How do we stop the threat of China from taking over the world? Also would you support a war against China?

Attached: redpillchina.png (752x4432, 698K)

chinas markets are entering a depression

This

Stop buying their crap.

Western globalist elites (bilderberg cfr) have for last 30 years propped up china because they hatef the christian conservative west, Usa in particular.

Now the atheist plan is almost complete and wests collapse is even faster. China can bribe its leaders because they have no moral values (lack of religion), and soon its too kate for even the globalists to know what happened.

China was tiger that globalist made big and strong, now it is ready to eat their forner masters.

I suggest everyone listens to last thursdays third hour of Alex Jones radio woth Vox day, they were talking of chinas growing power:

rss.gcnlive.com/alexJones/media/2018-11-15_alexjones1115183.mp3

>USA refuses to continue commerce with a communist regime that sees its own citizens as cattle incapable of having human rights, paper dragon collapses on it's own.

The problem with China is that America has built their entire economy, but we are literally funding the enemy. Honestly, I am all in total favor of ended all trade with China Immediately and watching the gooks destroy themselves before their economy is as big a power player as ours

How is it a threat? Imagine all the Nike and Apple jobs we could get.

>Whatever nation demonstrates the most strength deserves to rule.
Good thing China doesn't.
>As long as they don't promote multiculturalism.
Putting all different chinks under the same banner and then calling them "han" is pretty much a mutliculturalism mini.

>Russian-Chinese axis
Lmaoing it this retard.
Go learn chinese, fag.

I already do

Good goy.

china will stop itself. they rely on the US for their livelihoods. They do not have the insight or tenacity to survive even the most basic economic slow down. They will devour each other and/or starve. The """rich""""' chinese will sell off their real estate in the west, to our benefit. Anyone that claims china represents the new hegemony is insane, but to that point i ask would your life be better if China was the supreme super power in the world over us amerifats?

Attached: for real nigga.jpg (900x900, 261K)

They are already attacking India and have set up an airbase in Bhutan so that they can conduct bomber runs on India if they want.

to add to this. i'm an old 37 year old boomer and i've been hearing this "muh china is supreme" since i was in grad school 20 year ago. since then the insects have proven anything but the capability to rule the world. they make money by cannibalizing each other. this should be exploited not admired. FACT!

Attached: xl4c8p444w911.jpg (1200x900, 272K)

>Would you support a war with China?
No, and I don't support any of our current wars.
>Stop China from taking over the world
Why? If you have to choose between being ruled by emotionless Changs vs. the Moloch worshiping, pozzed, Soros Funded multicultural cuckoldry which would you choose?

Ideal situation is that America would stay America, but that can't happen if we keep allowing the mestizo population to grow. But if America can't stay America, then I'd rather become China the Mexico.

destroy the globalists that transferred our civilization to locusts of aisa/africa/latinx amd created superpower asia

Would you rather your grandkids be slant eyed, black, or Muslim? A choice between slants and 3rd worlders is an easy one.

The anglocentric worldview will come to an end and a world centered around China, which is the norm, will come to dominate first Eurasia and then Africa. America should be forgotten and treated like the subhumans at the edges of the civilized world.

Attached: gnomed.jpg (208x355, 19K)

I think you are a Chang, and probably FOB, but I mostly agree with you. I'm white, Christian, and have a family. Changs MIGHT kill me in one of their anti-religious crackdowns, but the kind of globalist pro-Islam left that we have will certainly kill me if they get the chance. 3rd world races seem to hate white people, whereas Changs seem to either like us or just not care about us, so I'm not worried they would kill or persecute me for my race, unlike the immigrants we do have coming in.

Changs are already taking control of Africa and are now starting to make inroads into the shitty mestizo countries.

37 is not a boomer.

>implying insects arent 3rd world parasites

Chinks actually think they got this big by themselves. They were gorging on human flesh right up to the 80s because they didn't have anything to eat. We created superpower China, and we can destroy superpower China. Once we're done with them, they'll be a wasteland with nothing to eat but each other (for the 1000th time in their history).

chinks always lived in fucking shacks farming dirt

In the 80's and 90's they were literally eating fucking roaches and many still have to. They prioritise who gets to eat a fucking worm out of a family of 5.
Then go throw in Mao shit killing everyone and having to survive in a corrupt government system.
I think you are not giving them enough credit for what they have done and have had to do.

