I hereby propose a Bill Before Congress OR an Executive Order OR a Judicial Injunction which will remove and outlaw the inclusion of any reference to political parties on the voting ballot.
The party system has no Constitutional basis and was specifically warned against by Washington. They are privately owned and operated corporations, unaccountable to even their own members, as demonstrated by the DNC's conspiracy of sabotage against Bernie Sanders, and the complete absence of meaningful consequences for it.
Those who cannot or will not show the agency to know the fucking names of the people they want to vote for should not be missed. It's not even like you have to memorize the names, just write them down beforehand or even look them up on your phone while in the booth. But, as demonstrated by studies on the removal of straight-ticket voting (which requires you to check each position's candidate individually rather than checking a single D or R at the top, requiring literally thirty seconds longer) low agency voters (read: niggers) are extremely easily discouraged.
Tax payer dollars being spent on the ink to print those Ds and Rs grants an unearned illusion of legitimacy to these divisive tools of the kikes. There is no reason why finding out a person's feelings about abortion should automatically tell me their feelings on gun control, their stance on environmentalism reveal their stance on immigration, their position on weed legalisation predict their position on corporate tax rates. And yet, for 90% of voters, knowing just one of those reveals ALL the others. This in spite of the fact that the stances they "choose" run from ideologically inconsistent to plainly contradictory.
To end the party system would be a major win in the war to set free the NPCs, and this is the first step.
"Freeing" the NPCs is, of course, fundamentally impossible. If you were watching that meme start you'll remember it initially had nothing to do with liberals or SJWs. It was only when the BuzzFeed tier "journalists" who lurk here started putting out triggered articles about dehumanization that it took that context.
Really it's a neurological state, and no Psy op will change that. But if you ask what purpose this serves, I say that the NPCs are serving as useful idiots (as they always will for somebody.) But the two party system is an extremely simple program for them to run. More complex programs will lead to higher rates of malfunction, turning useful idiots into useless idiots.
Most liberals I know only vote based on party. They can’t even say what those candidates platforms are. I agree with this proposal.
Michael Anderson
For all the liberalist brainlets who might think (or disingenuously claim) that I’m trying to call in the feds to ban the parties:
Since the parties (or, more accurately, the uniParty plus assorted meme parties) are private corporations, it is impossible to ban them without undue curtailment of freedom of association and other essential liberties. But this plan harms none of these. It simply regulates public property: the ballot.
This tiny, eminently legal change involves no expansion of federal power. In fact, it reduces it. The presence of those Ds and Rs stands as the federal government running advertisements for private corporations IN THE FUCKING VOTING BOOTH. Any right thinking American should consider this a sacrilege.
That said, this is no mere token gesture. The end result of such a small change would be a crippling blow to the grip of the uniParty. In the absence of plain direction on how to remain loyal to D or R, the NPCs of both simply choose not to vote, for fear of choosing wrong. This is a proven fact of the psychology of gambling: Most people hate losing more than they love winning.
We can already see this play out in judicial and other non(explicitly)partisan positions. They receive a fraction of the amount of total votes received by the big ticket positions, despite being on the very same ballot.
The NPCs, both D and R, will voluntarily remove themselves from the electoral gene pool. They'll still show up to vote for the virtue signalling points, but they'll restrict themselves to the big ticket items they get blasted with advertisements for and told how to think about.
It is in the down ballot that this plan will truly bear fruit. With severely lowered voter "turnout" (again, despite being on the very same piece of paper as the high "turnout" positions) the lower positions will be far more susceptible to the will of numerically and financially inferior, but informationally and energetically superior 3rd parties. As demonstrated by the Tea Party strategy of the Koch Brothers; pound-for-pound, dollar-for-dollar; you get the most bang for your buck national-influence-wise by going hard on the down ballot. I have no love for the Tea Party, let alone the Koch's, but this is a strategy we can learn from.
>But humans will never get along in a multicultural society.
Don't I fucking know it. A side benifit to this: the escalation and acceleration of Identity Politics. Pic fucking related, the spic is the incumbent, the gook some /our lunatic/ who has never even been a judge.
