Our consevatives want to open the border for cheap labor

>our consevatives want to open the border for cheap labor
>our liberals want to close border because it can decrease Japanese labor's wage.

which is more red pilled option? or do I only have blue pills?

Attached: 1452441801652.png (399x536, 107K)

Nothing about Japan is red pilled, sorry. Maybe some fringe movements/parties, but Abe is far from conservative or red pilled.

>consevatives want to open the border for cheap labor

Serious question: How the fuck are they conservatives when they're against conserving the demographic?

economically conservative.

keeping out immigrants for the sake of higher wages is more of a leftist policy than a liberal one

40k is nothing and they have to get a job AND its not open boarders its work visas that expire and japan deports people faster than any one. they go door to door and show up at hotels and parks when people have run out of time as a tourist. so you got 2 weeks to find a job and nobody is hiring except that government contract group who has people building a wall they tear down when it done over and over

take it from someone in 56% land:
do NOT opt for opening your borders

almost nothing else could be worse

Attached: muttistan.png (1024x957, 587K)

You're Japan bro. Your cheap labor comes from robots not immigrants. Focus on that and then tax the robots.

isn't leftist and liberal the same thing in murica? i thought “classical liberal” would be the new liberal. liberal stems from the latin word for freedom but liberals hate free speech and guns

not exactly. but republicans are democrats are both liberals here. we can't escape the liberal faggotry but I assume it's the same in europe.

japan needs refugees to survive

akapirru

>our liberals want to close border because it can decrease Japanese labor's wage.
Then your liberals are right there.
They seem to be fighting for nation, rather than profits of big companies. Atleast according to what you just wrote.

That's the most retarded argument anyone can make.

Replacing a population with a foreign population is not "surviving".

great argument. japan should make better juristic conditions for men with children and financially support people with children. It's really not that hard. The reason i don't want to have children is because the lack of freedom, the misandric marriage laws and the cost. eliminate those reasons and i will have children.

Japan has been emasculated by design. All that hello kitty shit isn't an accident.

All the news say 外国人労働者 foreign labors
Why do you guys say "immigrants"?

The same system has been effective for decades now in the name of "研修生" interns
The fact is that they won't be granted citizenship, period

Yeah yeah I know what happened in Yurope, like those Turks in Germany
But Japan is not Germany

People had more children without economic support from the government

do always opposite of what fuet says

Make the work environment safe and comfortable, kill the capitalist who is not keep law
or
National Socialism

Not even that.
They're usually economically liberal, aka free trade and free movement of people.

Attached: Rapture~01.jpg (1440x2264, 984K)

This one.

Attached: 1523416107261.png (1600x900, 2.32M)

afaik most of the foreign labor would be coming from singapore, malaysia, thailand, china, south korea, and maybe pakistan and india but i dont think they're going to mass import muslims like yurop did.

what doesn't help Japan is the difficulty of assimilation into their culture. The language and culture are both quite hard to learn for most foreigners (to varying degrees, for example China and Japan share Kanji which have the same meanings but different words/pronunciations/readings).

the big problem here at least when it comes to immigration into Japan as a social issue is the difficulty of foreign workers assimilating.