Globe earthers:

Proove the earth is a spinning ball spinning 1000mph around itself, 67.000mph around the sun, the sun is 93.00.000 miles away and earth is a globe, WITHOUT; NASA or scientists. Maybe they lied to you? And oh, we cannot measure any curvature on earth. That is not strange because on a BALL EARTH you cannot have ANY FLAT AREAS! ON A SPHERE THERE DOES NOT EXIST ANY FLAT AREAS.

take the redpill. think for urself. dont listen to government agencies / scientists that provide u with "math" that u havent even looked into.

Attached: boats dont sail over curve.jpg (564x872, 58K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=IAcp3BFBYw4&t=1s
archive.org/details/kingsdethronedhi00hickrich
youtu.be/5HMwKwWnV4k
eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/57000/57723/globe_west_2048.jpg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Forgot the meme flag, idiot.
obvious bait thread.

Attached: 1533674086923.jpg (478x523, 56K)

just proove it without nasa or scientists.

when u go out of ur house, do u feel ur rotating at 1000mph? and earth rotates around sun at 67.000 mph? no u dont feel shit. and does the atmosphere protect us from vacuum of space?

how the fuck can some air not be sucked away with the vacuum of space? is there a magical border that says vacuum of space is weaker than some air?

Attached: 45222736_10156819189780421_8719281852856139776_n.jpg (856x960, 65K)

what about reflection on a sphere?

just tell me - where is the vacuum seal?

and do u really believe that an explotion from NOTHING created matter?

listen to urself:
>believes matter was created out of nothing

ur contradicting urself cuz einstein said we cant create matter?? what ??

Attached: flat earth nonvacuum.jpg (793x485, 56K)

watch this vid - a rocket hits the flat earth dome.

youtube.com/watch?v=IAcp3BFBYw4&t=1s

Attached: 1542453860328.png (700x700, 1.87M)

It's not like the curvature of the Earth is so minute per our field of view that the curvature would look around the same as a plane, or anything.
If only you fags knew how to do math you could have saved yourself some trouble.

Alot of convincing shit desu

If the earth was flat, gravity would pull it all towards the center of mass creating a sphere.

Prove that flat earthers are not reptiles trying to make humanity look stupid in the galactic community.

Attached: REPTILES DID IT.jpg (630x630, 65K)

>The earth is a sphere because you can't tell it's a sphere

Attached: 151211326629.png (408x450, 35K)

Yeah!

Attached: flatacado.jpg (216x451, 30K)

flat earthers arent capable of math which is why they're flat earthers.

You forgot to place an argument, user.

Honestly, you flat earthers cum suckers are dense as fuck, not being able to acknowledge roundness of the Earth.

If you dirt lickers could just see the Earth is a cylinder, we could probably start colonizing and preserving the white race.

I didn't though? All you and this retard have done is say that IF the earth was a sphere (and a large enough one), then it would be difficult to detect the curvature from the surface. That in no way is an argument that the earth is actually a sphere, which is what the OP requested. So, ironically,
>You forgot to place an argument, user.

And finally, fuck flat earthers.

Yeah because a rocket traveling 30,000mph isnt going to instantly atomize on impact, and instead will gently bounce off and stop spinning.

Attached: 1531549572455.gif (352x240, 854K)

I guess that same logic applies from OPs too, assuming the world is flat from an image bounded by perspective.

The speed of the Earth relate to if it's round or not. Might as well be a frisbee flying at the same speed.

Look up star/planet positions at continuous timeframes and the Earth speed can be found.

Never said Earth was a sphere.

I like how even in the proof pic posted the boat is still low in the water lmao

Gravity naturally makes any large object within small turn into a sphere. This includes our moon, our sun, our neighboring planets, and our own planet.

If you don't believe me, jump off the nearest tall building and prove me that gravity is fake.

The absolute state of Norway.

Attached: npcbaitfished.png (1242x1230, 188K)

Attached: 1535050739067.webm (1280x720, 2.95M)

Typo, meant to put "within our universe turns into a sphere.

>i am so stupid, just like you guys

>earth is a globe
simple. you fly an airship on one side of the planet and try to spot it from the other side of the planet using whatever telescope you deem worthy for the task. You can't.
You can somewhat calculate angle by roughing proportions into an angle by calculating acos(observed height / actual height) (we are taking the angle between vertical and the tower lean) (like if a tower is very stout when you see it, it's probably leaning far away from you) and then extrapolate the angle into the radius of the earth by scaling the adjacent line of the tower angle by taking the shortest distance between the top of the tower unbent and the top of the tower observed using the cosine rule and then getting the scale of the tower to the radius of the earth by dividing the distance between observer and tower by the distance between the top of the tower unbent and the top of the tower observed and then multiplying it by the height of the tower to get the radius of the earth.

You can then get the circumference of the earth easily from there, as well as the area.

It's really easy if you selected Chinese as your race in the character creation screen, honestly.

archive.org/details/kingsdethronedhi00hickrich

Interesting book from 1922


Kings dethroned : a history of the evolution of astronomy from the time of the roman empire up to the present day; showing it to be an amazing series of blunders founded upon an error made in the second century B.C.

