DEATH PENALTY

>I'm pro-X
>I cannot defend why I'm pro-X, youbdo it for me
Fuck off newfag

It wins elections. It makes people feel safe and gives them Law & Order boners. You could be terrible at your political job, but tell people how motherfucking tough you are crime? So much fucking tougher than that faggot you're running against?! He wants families and household pets murdered! Ohhhhh fuck, but you're fucking crime in the ass all day everyday! Sure, maybe some don't deserve it or aren't even guilty because we just needed to show how TOUGH we are on crime! But that's because... Fuuuck. I just came... But yeah, political benefits and making stupid fearful vindictive cunts feel good. Mmmm. Yeah.

So you're telling me you're pro-something without having any arguments on that position? how does that register in your fucking brain?
Try thinking for yourself, we are not your nanny.
Seriously you faggots are getting worse and worse at being a functional human.

Think of it this way: if you sentence someone to life in prison aren't you sentencing them to die via prison?

>All that matters is that it costs more to kill a prisoner then to just keep them alive

the US has a token and self-defeating death penalty system, with years wasted on keeping the prisoner alive on death row.

Because they are kept in extra expensive prisons for years if not decades, while Jewish law firms keep courts busy with revisions and other claims.

It only costs more because of the legal bureaucracy built around it. If you make it more streamlined and limit the number of appeals to something like 3 max, it can be more cost-effective.

The standard argument is that if you let them live with what they’ve done then that’d be the worst way because some of these psychopaths crave death, and want to have themselves killed but they just get life in prison. But on the other hand, if they show absolutely no regret and would do it again, they should be thrown to the fucking dogs.

Attached: F6B9C7B6-6BC3-4A69-8700-3793C95C6552.jpg (540x717, 109K)

Spend 5 min behind the gates of any high security unit in America.
You will support the death penalty in no time

Yes but after several dozen more trials and hearings.

Don't listen to this shlomo if you give everyone life sentences they will just become career prison hit men like the bloke that killed Whitey Bulger. If you kill criminals who are likely to kill again there is a net of less death

All those costs (appeals, etc...) can be associated with keeping a prisoner alive. There is an absolute fixed cost that does not change in the act of killing a person which is whatever method is used.

Best reason for Death Penalty: Makes people afraid of doing wrong and cuts government tax spending.

This should only be done for such crimes though like: Planned murders, rapes and treason to your country.

It's bad because:
1. We allow an inordinate amount of time to appeal, wasting a fuck-ton of taxpayer dollars.
2. We use it in cases where the evidence is not airtight.
3. We don't use it enough on irredeemable repeat violent offenders.
4. We waste a ton of money doing it "humanely" when a bullet to the head is about 20 cents and just as if not more humane.

Attached: 1421169181200.jpg (250x234, 7K)

because theres two types of criminals. one that decides he'll steal, but he won't kill to do it, and often they can change their path in life.
then theres the type that decides they'll kill anyone. The 2nd type is already lost, they're not going to reform, they're going to be a permanent burden on the system.
If not on you, then the police officers in the prisons who have to deal with their shit all day. put them down like the animals they are.
and put down the jewish lawyers defending them too

Some people are beyond any kind of redemption. Most statistics show that a large majority of sexual predators will act again, for example. Killing them prevents that.
Some crimes are so horrible that a message must be sent : do this and we will get rid if you. There is a disuasive aspect, and even more when executions are public.
It is, unless you do it in a very retarded way like the US, cheap, unlike keeping criminals in prison for decades. And some would argue less cruel, but i do not debate for or against this since it is irrelevant. The point is: if you execute a pedo, he will never do it again, and maybe some will not act either, out of fear.
The US system is bad because they keep them for years and use complicated and inefficient ways of doing it, and not public.
Hang them a day in the city plaza after the result of the trial and be done with it.

Some will argue it will make criminals even more desperate but it is just plain stupid. Most concerned criminals already do the maximum to go unoticed. Thats why you execute murderers but not thieves, because if you did, they might kill witnesses and then become also murderers, in order to cover their track.
In fact, aside human rights there are no arguments.
Well there is one: what if the person is falsely accused ?
Nowadays, we have more reliable tools and ways to prove things, so unless there is doubts (in that case the penalty should be imprisonment and forced labor), you will rather almost never execute an innocent unless he was framed. And even if so ? I prefer that 1000 pedos and an innocent are hanged, than 1000 pedos imprisoned, released one day, and half of them raping a kid again. Costing us millions of bucks in the process.
So the point doesnt hold ground: if you execute only when having no doubts and solid evidence (like DNA), you will not kill innocents.
If we follow logic and the common good which is the goal of a society, you must get rid of some criminals, in particuliar the mentally.

It's bad because the state shouldn't have the right to life or death over its citizens, and the only lethal outcome of a crime should be immediate and when in selfdefense (violating the NAP).

But there's also a libertarian approach to being pro death penalty.
One could argue that if the state exists stricly to enforce individual rights, each individual could agree to face death when violating certain rights.