Capitalism is working fine guys

>capitalism is working fine guys
>capitalism is working fine guys
>capitalism is working fine guys

Attached: income graph.png (920x690, 51K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965
cis.org/Report/Immigration-and-American-Worker
forbes.com/sites/eriksherman/2017/09/11/median-wealth-of-black-and-latino-families-could-hit-zero-before-the-centurys-end/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Can you capitalist faggots please explain this then?

Attached: 379-reaganomics-we-told-them-the-wealth-would-trickle-down.jpg (599x479, 36K)

Now put that graph over the a graph of the rise of deficit spending in the US and see if they correlate at all.

>capitalist

A system of government where you can buy power and influence from government in the form of lobbying kickbacks and subsidies is not capitalism you retarded faggot

For the millionth time; the unit price of labour has stayed low because the supply of labour is increasing at an unnatural rate. The reason the supply of labour is increasing is that western countries are importing labourers at a huge rate. If you stopped mass immigration that bottom 90% line would start to shift up.

Bottom 50% provide essentially zero value and their jobs only exist to serve garbage food and mindless entertainment and other shit to their fellow plebians

Let's see that graph pre-1965

>muh shekels
this isn't you nigger

Can I kiss you?

The US isn't capitalist, and hasn't been for decades. The welfare system takes from the worker and gives to the privileged, along with social security, education system, post office, etc.

Well aint that just what the left does? Cause a problem so they can complain about it, blaming everyone but themselves?

Labor glut, rising populations, means more money to be had by the few who can make it. It's common sense, which the left lacks.

No, it's that the job outsourcing is just redistributing itself after the infrastructure collapse after WW2.

The developing world is no longing buying all of the shit from US factories; the biggest sector of engineering and manufacturing is government/military contracts because they can't be outsourced.

>2008
Good work, retard.

I agree, but can I have a source on this for argumentative purposes.

That is a reason, yes
neoliberalism still played a role, though

>"why isn't average income going up?!"
>supports policies that displace non-skilled/manual laborers

underrated post

Attached: golden ratio bear.jpg (750x730, 55K)

That doesnt exclude the fact that mass migration tends to put a downward pressure on wages.

>No, it's that the job outsourcing is just redistributing itself after the infrastructure collapse after WW2.
Its both all the good jobs have been shipped overseas and now we have to compete with subhumans for scraps off (((their))) table

Why 1965?

When more people are going into the workforce, usually these are people who weren't working for a long time and who take among the lowest salaries. When they are coming back to the workforce, they are lowering the average salary.

A nice graph would be:
*Salaries of the top 10%
"salaries of the 10%-40% range
*salaries of the 40-70% range
*salaries of the 70% - 90% range
*salaries of the bottom 10%

Another thing is that, in multirracial countries, as each race performs differently, that influences inequality, increasing it

fake and gay

The bottom 90% must be doing something wrong if they think CEOs make millions by just sitting around.

MILTON FRIEDMAN

There is no data that suggests immigrants hurt wages for American citizens or take their jobs. In fact they're taking jobs that Americans think they're too good to do. We could bring back penal labor for that work though.

Wages were high back then due to labor shortages from lack of immigration, birth rates were much higher back then but couldn't keep with economic growth, even after including women in the workforce. It wasn't sustainable.

What’s the problem here?

>be stupid
>hence you make retard money decisions and be poor

Oh my god muh capitalism is bad

I like how so many idiots here are defending this, those are the same people that vote against their own interest.

Attached: 1528694683048.png (807x802, 733K)

Wealth isn’t dollars in a bank account, it’s goods and services, or more accurately TIME.

Anyways, your average American welfare recipient lives with luxuries that King’s of old couldn’t even imagine, they just take it for granted.
Transportation, clothes, entertainment, food, comfort; all this and more in greater variety and abundance and even quality than any king to walk the earth before 300 years ago.

This right here. Nearly everything fucked up about our crony capitalist system can be linked back to either the federal government or the federal reserve.

Attached: 1474847109028.png (1313x625, 802K)

Communism is unironically the only way

As quality of life for the general population increases, the cost of it decreases.

And who do you think spends absurd amounts of money to lobby politicians into importing third worlders?

>capitalism
Open borders and niggers ruin everything
middle class = white people
internaltional clique of capitalist cronies = jews

The leftypol capitalist pigman meme is just a pink small nosed jew meme

>What are non-wage benefits?

I agree, but can I have a source on this for argumentative purposes?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

Anarchism is a retarded fantasy. You are a fucking moron. Kill yourself.

There is no data that suggests immigrants hurt wages for American citizens or take their jobs. In fact they're taking jobs that Americans think they're too good to do (for shit wages).

You just proves yourself wrong in two sentences, motherfucker.

>wages are stagnating
>better import forty million foreigners who will directly compete with me for wages
t. commieshit

Not sure what form we have in the US, but a few monopolies run all commerce, social media, and and the government. That’s not Capitalism

Anarchists can have anarchy tomorrow by just running into the woods. Their refusal to do so means they're hypocrites. Their demand we follow suit means they're enemies.

