OY VEY

OY VEY

Attached: 85989987.png (583x792, 642K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=eAQv4upffS8
ancreport.com/report/teu/
youtube.com/watch?v=yHM-0c_Otes
quora.com/What-is-the-maximum-airspeed-of-a-Boeing-747
youtu.be/FzF1KySHmUA
youtube.com/watch?v=4ml6r7cuKe8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

A B-25 is just a really big Cessna. Fun fact: a lady was in the elevator when the plane hit and it dropped all the way down and she survived.

>747 Jet going close to mach 1 loaded with jet fuel
Yeah... that's more than 50 times as much energy

Yes. Do you understand what evidence is?

youtube.com/watch?v=eAQv4upffS8

Pssst, Wanna learn about 9/11 kid?

ancreport.com/report/teu/

>loaded with jet fuel
most of which exploded outside

Go back to selling overpriced fridge magnets to tourists you retard

What is basically physics equations such as F=M*A

survived
in what state though

Attached: yvonneromain41.jpg (510x679, 38K)

747s can't obtain speeds that high at that low of altitudes. Fact.

new york id guess

new york is a city

>747 is literally the fastest passenger liner next to the Concord

mfw they have enough power to go supersonic but without delta wings the wings might fall off... stupid fast planes

Honestly. She gave some story how it was her husband who saved her. It's bbeen a long time since I heard the story.

What do you know. Here she is

youtube.com/watch?v=yHM-0c_Otes

>However, during testing of the Aircraft from 2010 to 2011, Boeing managed to reach a speed of Mach 0.99 with the aircraft's nose pitched at or less than 5° down.

quora.com/What-is-the-maximum-airspeed-of-a-Boeing-747

If you intended on dying or if flown remotely why not go full throttle?

One thing you're missing out on is that the Empire State building was well built by Americans who wanted to build the best and tallest tower in the world.

The twin towers were built by cheap penny pinching twats who used a tube structure to lower costs. There's a reason that the Muzzies tried to blow it up in 93 and then tried again in 2001. They knew it was poorly built and vulnerable.

That's the real conspiracy behind 9/11, they don't want you to know that cheap rich fucks built a shitty building because if that became public knowledge then all the people who lost family on 9/11 would sue the twats into the poor house.

Attached: Osama Bin Laden - Anti Soviet Warrior.jpg (2151x1606, 596K)

I refuse to believe a burger is this retarded

New York, new York, so good they named it twice.

American education everybody. An Englishman having to inform an American that New York City is in New York State.

@ 30,000 feet. Not 500. Like I said, its engines can't produce enough thrust in that dense air. Wings would brobably rip off.

t. Dr. Shekelstein

>500 feet....
You are truly retarded nigger... also the planes descended to hit the buildings

Nah, that's Jewish physics.

B-25 was basically made of twigs and twine and the one was almost completely empty and low on fuel during the accident
modern airliners literally flying tankers that weigh 10 times as much (just the jet fuel alone weighs roughly 3 times more than the entire B-25)

Lol, yeah... Air density. It's a thing. Did you even read the article you posted?

They didnt descend from 30000 right to the towers you retarded shill. The wings would have still been flapping to pieces uncontrollably at the height it was.

>nobody heard it yet it was supposedly that fast that close to the ground

ITT people without STEM degrees that can't calculate energy
It's orders of magnitudes of difference and a much weaker structure

I wish my 12 year old wife could B-25. Can I get an آمين guys?

Learn sarcasm, smart one
~1/2*mass*velocity^2

Fuck off kike... your wife is out fucking a Palestinian right now

Oy vey

*chuckles smugly*

GLOBRO INCCCCC

>B25
Totally the same thing as a commercial airliner.

>747
They were 767s you retards.

Attached: 1542125146932.jpg (1200x900, 152K)

To give you an understanding of kinetic energy...

That second 767-200 impacted at 950km/h and we if assume a conservative weight of 110 metric tons at the time of impact, that is 68.9 times as much energy as a B-25 at max take-off weight going 300km/h.

Doesn't change the fact that it can't travel at claimed speeds at such low altitudes.

Attached: kikeoftheSEA.jpg (960x960, 77K)

>Concrete building
>B-52
Its the same thing goys

Fine! Here's your (you).

Attached: gljHX0N.gif (213x200, 250K)

>B-52

Why is almost everybody completely retarded when it comes to knowing common aircraft types?

Pic of B-25. It is tiny compared to a 767, B-52, 747. If you don't know the difference between a small 2 engine prop plane from WWII and a huge jet then you don't really have any business debating this topic.

Attached: North_American_B-25_Mitchell_Góraszka_2007.jpg (2670x1818, 998K)

B-52

Attached: 160615-F-IP109-006.JPG.jpg (2834x1235, 278K)

767

Attached: Delta Air Lines Boeing 767-300 2011.jpg (770x400, 46K)

747 in background. And that little jet in front is probably similar in size to a B-25.

Attached: maxresdefault(4).jpg (1280x720, 331K)

>still believe planes took down the twin towers on 9/11?

There are retards who think the earth is 6,000 years old, but who cares about their opinion?

Here's a question for you:
What is the melting temperature of ASTM structural steel compared to the combustion temperature of jet fuel? What is the difference of these values? Give your answer in absolute degrees Kelvin magnitude.

Extra credit: What is the time it takes for an object to fall 417 meters if we neglect air resistance and assume a starting velocity of zero given the equation y=y¡+v¡*t+1/2gt^2 ? How does this time compare to the WTC collapse which supposedly did not occur in free fall?