In the absence of Ds and Rs telling you how to vote (as in this judicial election) people just vote for whichever name sounds most like their in group. Except liberal Whites, like those in Seattle. With no Whites in this contest, the (((establishment))) is worried all the other gooks in Seattle, plus however many White's decide Asians are more benign towards their interests than beaners, will be enough to get the insane dude who has raised $0 for his campaign in over the spic who has raised hundreds of thousands.
Another case is a California Senate candidate, Kevin de Leon. His father's a chink, his mother a squatemalan. He actually changed his name to de Leon to be more appealing to Cali beaners on sight of name alone.
This proposal will ensure minority majority areas, and cucked whites' areas will henceforth elect only the most unWhite sounding names. No more cucked-but-competent whites in charge. Let the lunatics run the asylum, accellerate their collapse, as uncucked white's reel back in horror and circle the wagons around the parts of this country that can still be salvaged.
>But the Jews will still own every politician or atleast the important ones
Very true. At first.
One of their main instruments of control is domination of down ballot positions, since most voters pick by Ds and Rs. Aspiring politicians start there, and they know they have no chance on their own merit, so they join one of the plantations. Then come the compromises.
The realistic ability to run for town dog catcher as an unaffilliated will give us a whole farm league of up and coming 3rd partyists. We have to start there
>TL:DR >thinks congress will give a fuck about his autistic bill limiting party power
I'll post in your thread, but honestly it's kind of boring.
Lucas Hernandez
You are naive if you think any "real reform" would ever happen without copious bloodshed. If Trump doesnt give us 90% of what he said he would get done by 2020 I am going to put my every waking second into getting as many people as possible to vote for God. I bet even a serious number of libshits could be convinced to do so out of spite.
Austin Williams
I'm going to buy property in the country and abstain as much as I can from society. I don't want to be in the cities when shit goes down.
Aaron Torres
Can you at least try not to use reddit spacing while shitting up my thread?
I've been periodically shilling this idea for the past week now. At first all I came up with was the OP. The others were addressing arguments and criticisms from Anons, which have helped me make a stronger case. This board isn't completely useless. Yet.
As I say in the OP, I can see this working through any of the 3 branches. Least of all Congress. But the next step of the plan is to clean it up and shill it on lefty forums with the same self evaluating process I've done here. I'm certain this will appeal to Bernie Sanders fans, if not the disingenuous kike himself.
Good. Keep doing this. If I see this thread as I browse pol in the future I will bump it. But if i had a permanent place to participate with this idea... i could do more "work" for it.
Imagine being such an NPC as to think democracy can be fixed.
Nathan Martin
Oh no. The whole point is to rob low-information, low-agency, low-energy voters of any means of identifying a candidate as Team D or Team R. I suspect that will primarily help Team R, which I hold is the better team, as dumbass boomers are more likely to show the initiative to get their shit together enough to write down the list of candidates they want than the Team D dumbasses, minorities.
But that's incidental. My main goal is to increase the ability of third parties and unaffiliateds to get down ballot positions. And hopefully NPCs of both sides, when they are forced to type into google: "I am a member of Team X, tell me exactly how to vote" will have a horrifying moment of clarity.
You’re going against the status quo pretty hard user. You’re also putting a lot of faith into regular people not completely fucking this up. That said the idea is solid on paper, writing, typing, whatever. Keep it up and you’ve got another supporter
(((Judicial))): A lawsuit against FEC for putting ADVERTISEMENTS for PRIVATE CORPORATIONS on PUBLIC PROPERTY. As many recent (((cases))) have shown, if a judge finds a suits political aims sympathetic, he can issue a Nationwide Injunction. These apparrently can overrule laws passed by Congress as well as decisions made by the COMMANDER IN CHIEF on issues directly related to National Security, or even who he lets into his own fucking house.
Till now, only the left has used this weapon. And, indeed, conservative judges, by their very nature, are disinclined to exercise such obvious overreach. But this could be the case where one decides to hit back. As the left does, we would have to carefully examine which district to file the suit in to maximize our chances of drawing a sympathetic judge, and file multiple suits till we get /our guy/. One of those crazy Texas Libertarian types.
If we can get an injunction, it goes to the Supreme Court, where I (a complete nonlawyer) think we'd have a chance. At the very least it would put nationwide attention on the issue, and get thoughtless people thinking.
