Do Millennial have a point?

>why would jews push for a system that puts them in complete power and hoards all the wealth into the state

>Labor Power Suppressed by the state
but theres no way the (((1%))) is bringing in massive amounts of foreign labor in order to suppress wages i would be an ebil raycis if i pointed that out

Attached: 38190309_289018034981465_5292869742833434624_n.jpg (960x766, 84K)

Attached: unless u do eberything 4 me i am opresed.png (569x1109, 1.02M)

>you will improve it by reducing the power of governments
The only thing standing between me and doing dangerous stuff at work is governemnt regulation. As a builder for 3 years I can say the government has saved my life. The shit CHILDREN used to do in construction was awful. i have rights and protection now.

5 men own as much as 3.2 billion people.

yup (((Rootless International Capitalists)))

if you have to breathe to live
are you free?

Do you believe if they weren't jewish they would act diffrently? Imagine being in a position to make billions. Being white would have no bearing on your decision. In fact we see that today.

As a mechanic, a lot of the required health and safety is literally impossible if you want to do a job. How am I supposed to use a grinder is the guard is 3/4 of the blade and catches on the drop link before it's even halfway through?
>5 men own as much as 3.2 billion people.
As opposed to the Soviet union, where 1 man owned 250 million people directly

Yes but Fascism is the solution rather than Marxism.

Attached: 1541794550292.png (577x608, 835K)

You say they grow up to be retarded but they dont set wages. Capitalists do. Are you saying the lack of unions is an issue? Or that capitalists have too much power in setting those wages?

>where 1 man owned 250 million people directly
That's still less than capitalists

because it doesn't.
The rulers of a communist country are always very wealthy and above the law.

Low wages are due to overpopulation. America was richest in the 1950s (per captia) because one man raised a family. Women in the workplace (and then mass immigration) greatly depressed wages, and continue to do so today.
Ah yes, the Rothschilds owning banks. They're not captialists though, they're simply jewish slave drivers.

Controlled op at the end of the day. Same as the alt-lite and mainline Republicans:
>You know things are bad.
>Look at these real problems.
>Now, look at these fake problems.
>Look at these people who aren't actually your enemies.
>Look at these people who are your enemies, but are impotent.
>Look at these solutions that won't actually fix anything.
>Blame these people who aren't actually the problem.
>Take action that is inconsequential.
>Support people who aren't really your friend.
>Good goy, burn your energy on this treadmill.
We have to address the real concerns of troubled people, that's going to mean draining the filler memes that cloud people's judgement.

own as much what? Float values on a bank computer? Or does their true wealth come from the power that comes from those numbers? Power ultimately backed up by the state.

>Do you believe if they weren't jewish they would act diffrently?
In a sense while the world wouldnt be some utopian ideal i think western countries would be markedly better. I think we'd still have environmental issues and our imperialism would be more focused on south america instead of the ME. But we probably would still have racial segregation and far less immigration from the third world. Although this is most speculation since i can only extrapolate from the actions of the ruling WASP class pre WW2

>The rulers of a communist country are always very wealthy and above the law.
You know I could substitute capitalist and that sentence still works right

Low wages are dues to inflation, but over population is due to immigration which is all leftwing anyways so your point is still our point.

Sounds suspiciously like the world could use 3.2b fewer mouths to feed.

Attached: dilfer smile.jpg (1000x667, 86K)

But the oligarchs want communism to secure their stronghold on power this is what retarded leftists dont understand with the technology we have communism is very very dangerous

>Are you saying the lack of unions is an issue?
Unions can fuck off and die. All unions do is get higher wages for people who don't work or are terrible at their jobs.
>Or that capitalists have too much power in setting those wages?
And where, pray tell, do you suppose they get the power to underpay people? Wages are a function of supply and demand, and under natural circumstances businesses have to pay competitive wages or get stuck with trash employees or no employees.

>muh inflation
stop licking he boot and call them out

Attached: muh inflation.png (1280x868, 356K)

>being this retarded
Cmon user

fractional reserve banking isn't capitalism. The only thing that gives their money value is that the government requires the payment of income tax on ALL income (no matter if it's in fed notes) but only accepts payment in the form of fed notes.
If you do not acquire federal reserve bank notes you will go to jail.

boomer false flag

Then how is what your advocating a solution to the problem you're seeing?

>Low wages are dues to inflation
Low wages are directly correlated with two acts, first the Civil Rights Act (1964) and the shortly afterwards, the "nixon shock" of 1971 and abandonment of the gold standard. The former depressed wages, and the latter accelerated inflation, leading to the world we live in today.

Oh look, this graph mysteriously diverges sharply starting around 1970. What ever could have happened during that time period that changed the underlying economic situation?

are there any bigger fucking retards than chicago school fart sniffers that think the free market fixes everything? Its just lies and propaganda. Its fucking madness that these stupid fuckers have so much influence

jewish bankers deliberately manipulating the *math* of our money supply to enrich themselves without having to take risks or create value.

name one industrialist that got more powerful and richer in a socialist country

one

Schiller is the GOAT. Market efficiency is like believing in Santa at this point

The Chicago school is just another neo-keynesian jew shitstain that places infinite money printing power in the hands of a central bank and then calls it the 'free market'. You might know that if you weren't a retarded commie faggot.

