They can't keep getting away with it

Once you notice it, you see it freaking everywhere. If I see a commercial for something family oriented (like household supplies or whatever) and the first shot is of a white woman, I am genuinely shocked if she is then shown with a white husband

>says the meme country

Attached: 1542522627086.jpg (918x792, 152K)

It's always life insurance commercials, investment commercials, or vacation getaway type ads where the couples are always white. Because shekels. But when they're selling household products (aimed at white women, who will be watching said ads) on daytime TV, the amount of racemixed couples is high out the ass.

Jow Forums, hear me out. It's time for realtalk.
You guys are paranoid. Yes, women are usually depicted with black males. Why is that?
You would scream "The Joooos!!", but thats not true. The reasons the following:
Ads need to be able to attract attention. They need to be visualy appealing. Black and White cause greater contrast and therefore make an image more appealing for our eyes. White is a very light color and therefore more feminine. Black is solid and heavy, therefore rather masculine.
Imagine the pic in OP with:
1. black female and white male
2. black female and black female
3. white female and white male.
None of these would look as pleasing for our eyes as black male and white female. It's all just a visual thing.

>inb shill
No, you are just paranoid and delusional. I don't want to say, that there is no propaganda in media, but assuming propaganda in each image you see is just naive and stupid.

It’s fucking obvious at this point. It might help to red pill some normies- like why exactly is every other couple interracial in media even though most people irl don’t go outside their race?

This kills the Euro

>it's "art" goyim, stop questioning it

Attached: B'nai B'rith Corporation.jpg (652x2982, 624K)

There's nothing visually appealing about seeing a stupid nigger manhandle a white girl

looks indonesian, nigers dont have faces and hair like that

The notion that America is a melting pot is based on a theatrical play written by the jew Israel Zangwill in 1908.
He proposed that society should be free of prejudice, free of strife, the usual rubbish.
Commies adopted the term and educated it ever since, in their stereotypical way: pretending it's always been that way.

>2. black female and black female
I meant to type "black female and black male".

>1. black female and white male.
Masculine black skin is in conflict with feminine woman - doesnt look right. Same for feminine white skin on masculine man.

>2. black female and black female.
No contrast between the colors at all - doesnt look as appealing

>3. white female and white male.
No contrast between the colors at all - doesnt look as appealing

>4. white female and black male.
White (skin color) and woman complement each other, as both are feminine. Same for black skin on male (both are masculine) - best combination for high contrast and best visuals.

This makes me sad. Good thing I don't own a telly-nelly and browse the internet with an adblocker.
I can show you something worse.
youtube.com/watch?v=YYucMt0vrXg

You are only partially right. Advertising IS thought control and the power of suggestion. Race mixing is a social theme being used to promote a less color oriented society. It is doomed to fail ,because the resultant dilution of the white gene pool wilt destroy mankind/civilization.

get a load of this kike.

>Thinking blackmale/whitefemale is more pleasing to see than whitemale/whitefemale
What fucking advanced cuckoldry is this?

Statistically it's very rare. For some reason, (((marketers))) like to push the illusion that it's common, though.

Attached: how can white boys compete.jpg (1028x611, 133K)

The smell alone should be enough to turn people away. That particular odor stirs up some deep ancient instinct that tells you "we are not the same".

Besides the race thing, why the fuck am I getting ads for boner pills when I cant even secure a gf? Facebook should be better at this crap by now I mean come on.

Germony, just stop.

I wish I wasn't so dead inside to be able to make such troll posts or to even laugh at one of them
Instead you just get a report

>whites are 1/5th global population
>see pic
This feeds the ironpill.
How can you be blackpilled and white in the knowledge that your race is by far the highest in demand with everyone.
Let this nourish your confidence, and observe how so many blacks will laugh at you and scold you simply for being white.
You're brilliant because you're white.
This hurts the majority.

Jews con everyone.

Attached: 5E5C1AD4-6D93-4770-80CB-63E4C2134FEB.jpg (540x500, 90K)

Are you denying perceptual psychology?
I am not talking about "muh modern art" here, but about our human perception. What i explained here and here is common knowledge in graphics design. There is not necessary an agenda behind, but foremost aestethics.
You cant assume an agenda behind each image you see. I am not saying there is none, but stop being that paranoid about every pixel you see.

