Is politics downstream from culture as Andrew Breitbart claimed?

>The Left had known that for generations, but on the Right, so many people in politics thought only about politics. To Breitbart, that was folly. “The people who have money, every four years at the last possible second, are told, ‘You need to give millions of dollars, because these four counties in Ohio are going to determine the election,’” Breitbart told the National Policy Council in October 2009. “I am saying, why didn’t we invest 20 years ago in a movie studio in Hollywood, why didn’t we invest in creating television shows, why didn’t we create institutions that would reflect and affirm that which is good about America?”

Also post art.

Attached: Pierre-Narcisse Guerin.jpg (1060x1441, 202K)

That's why they don't want you to make or promote good vidya or music or jewtube channels or anything the average person can do to contribute to influencing culture.

It was pretty weird to see in the game industry at the time. This giant push to only make games with a certain perspective and the disappointment that the critics had at not being able to influence larger corporations to make feminist games.

Attached: paris vanishing Maya Kulenovic.jpg (1024x763, 122K)

Attached: 1483885531713.jpg (3632x1482, 467K)

But stifling them isn't good enough we have to beat them and succeed in spite of them whether its documentaries or commentary or Indie movies or a good old painting or poem.

It's begun as organically as we could hope for.
Jow Forums hosts right leaning memes and jokes all the time currently.
More and more will come, slowly we will see more books, films, and art that lean right.

Agreed.

Has any moviemaker done more good for the US than mel gibson?

Attached: Konstantin Razumov.jpg (535x720, 126K)

Absolutely, I grew up in the fading afterglow of Christianity (norm mcdonald stole my line), and that has now been replaced by a Scarface poster, a rap song about how cool it is too be rich, and childrens marxist television cartoons that were produced under the guiding eye of trans-national megacorporations. The politics of the next 50 years are going to be absolutely shit tier pathetic, and they will generate incredible amounts of human misery.

Sometimes I sit and wonder if that is a good idea.

This girl only paints pepes.

Attached: pepegirl.jpg (1080x767, 134K)

What's with the art threads?

Don't touch my marxist children memories.


j/k burn it with fire.

Attached: marxist.jpg (900x600, 194K)

HEART

Attached: 1539315109308.jpg (500x356, 30K)

Also right leaning youtubers have a presence, although they are all called shit for not being the manifestation of Evolas ultimate spiritual abstraction of pure right wing energy.

The radio at least has managed to have right learners hanging around. Newspapers also do manage to keep a right presence.

WEEND

Hi schlomo memeflag.

Non-demoralizing art is like battle standard, a flag to rally under. An ideal to believe in, to be touched by in the deepest reaches of your soul.

If Breitbart was correct and I think he might be, that politics is downstream from culture, then if you want to work on long term political oals then you must necessarily concern yourself with culture, how people are educated, what people believe, what people aspire to, how they view the world and how they reinforce norms in each other.

We've left hollywood to decide for us what's good and bad, with only those who received conflicting ideas (for example christians) being resistent to those ideas.

There is something about beautiful art that pierces right through propaganda and is undeniable and unironically can guide people toward truth and away from darkness.

Also, some faggy mods kept moving the threads because they didn't understand the link between politics and art, so it's good to talk about the subject of art and politics and its relationship. Prove me I'm wrong.

Attached: Siege-alesia-vercingetorix.jpg (2204x1469, 920K)

I never did finish reading Evola. Perhaps because I was being asked to do so by a literal son of a rabbi.

Can you explain Evolas ultimate spiritual abstraction of pure right wing energy?

Attached: Pierre-Narcisse Guerin2.jpg (2527x3500, 1.27M)

heh I never realized. Good point.

Attached: pepe.jpg (1080x720, 114K)

>UHH!

Attached: kwame 3.jpg (479x355, 18K)

Attached: 1483878686182.jpg (538x796, 99K)

It's really stunning the more I watch old documentaries and the more I realize boomers really had so many good institutions, education and upbringing handed to them. I'm sure they also worked hard, but not very conscientious of what they had been handed.

Attached: 1483904010895.jpg (3592x5385, 2.31M)

Attached: st-mary-s-basilica-krak-w.jpg (1800x1200, 632K)

Clint Eastwood? Maybe, I'm on the fence

Not a bad point.

I probably should watch more Eastwood.

Any recommendations?

Attached: Konstantin Razumov3.jpg (574x720, 95K)

As I said, I'm on the fence. I haven't seen anything he did since Invictus, which was a fine movie if you ignore everything that happened since 1995 in South Africa. It was the "hey, we can live together" fairy tale that everybody wanted to believe about Mandela and the ANC.
Grand Torino was sweet until you realize that it's old white man teaches a fatherless refugee how to be an American because his own offspring don't really care. (though to be fair, the Hmong fought with us in Vietnam, far better than the Vietnamese did, and faced genocide as a result of our leaving so there was a real case to let them in).
Eastwood loves America but a lot of his stuff preaches boomer-cuck civic national idealism. (Eastwood himself is not a boomer)
The Dirty Harry stuff was good. Sort of. The Enforcer was Harry learns to get along with a feminist hero cop

Thanks for that.

Hard to believe how hard propaganda art is pushed sometimes like pic related btw.

Paris is dead.

Attached: e0eae03410ea6ad13b0d667d3d5a6d31.jpg (1920x1080, 161K)