Asians were peasant rice farmers prior to 1995.

Yes these (vasall) states will serve China with raw resources and an outlet for excess capital buildup not being used in the homeland. You can see American influences in Africa waning, and fault lines being drawn up been the pro-china camp of countries and those that wish to remain in the US sphere of influence.

China has been around since before the time of Moses, and over all this time they have only grown both in territory and in numbers. The US came into existence in the 1700's, and is rapidly burning out. Trump is quite possibly the last Republican president we will have.

If I have to be overwhelmed by some other race I'd rather it be Asians, who at least have an IQ in the triple digits unlike the Mexicans who peel off people's faces for shits and giggles.

Ask yourself, would you rather have your grandkids be Asians or beaners? At least Asians are good looking, have good food, appreciate order and history, and seem to appreciate our music. Mexicans, blacks, and Muslims don't give a shit about our music or art, and the only thing they are interested in taking from us is our money and (sometimes) our women.

This is China's history
>farm rice for all of human history
>have incredible amount of resources but no intuition to do anything with them
>get addicted to a shit tier drug
>cry and kill a bunch of their own people
>communism, kill more of their own people
>"what if we copy white people?"
>steal idea's, reach 2 billion locusts, but most of them are that stupid that they can only do factory work.

>we wuz invetardz n shiet

they're the same thing: 4+ billion leeches who think they deserve an industrial revolution because they couldn't into civilization the first 2 times. we simply need to euthanize them all

6000 years of nothingness. A race of literal human ants.

The US will fail because it has been disobeying the directives of the Founding Fathers, which is the only way it could have lasted. Being founded on an ideology vs. being an organically developed ethnostate means you can't deviate from that ideology AT ALL and still exist. Though race also makes a difference. Ideology and culture is software whereas race is hardware, and most of the 3rd world people's don't have the hardware necessary to run the software the US was based upon.

Agree about China. I predict they will remove all birth control restrictions and start filling their colonies with their people. Right now they're laying down infrastructure in Africa, and soon they'll start mass farming there which means they won't have to buy food from the US anymore. Even if Africans figure out what's going on they won't be able to do anything about it.

Exterminate shitskins. Then exterminate chinks.

China does not have 5000 years bro. Earliest Chinese dynasty is from 1700BC.

China is overblown as all fuck, it's less than half the age it claims to be and was never some kind of technological marvel land like some people make it out to be
The region where caucasians lived outshone it throughout all of history

also

china was always a backwards shithole, long before communism.

when the British arrived, chinks were still living like they were since the 100 BCE. chinks were 2k yrs behind the Brits!!

all of us are constantly reminded of the fact the chinese culture goes back 5000 years. which means china should have invented the internet about 4500 years ago.

3000 year of dicking around, conquering one another farmfield ad eternam until westerners came around and all those thousand year of hedonism came to bite them up the ass all at once as they had weaponry league ahead of them by then

>37 yo boomer
>grad school 20 yrs ago
17 yo grad student, damn

Attached: bigbrain.jpg (618x494, 52K)

No. African and Amerindian cultures are what thousands of years of nothingness looks like. Not even inventing the wheel, metal working, or a written language. Of course such people can only expect to be colonized by others, and it's no fault but their own.

China is like the tortois, who is slow and steady but wins the race. US will be gone by, or before, the next century, and whatever sort of population remains here will just be carved up by another colonizing power. Hopefully it's Changs that take over and not Muslims once the US is gone.

>t. retard cant into history
china wasnt a civilization, since civilization requires cities and chinkland had no cities-- only semi-permanent primitive settlements

>civilizational development
ignoring the noise from CCP propaganda and comparing Western and east Asian civilization, objectively, based on ancient city footprints, we observe that Western civilization contains more than 4000 ancient cities older than 2000 years and far exceeds east Asia which barely contains a dozen ancient cities. east Asian civilization was a collection of peasant villages that do not even rival the complex network of thousands of large ancient cities of Western civilization

list of ancient, complex european cities with extensive infrastructure still evident

greater than 3k yrs old: Athens, Argos, Santorini, Corinth, Knossos, Mycenae, Cádiz, Siena, Granada, Barcelona, Lisbon, Marseille, Cagliari....

greater than 2k yrs old: Rome, Syracuse, Vienna, London, Lyon, Milan, Naples, Paris, Padua, Augsburg, Córdoba, Venice, Trier, Cologne, Autun, Ypres, Toulouse, Salonika, Speyer, Ravenna, Pozzuoli, Philippi, Marseilles, Messina, Genoa, Worms, Florence, Feodosia, Constantinople, Nuremberg, Bologna, Narbonne, Palermo, Brussels, Dublin, Kiev, Lublin, Leuven, Seville, Plovdiv, Évora, Cork, Béziers...