You are partially right too.
Yes, ads do influence our mind, but:
1. this depends on the person. Not everyone is weak minded and lets him control
2. Every ad needs to be visually appealing, otherwise its useless. therefore we should judge the ads itself, not the techniques used.

>Thinking blackmale/whitefemale is more pleasing to see than whitemale/whitefemale
You are judging by your political ideology, not visual appereance.
If you wouldnt be so shortminded, you would actually admit that black/white contrast is ALWAYS percieved as pleasing. Thats why you see it so often

Everywhere except reality.

>look at this big black bull breeding your women, you dweeby pathetic white goy! She's going to have his big brown babies and there's nothing you can do about it ;^)
is what that commercial is trying to convey.

Exhibit B is anything ever produced by (((Netflix)))

Attached: 1537101159590.png (1313x776, 491K)

Attached: race.png (1000x1000, 89K)

I am sorry, that you are so biased and cant understand basic knowledge about perceptual psychology.
I am not a shill, neither am I trolling. As i said before, this is common knowledge and is a MUST in creating appealing images.

Attached: C00683C0-1E83-401E-9345-4B59B7169A24.jpg (691x466, 69K)

So who are the (((ad men))) designing the campaigns? It's not a bunch of corporations doing this. It's a small number of advertising agencies.

How about just putting the female in light clothing and the male in the dark clothing then?

You're looking for reasons to justify why you've become a cuck.

Attached: 1505335249071.jpg (270x180, 9K)

this

>If you wouldnt be so shortminded, you would actually admit that black/white contrast is ALWAYS percieved as pleasing

Is that why only police cars come in black and white?

Your entire thesis is pathetic, obviously false, debunked and dead. For the lay man: There was an an hour-long doc on New York advertising posted on Jow Forums before where the very Jewish people in charge said they're going to actively promote mixed-race and "diverse" advertising, and that they were doing it to advance a social agenda. You're basically asserting advertising didn't exist before race-mixing ads due to color palette and then feigning confusion why nobody is buying such an obvious lie. Look at picture related. Guess how much post-process work the photographer had to do to get the black faces to match the white woman's. You're also speaking to someone in advertising and design and I deal with these people every week. So of course I know you're lying. The only aspect of this agitprop that has some basis in reality is that advertisers know black men view white women as status symbols, so they will advertise to richer upper-middle class black men with race-mixing ads usually featuring blonde blue-eyed women (the most desired type) fawning over a black man.

Attached: 1537101401534.jpg (980x523, 102K)

>Those dislikes
cry wh*teboy, nothing will stop your women from craving our giant BLACK COCK.

Here's some high contrast for you

Attached: 1505196772478.jpg (1907x925, 512K)

>Walk around Westfield (Stratford) aka non white central
>the only IR pairs were white men and asian women
I was surprised desu

Stage 1: Anger
>spends all his time on Jow Forums
>hates blacks
>lonely and resentful
>hates life and finds meaning by connecting to racial identity

Stage 2: Shame
>alienation drives Jow Forumsack deeper into isolation and porn addiction
>taboos become attractive
>blacked spam starts having an effect
>begin jacking off to sissy hypno and BBC
>shame from anti-white perversions drive Jow Forumsack deeper into politics and isolation

Stage 3: Giving In
>in loneliness, horniness, and sheer boredom alt-right sissy hooks up with a black guy
>though shy and nervous, the moment black dick enters his mouth the Jow Forumsack is hooked
>months or years of porn and fetishism aligns to make everything- the black man's musk, his heavy, chocolate dick, the sissy's soft white hand on dark skin- reaffirm the sissy's fetishes and send so much pleasure into his faggot brain that there is no going back

Stage 4: Dedication:
>sissy white boi begins having gay hook ups at increasing frequency
>gradually loses interest in politics
>more body conscious, begins squatting and running for a better butt
>starts practicing a campy gay voice because it turns him on
>gets into cross dressing and make up, derives submissive thrill from looking slutty and ridiculous

Stage 5: Obsession
>completely broken by black cock
>flaming sissy faggot
>is a devout leftist because white extinction makes his penis twitch, votes for whoever increases immigration
>mannerisms so excessively campy they make his family uncomfortable
>no longer alienated, now extroverted and sassy
>has circle of faghag friends who he gossips with and makes BBC jokes around
>loves going to gay clubs and twerking his white booty for black men
>shameless size queen slut who fucks several strangers a week
>views alt-righters with mixture of pity and bemusement, uses Jow Forums only to post interracial and ERP
>thanks black cock daily for changing him from an angry, resentful loner into somebody with a full spectrum of human emotion

Looks like this thread is now a log thread.