>labour shortage
labour surplus from robots and immigrant influxes, which is why wages are shrinking - those things give bargaining power to the elite
everything else is fine until the conclusion is communism, which doesn't work as a solution to those problems

Theres no difference between "owning" and "completely controlling" to the kikes.

The main industries hitting maturity and ultimately becoming monopolised.

industrialists make things we want while communists murder people.

Well, it doesn't really take their wealth.
Because the system of communism typically means that a select few individuals get a shitton of control over the economy and only the most ruthless corrupt assholes will end up seizing power
Just as what happens now in the faux-democracy that is the United States where you have to buy your political seat.

But aside from that, the kikes are simply hijacking the "communist movement" to prevent it from beheading them.
It's happened in the past too.
That's why you get Soros funding one thing or another.
And it's how you get your Betos and shit.
((They)) will try to dictate the terms in which (((they))) "surrender" wealth/power, but end up implementing a system that still grants (((them))) all the power.

You can look at the history of IBM to see how this unfolds.
In the late 60s they were forced to separate various services of companies under antitrust, and this happened:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_IBM#1969:_Antitrust,_the_Unbundling_of_software_and_services
>This transformed the customer's value proposition for computer solutions, giving a significant monetary value to something that had hitherto essentially been free.
Later on, Microsoft established itself as the monopoly position of software on all IBM hardware.
And our freedom once again was stolen from us.
Perhaps you are familiar with the Free Software Movement that came as the problems of proprietary software became apparent?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_movement
Do some reading if you are not familiar, perhaps you will learn to understand it as I do.
All these things link together in a way that ensures either corporate or government oppression in one way or another.
We will never be free.
There are too many people. Too many factions. Too many organizations.
And almost all of them seek to control us.

who exactly is pushing the commie meme again?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_shock
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964
>Money supply increases at the same time as the worker base goesfrom 40% of the pop to 90%
Big thinks

>n the context of macroeconomics, it is connected to the "freshwater school" of macroeconomics, in contrast to the saltwater school based in coastal universities (notably Harvard, Columbia, MIT, and UC Berkeley). Chicago macroeconomic theory rejected Keynesianism in favor of monetarism until the mid-1970s, when it turned to new classical macroeconomics heavily based on the concept of rational expectations

"Chicago macroeconomic theory rejected Keynesianism"

I hate this stupid fucking board

The USSR went from a shit hole to a superpower in decades. The US even created a massive campaign to manufacture public compliance to fit their agenda.

you didnt answer the question

and the point isnt to conclude or solve anything. It is the march towards communism that they use to lead their sycophants around. Like leading an ox with a carrot. All the while it walks in a tight circle in a sad pen, turning the cogs of the machine that oppresses it.

Monopolies are pretty simple to deal with. So are multi-generational aristocracies. Most modern oligarchies are government-sponsored though. Look up the leveraged buyout bubble.

if you have to poo in loo
are you free?

They complain about fucking everything... shit gets old.

Gas the shills, board war now.

>But aside from that, the kikes are simply hijacking the "communist movement" to prevent it from beheading them.
oh really kikes are hijacking the communist movement ? (((Karl Marx))) must be turning in his grave

That doesnt matter in todays world because of multinational companies that are tax exempt because of all the corruption

Those same multinationals are the one saying you need communism/socialism

See their trick user?

Ofcourse capitalism and freedom creates huge amounts of wealth, this is why it has been so successful, meanwhile they easily can manipulate countries like china and have huge amounts of wealth while the lower class are basically child slaves, not so easy to do that in america though is it?

>shrinking despite labor shortage

cocksucking lying commies

They pretended to reject keynesianism while accepting all of its basic premises. Milton Friedman's theories were unbelievably fucking retarded one way or the other.

> 1970
> women on now-legal birth controls, getting abortions, entering the workforce en masse
> Gee what happened to wages guise?
Such a mystery.

Attached: 1542124074621.jpg (600x481, 44K)

I drive a truck (cdl) and made 95k this year, with a month to go. There is no "wage supression". If you can't figure it out you are a fucking retard of such epic proportions Pedro deserves your job. Capitalists funded ever "ism" in the modern era. Communism would never have existed without Capitalism, and certainly couldn't survive today without it. Asking for it is like asking for your own death because you haven't figured out how to breath.

Attached: Handi-Man-Living-Color-Wayans-h2.jpg (725x576, 45K)

The majority of people lamenting Millennials are other Millennials.

This generation, and our generation and the boomers have had the easiest lives any human has ever had.

>omg I have so much student debt!
>omg I can’t buy a house!
>omg my wages are to small! I can’t bug loads of cheap plastic shit from china!
Literal first world millennial problems.