Madrid, Hamburg, Ghent, Berlin, Amsterdam, Bucharest, Prague, Moscow...

China (or Asia) will rule the world simply by virtue of vastly outnumbering whitey. It's an inevitability. Might not be in a hundred years or two hundred years, but eventually. Unless they all die off or whitey escapes to another planet.

But if there's a silver lining to this terrible end-of-the-world scenario, it's that the way the Asians will eventually treat shitskins, kikes and other garbage races will have them begging for whitey to come back in no time. Compared to the heartless Asian, whitey will be as a benevolent god.

Too little too late though.

>farm rice for all of human history
congrats on not knowing about the longest continues civilization
>have incredible amount of resources but no intuition to do anything with them
Largest economy in world history up until the 19th and 20th century. Plus an internal economy that produces wast amounts of wares that facilitated an almost modern system of payment and financial services which didn't require them to really pay attention or care about the west, which really irked the attention seeking Semites.
>get addicted to a shit tier drug
Yes western jealousy and greed getting a whole nation addicted to drugs is a very white thing to do. They even get their own people addicted to it, all for that sweet profit margins.
>cry and kill a bunch of their own people
What does this even mean.
>communism, kill more of their own people
The hundred years of humiliation ended with Mao Zedong, and the long reach of white imperialism ended.
>"what if we copy white people?"
Independent market dynamics is an eastern invention, nice try you Adam Smith shill.
>steal idea's, reach 2 billion locusts, but most of them are that stupid that they can only do factory work.
The same system westerns idealize is the one that enriches Asia, only difference here is that Asia knows a golden opportunity when it sees it and thus will surpass the decadent and weak west.

i live in a relatively big city but not huge here, and i can tell the amount of chinks opening business here is ridiculous most don't even speak portuguese
whats best the japs absolute hate them and there is an ongoing "business territorial war" on my city between japs and chinks business owners, the media even local doesn't report on it of course and most people in the city doesn't even notice or talk about it except business owners that aren't japs or chinks
AND CHINKS SELL THE WORST FOOD IN THE FUCKING WORLD

You keep operating from the assumption that the US is going to still be around for any significant amount of time. It's not.
>Areas where caucasians lived
Did you know that parts of western China used to be peopled with white Indo-European peoples (Tocharians, Pamiri)? They took it over from them because they needed more land, and there was nothing those people could do to stop it.

If you want to compare whites to Asians, we tend to progress in spurts but also go through dark ages, whereas they tend to progress slowly but are much more stable. Today we are facing an unprecedented problem, because we're headed toward a dark age, but we don't have birthrates which are anywhere near replenishment and the barbarians that are invading us are all different races as opposed to other groups of white people.

What genetic path would you rather have for your bloodline? Staying white probably isn't an option. IF you have to choose between Asian, beaner, or Muslim which do you choose?

see China being the oldest "civilization" is the most hilariously retarded meme I’ve ever seen pushed en masse. They’ve been conquered, colonized, and revolutionized a hundred times. If the US were to be conquered (lol), then they just decided to start calling the invaders American and add them to our list of dynasties, everyone would think it’s the most pathetic fucking thing they’ve ever seen. Yet China gets conquered by illiterate nomads who slaughter millions of them, and they just say “Oh boy, looks like a new Dynasty has begun!”
I’m not sure why it is that Egypt and China are the only places that get this treatment. When Phillip II conquered Greece, it didn’t become “a Greek dynasty”. When the Persian empire took the place of the Assyrian Empire, they didn’t get to claim that they were still the same society as before.

chinks never had permanent stone cities, which is the foundation of civilization!!

TL;DR, the modern Chinese Society is as old as 1949 at the very latest, quit LARPing

Every so-called conqueror of China integrated into the already pre-established culture, rule, and conduct. You don't see the Mongolians or the Manchu imposing their cultural and civilizational spirit will onto the Chinese, then submit to the Chinese and become part of them and part of it. They change to it, not the other way around.