>they're not taking jobs and driving down wages, they're taking jobs and driving down wages
wew

I hate this argument.
>Americans don't want those shit jobs
That'd force them to raise the pay for those shitty jobs to attract Americans if there wasn't a constant influx of shit skins coming in.

If 50 communist retards formed a village one of them or a small group would rise to the top and become de facto leaders.

>after WW2
except the disparity in the graph shown here starts in the 80's, right around where mass immigration started

>mfw wage sklaves defend their capitalist masters in this thread like the good cucks they are

Attached: 1529425478604.jpg (980x945, 85K)

>What are non-wage benefits?

Communism and unamerican

Perhaps we should get the government to regulate wages to ensure that actual citizens would want to take those jobs instead of illegal immigrants

this meant for

cis.org/Report/Immigration-and-American-Worker
>Although the net benefits to natives from illegal immigrants are small, there is a sizable redistribution effect. Illegal immigration reduces the wage of native workers by an estimated $99 to $118 billion a year, and generates a gain for businesses and other users of immigrants of $107 to $128 billion.

inb4 "I don't like the source therefore you're wrong"

Why is Somalia referred to as a Libertarian paradise and not anarchist paradise?

Why don't they support $15/hour for agriculture?

>Gadsden flag
>Government regulate wages
>?????????

Why don't we just do the most logical thing and protect Americans but not flooding our country with non Americans?

Such is biological programming, which anarchists and communists can't seem to grasp.

just get a better job instead of crying like a bitch

America is unable to protect its borders and stop people from coming in

Because it's full of nigger Muslims with low IQs that nevertheless managed to form a rudimentary government based on tribes and sharia law.

Why doesn't who support it?

America is the wealthiest and most advanced nation in the world. We could easily protect our borders, but we don't want to.

Because of subversives and traitors, yes. 100 years ago this wasn't a problem.

>Using averages instead of medians
This is how I know you're a retard.

Attached: 1421312789429.png (1158x419, 44K)

>Why doesn't who support it?

I only hear support for retail and fast food.
Some actually say, "Enjoy $9 oranges and strawberries if we don't have illegals picking them." But some how that price increase doesn't apply to retail products and fast food

HMMMM its almost like the excessive amount of retarded taconiggers flooding over the border is creating an extreme overabundance of low skill workers that are suppressing the lower middle class and below.

really activates my almonds

Attached: labor being suppressed.png (920x1286, 81K)

No. They are what workers have been steadily gaining in lieu of wages. What Grand-Dad at the Ford Company would have gotten in the form a couple more bucks is going to his office-working grandson in the form of Healthcare, Life Insurance, and other fringe benefits.

Every buck your employer puts into Dental is one the Employee isn't getting as spending money.

The top 1% is not comprised of the michael bloombergs, soroses, and rothschilds. It's comprised by and large by the most talented and capable people in our society. When (((they))) say 1%, make no mistake, they are not talking about the rothschilds or the jeff bezoses. They are talking about the productive class which they want to do away with.

hint: this isn't a flaw of capitalism
can you guess what is actually broken?

It's funny hearing Liberals say "color is the future" meanwhile blacks and Mexicans have net worth under $10K and they're expected to hit $0 in the future.

forbes.com/sites/eriksherman/2017/09/11/median-wealth-of-black-and-latino-families-could-hit-zero-before-the-centurys-end/

>meme flag
>shilling for obamacare

My almonds are active

Even if they raised the minimum wage for agriculture I'm sure they'd still hire the spic who's willing to work for half 10$ an hour under the table and make more than the white boy working for 15$ an hour and paying taxes.

I don't care what they set the minimum wage to as long as they address illegal immigration.

If i remember correctly, in terms of federal tax revenue the only group that has a net positive is white males. I think white females were neutral. Then mexicans were moderately negative. And then nogs were a massive fucking drain.

Reagan destroyed America. It'll take 50-60 years but his (((economic plan))) is what ruined the country.

>Implying "capitalism" (free trade) is the only thing happening in our massive Federal system
>Glossing over significant issues caused by our bloated bureaucracy such as iron triangles

t. can't into economics
>THERE ARE JUST TOO MANY BROWN PEOPLE!!!

No it really isn't. The vast majority of people in that lofty percentile got there through finance, not doctoring or engineering or whatever you think.

I'm not shilling for Obamacare.

I'm just saying that since WWII, employers have been increasing funds for fringe benefits, which is where increases in employee compensation have came from.