Attached: poopfiction.jpg (1300x1733, 991K)

>How about just putting the female in light clothing and the male in the dark clothing then?
Sure, its possible.
But if you are advertising viagra (or whatever they are advertising), you would rather depict people naked or in lingery. There are not many options for clothes.
Going back to OPs image, you cant have clothes on hand.

Industrial desing has slightly other rules and than advertising. To keep it simple:
Ads - highest priority is attention through aestethics
Real objects - highest priority usability through convenience

telling half truths here.
Your example is not correct, because you have to see the whole image to understand why black faces have to be matched. Its not just about skin color, but also the lighning and environment. As in OPs pic, you got much white space, and black skin fits perfectly fine in there., while your pic is going for analog coloring, which tries to adjust the black to the whole color palette used.

Is this what happened to you?

ew.com/tv/2018/11/16/channing-dungey-abc-president-resigns-canceled-roseanne/

this is who's forcing race mixing, and many
other non white top executives.

Attached: BBPN3Pi.jpg (624x416, 26K)

>The problem is that it's getting blasted in virtually every corporate advertisement now. It's clearly meant to be subliminal

Nice mental gymnastics. The reality of it is millennial and Gen Z white girls increasingly prefer to date black men, so naturally they're going to market to that growing demographic that are more likely to consume trendy Viagra pills.

There is no "subliminal message" to be made when white women and black men are already breeding in large. If promoting race-mixing was some imaginary bogeyman's goal, they've obviously succeeded by now.

Besides, when a black guy looks like pic-related, why wouldn't women of all races want to date him? There's no conspiracy.

Attached: a6f7ef777e45744e1a8b3ef0fc2ab11e.jpg (500x514, 42K)

If the (((publicists))) were confronted about this, what would they say?

Hey, i've noticed that you exaggeratedly overrepresent black male and white female couples, why is that? Isn't that a little bit racyss and sexist? Are you fetishizing interracial relationships?

One could even turn the tables on them. If it was always a white male and an asian female, i bet there'd be leftists complaining about racial fetishization of asian women

t. literal blacked addict

Attached: white women mixed kids.jpg (553x467, 259K)

Attached: white women are loyal.jpg (803x342, 80K)

>It's all because of contrast
>muh color theory
>Black men are more masculine
Cuck, if those were the reasons why no just put a black background and rough veiny hands with some scars? Also, view it from this perspective, why are almost all campaigns aimed to lower the IQ of the population? Think about it, most ads, movies, series, etc have interracial couples, open borders are fully supported, incest is now becoming more popular, reading is looked down upon or made cringy on purpose, almost all movie "heroes" solve everything with literally no fucking critical thinking, just by punching/killing someone, flawed logic is common, literally all dialogs have to explain intentions to details so people don't have to put pieces together, "technology" is viewed a God, cringy "opposition" against drugs and alcohol purposely made to annoy, I could go on, but it all can't just be a (((coincidence))) now can it? Fucking kraut faggot look at how many ads, movies, anything in media supported by big networks have talked bad about Israel

Why do black people even bother getting tats?

>trying this hard

By the way, these are the same people who post WMAF propaganda 24/7, they want you to be demoralized and racemix with Asian women

Stop being triggered and colonize black women.

I've been doing graphic design for over 20 years. Their reason for doing this is not fucking color theory but believe whatever you want lol.

Maybe if it wasn't 90% BMWF then I'd give you the benefit of the doubt.

Attached: file2.jpg (480x360, 70K)

I'll be by to bang your wife in half an hour. I want you caged and in the closet when I arrive.

*facepalm*
1. I have NOT said, that there is NO propaganda involved, but that you should NOT sperge out, because you see somewhere an image like that, since there are aestethics involved too.

>Black men are more masculine
2. Again, this is not what i said. What I said was, that the COLOR black is much more masculine, than white. Why do you think women wear usually light colored clothes, while men tend to wear dark clothing, as a simple example?

>why no just put a black background and rough veiny hands with some scars?
3. What's even the point of this? It would look horrible. One main reason is, that the color weight in general would be way to heavy/dark.

