Does he even understand how economics work?

The US will turn communist in your lifetime. Capitalism will make its last breath with Donald Trumps last term and finally socialism will free the people.

Attached: Flag of communist America.png (900x473, 15K)

>ability to transition to automation
Why haven't they done it already?

Well fed muslims

When shit hits the fan lots of so called patriotic capitalist Americans will demand any measure to ensure their Social Security and Medicare are protected. You can stand there and piss into the wind about how that is communism but people will look out for themselves.

>Capitalism will make its last breath
So communism will make its last breath too? Nice

Attached: 1528251258096.jpg (1120x840, 200K)

Have you even been to Europe?

>capitalist Americans will demand any measure to ensure their Social Security and Medicare are protected.

>people will look out for themselves.
>Social Security and Medicare are protected
>people will look out for themselves.
>Social Security and Medicare are protected
Lol an actual liberal is here. Go away

You are alright, user.

Attached: 1539453563053.png (169x241, 117K)

I tried once but they said i had to come by raft or it would cause too much trouble.

b8 for sure.

And for the people who fall, it's good. But too many cunts just jump because they know they can earn almost as much by not working than by working a minimum wage ft job

>introduce bill to raise the cost of labor for corporation
>impacted corporation cuts jobs to reduce labor costs
>82-IQ mongoloid Wal-Mart employees all replaced by self-check-out in 5 years anyway
>mfw

>too many cunts just jump because they know they can earn almost as much by not working than by working a minimum wage ft job
Yes but he have to burn ourselves to learn. Our leftist say "come on do you really believe anyone would do that."

>socialist
>understands economics

Choose 1

Are you a free trader?

Normal people learn from their mistakes. Smart people learn from other people's mistakes. And of course they would do it, they do it now! So if you increased the incentive....

>Smart people learn from other people's mistakes.
Not smart people still get a vote.

capitalists and the chicago school do not understand how the economy works

they are not looking at reason or data, they are just cheerleaders and faggots in a fantasy world.

If you arent a socialist in 2018 you dont understand economics.

this post should be pinned to the top of Jow Forums at all times

people in favor of free markets do not understand economics. they understand propaganda.

This is the first active step of the Jewish Agenda that will lead to WW3. It begins with mass unemployment of the lower class.

Only a matter of time now.

Attached: 1540430926065.jpg (696x936, 146K)

Well we're in a weird position because minimum wage pays for very little, but most of our highly successful businesses practically model their success solely around having cheap labor. And these businesses get strangleholds on the market, and bust unions. Walmart has historically taken a negative to their profit margins just to undercut competitors, because the company has enough money to outlast someone who can't afford to bring down their prices lower. There is so much wealth behind so few that they can utterly subvert what the free market is all about.

Some peoples job opportunities are literally a choice between Walmart and Target and Home Depot, and that's not actually a choice at all. What we really need is an entirely new job market. But we can't force that. Lower taxes incentivize risk, but at the same time, lower taxes on the wealthiest underscore just how little they're doing to solve the fundamental problem of the lowest not having any mobility or spending power, because the wealthiest aren't going to change their model when it works for their investors.

And that's basically everything about what's going on right now. Employment is up, wages are down, lots of people are poor, and yes, they probably would take the gibs because the minimum wage job is some asshole demanding everything for barely anything in return.

I think in order to change that we need EITHER to change the thinking of wealthiest such that they can be content with poor people being less poor, OR we need to continue to modernize our education system, like teaching programming at a younger age, or improve STEM programs, or encourage Trades, to subvert the hold companies like Walmart have on the worker pool.

>the wealthiest aren't going to change their model when it works for their investors.

>we need EITHER to change the thinking of wealthiest such that they can be content with poor people being less poor, OR we need to continue to modernize our education system

So when you say "modernize", do you mean privatise / semi-privatise? Upgrading the education system to facilitate the need for skilled tech workers seems fookn spensive

I don't know. I think there exists an imperative to make improvements but I have nowhere near the expertise to prescribe how it's done.

Definitely seems expensive, and potentially removes other curricula from students that parents might not approve of. Although, I think by 9th grade in the US you should be allowed to just tell Literature classes to fuck off and take intro to programming classes in their stead. How to afford extra educational avenues, though, yeah dunno.

What if we had a .gov with coding tutorials to supplement schools who can't afford to hire many teachers for this specifically? It seems far easier to do than with other subjects.