strawpoll.me
For those who missed out on yesterday, get in here lads.
What is your political ideology Jow Forums?
Who cares?
>anything but national socialism or fascism
Canada is the first post-national nation. We have nothing to be proud of
>those of you who missed getting cataloged and listed yesterday get in here NAOW!! fuck you and your fucking bait faggot
where is anarcho-fascism??
>defeatist cuck
It's not over until it's over. Get a spine or get out.
Not sure if meming
Fascism and anarchy cannot coexist, one is statist and the other one is stateless
i support a stateless national socialist state.
Judaism
If commies can perform the mental gymnastics required to convince themselves their ideology is both statist and anarchist, so can fascists.
Way too many options, I just always pick nazi in these
I will continue to work, pay taxes, and support my family but supporting any large scale Canadian Nationalist movement, be it pro-white, or pro-Canadian is suicide for for any potential of getting a good job.
I will constantly push for a 3 or 4 nation solution for Canada but any hope of a pro-nationalist movement in today's political environment and with the number of foreign welfare leeches would be for naught
>Using the derogatory term made up by the allies rather than the actual name to refer to your ideology
yep, most of the anons that pick natsoc are edgy larpers
So summed up, what we've seen in every strawpoll on Jow Forums:
>38% "Radical" Nationalist/"Far-right"
>24% Minimized Government
>21% Other "Right"
>12 Moderates/Fence sitters
>4% Leftists newfags that will change over the next year or so
Which generally speaking ends up in limited polls as:
>40-50% NatSoc/Fascist
>30-40% Libertarianism/AnCap
>10-15% Moderate right making the shift
>5% Leftist newfags
bumpin
It's like nigger, we use their negative term to own it
I'll always be a centrist. It's the only thing that triggers the extremism.
You could say I'm a radical reactionary centrist :^))
So as always, a 40/30/30 split between natsocs, libertarians and moderate/center-right
The goal of anarcho fascism is to create a group bent on the absolute destruction of the current system.
That system being one that is corrupted by materialism, degeneracy, and stagnation.
Look to the movie Fight Club.
Its not about recreating society or replacing it with an "Anarcho-Fascist" government.
Its the blackpilled version of Fascism.
>What are you Jow Forums? Here are your options:
>A meme
>A kike nigger meme
>A retard
>A boomer
>A gay retard
>A civicuck
>A Falangist (only acceptable one)
What's with all the normie tier systems pulled out of plebbit? No monarchy, no lolbertarians, no transhumanism, no fascism, no natsoc, no anarcho-primitivists/tribalists. Explain yourself OP
>The goal of anarcho fascism is to create a group bent on the absolute destruction of the current system.
...pretty sure that's just anarchism in general; the destruction of the state apparatus and the social/economic trends it maintains with it's existence. On some level you can have Anarcho-nationalism, but Fascism is a holistic political doctrine that attempts to organize everything in support of state goals, with the state being totally representative of the spirit of the Nation. A powerful state is central to Fascist political and social organization. They're not really reconcilable with Anarchists.
If you go to the page, it has most of those, it's just there's so many, when OP screen shot it like a dipshit he left everything out.
>If you go the link with third-party access you can vote for the data mining
user only newfags would actually vote to know something so trivial and retarded
>damage control
Yeah, deflect, that's fine.
"Anarcho" Fascism. Did you just gloss over it?
Anarcho-Fascism is a meme, true, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
>deflecting from the main point
Expected from a memeflag
>Ancaps and Lolbertarians are only 16% together
The memes about Jow Forums turning full fash were true, uh?
>If you play according to their rules, you win
Wew lad.
what's wrong with libertarianism?
You don't make any sense. Communism is suppose to be stateless anarchy; that's why commies always go off on their not real communism rant.
Fascism requires a states. Anarchy fascism is an oxymoron. The mental gymnastics is anarchists claiming fascism is akin to communism, where anarchy is freedom/capitalist based or equality/socialist based.
What if I don't actually care very much about any of that and just want a white nation in general.
Personally I don't dislike it, but I do fear that it simply cannot oppose the left's increasing will for authoritarianism. As many here, I used and still do somewhat support individualism, but I also think that a society cannot be individualist if not made up of whites.
Basically I consider fascism a mean to an end, though I fully understand its dangers and how difficult it could be to make it fall once it gains power. However between Fascism and Communism I will always prefer Fascism, and no matter how much time it takes, Fascism can always bloom into something different, while if we let our countries be swept by the African horde our blood can never be restored.
Just pick one between NatSoc and NatCon. They do imply other policies too, but they're the closest to Ethno-Nationalism.
So basically, its a process which invlolves forming a fascist state after transitioning from a stateless/anarchial society, rather than a specific belief system. I would assume that would just be fascism then (being the desired end result).
You're right about fascism > communism
It may take a bit but finally the once welfare leeches will have to learn to become an individualist and not rely on the government for gibs and healthcare. they actually have to work for food, money, and housing. And in a libertarian society there can still be private charities where people can voluntarily donate to give people gibs instead of being forced to by the government
They need a state to make sure that people don't hoard land/factories/whatever, the commies themselves literally describe it as a state-enforced stateless society, but they claim they're anarchists even though they admit they need a government to stop someone from just taking all the land for themselves, selling it, or whatever.
They're expert mental gymnasts.
>state-enforced stateless society
Lmao that does not make sense
It's interesting
You forgot anarcho-syndicalism
Where's is the Eco-Fascist Representation?
Cant have all the meme options come on, dont be silly
bumping
Almost 1000
>Data mining threads 24/7
>Jannies don't give a fuck
I hate this place.
>most of pol is right-wing
wow what a shocker
final bump
most of these labels are entirely meaningless