>why are almost all campaigns aimed to lower the IQ of the population?
4. Nonsense. If you wouldn't be a low IQ in the first place, you wouldn't watch ads/wouldn't get influenced by the crap they are broadcasting.

>ads, movies, anything in media
5. They have different functionalities/mechanics. Don't throw everything in one bowl.

read this:

sorry, i meant this:

Rates of child birth are decreasing overall and that is by no means representative of the general population and the types of relationships they're having, which are in fact becoming increasingly multiracial with a black male/white female dating majority.

>Source: Yahoo Personals
>no date (dating dynamics have changed drastically over the last 5 years alone

Either this "study" was conducted while Yahoo was still relevant (roughly 10+ years ago) or in its current state of irrelevancy.

And "Yahoo Personals" isn't an accredited scientific source, I'm sure.

Attached: 1542516365164.jpg (615x923, 95K)

>whites are 1/5th of population
Dude whites only make up about 7.5% of the population world wide

The guy in your pic is quite cringey actually

When you're black like me, there's really no such thing as "trying hard" when it comes to white women. They're like submissive lapdogs and seem to enjoy that role.

If you can't make a woman submit to you as a man on a whim, that's a personal problem.

Attached: 1542499128600.jpg (960x540, 50K)

Why do you losers care? Interracial relationships are as normal as heterosexuality.

Pulp Fiction was bullshit and terrible.

Noone says White women are dating black men. They're fucking them and having kids with them. Which is why you always see a white woman alone when she has a half black kid.

keep me posted roody

Attached: jgyu.jpg (776x792, 37K)

Damn the south west is getting SPIC'd. Its funny , every spic i know who got some euro genes only wants a white girl to try and bleach himself.

Ok so you're justifying ad agencies pushing black male and white female relationships because black and white contrasted looks better on camera.

It's funny that you accept traditional color theory without question if it makes these companies a few extra shekels but not the human tradition of procreating with your own race.

Attached: Tucker.png (630x565, 261K)

I remember seeing this made me discontinue netflix.

>Why do you think women wear usually light colored clothes, while men tend to wear dark clothing, as a simple example?
This is literally pulled out of your ass, there is no possible way to know that, from empirical evidence I just see everybody wearing dark colors except the very stupid people, so either bring some stats or don't make assumptions
>It would look horrible
Nigger, I only draw in monochromatic, so you can suck my dick
>General weight would be dark
So? Is not like people can't handle it, plus dark weight can be used for elegance (pic related -not mine-)
>If you wouldn't be low IQ in the first place, you wouldn't watch ads/get influence
Now that's nonsense, going outside automatically puts you in contact with media, being online does the same, you're only safe in solitary or blind
>They have different functionalities/mechanics
Who gives a shit if it's all used as propaganda, they fit within that same bowl if I say they do, because not only it is empirically evident that it is the same shit with minor variations, the core principle of art can be rationalized to be equal in all of them, it is just used to influence people, rather than that it has no value. So let's agree to disagree, genocide of the jews is the best and only solution acceptable

Attached: harambee_never_forget.jpg (577x751, 216K)

Nigger hands are ugly and disgusting.
I don't want to see them
Now fuck off back to r/cuckoldry you kike

Maybe in kangaroo and sardine land, but here in the U.S. of A. I will bet dollars to doughnuts that I can find a white woman with a niglet child within three swipes on the Tinder™ Degeneracy app.

Australia doesn't have niggers (unless you count Abos) and Portugal only has a few in Lisbon. It's not comparable to the situation in North America and Western Europe in general, so I don't know why they think they should have an opinion at all

>tinder is reality
wew kiddo. the stats dont lie, race mixing is extremely rare even in the US non segregated areas. just because you can find the bottom rung of humanity on the internet or hookup apps doesnt mean that's all there is. in fact it's so rare that a lot of those degeneracy apps are actively getting rid of the racial preference options.

>with a black male/white female dating majority.
I mean I don't buy into most of the crap in this trhread, but a quick look at the numbers in the US shows that this can't even be possibly true.

People classed as "black" in the US comprise ~17% of the population (high estimate)
People classed as "white" comprise ~50% (low estimate)

If every single black male (8% of the population) was dating a white female (25% of the population), you still have nearly70% of white females not dating black males.

Jesus christ you must be bad at maths.

Say what you want about black people Jow Forums, they clearly have superior imaginations.

The worst for me (since I have young kids) are the gay commercials they are starting to ramp up. I notice them more and more.

