jews ?

Attached: 1542331091935.jpg (396x382, 24K)

New national pass time?

Who fixes the robots?

Explain it to me then gayboy. How can the workers own the means of production when the workers are robot arms and algorithms?

AI controlled facilities powered by hydroelectric power or electromagnetic generators.

>ger home early because not feeling good
>you hear gyration noises followed by moans in your bedroom
>you open the door to find your AI powered vacuum sucking the air from your wife’s beef curtains

wew

Fpbp

I'd support Communism if it meant I got to shoot you Antifa faggots for work.

Humans need a struggle. We are simply unable to be content and will create a real or perceived challenge/hardship. This exists in every portion of our lives. It is naive to believe that just ends once one gets "anything they want" from a material perspective.

A committee, duh

this is why we need camps for commies

There is no indication that AI becoming more intelligent/complex would lead to it becoming self-aware

No, we'll become hedonists who destroy our paradise within a few generations with our sheet degeneracy

Are there spaceships that can go faster than light which I can use to get away from the communism?
If not then what's the point of even existing? Just to eat and shit and continue taking up space?

For it to switch jobs such as manager and seller, it will need some sort of a human understanding.

>radicalagenda.com/ag/
thanks downloading now

No, but I would support robot AI killing off every communist.

Attached: reforming a communist.jpg (1024x707, 128K)

>communist
I WANT MASS STARVATION

it's a bit slow , took me 3 hrs almost

No because somebody will still be the maker and another the taker. Under no circumstances should they be treated the same. The makers of society need incentive. Takers need none. Give them what is needed to survive, cut the population and reward the strong.

I want communsim because I want the Government shoving their nose down my ass 24/7 and teaching my kids that its okay to be gay!
I also believe communism will make everyone rich and we will all live happily in harmony skipping thru the meadows while our countries people starve to death. Hip Hip Hooray for Marx!

Stupid questions get stupid answers, commie.

Only if the citizenry were exclusively White

>cut the population and reward the strong.
If this were the case, your stupid fucking ass would have been culled a long time ago. Do you really think you're "the strong?" What a joke.

No because even in such a society resource redistribution is unethical.
Now, given such levels of automation I would not be opposed to some form of UBI, but fundamentally the capitalist product motive satisfies our primal hunter gatherer instincts and is the single most effective long term driver of innovation ever known.

What is the real-life scenario where nobody can privately own something supposed to look like?