Incomplete answers will result in a falling grade for all Israeli shills.

t. Mechanical Engineer

Don't get me wrong. I don't believe the government's story about 9/11. I believe there is a conspiracy behind it.

That being said, it is incredibly dishonest to try to say the steel needs to reach melting temp to fail. It loses significant strength several hundred degrees before melting.

>ASTM
>AS TM
>ASS TM
>ASS TO MOUTH

I'm down for ASTM with Kelvin Magnitude

>poorly built and vulnerable.
Nonsense, they were the two strongest buildings in the world, yet they were designed from the beginning to be destroyed 33 years after construction began, Jachin and Boaz.

>Vice President Dick Cheney, in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center deep under the White House, authorized Flight 93 to be shot down, but upon learning of the crash, is reported to have said, "I think an act of heroism just took place on that plane."

What a disgusting cunt.

Steel melting point: 1,500 Celsius
Steel hot forge temperature: 1,150 Celsius
Jet fuel burning temperature: 815 Celsius

That's 335 Celsius short of even beginning to weaken structurally.

Oy vey.

don't question (((USA and ISRAEL)))

Attached: 1529774912129.jpg (343x147, 9K)

Attached: 1518074157446.png (299x887, 176K)

Attached: 1517777440518.webm (712x480, 2.62M)

Attached: 1522022217628.jpg (960x645, 92K)

Attached: 1513424955406.webm (712x480, 2.76M)

you deserve a kek

>Why is almost everybody completely retarded when it comes to knowing common aircraft types?

Stop being autistic. I'm on an ATPL course and I'm not getting butthurt about people not having specific knowledge of aircraft that bear no relevance or relation to their lives.

"Hot finished carbon steel begins to lose strength at temperatures above 300°C and reduces in strength at steady rate up to 800°C".

Attached: 1528013018953.png (387x334, 11K)

Attached: 1521694150530.png (862x402, 87K)

She jumped at the last second

So eager to correct someone you make an ass out of yourself. Good job Paco.

checkd

Attached: theyknow.jpg (1024x704, 143K)

Good one Chang.

Not today Satan

Attached: timehop.png (640x640, 798K)

youtu.be/FzF1KySHmUA
>*destroys your conspiracy theory*

Get BTFO by one of your own countrymen

Attached: 46a.png (645x729, 97K)

B-25
>53ft long
>35,000 lbs max takeoff
>200 mph

747
>250ft long
>892,450 lbs max takeoff
>500 mph

When some faggot wants to talk about cars but can't tell a mini cooper from a fucking bus you have the duty to call them out.

Well to be fair, a B-25 has a lot less kinetic energy. Jet fuel does not melt steel beams, however.

this is a decent redpill but james corbett is a kike shill

Attached: 1531213104185.gif (360x346, 218K)

This just in. Ops a fag

Attached: ui88rjj.jpg (576x768, 116K)

It wasn't a 747 for the love of fucking god...

At what point does it become liquid molten metal as was observed by firemen on 9/11 ("like a foundry").
1000% obvious the beams were all rigged with thermite.

Unfortunately you just described the participants in most topics on this board, most of the time.

HOW?!?!?

Attached: 1540669296167.png (347x395, 8K)

Lawl

This I agree with. Especially the molten metal observed in the rubble days later. Now that is strange. I'm all for debating real facts about 9/11. But when people on both sides can't even get the type of aircraft correct or be honest aboit what happens tomsteel as it gets hot I just get annoyed. It is just a bunch of morons talking out their ass on both sides and contributes nothing to the debate.

it's been demonstrated before, there's footage

1000% obvious you're a retarded shut-in neckbeard, who does great damage to any cause you take up.

I get your point but they were 767s.

wasn't it a 767?

wow you fucking idiot, the B-25 is not a jet it's a propeller plane.

The plane is not what took down the trade center, it was the jet fuel that cause structural failure due to heat.

B-25 does not have jet fuel you complete retard.

jesus christ... I pray you're not from New York... you embarrass us.

Attached: manhattan.jpg (700x471, 92K)

Did the elevator have breaks?

Not at sea level you blithering idiot.
At cruise altitude, possibly.

>every plane, building, and crash is the exact same size and happened in the exact same spot.

Attached: 1533989271310.jpg (330x319, 26K)

It doesn’t work that way

10/10

Attached: 1541719200670m.jpg (1024x768, 96K)

LOL OP SUCH A DUMBASS HAHA IT WAS A 747 YOPU RETARD LOOOOL

That thing in the upper left is the stuff of nightmares.

They can hit higher speeds while in a decent and it takes forever to bleed off speed, I must concede my position after reading what 767 pilots have claimed. Instead of referencing theroetical maximums at level flight.

Bait

But they didn't dive into the towers. They came in low from miles away.

It's overrr
youtube.com/watch?v=4ml6r7cuKe8

Attached: king-trump-post-invasion-of-ksa.jpg (746x497, 77K)

How come we used to be able to build such majestic buildings like Empire State Building that could withstand airplane hits or giant apes climbing them and now we're building this hideous glass boxes that melt as soon as you give them a dirty look.

>How come we used to be able to build such majestic buildings like Empire State Building that could withstand airplane hits or giant apes climbing them and now we're building this hideous glass boxes that melt as soon as you give them a dirty look.

The answer is and always will be the same.

Attached: 1.jpg (649x664, 16K)