>implying women only date/fuck one guy at a time

Better start raising them Chechen now at this point, its just too much these days with what goes on. Though I avoid most of it since I don't have cable TV and most adverts are blocked thanks to host files + unlock + Firefox.

Why are you guys so superficial in your thought? I have to work, hence won't spend much time on detailed explanation.

>so you're justifying ad agencies pushing black male and white female
No, as i said dozen of times: Aestethics and propaganda are two different things. They are coupled together, but there is no point in spergin out about every image for two reasons. First, you don't exactly know if it has been specifically designed to push this propaganda, secondly it's just weak to get offended by an image (like a whiny leftist). Grow some balls instead.

>accept traditional color theory [...] - [...] not the human tradition of procreating
Wrong. I explained the theory behind the colors, that's right, but don't mix ads with reality. In reality, when we walk outside and see a BMWF couple, we react differently, than on ads. And i am not talking about reactions on the emotional, nor rational level, but the perception only.

>pulled out of your ass
It's not pulled out of my ass. Just use your brain and you will realize. You seem the kind of guy, who would disbelieve, that fire is hot and burns things, before he sees a (jewed) study explaining to him, that fire is indeed hot, instead of experiencing it by himself/using own intellect.

>monochromatic - dark weight can be used for elegance
I don't want to talk about good design here, but you are wrong. For most websites it's a bad idea, since it wouldn't fit as seamless as light ads (depending on website, but i talk about the majority at this point)

>going outside automatically puts you in contact with media
Are you admitting that you are an NPC? You should understand that you are producing your thought and not your surrounding. If the opposite is happening, then i recommend you to focus on your consiousness more and get an idea of independant thought once in a while.

>let's agree to disagree
ok, no space left

I gladly repeat:
>Why are you guys so superficial in your thought?

On the positive side, they can't change science and statistics... You know that white's in general don't race-mix based on stats and that blacks do. You also know, from genetics, that minority alleles in a population will drift away to extinction when severely outnumbered AND there is selection pressure against it (and there is with black people).

Therefore, despite whatever race-mixing agenda that is going on, the results of any such thing would mean the extinction of black people over time. You'd probably say, "well the genes are still mixed in." Nope. Those would be gone too, after awhile.

>spinning words
>muh selective statistics
Okay, would you prefer to take a trip to the grocery store and do a head count? Nightmare mode: you can't be in an Iowa town with a population of 200.

>you don't know if it's specifically designed to push this kind of propaganda

You sound like me ten years ago. I think it's pretty much confirmed at this point.

Attached: 1507250857484.jpg (4656x2620, 887K)

>Among the set of people who are dating online (which is a strict subset of the population with a bias towards dating multiple people at once) only 9% of men and 14% of women date multiple people at the same time, compared to 38% of men and 24% of women who won't even consider contact more than one person at a time

So yeah, people with multiple partners are a vanishingly small group here, you can squeeze in at most an extra 9% and still won't make the majority.

why germany is dead 101

becauuse they know dirty white girls luv it

Women don't date black men, but they are having sex with them, and that can mean multiple women having sex with the same man and vice versa, and this is occasionally resulting in pregnancies, which is when you see the increasingly common sight of a non-black woman with her half black kids with no father around. I don't think you realise what "hypergamy" actually means. It doesn't mean women are getting into relationships of any kind with the kind of men they are having sex with. Relationships are for material providers, which the kind of men they're fucking often can't or won't provide. So the dating statistics you keep showing mean nothing.

>that enlongated palm
i unironically thought that was a chimp's hand in the thumbnail

>the results of any such thing would mean the extinction of black people over time.

Are you retarded?

Attached: populationvictory.png (600x414, 58K)

Women are notorious for lying or changing their minds so surveys don't tell me anything about relationships.

I was on OKC years ago and one of the questions was if you found someone better than your current partner would you stay or leave?

The large majority answered leave. I'm still trying to make sense of it but I can't.

Attached: 1513136733498.png (745x526, 693K)

You:
>''aesthetics and propaganda are two different things''

also you

>''*facepalm*
>I have NOT said, that there is NO propaganda involved

????

Attached: 51% sure....png (1484x1271, 137K)

Its always a black male and a white female.

This is completely divorced from reality.

Attached: PST_2017.05.15.intermarriage-00-00.png (184x845, 51K)