I forgot that one en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade

>98% of my states young adult generation should kill themselves since they arent soulless money golem
>a good chunk of the 2% most likely didn’t work for it
>another chunk of that 2% is asian/pooinloo

Get fucked kike, seeking to demoralize the white community with tales of riches that do nothing. You’re salvation is most likely a lost cause.

Attached: 00B45564-8F99-4F60-8EB4-CBD2FA1B0703.jpg (1024x896, 183K)

>Pro-Commie OP
>made by an Australian
Are you all newfags in this thread or what?

Ah yes giant multinational companies are the REAL communists. Thats why the American government and Exxon, Shell, BP, Chevron, etc keep funding coups and conduct economic arfare in Venezuela after they nationalized their oil industry and pump out massive amounts of propaganda against the country to stop anything even remotely left wing influenced in the cradle.

You people are so fucking stupid. You just make shit up and expect everyone to agree with you and provide no evidence or even the slightest shred of evidence for your bullshit.

>6 figure truck driver

There's no studies that suggest switching to the gold standard effected wages. You're arguing correlation=causation. The increase in labor due to the civil rights movement should create more jobs and higher wages according to basic economics. Unless you're saying that you don't believe in capitalist economic theory? In that case what do you believe?

Read Cockshott faggots

Attached: e7e53c28a998c60da729cfb439baa7eebdfca8ba.jpg (1280x1280, 146K)

Zoomers have no convictions or beliefs.
They can't even make decent memes.

Attached: 1530312875486.jpg (376x349, 53K)

Ren Zhengfei

But I don't care. I agree with your underlying point.
>Industrialists ostensibly do not get richer in socialists nations
My point is that industrialists do good things we like to get rich while socialists steal and injure people to get rich. It is good when people get rich by doing good things.

>Monopolies are pretty simple to deal with.
mind expanding on that thought?

>Communism would never have existed without Capitalism, and certainly couldn't survive today without it.
Yes. what the fuck is your point? Marxism is a critique of capitalism. The fuck are you trying to say

Of course some third position retard comes along to correct us all on how we should all just live in a monarcho-communist utopia, because monarchy and communism were both amazingly awesome.

Dont forget immigrants the Hart Cellar Act was Signed in 64

>Those same multinationals are the one saying you need communism/socialism
name one corporation doing this. it's simply capital co-opting social justice. Just read "capitalist realism" your confusion will be washed away

well at the time they were probably more sincere, but those who are puling the strings today use the promise of communism to keep leftwingers in line.

>He doesnt know what the oilfield is.
Just like a fucking warhead to not know 100k a year is average for crude hauling.

China is capitalist

Easy, you break them up and/or force them to drop their conglomerate parts. It's been done many times in the US.

then we show them

Attached: bilderberg.jpg (3434x2959, 2.01M)

they are bad faith communists.

>The fuck are you trying to say
The meme is shit. Pretty easy to understand really.

You've got a point.

Attached: 1539281359495.jpg (381x376, 85K)

>There is no "wage supression
Now THIS is bootlicking. There's just a massive conspiracy involving thosands of people who collect the stats. and the people comparing wages to older times are all just collectively lying?

what the fuck does that even mean
corporations are not in fucking favor of socialism.

I have no problem with communism as long as the parasite is not involved in its organization and management. Because Communism is the solution to their tricks as long as they can't co-opt it.

Yes I understand why you're saying that, but let's forget about the dumb hting you want to talk about and skip to the heart of your point.

In one set of rules group A is heavily rewarded. Under the other group B is heavily rewarded. Group A does good things that make us happy, and group B does bad things that make us sad.
So who would you prefer were the winners?

>dumb as fuck
>drive a truck

Guy in my church is a truckdriver, only one I know that makes six figures doing it. Not a life I would ever want to lead, only way to do it is if you have your own equipment and a good broker, and absolutely no life to lead. Then, its not too hard to make that big money.

why do people defend that though? what makes a self respecting man say "yeh this ok"

>Just read "capitalist realism" your confusion will be washed away
I really hate when you faggots do this. if you cant articulate your point then its futile to even have a discussion.

all groups that don't understand politics is a control of information are doomed.
corruption and misinformation is the underlying cancer that destroyed communism and now capitalism.
future sustainable governments will have absolute mandated transparency in politics and economics.

jesus christ read some foucault already

>Thats why the American government and Exxon, Shell, BP, Chevron, etc keep funding coups
But this has absolutely nothing to do with capitalism thats corruption you absolute retard

Those multinationals that lobby government and make them invade other countries are the ones pushing for communism worldwide, you said it yourself actually, economic warfare against venezuela? What a coincidence that they just turned commie and are now starving?

Fuck mate

Yes, i identify through my gender, and white people are bad and orange man bad and we fix all the worlds problems by giving power back to the political establishment who caused them… pro-gressive.

Attached: 1514829004704.jpg (375x375, 21K)

Through beutal dictatorship and the slaughter of nearly 100 million and the seizure of food and property of every nonjewish citizen. Guess you forgot that part