>mongoloids usher in the dark ages

mongoloids chink raids asia, setting off a domino effect of westwards fleeing and invading that culminates in the hun invason if europe, which plunges europe into the dark ages

Why should I be impressed with ancient Chinese history? They established basic culture -not even civilization - so they are better than abos, granted, but their culture was stuck in early neolithic state that lacked permanent cities, subtlety and never developed to a mature phase. China remained at an early stage of culture and became ossified there.

Compare the institutions of the Roman Republic with Chinese institutions at any time over the following 2000 years. China never developed a more subtle form of government than direct totalitarian autocracy. Compare their tax collection systems. The Chinese state operated entirely through the subordination of its people and not through clever mechanisms which encouraged enterprise and original thought.
And where is China's profound philosophical tradition? Taoism is the greatest Chinese contribution to abstract thought and it doesn't hold a candle to Zoroaster or the Vedic tradition or Platonism.

>>farm rice for all of human history

Chinese civilization started in Northern China and their staple grain was millet which is a wheat. As they expanded, they conquered more lands including Southern China which is warm enough to grow rice. But in Northern China, they eat wheat.

>no intuition to do anything with them
Ummmmm, they created the Chinese empire which was larger than any European empire prior to the 1500s.

Attached: china vs europe_map_01.png (1600x1091, 631K)

How many boxes checked so far?

Attached: Anti-Chinese NPC propaganda template 2.0.jpg (1000x1462, 456K)

Now you're just being subjective.
>All of Europe added together had more ancient cities than China
If you're going to make this comparison then you should compare China vs. an individual country.
Pic related shows current state of "European" cities.

The fact is we have no future. You can't have western civilization without westerners. It would be better for China to take over rather than to have North America fall into the hands of the Mexicans or western Europe into the hands of Muslims and Africans.

The only white countries that will exist in the next century will be Eastern European (Russia, Hungary, Poland).

Most of those other places you mentioned will be bulldozed by 3rd worlders and there won'y even be any evidence left that they ever existed.

Attached: Paris then and now.jpg (588x767, 151K)

China has been the "asian superpower that's going to take over the world" for pretty much all of its history.
It never happens because they're a fucking failure that lacks the spark to do something important and only has numbers.
Even without mongols or Communism, they'll stumble into some retarded shit and crumble back into being a shithole once again.

Han is a artificial social construct

Han are rapebabies of Mongols, Manchus, Jurchens, Japs, Gokturks, Xioungu, Xianbei, Qiang, Tanguts, Khitans, Qing, Yuezhi, Wu, Thai, Viet, Bai, Naxi, Min, Yue, Zhang, Zhuang, Miao, Yi, Tujia, Tibetans, Bajia, Lai, Deng, Gejia, Akha, Hani, Lahu, Buyi, Chams, Utsul, Waxiang ...

"China" is a myth. Its been a single country for roughly 200 yrs out of its 3000 yr existence. The biggest single chunk of china being "a country" has been from WWII onwards.

China is the accidental by-product of post-WWII monetary and security policies of the west. The slightest lapse of support, it will fragment again into dozens of different enclaves.

Long term shorting of the Renminbi is perhaps the highest returning trade that can be made these days. Onpar with bitcoin in the possible returns.

>Vedic
>one of these is not like the other
Poo you need to go back and fight China

Alright you're obviously one of those people stuck in the 19th century that unironically use the term "Dark Ages" but we'll look past that for now:

Other point that you seem to think that ancient civilization isn't impressive because its... basic? Basic compared to what exactly? You bring up the example of contemporary Rome that shows you how to NOT rule and empire to build and long-lasting success(mostly due to trade not really being a thing in between provinces and the central authority of the empire not doing anything to alleviate this and thus having the the whole empire fall apart but on that another time).

In comparison, china has virtually 0 complex ancient cities with extensive infrastructure that is still evident, not even beijing has ancient city infrastructure and remnants!

yes, Europe went thru thousands of wars, yet thousands of ancient Western cities still have ancient buildings! China was always a glorified collection of primitive peasant rice farming villages and 1 hive queen in the shitty Imperial village to control them. Based on European standards, China never had an ancient settlement to even qualify as a city.

europe has 1000s of ancient cities with ancient permanent buildings

china has ZERO

china was never a civilization, just a peasant village culture

I take issue with an american using the term "rape baby" when your average american can trace his lineage back to 25 different countries in Europe. Real melting pot of the ratchet, the poor, and the stupid.

