What do you guys think of Hitlers art? I was thinking of getting a print for my home.
Hitlers art
Other urls found in this thread:
bump
Post more
I was thinking of going with this one or the one into the OP
I like this one
Its not bad, and also not great. The art of a self trained apiring young person who couldnt compete with the atelier kids who lived and breathed it from birth
This is good insight, and i see it. Kind of makes me like it more for that reason.
Why would you want his art? Seriously. What happened in your life that made you sympathetic to him or his art?
They look like he made them in a pych ward as therapy to cope with his ww1 ptsd.
Serious question? Ok, here’s a serious answer: I read mein kampf and actually sought the truth about the man
We've had this discussion a thousand times. There's some talent there but you'll notice quirks in his proportions and use of colour. His work is no better than landscapes you'd find in a charity shop, painted by some random person's grandmother
What "truth"? I'm asking in good faith.
I’m sympathetic to him for his stance against communism.
Youre absolutely right lol. But I don’t want it because I think it’s good art. I just want something in my home that I will recognize that normies won’t
>What do you guys think of Hitlers art?
It looks really generic. Like the kind of stuff you'd see on the wall in a bed-and-breakfast inn.
pedestrian. suitable for a cheaply decorated motel suite bathroom
For one reason
>hey that's a nice picture up there user, who's it by?
That’s not a very astute question but the best answer I can give you is this: he might be the most lied about man in history. The great majority of people don’t know the first thing about him or his ideals but instead are familiar to a small degree with revised history. If you haven’t read his book, or read transcripts of his speeches, how could you pretend to know what he said or wanted?
Lol I’m looking forward to having this interaction. Maybe I’ll put my place up as an Airbnb and get several pieces
A yankee with brains
>screencap this shit
Pretty much. Competent, but totally uninspired.
Someone post that Jewish artist who drew shitty abstract vaginas and got into the art school the same year Hitler was rejected
God dammit gook moot
This isn’t the picture I posted
I don’t even have this picture saved
Trying again. I’m trying to post a picture of a castle Hitler painted
Good example of his poor understanding of perspective and vanishing point. He probably could've improved those deficiencies with more practice and instruction.
their mediocrity is charming
it's mostly interesting to see what he saw in his time that he loved enough to preserve for posterity and gave everything to protect
its his jewish ancestry creeping in.
So Hitler got rejected while painting things like that.
The same year, the guy who painted this
Was accepted. And people wonder why Hitler thought Jewish art was degenerate.
I like Otto Lohmuller but I'm not John Pedesta so I can't hang his paintings around my house.
Reminder that in EVERY Hitler art thread, shills come and do their shill thing.
1. He was applying to art school, presumably to LEARN HOW TO GET BETTER AT ART
2. THE GUY WHO PAINTED THIS GOT ACCEPTED THE SAME YEAR HITLER WAS REJECTED
Yea, he probably should have gone to Art school or something
>His work is no better than landscapes you'd find in a charity shop, painted by some random person's grandmother
Are you actually aware that he was applying to art school, not someone who had 60 years of actually painting shit behind him, like that random person's grandmother?
Check out his Madonna with child. Anyway there's a good book on his art called Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics. It's only mildly pozzed, quite factual and you'll learn a lot.
Probably better than sucking on a dogs cock though
thinking of posting famous art and saying its hitler to see if people still call it shit lol
Hitler never painted anything that took as long as that, he was only a young student
Listening to Mein Kampf, I believe he grasped the fact that painting wasn’t really his thing and he had a natural talent for architecutre.
Seems to be the same place. Shame I forgot what its name was.
>he bad, no talk about his art
>dubs
>1488
Accepted to the school the same year Hitler was rejected
Neuschwanstein Castle
This too
Literally the Disney castle lol
>1. He was applying to art school, presumably to LEARN HOW TO GET BETTER AT ART
except you don't go to the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna to learn how to do that. you go there to hone you ability if you have enough talent, ability and technical ability to begin with. it's like crying over someone who got rejected by MIT because their 8th grade understanding of math and science wasn't enough.
they told him he was better suited to architecture than painting
Accepted to the art school the same year Hitler was rejected.
>muh Hitler needed to work on perspective
Bullshit. He knew a Jewish scheme when he saw one. All they had to do was accept him. They drive him to insanity with their subversiveness.
egon schiele was pretty degen, but without his influence we wouldn't have aeon flux
>nip bantz are best bantz
this may may has grown on me tbqh
Like this guy who was accepted?
Checked
I think Hitler was pretty inspired if it led him to attempt killing Jews
possibly. but judging from his artwork and what was cutting edge/avant garde at the time, there was no way Hitler would have cut it as a great painter and was rightly rejected
Egon Schiele was a master and art isn't about literal copy and pasting
>Klimt puts in a good word for you
Of course they'd accept him
Also his art is pretty cool desu. Kinda hit or miss to me though
His best art was the way he transfigured the german people into the best version of themselves. "Das Volk" 1928-1937
No other artist could every compete with this artistic accomplishment.