People (libshits) are under the mistaken impression imported illegal slave labor is required for them to have their daily avocado salad. The truth is that agricorps save money by not buying mechanized harvesting equipment and instead paying Paco pennies on the dollar. By paying Paco, they don't have to buy harvesters. By not buying harvesters, they don't have to hire qualified technicians and drivers. By not having to hire qualified technicians and drivers, they reduce their costs (wages). They also have the benefit of dodging taxes by using illegal labor. The reason the Left has utterly lost the working class is because low-wage workers (that aren't retarded niggers) are aware importing millions of illegals will directly impact their economic opportunities, either through direct job competition or peripheral wage suppression. Wage suppression is difficult to calculate simply because we can't accurately *guess* how many decent paying jobs are lost as a consequence of Paco. There's also a host of tertiary costs that can't be accurately calculated for the same reasons, such as healthcare being expensive as fuck because illegals like to go to the ER for every hangnail and skip the bill.

But don't worry: People who become even tangentially aware they're being fucked by illegal immigration are also hit with the "MUH FOOGEES ;____; " line to drive them away from any dangerous thoughts of self-preservation.

It's looking the solution to illegal immigration from both sides is amnesty, rather "path to citizenship". We've seen it from Reagan.
Employers do need to be fined hundreds of thousands for every illegal they hire rather than being raided and workers hauled off.

Neat argument.

If you haven't outgrown your college communism by age 21, consider self-castration.

30.000 is a lot

Conclusion shows it negatively impacts only the poorest Americans, as in a lot of niggers and utter white trash.

>tfw in the dark green graph and knowing that lazy, envious commies will never have a chance to steal my stuff.

Attached: 1472284932028.jpg (600x600, 27K)

>In fact they're taking jobs that Americans think they're too good to do
Almost like they're suppressing wages because employers don't have to offer a salary that would entice American citizens. Meanwhile third wordlers are happy to work for shit wages and drive up housing costs. Jobs Americans won't do? Because thanks to illegals they pay only enough to satisfy someone from a poverty stricken shithole.

I'd love to see the data for top 5%, top 10%, top 15%, etc.

It’s another jealous cunt who refuses to apply himself to gain that which he desires thread!

Spice it.

In general boomers destroyed the world. As ancient Greeks said, society is great when men plant trees in shade of which they know they'll never sit. Post WW2 society has been characterized entirely by "I got mine, fuck you" and the trend is accelerating. Millenials are fucked, but generation Z is gonna be just utterly assfucked by a combination of automation, outsourcing and employees having less leverage than ever before.

They're not taking jobs that American want to do dummy. How does it hurt you wages when someone works a job you don't even compete for? How come your local citizen garbage truck driver not being criticized?
Cause low birth rates mean labor shortages and unsustainablely high wages. It's why the 1965 immigration reform happened.

>because they are economically unsupported

Lol you're saying you make >500k PER YEAR?

any capitalist system will evolve into the scenario you outlined you retarded faggot

>muh market efficiencies

>people keep giving more and more money to large companies
>large company owners get more and more money
>people are angry because they keep giving more and more money to large company owners
How about you stop buying from Amazon and Walmart, dumbshit, eh?

mass amnesty has been tried before, it's not the answer. You'll still have paco working under the table, but also collecting unemployment and food stamps.
The only thing amnesty does is bring in a lot more voters for liberals, and that's it.

But yeah, they should be fined a lot.
My main gripe with capitalism is that it's designed to maximize profit, even if that means forsaking your citizens.

>it doesn't impact Americans
>but it does
>but I don't like those people so who cares
Go freebase some more cum

Wikipedia
Capitalism is an economic system based on the freedom of private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit.

It works correct
If you are rich you can buy other people and even make them your slaves if they are cucks.
Poor people are forced either to pay "cost of life per time" or to become homeless.

Attached: images.jpg (300x168, 8K)

Actually low wages hurts businesses in the long run cause it means workers having less money to spend and stimulate buisness. Lack of immigrants in a low-birth rate native populace country means labor shortages and too high of wages which is unsustainable. They want cheap labor migrants to maximize profits without the labor shortages. It's a lose-lose situation unless we adopt a strong welfare state which is antithetical to mass migration as the Euros are realizing.

>moving the goal posts this hard

Came to post this. National socialist are too stupid to understand the way Jews take over is though large governments

>let in hoards of 3rd worlders willing to work for pennies
>wow, why the fuck did the unions die?
>wow, why the fuck are corporations making record profits
>you want to stop immigration? You're a nazi!
honestly, I can see why the Jews call us Goyim, the majority really are fucking cattle. It's right in front of their faces yet they keep asking to be fucked harder

Attached: wojak heart.jpg (4175x3635, 1.06M)

>Starting in the 1970s
>"muh capitalism"
It's more complicated than just "capitalism" you dumb nigger.
The US did two things in the 60s that completely fucked US workers.
First it opened trade with communist China
Second it opened the immigration flood-gates with the immigration act of 1965.

Wages haven't fucking moved since then because the fucking labor market has NEVER had a shortage since then to force the raising of wages.

Attached: 1504209696429.jpg (599x483, 61K)

Based on socialist logic I am allowed to say that real capitalism has never been tried