(((Legislative))): Rewriting the proposal so as to be most appealing to the particular sensibilities of the best established and least persona non grata of the 3rd parties.
Playing up the aforementioned separation of public and private entities could work with Libertarians. The DNC fucking Bernie and the impending Pelosi Speakership can be used on Socialists who increasingly want to splinter, but puss out at the fear of spoiling ala Jill Stein. Trumpists (closest to NatSoc we've got) are the least motivated since their seeming hijacking of Team R, but the sabotage of Trump's agenda for the 2 years they held all 3 branches, and the impending 2 years of gridlock might give them the kick needed.
For all 3 the appeal of breaking uniParty stranglehold of downballot positions will be enticing.
I have no illusions this will pass through Congress, but if we could get a single Rep or Senator to propose the bill, and God willing get an across the aisle cosponsor, it could give the issue the attention needed for the third option.
?(((?Executive?)))?: A previous user suggested starting a petition at change.org, and while that certainly couldn't hurt, I don't think that site has ever achieved anything and I don't think Trump has ever even heard of it, let alone hold himself to the Obama rule of paying lip service to any petition that got X signatures.
But /our boy/ is much easier and effectively reached; through /our guy/ Tucker Carlson.
This seems like the kind of thing he'd go for, and only he among all MSM talking heads. He really likes running pieces on the meta of politics while all the others discuss the minutiae of daily "bombshells." The rest are just cheerleaders for the uniParty. But if his attention can be gotten (through a lawsuit, through a bill before Congress, through direct emails to him) and he runs a story on it, Trump will see it, and I believe he's pissed enough at the GOP right now to throw a fucking grenade into the whole Party system via an Executive Order.
This will obviously be challenged, and from there it goes to the Supreme Court, where I truly believe it can win, especially with our increasingly Originalist majority.
Personally I think it won't do a damn thing. Embarrassing the nature that political parties are a thing and redesigning the system around them would be more productive.
Voter participation is already so low I. The US. You're setting us up for only informed voters of reasonable intelligence & community investment to have a say. What do you think this is nigga, a republic???
Tyler Russell
Based
Jason Parker
cato and his ilk all have frescos of little boys. It really gets jupiters cock throbbing
Ian Robinson
Its funny, isn't it? The optimates can easily be compared to neocons, the populares/julians to Trump (or even berniebro) When do we cross the Rubicon?
when the traitors to the republic let the gauls in and give them the right to vote and property and true sons of rome are reduced in number.
Luis Smith
Pedarasty was the sexbots of their day, sent roasties into a rage that the men could relieve themselves elsewhere. Does this intimidate you, you wretched woman?
That Isn't how the empire began. That's how the empire died.
Dylan Hernandez
a man who turned his back on the gods. speak no more tyrant. the republic shall endure
Zachary Baker
junos cunt. youre right i stand before you humbled senators.
Hudson Williams
But that is how our Republic is dying and soon come the Dark Ages. Or, we can steal the thunder of the barbarians by killing the Republic ourselves and ushering in an Empire.
I'm at a loss. I have literally no idea how you could have come away from reading anything in this thread thinking that that was a rational reply. What in the fuck did you mean by this?
R and D will print ballot guides to voting straight party line as they already do in jurisdictions that don't print parties on the ballot itself or for certain offices that are supposed to be non-partisan. This change will help the free gibs candidates which you are transparent about supporting. Neck yourself.
Andrew Reyes
Take a look at the "Voter turnout" in elections without specific Ds and Rs. Much lower than "turnout" for the big name positions people hear on tv, despite the same number of people "turning out." This in spite of Rs and Ds already printing and mailing voter guides to their masses. The low information, low agency voters (read: NIGGERS) self exclude. This will get gibs monkeys out of the way, you disingenuous nigger. Or did you only read the OP?
Kayden Bennett
"Disproportionately harms PoC voter turnout" is unironically the grounds on which they challenge the removal of straight ticket voting (mentioned in OP) which requires you to check each position's candidate individually rather than checking a single D or R at the top, requiring literally thirty seconds longer.
The sad part is it's true. Nogs will register to vote, get their state ID, drive to polling place, wait in line, go into the booth, see they have to check each box instead of just one, and say fug it and go home. This has been demonstrably proven with statistics and shit. That's how I know my proposal will work and you should kys.