Hitler was a fine artist and could have made it in a more traditional Berlin.
I like some of Schiele's work but at best he is a talented, imaginative, and somewhat perverse artist - but a master? of what?
Checking myself
All muh perspective posters are shills
Much shittier Jewish artists got accepted the same year
Pic related
Thank god I'm not the only one with a brain.
Not sure why everyone here is an art critic now. These pieces are works he made to sell to the general public and to apply to art school. The general public likes and will always like paintings of simple things like: landscapes, buildings, erc. Hitler was very talented as evidenced by his strong technical ability at his age. He was actually recommended to apply to the architecture school instead of the art school which in his day had already been subverted.
>shilling for pedophile Egon
>Egon Schiele was a master
Of what?
There is not one example of him being able to draw anything with any remote degree of accuracy, he is utterly incompetent
Half of his art is degenerate and It's a good thing he died
I seriously love Hitler.
I'm sure a lot of the scenery and buildings Hitler painted touched him in some way but he had neither the talent, imagination or technical ability to translate it to oil on canvas. It's not the subject matter or time period that was his problem. Schiele will always be an Expressionist great.
Checked
ITT: internet art critics
>dubs
>1488
Checked kamerad.
Fuck Hitler
Expressionist art is not even a thing. Jews literally just sucked at art, so they lowered the standards for them. Same thing Jews are doing to this very day.
>alf of his art is degenerate and It's a good thing he died
>Egon Schiele was a master
Well, he was definitely Jewish
They branched out from realism because the camera could already show realism. Painting became challenged so artists branches out to try to experiment with what constitutes “art” with line, texture, composition, etc. Art does not have to be realistic to be art. Hitler was a good painter, but he painted realistic landscapes which at the time was seen as too traditional. Jewish trickery in the art world exists, but try to grasp what they’re trying to achieve instead of just dismissing it. It’s deeper than black and white and would help if Jews weren’t the only people basically controlling the narrative of this whole art form just because people on the right can’t grasp art other than realism. There were many people similar to Hitler art wise but only one Egon Schiele. That’s what separates them.
Powerful get user
Basically if Hitler would have been given a Public Access TV show, he would have been the Bob Ross of 1940's.
1488 wew lads, wew
>in full command of his talents
He paints like he has cerebral palsy. I hate people who call this trash art. It looks like art that got hit with a hose after it was completed
>subverted
always an excuse. ok so he painted motel room art to make ends meet. they still make for a terrible portfolio if he wanted to impress a top tier art school. if he had the talent or aptitude for it he could have bypassed art school. but really the stuff he painted and the way they were painted was even dated and stale then.>There is not one example of him being able to draw anything with any remote degree of accuracy
he was an Expressionist painter, not a draughtsman or a photcopier
...
Its bland and uninspired desu, he was meant to be the subject not the artist.
Hitler wanted to get good at traditional Aryan art. Vienna wouldn’t have it, and accepted the Jew Egon, who doodled underaged prostitutes masturbating, the same year Hitler was rejected.
Reminder that even with all of our advancements in technology, NO ONE can replicate the mastery needed to create paintings like those in the renaissance. Pic related was even painted by a woman. No one is capable of doing this today. Hitler aspired to learn how to make great art again. To this day, still, no one can. It’s a lost art. Even more, it WAS the pinnacle of art. All other “art” is a scheme. True art hasn’t been produced in hundreds of years.
They were venturing from realism. It has a certain aesthetic that it achieves and just because you don’t “get” it doesn’t mean it isn’t successful. I’m also willing to bet if you try to make art it wouldn’t be anywhere near as successful. It was supposed to be ugly and weird, that’s the point. Anyone with painting knowledge can learn to paint like Hitler, DaVinci, etc but to venture out from that and create your own unique successful style is a lot more challenging because there is no steps to your destination.
Nice
No, ross did easy npc shit for cat ladies, hitlers work was more complex, still nothing to special though.
That art was made because cameras did not exist to take realistic pictures. Once cameras were invented this art style became challenged and outdated to the public eye.
Egon is widely regarded as the worst artist to ever live.
>1488
>Hitler thread
Lol, im going to bed with a good smile.
Egon Schielle is Yoko Ono Tier.
I understand that and I like some abstract art like Dali
But Egon was objectively bad.
He has no examples of his using his medium above the ability of a toddler nor any creativity other than drawing things with wobbly lines
There is no creativeness or thought behind his "art" and his skill is poor
>They were venturing from realism
into the realm of infant with a crayon tries to draw realism
masturbator
Is he a confirmed pedo? I never looked deeply into his life.
dear jews : Eating poop is not an art form.
youtube.com