Why do people think this ideology is flawed?
Why do people think this ideology is flawed?
That’s two triangles
anarchy is impossible, there will always be power structures. minarchism is more respectable imo
>copyright the NAP
>everyone has to pay you everytime they refer to the NAP
>mfw poor people are no longer protected by the NAP due to my royalties
also
>not copyrighting air
>not copyrighting oxygen
>not copyrighting the USA
isnt everything anarcho capitalism?
Because the road outside my house is paved twice a year in order to keep employment numbers artificially inflated so that Maximus Employment cancontinue to reap profits.
>Somalia
Here, go enjoy your ancap paradise land. Filled to the brim with niggers and murder.
muh roads
>"ooga booga what means small government in latin? oh, i know, minarchism"
its called libertarianism you fucking retard
Elysium is exactly what a ancap society would look like. Matt Damon, 50 million spics, and one affluent white neighborhood in space
1. Nobody ever reads the libertarian canon. I mean maybe they read a Ron Paul book once, but they never read MES, Ethics Of Liberty, Economics and Ethics of Private Property, or Human Action.
2. Memes.
3. The libertarian party is cucked, so ancaps are obviously bluepilled amirite?
4. Jewish founders. Nevermind that Rothbard was a holocaust denier or that Hoppe is a German.
Shit could never work especially not in a multicultural society since niggers don't respect the NAP. Also what lolbergs call free market capitalism is not free the system is controlled by jews.
>1. Nobody ever reads the libertarian canon.
>2. Memes.
Case in point Nobody fucking understands what they're criticizing.
bwahaha
I wouldn't respect the NAP and I am white. I would go on a massive murdering spree killing rich people, burn down their houses, rape their daughter, and kill their family.
You cannot have a society based on individual liberty and freedom when there are people who want to take them away. This is why so many people on here went from libertarian to natsoc.
i dunno, and I don't really care, but I do enjoying discussing it
Because it's literally retarded. So poorly thought out on so many fronts that it's rightfully reduced to mockery.
I wouldn't even care if I died in ancap land as long as I can drag a few richie capitalists to hell with me.
There is no copyright under AnCap, user.
Why are you trying to discuss an ideology you don't know?
Because most people are not Anglo or Jewish
Because no libertarian has done anything mentionable in the past century other than becoming a meme.
Typical commie soiboy thinking the rich wouldn't arm themselves
Elysium seems like a decent place to live, but why didn't the station have it's own weapon systems? I'd say I liked Delacourt for making the hard call and ordering the spic ship shot down but things would've worked out way better for everyone on board if they didn't have to deal with assholes like Kruger. Competent SecDef would've pushed for that far earlier.
They better arm a lot because there will be tens of millions of poor against them, and even their own bodyguards may betray and kill for money.
If that is what is needed to bring in the age of space colonization than I say so be it
because anarchism is the abolition of artificial unjust hierarchies and under capitalism where there is no regulation of industry and markets, you end up with massive monopolies and wealth concentration that can excerpt immense power over the country. It will always create unjust artificial hierarchies so the idea of an anarchist capitalist country is total bullshit even in theory. It ends up being an authoritarian slave empire which is the fucking opposite to anarchism.
Guy, you're just another anarchist as well. Both shit tier ideologies. In fact, the only one dumber then AnCap is Communism.
>tens of millions of poor against them
kek, the only commies in todays society are upper middle class art students
the libertarian canon is a fucking embarrassment to political philosophy. Libertarian "theory" is the Enlightenment's Vietnam.
Fuck you commie faggot eat a dead horse dick
Who says there isn't? Kinsella doesn't have the final say.
Anarchism is a military impossibility. Several mutually overlapping and competitive private defense agencies would be an unstable situation that would have to fall back to taxation once a real external threat emerges. A state that can tax, raise an army, and use finance will outcompete ancapistan in geopolitical sphere.
nobody unironically believes in a meme ideology where you take away the state
copyright and the nap aren't even the problem
the whole fucking ideology is itself a problem
just not have a state and let everyone fix their own shit
if anyone figures out how to make a state they'll just conquer all and every proclaimed piece of ancap land
>libertarian canon
>book literally no one reads or even should read
>mfw you need to read a book to understand the system
>invent copyright
>copyright copyright
who says you can't do that? if you have information that is yours, it's your property, right?
W H O
H
O
Because no ideology can work without a homogenous society. Nearly any shitty ideology can work as long as the society believes in it, and that society is homogenous. Communism works pretty good in China... because it’s filled with pinko Chinese.
yep
I think a sufficiently autocratic regime could handle a multiethnic society reasonably... not that they'd really want to, had they an alternative.
replacing tyranny of the state with tyranny of the corporation
corporate power is voluntary , bud
coca cola does not extort you
mcdonalds does not make you buy a big mac
walmart does not make you fight in a war
see'>a black country in chaos = ancapism cuz reasons
good logic bro
screaming brown people does not count as a logical point, bud
THIS
>I CANT COMPETE WITH JEWS , GUBMENT FUCK ME
kek
this
many libertarians believe in physical removal , google it bro
such as
>x d most of us arent anglo
>aus flag
> a nation of mainly anglos
kek
THAT POLITICAL COMPASS@!!!
MY FUCKING SIDES
>>x d most of us arent anglo
>>aus flag
>> a nation of mainly anglos
>kek
Australia is a Chinese country, retard
>JOKES ON YOU MYCOUNTRY ISNT WHITE
youre saying that like its a gotcha on *me*......
Anarcho-capitalism wouldn't even be able to sustain itself.
Imagine that there are starving people everywhere and you tell them "You can't steal my land because of the NAP."
Well … what's stopping them from violating the NAP if there is no government? Do you think that they will just fall down dead?
>I openly admit that I would create a de-facto dictatorship if I lived in an an-cap society.
What's stopping someone else from beating you to it?
why exactly would people immediately start starving to death without the government ?
Because it is just a poorly forced meme and nothing else
>Anarcho-capitalism
Give me a break
To be fair, Somalia was never an-cap. Back when Somalia was a failed state, people violated the NAP all the time.
Anarcho-capitalism can never exist because the NAP cannot exist without a government to enforce it. The NAP would cause mass starvation if it were ever implemented. You can't make people accept a self-destructive moral code without the threat of lethal force.
explain
bro........you said that , twice now
what I am asking is why everyone would starve without the government?
Price fixing would be legal.