A civilization is a complex society characterized by urban development (cities with permanent structures), social stratification imposed by a cultural elite, symbolic systems of communication (for example, writing systems), and a perceived separation from and domination over the natural environment

A city is permanent settlement with complex infrastructure (ie Ancient Athens). Cucuteni-Trypillian settlements contained a population of more than 100k, but was made of wood and burnt down frequently, and was thus a settlement, due to temporary structures.

Cucuteni-Trypillian is considered a culture (not a civilization), since it contained dense semi-permanent settlements.

This applies to China as well.

Assuming these chinese villages are "cities" they are still very few, inferior, and sparse to even compare or rival the 10000s of complex European cities.

You know people can see that you are a bot with txt. file and you just randomly post sentences out of it.

>europe has 1000s of ancient cities with ancient permanent buildings

china has ZERO

The forbidden city in Beijing was built in early 1400's and is still standing. In the same city that predates it and is still standing.

Stop buying Chinese shit.

Chinks are eternal cucks and suck White cocks

2 out of the last 3 dynasties of China were ruled by foreign conquerors. Let that sink in. TWO out of the last THREE. Even before the Mongols came along, the northern half of China was ruled by foreign conquerors for almost 700 years. In fact, the Jin dynasty that the Mongols conquered was already ruled by foreign conquerors (called the Jurchens) who themselves had replaced another dynasty of foreign conquerors (called the Khitans) to become the rulers of the northern half of China. Keep in mind that the northern half of China is the more important half, as it contains the heartland of China while the south was originally a frontier land. Khitans and Jurchens alone brutally enslaved Chinks for more than 300 years.

Even the Tang dynasty, considered the golden age of China, originated from foreign-ruled dynasties. After the fall of the Han dynasty, the northern half of China was repeatedly conquered by various foreign invaders for almost 300 years during a time of total chaos and suffering. The foreign "barbarians" came in wave after wave, replacing previous conquerors and running a train of rape and destruction on the enslaved Chinese population. As a result, the Chinese who lived in the northern half of China were completely mongrelized after suffering almost 3 centuries of nonstop rape by all those different foreign ethnicities. Genuine Han Chinese no longer existed in the northern half of China by that point, only larpers with fabricated genealogies remained. Eventually, one of the northern barbarian-ruled dynasties conquered the rest of China and then transitioned into the Tang dynasty. The rulers of Tang were ethnic Xianbei (Scythian royalty) who larped as Han Chinese. The Tang dynasty may have been culturally sinicized, but most of its population including the rulers and the elite had already been racially mongrelized by hundreds of years of rape and enslavement by hordes of different barbarians

Why are you going on about genuine Han Chinese I never brought that argument up, this is about civilization and the prevalence of that within Chinese society. What are you going on about?

>China conquered by illiterate nomads
Yes, and they came out of it and eventually reestablished themselves.
We are being conquered by illiterate nomads right now.
>calling the invaders America
The difference is that there was no demographic replacement with China, just a change in the ruling class. In the next century people won't even be speaking English here, and whites will be a minority by 2040.

Attached: 2018 Invasion.jpg (1200x801, 229K)

>Wtf?
>Sees flag
Nice try, Wang.

Also those people were minorities. Not like America and Europe where wholescale population replacement is going on.

Send some jews over there

Attached: FEB9BF33-B70A-43FD-A5A2-0A9BBF783017.jpg (742x1024, 236K)

>chinks have no ancient permanent cities (over 2k yr old) like Europe does
>chinks built in early 1400's
thanks for proving the point, mongoloid

china had over 20X the population of the west, but has less than 1/100th of the civilizational footprint of the west...

the west is covered with thousands of ancient cities that retain the ancient infrastructure

the east is a wasteland, void of any ancient civilizational footprint

China has been a backwords shithole for a couple of thousand years. A civilization? I don't think so. Even the Chinese don't trust the Chinese

Go to hell, fingoloid chink. Your ancestors were raped and enslaved for thousands of years. Chinks are an eternal slave race.

It scares me. China is taking over Africa, taking over the south china sea, and have significant influence in new zealand, australia and canada. And its like nothing is being done about it.

Feels comfy bros.

