US could lose a war to china and russia

>US could lose a war to china and russia
is this true?

nationalpost.com/news/world/u-s-military-could-lose-a-war-against-china-or-russia-a-study-found?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=recommended_articles

Attached: you either die.jpg (706x471, 110K)

I’m not reading that shit, but none of those counties could successfully occupy each other in an all out non-nuclear war.

Non nuclear war with US and Russia teaming up as well as backstabbed by UN/NATO

OK lets say US military loses, How do you deal with the 200 million well armed and not wantin to be fuck with people?
>hur der nuke em kek kek kek
And cause global winter for hundreds of years and massive world wide fallout? ya nah.
You cant do shit, we win.

I'm starting think these outlets are just posting this because they have sponsors in the military industry and it would be profitable for those sponsors if people started believing this shit.

Attached: 1528382855846.jpg (400x400, 23K)

>>US could lose a war to china and russia

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 103K)

why do you think logic is applied when waging global scale war, its purely an endeavor of ambition and pride

like what 4d chess or something, they military lies and says it needs more money and increases profit for weapon companies

Talks about war between the super powers is not a fruitful conversation.

All three are intelligent nations that put their interests first. War amongst the three is not in their best interests, regardless of who’s provoking.

Landscapes change, Nations adapt, so do alliances and priorities. Who’s to say if America attacks Russia or China directly the alliance between the two doesn’t change? Like wise if one of the other two nations attack America. We have already seen China change their Stance on North Korea when America was applying pressure to them.

Point is their self interests guide their actions, and it is not fixed, even if laws and alliances have been established.

If we are talking military strength and experience then America hands down still has the upper hand.

If we are talking military budget America ,wins by a long shot

If we are talking about military technology, I urge you to consider what The super powers are NOT releasing to the public.

And if we are talking current alliances that have their interests aligned with Superpowers, America wins at that too.

The only option left is mutual destruction.

Because I look at it from my perspective and from where I'm sitting we cant lose, the American people are the largest armed force that has ever existed, combined we out number every military on the planet put together and are better equipped than most, and to destroy us with current technology would be to destroy the planet. That our pride bitch.

but then you are confident to negate the findings of ex pentagon members who formed a bipartisan comitee to neutralize bias and still say it can happen and also how can you confidently say you have any idea what russia or china are hiding, also nuclear wrfare is understandably out of the question if there is ANY logic apllied

>need an excuse to start building lots of gear
>create an excuse to build lots of gear

we already knew we'd lose to rice farmers, throw in some vodka niggers and of course we'd be toast

>US lose a war
The US has been at war forever if we were comparing using actual combat experience everyone else is a baby

Attached: you-are-like-a-little-baby-watch-this-1608659.png (500x522, 96K)

Leaf you never get to speak about military matters after Kandahar, fuck you you're the new French for 100 years

Attached: IMG_9553.jpg (172x294, 20K)

Lol.... anyone loosing war to China AHAHAH what a joke! They are cowards as hell. Even Czechs are more brave than rice people. Last war They had 7 china men vs 1 japan soldier and They had 1KIA per 125 surrenders. Meanwhile, in Europe it was 1 KIA for every 3 surrenders.
Russia on the other hand is different story.

>Low IQ boomer arguement

>Be China
>Land first Jet on Air Craft Carrier 7 years ago
>US did this in 40's
>Be Russia
>Have 1 Carrier the Admiral Steamruskbuckdt
>Lose battle with dry dock
>Be USA
>Be USA
Yeah I think we're good niggerjew; jigger, if you will

>Low IQ
>arguement

Is this before or after we kill the kikes

>You really think a group of lifelong federal employees reliant on ever increasing defense spending would just tell lies?

Surely not.

>how can you confidently say you have any idea what russia or china are hiding

Unless it's an entirely reworked logistical chain for China or a reason to commit suicide by panicked NATO neighbors for the Russians, it's fine.

Attached: 1530105315492.jpg (636x631, 68K)

>American soldiers use tik tok to flex on people about being in the army

I think so user

No. China could not beat Japan in a naval conflict and russias already shit army is shrinking to half it's size in less than a decade

the first point u made is possible the second is meaningless

The Normandy beach landing was a success. So I'd say anything is possible.

Quality of construction in china is beyond trash.
The only way China will beat anyone is by drowning their opponents in a river of their own blood.

wew bit of a reach
not aware of that

Depends on what the bankers tell your government (gubment) to do

The US military has been fighting muslim guerrillas for the past 15 years and has built equipment exclusively for fighting them. They've slacked on equipment to fight near peers. American doctrine has always been to be ready to fight two wars at the same time; they're failing with the near peer scenario. This is not a MIC whine fest for gibs. The Chinese will overtake us technology wise by 2030 some areas if we don't beef up our R&D.

>china isn't at war with the US already
I'm just curious what kind of backhanded tactics the chinese will use. If history teached us one thing it's the us will be unprepared for terrorist attacks as long as the (((right))) people will profit out of it.

True, and they will lose badly.

im always worried about the comfort of the ruling class, if america is taking it easy and china has full control of the nation and puts its objectives first, they could have stumbled upon something new by now

You are losing the war in Afghanistan, Syria and Yemen.

China has already won the economic war with America. They own the Democrats and are getting away with being colonialists, currency manipulators and the world's biggest polluters.

The Chinese cannot beat America in terms of technology or warfare. Their R&D is more or less plagiarism and their military-industrial complex is Chinese manufacturing meets plagiarism.

Russia doesn't want to fight America or NATO, it just wants its status as a regional power to be respected. Corrupt Ukrainian politicians being bought by America then cancelling a lease on Crimea is a key example of Russia being completely disrespected.

The only enemy that America faces is internal. It's the partisan, race baiting politics and immigration of third worlders which will cause their country to collapse from within.

Who thought it was a good idea to import Somalis? People who are contenders for being the scummiest people on the planet.

toe to in comabt though, obvisuly both lose but at this level isnt it just a matter of strategy, who out plans who

US as it was a decade ago wouldn't. US as of now would.

putin confrims oooooh fuck

the world would because the three nations would hurl nukes.

non nuclear guy

The US has no national unity, jews have poisoned every institution that brought them meaning and order, and their elite are literally pedophiles who are blackmailed by the cia. It’s a really shitty country now, and the citizenry hate it so much theh yearn to ‘maga’ implying it is entirely shit now. An empire which only disgusting kikes or cia freaks believe in is not an empire which is going to last very long, let alone be willing to fight prolonged vicious wars with well armed opponents.

There can't be a war between superpowers. You can have some proxy wars with conventional weapons but when it comes to total war neither side will ever accept defeat before resorting to nukes. There is nothing to be gained by an invasion of the US or nice versa that is worth initiating a nuclear exchange.

>half of country is obese
>other half is a coalition of faggots, trannies, and 85 IQ niggers and spics
Let's get this done, Vlad.

Nope

Attached: B-1-turn-with-condensation-cloud.jpg (1347x784, 403K)