Attached: 1539298954809.webm (1920x1080, 2.92M)

>is a spinning ball spinning 1000mph around itself
Just divide the circumference we got in my last post by 24 hours, since it rotates that distance in 1 day (or the sun rotates around it)
>around the sun
calculate the average gravitational field strength of an atom and then extrapolate it to earth's mass by rock sampling as well as accounting for gravity compression
then calculate the gravity it should have
then subtract the actual gravity and air resistance from it
if result > 0, then it must be centrifugal force acting against it. That means spinning earth

I can do it with two sticks and some shadows

Or I can do it with nothing at all if you watch the moon on January 21 from the right spot.

How come the moon always shows th the same static face if both earth and moon are spinning? Makes no sense.

Attached: 1528363442314.png (2278x958, 1.66M)

Attached: 1528362443282.png (1142x953, 2.01M)

>the sun is 93.00.000 miles away
Now that we know that the earth is a globe from my last last post, we can now extrapolate the distance of the sun.
Simply create 2 structures such that both will have no shadow during noon, which should be at the exact same time. Then get the angle displacement between the two, get your looking straight forward distance, then multiply tan(angle) by the looking straight forward distance.

Makes sense

>67.000mph around the sun
almost forgot about this one, but just turn distance (radius) from last post to distance around (circumference) then divide it by hours in year

Because the earth and moon are spinning in concert

Attached: 1537820123038m.jpg (430x1024, 64K)

It doesn't, but the rotation of the moon is slower than its orbit.

but that would not make sense with linear gravity, or if there are portals on the sides of the earth making the pull relatively even

Attached: 1541738250336.png (1292x732, 173K)

Right. Neither is spinning at all.

What I love about you faggots is when you say NASA and esa are behind the conspiracy, but dont account for the thousands of telescopes from amatuer astronomers and other countries who watch Mars rotate and other natural celestial motion. Are all those people hiding the truth of a flat earth from you?

Do we have portals on the sides of the earth

Attached: flat earth.jpg (1920x1080, 88K)

That's a NASA image from 1984 that Remedy Drive used for their album.

Serious question, what difference does it make it it’s flat?

>when u go out of ur house, do u feel ur rotating at 1000mph?
when you're driving a car at a constant velocity on a smooth road, do you feel the car moving?

>how the fuck can some air not be sucked away with the vacuum of space?
the force generated by earth's gravity overrides the atmosphere's ability to "expand out" into the vacuum of space.

Okay, now THIS is epic.

youtu.be/5HMwKwWnV4k
17:50

"What an amazing cheat--uuh-thing you have done

Attached: 1541925202521.webm (486x598, 2.43M)

The Earth's gravity pulls on the closest tidal bulge, trying to keep it aligned with Earth. As the Moon turns, feeling the Earth's gravity, this creates friction within the Moon, slowing the Moon's rotation down until its rotation matches its orbital period exactly, a state we call tidal synchronization. In this state, the Moon's tidal bulge is always aligned with Earth, which means that the Moon always keeps one face toward Earth.

Here I am faggot. I'm in an airplane. 15000 feet in the air. If the earth is flat, I should be able to see Himalayas and the Antarctic ice shield from the north pole. But I dont because you cant.

Also, the van Allan belt which you claim prevents the shuttle from reaching true orbit, because they are too hot, should melt the fucking ice dome. Or is that how you explain rainfall?

Attached: 1539302976300.webm (640x480, 1.74M)

Achievement, cut short and replaced with other words. SIMPLE

Not a flat earther but I have one argument. The lagrange point changes many thousands of km meaning at some point there should be partial rotation due to gravitational fluxuation. When there is a super moon the object moved much closer to account for the rotational flux.

I wont go into explaining the lro NASA mission but I'll tell you the moon is hollow and made of mostly iron. It is an engineered ancient battleship that was the home of the 'titan' nephilim following the Mars disaster. It is intelligently controlled and operates as a frequency sender/fertility monitor as the lunar cycle controls ovulation in all lifeforms. During a full moon people do unpredictable things and I feel that is part of these beings sexual mind control over planetary cattle

fuck you faggot falseflagging

Attached: STS-41-C(1).jpg (2000x1500, 1.86M)

Attached: Eratosthenes.jpg (509x264, 16K)

Attached: fadeout.webm (1280x720, 1.57M)

>those cloudforms
They can't even fake that shit in top-notch CGI. I've seen fake NASA clouds, But logically I attribute that to pushing pics for the press because ACTUAL photos in space are very difficult to capture because lighting conditions outside of earth's atmosphere cannot be accurately captured easily by cameras designed within earth's atmospheric lighting.

People don't seem to understand this. Filming in space is alien, because all cameras are built and designed to earthly lighting specifications which are always under the influence of an atmosphere.

Awesome image BTW. Wonderful to see man looking down on his world in a marvel of engineering.

Where's the original NASA-provided video?

eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerecords/57000/57723/globe_west_2048.jpg

Attached: copypasteclouds.jpg (800x800, 216K)