Really makes ya think, huh?

>what are solar flares and activity

absolute carbon taxing npc

Attached: Image 2018-09-18 at 7.01.24 PM.png (725x949, 690K)

Showed that spic cunt

Really? As if that's the only thing she's gotten wrong.

if it were increasing its heat output we would see effects on other planets in the solar system
it was this irregularity that first alerted scientists to something going on in the Earths atmosphere

LOLOLOLOLOL! The Earth is only 2000 years old, faggot.

>our CO2 is magic and doesn't retain heat

Attached: NPC.png (416x435, 114K)

what, are you just gonna come on /nu-shill-pol/ and post facts?

SHILLL!!!

either today or a few days about she said the three branches of government were the Senate, the house, and the presidency

The three branches, not chambers, of the U.S. government, are the executive, legislative, and judicial.

youtube.com/watch?v=hu325JddgcI

you mean water vapor?
lol

it's ultraviolet to gamma output is highly variable. this is the range that causes water vapor to form clouds, and rain.

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-09-05 11-48-03.png (789x446, 364K)

>warming is bad

Attached: Image 2018-09-18 at 7.06.47 PM.png (726x958, 1.19M)

>Heat is bad
CO2+heat=more vegetables=more animals
CO2 is life. We don't need more coolness in this damned world. Give me a reason to start a fruitless fight global warming that is not "muh Netherlands" or "muh New Orleans"

Attached: large.jpg (500x333, 23K)

>other planets in the solar system
they don't have an atmosphere.
more to the point, is anyone even measuring their temperature to tenths of a degree celsius accuracy?

We should have never "acquired" Puerto Rico or Hawaii or some of these other quasi-Americans states such as Guam or Ausfaila

In her defense she was confused on the dates because of the last ice age

Attached: Nasa Hedline.jpg (651x410, 48K)

>fight against*

>Trump: I AM A SILLY STRAWMAN
>Ocasio: I am legit a retarded bitch

Wow Drumpf blumpfed

>Trump says 4 accurate things
>Cortez says an inaccurate thing
>somehow Trump is in the wrong on this one
Uhhhhhhhhh

I doubt that'd have helped.
She doesn't know anything about economics either.

I don't get. The only person incorrect in that post /ourgal/

Attached: 1536794914133.jpg (785x757, 60K)

She also thinks transgenderism is real, idgaf about Puerto Rico one way or the other. She and other mainstream leftists in this country are not intellectually honest either.

we're going to see another mini ice-age before 2050, the opposite direction of the current "projections"

screencap this post for good luck

Attached: Image 2018-11-16 at 2.52.08 PM.png (714x798, 174K)

>"muh Netherlands"
has anyone actually made that argument?
what a bunch of faggots.
who gives a fuck, all that water might help with the degeneracy.

Attached: retard.jpg (194x259, 12K)

Hers was an objective fact that was wrong, his was not.

Attached: 1541440192296.gif (400x300, 1.99M)

>Puerto Rico ceded to the US
It's almost like we lost. Next time we win a war, we should cede PR to the loser.

Well who even knows that factoid

>earth is a closed system

Why are they so convinced sweeping the forest floor won't work?

Yes, they do it. Also Venezia. They say they're environmentalists, but all the arguments they got for fighting against the Earth's natural tendency is the preservation of cities and countries built against it.

what book is this? i wanna read it

Oh really? I thought the problem was her absolutely retarded speech on Israel, or any other of her incoherent bullshit speech.

It's not about the warming it's about the rate of warming, that's the problem.

re: the rate of warming is problematic

Proof?

No you dumb bitch the joke is she can't name the three branches of government. Better not stuff so much straw here, you don't want your state to burn down too now would you?

Well, I can provide papers on the effects of rapid temperature change on coral reefs for instance, but I doubt you're unfamiliar with that concept, you disagree with it, so I would just be wasting my time.

oh there's also this little gem
twitter.com/magaindex/status/1064571056353157120?s=12
dumb cunt

>tfw will never serve in Trump's space force

Attached: 44B519D10D9B4CB98B0003F5E403B844.png (593x721, 144K)

Enjoy your rising sea levels, extreme weather, and destroyed ecosystems.

They'll just roll back to the 70's when they were shouting global cooling.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling
It's almost like the Earth has cyclical temperature fluctuations which are largely independent of us, and we're back-fitting data to squeeze out revenue.

muh coral reefs meme.

The reefs have survived much warmer temperatures than these.

Of course she can. It's more like she's suddenly being thrust into the spotlight. Organizing your thoughts while talking to literally millions of people can be hard. People will misspeak when they are speaking off the cuff.

The difference is that Trump doesn't misspeak. He says things that are completely ridiculous regardless of how you interpret them.

You guys are more concerned about one of 435 house members misspeaking over the US President not having a basic understanding of government.

Makes me think she's a dumb cunt that just spouts any old bullshit without fact checking.

It's a system with unequal thermal contact. The balance of emissivity and reflectivity (which are unequal since the Earth is a cool, non-black body) determines the point of thermal equilibrium.

CO2 lessens the emissivity of Earth by reabsorbing the heat before it gets emitted into space. In effect, this reduces the heat that the Earth can dissipate. The reason CO2 does this is because while transparent at "hot" temperatures (the entire visible spectrum), it is opaque in the infrared, which makes up most radiation from earth-temperature bodies.

Since we absorb the same heat as before, this means the Earth does two things
A) increases evaporation, thus increasing albedo and therefore reflectivity, decreasing the amount of heat we absorb
B) increases its overall temperature, therefore emitting more heat radiation
Both of these mechanisms involve an increase in temperature, since the rate of evaporation is also determined by temperature (through vapor pressure). Therefore, an increase in CO2 should lead to an increase in:
1) water cycle related weather events - e.g. hurricanes, tropical storms etc
2) an increase in average temperature

Does this hold? So far as I personally researched it has held until now, with the average world temperature increasing. People here post evidence to the contradictory, which I'll be honest that I haven't bothered to fully research yet. The point however is that CO2 has the mechanism to increase temperature, and in itself the question of why we *wouldn't* see an increase would be a worthy topic of meteorological investigation, since if it's true, fuck knows what else meteorologically it involves.

I really am sick of Shapiro watching, dead end boomers and boomer-kin trying to own the libs with facts and logic. Nobody cares about your facts, or your feelings. They like AOC because free shit and fuck whitey. Demographics is destiny.

Yo for real tho, the sun could eat a bad comet, and straight rip a fart in our direction and blast our atmosphere away.

Never change patriot.

>cut to 2040
>cooler period
>Kikeory Shecklestein: "The green initiatives are working! More taxes! More public organisations! More education!"

If someone made the point for you, you’re not doing anything thinking, OP.