Attached: 2000px-One-belt-one-road.svg.png (2000x1344, 472K)

moving the westerners industries on china to brazil

Attached: 44262501_1055057271338454_6994141073719164928_n.jpg (720x721, 50K)

If you can't understand Xi Jinping Thought you aren't allowed to have Chinese Citizenship.

Attached: 1-e21f7774b2.jpg (903x1444, 753K)

>Dark ages
Europe has had mutliple dark ages, but usually recovered because there were healthy birthrates and no demographic replacement.
>no civilization
All that's required to have a civilization is: 1) written language, 2)cities, 3)social stratification/specialization of labor
China was more advanced than Europe at many stages, particularly after the fall of Rome, and it's going to be more advanced than Western Europe once it become the next Caliphate.

>Roman Republic
Is gone. Just like the English Empire. A lot of what you are calling "the west" is actually postwestern.

>Vedic
OK so you're a Pajeet. That explains why you hate China so much, but I don't see how India has contributed more to world civilization than China. Both are very ancient civilizations. India has more freedom than China but China is more organized and cleaner. I'd even rather be taken over by Pajeets than Mexicans but you guys will never take over because you have no lust for conquest or power.

man, you couldn't find it in better resolution? I actually read it, and if followed by letter, it could lead to some great results. Lots of talks about how to govern and be mindfull of science, innovation. Too many metaphors though.

Why should we stop them? Authoritarian Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics will prove itself to be a more viable political-economic system than Liberal Democratic Capitalism, why not embrace their takeover of the world?

its gonna be glorious.

Attached: mlk.jpg (540x720, 68K)

I'd fuck up china just to liberate the doggos, they're the real victims here. Could care less about bug men

14/88

I have ancestors from 5 different countries but none of it was rape. In the past the US relied heavily on immigration from Europe to bolster it's population and expand west. Europeans came to the US because they had more freedom and breathing room, and there were no handouts. People who didn't want to assimilate, speak English, dress like eveyone else, etc., were ridiculed and shamed so everyone who wanted to come here ended up being an American. Since all the immigrants were European then by the next generation the only difference between immigrant children and the host population was the last name. Now we're in a huge problem because of the non-European immigration which are still different no matter how much time goes by. So the question is who is going to be in charge, because we aren't all the same. So if I have to be a minority among some other race, I'd rather it be among Asians who at least have clean cities and don't commit as many violent crimes.

Boomers have sold this country out to them and they're doing the same to many others around the world. Imagine if there were over 1 Billion Ashkenazis, that's the situation the world has now.

Authoritarian Capitalism is already slowly replacing liberal democratic capitalism around the world even in some nations with minimal Chinese interference. They're winning the "soft" power games.

this

brudda

Attached: mybeautifulson.jpg (1280x960, 178K)

this is what the cyberpunk genre warned about. Notice how some people recently tried to redefine cyberpunk to be a good thing.

Social stratification doesn't have to be artifically imposed or require elites, it's the inevitable outgrowth of natural inequalities that exist between people. In savage tribes there isn't stratification because most of them have low IQ to begin with and can't innovate or build.
>differences in construction
You're still trying to split hairs. The real judge of a civilization's strength is it's ability to endure and continue. You're absolutely delusional if you think that Africans, Amerindians, and Muslims have the will or wherewithall to continue western civilization after we are gone. Better to be absorbed by the Changs where at least my Y chromosome will continue, and my progeny will still be able to marry beautiful women if they want to.

>are white cucks
So if I have to be buried up to the neck by some other race then I'd rather it be a race who likes me and not one who hates me and wants to steal my shit.

The fact that China was taken over by foreigners and still managed to come out of it with their culture and population intact is a positive thing not a negative. What do you think will happen to Germany when it becomes mostly Turk or the US when it becomes mostly Muslim?

are you implying chinese do not steal?

>liberal democratic capitalism
Is not going to last anyways once Muslims, Africans, or Mexicans take over.
Also we have to think about our bloodlines. Would you rather have your grandkids be a minority among Changs, or 3rd worlders who never figured out how to make wheels on their own?

I think Eastern Europe can and probably will remain European/white. Not so the United States or Western Europe.

Well even though China is nominally communist they don't have a system of gibz and they aren't as likely to shoot me for my wallet or peel my face off for lulz as the beaners are.

moldy desolation, infested by deathly chinks, morbidly stares at you everywhere in China. In spite of their infinite locust numbers, the Chinese are without doubt the most slipshod people on earth. The common huts are always about to fall to pieces, a not infrequent occurrence. Their roofs leak, and the mud walls are usually cracked and partly knocked to pieces. Mending anything before the imminent danger of its falling upon his head, or upon his livestock (a more important concern), would be unthinkable to a Chinese. Even the premises of the well-to-do are almost invariably in an advanced state of disrepair, though the family has an abundance of money for eating chink babies. Many tourists who have fed their imagination on vague ideas of Eastern splendors have failed to delimit the geographical applications, and expect to find in China the sort of man-made glories that belong to Aryan-built India. China has no temples to compare with those to be seen elsewhere in the Orient. The pagodas are impressively primitive and weak, most of them are crumbly affairs, with no stonework or decoration of any special quality. They are simply towers in the primitive Chink manner.

The blending of intricacy with magnitude, as seen in Aryan-built India and Roman North Africa, is nowhere in China evident. Their best structure, as a spectacle of art, would not rank 1000th place compared to what Aryan-built India produced in the seventeenth century, or Europe, or the Byzantine Empire before its final decline. The average Chinese temple, a mangy affair with low roof and wooden beams, has no art about it to speak of, and inside and out is less impressive than an ordinary chop suey joint. The walls of Peiping, built by conquerors of the Chinese, make a profound impression for somber, square-faced immensity.

you say a lot of shit you know that

Well I have to go. I still think you're just angry because of them attacking India, so I'll just leave you with these videos to make my arguments for me:
youtube.com/watch?v=tl0Bo4GKQ-U

youtube.com/watch?v=DHZoW1Dqclc

It's not shit. You can't have western civilization without westerners. Westerners will be a minority in the US by 2040, and after that there's no going back. See videos I posted:

>Also would you support a war against China?
no, that would be stupid
in any case, Russia is a much larger threat
-t Crimea

You take back all of America's industry and jobs that Obama had given to China. Then the American's bomb the living shit out of them and all of America's enemies.

They've been saying this and that about the Chinamen. Yet they keep being a threat. The problem with you westerners especially white fellas, is you like to indulge yourself in Jewish fables and watch Jewish interracial nigger porn. You view yourself as people with high moral ground. Promoting trivial matters like equality and "liberal" democracy. While the Chinamen is a cunning villain that keeps winning. If the price to be a social justice warrior is to have declining white demographics. I rather be the bad guy.

Attached: cao.webm (720x400, 2.91M)

This
Both are ludicrously overpopulated
Make em butt heads and see what happens

>force god to give us all big dicks

what font is this?

>How do we stop the threat of China from taking over the world?
Too late, it's happening.
>Also would you support a war against China?
It's happening anyways.

The blending of intricacy with magnitude, as seen in Aryan-built Roma Magna, is nowhere in China evident. Their best structure, as a spectacle of art, would not rank 1000th place compared to what Aryan-built India produced in the 17th century, or Europe, or the Roman Empire before its final decline. The average Chinese temple, a mangy affair with low roof and wooden beams, has no art about it to speak of, and inside and out is less impressive than an ordinary chop suey joint. The walls of Peiping, built by conquerors of the Chinks, make a profound impression for somber, square-faced immensity

But there the effect is perhaps as much from the spirit of history about them and from the setting as from the walls themselves. City walls at large in China were never anything impressive as works of art or architecture, being usually of roughly fitted mud for a frame with a dirt filter. the Chink apogee of architectural spirit did not exceed that of subsaharans. Certainly it came nowhere near that of Athens. One of the most surprising features of Chinese architecture is that outstanding permanent monuments of any kind are scarce. Their temples in their heyday were rarely built for permanence, and accordingly no very old ones are to be seen. Nothing in Chink records indicates that any particularly fine ones ever existed. The traveler looking for signs of antiquity in China will not find many in their buildings. Where Rome and Greece abound with really noble edifices standing recognizable after more than two thousand years, China has none. For a land where building stone was plentiful in areas of foremost culture, this is a strange inconsistency. Possibly their veneration for the past banished all desire to memorialize themselves for posterity in architecture. But it is odd, with their respect for graves, that no notable mausoleums were built in the past, as in the West, despite an equal abundance of cheap or free labor.

thekbh.org/waysdark.htm