Ask a Communist Anything

Why do you assume that humans are naturally greedy, when in reality we've been conditioned to act in our own ruthless self-interest by bourgeois propaganda?

>durr why communist use things
Normie argument.

Make me.

I don't believe you
prove you are a communist first

Were you deprived of oxygen at birth?

I'm gonna steal your toothbrush and guillotine you.

Don't worry, we are going to make you leave this life sooner than later.

> communist
Hello, I'm unicorn.

No, I was born in a government-run, publicly funded hospital with excellent service.

You might wanna stop getting stomped and run off by Antifa first, fascist dog.

milions of years of evolution you blame on the bourgeoise propaganda ok you are a litle kid arent you?

>tells me I’ve been conditioned by bourgeois propaganda
>wants to recondition me using commie propaganda
eat shit nigger

Attached: 1D2F7357-79EF-4068-9580-A8007BDA1A6D.jpg (436x536, 63K)

how big is your nose?

Attached: 1397935174222.png (200x185, 9K)

Average to small-sized.

That sounds like Kulak talk.

You gonna get collectivised one way or the other friend.

And if you're statistically above that average wealth curve, as many of you trendy commies are, it's not going to go well for you.

Socialism is a guilt based middle-class affectation that allows them to feign solidarity with the poor, for the purposes of hating on the truly wealthy.

Anyway, I have no questions for communists; I want true answers for one.

- t. Lumpen

Where did I imply I want to recondition you?

how about you fuck off and kill yourself you government worshiping ass wipe

die in a fire rat

>muh evolution
Humans have always operated in groups and worked under mutual aid, up until now and perhaps a few hundred years ago.

I'm lower middle-class, but okay.

do you support the continued descent of white countries into revolting third world shitholes

Somebody's never read the code of Hammurabi.
Or studied the rise of the God-King as a social phenomenon amongst early city-building cultures.

big surprise.

>fascist dog
confirmed kike
dog is human man's treasured friend
unclean only in the eyes of desert goblins

Communism: a stateless, classless, moneyless society.

Go worship your corporate overlords, bootlicker.

I don't believe in myth of "white genocide".

Literally what.

theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-mutual-aid-a-factor-of-evolution

You're still richer than I am then.

Say I want what you have, and by marx's rationale you owe it me.

How you justify not coughing up, and still calling yourself a Communist?

Props if you actually try to answer hard questions; most lefties are content to simply post over nine thousand negro penises, declare unilateral victory, then leave.

I was reading the bread book earlier. Welcome, comrade.

Greed is an evolutionary trait brought on by a lack, and therefore competition for resources.

In your own opinion why hasn't real communism (as you define it: a stateless, classless, moneyless society) ever been able to be successfully implemented over the course of human history?

Are communists sympathetic to the INCEL cause?

How come communism fails under any type of implementation?

not an argument you retarded ass wipe. try again.

If you think Marxism is just 'gib me dat', then I'm afraid you have a fundamental misunderstanding of Marxism as a whole. I don't personally owe you a thing (though if you needed something, I might very well offer it), but the wealthy capitalists who own the means of production, do.

Rojava, Paris Commune, Catalonia.

Why do you support an ideology that killed millions of people, doesn't let people follow their own believes and religions and oppresses those who do? You blame Bourgoise propaganda (lol), yet communist leader took riches while their populations starved to death. Critics got smashed violently and people who oppose the idea of a communist regime get imprisoned or slaughtered. Why do you support an ideology, that by its deeds is as bad or even worse than NatSoc?

kindly explain to me how the easily verifiable fact that nearly all white countries are becoming less white is a "myth"

Explain to me how it constitutes genocide.

But aren't all those states?

Should communism be reestablished somewhere, what makes you think it would work?
Real communism not China's state capitalism thats going on atm

The things you mentioned aren't specific to communism, and religious forms of communism exist. I'm of a mind that most religious texts advocate socialism/communism in one way or another.

Anarchist societies.

I think the only way communism can truly work is through global revolution, as Trotsky theorised. That means worldwide class consciousness and revolt.

but each one of those had a sort of government.

Remember to sage this slide threading commie faggot you God damn newfags.

Attached: 4947034.jpg (1024x1024, 261K)

i never said it constitutes genocide, dumbass. white countries are becoming less white because of immigration laws. who is responsible and why it's happening are irrelevant. do you support those laws or not

There's a key difference between basic social organisation and an established government. IS voting for which pizza to order amongst a group of friends a form of government?

I don't think race is a relevant factor of human existence. AKA I don't believe in supremacist pseudoscience.

Overall I want more of a refugee intake in order to aid those in need, but I don't want a huge influx of economic immigrants, which lower wages for the proletariat.

sage in all paths

Attached: C91Ts1ZUMAAiB2F.jpg (689x1200, 141K)

Not by definition, but they occure in most communistic countries. In the end these things oppose the classless society which is why such things happened. You didn't really answer my question. On the surface communism looks like a cool idea, but when you go around a corner or too, the consequences of such ideologies are often very bad, as we could see on various examples throughout history. NatSoc doesn't aim to kill Jews, Handicaped and Gypsies either by definition, it was simply a Hitler thing.

Not if it veers into violent misogyny.

Communist soviet union killed 25 million people in ukraine while the chinese version of communism killed 50 million.

Those are some pretty good numbers and we haven't seen anyone like those two in a while, it may be a long time before those records are broken.

So now my question, why was the Chinese version of communism two times better than the soviet?

How about establishing it in a country that has met certain requirements?
>completely self sufficient
>full isolationism
>absolutely independent from globalists
>nuclear power
maybe robotization of most if not all jobs where all people need to know is how to repair machines? Or does that stray too far from the ideology?

Say I interpret the wealth disparity between me and you as the result of systemic injustice perpetrated against my social class throughout history, and use this as justification to compel the commissariat to expropriate your goods and property.

What then?

why haven't you starved to death? oh wait you are not living in a communist nation

Attached: knothead.jpg (645x729, 32K)

Define what you think communism is.

Yeah the world wide argument. The problem is that people think: If something works, it also works when it's bigger. If something doesn't work, people think it's gonna work when it's bigger. Those are massive mistakes.

you bring up a good point. I wouldn't consider something like voting for which pizza to order amongst a group of friends as a form of government. However if me and my friends voted on a person to order a type of pizza for us and then said individual made sure we ate the pizza he ordered, then it would be a sort of government in my eyes. albeit a dictatorship

>that flag
Wew boy. Also, muh starvation. What's the homeless population of western, capitalist nations?

To aid those who truly are in need, you gotta go there. Immigration is absolutely useless. You may help a handful of people, but you don't really help at all.

>voted for a person
>dictatorship
American education folks, nothing to see here

Sure, but anarchists historically aren't a huge fan of dictators.

communism is a great idea on small scale like a little tribe or a single family. Problems come once you go big. My opinion at least.

Are you implying that someone who is voted into power can't become a dictator?

You're the expert you tell me. I rely on the examples throughout history, and experience is usualy the better measurement than theory.

A stateless, classless, and currencyless society, achieved after a period of socialism.

In the years 1932-1933, the Kremlin exported record amounts of food to the west and got rich from this while millions of Soviet farmers died from starvation.

How will you prevent this from happening in YOUR communism?

Attached: please reconsider.png (824x720, 430K)

most of them are too lazy or fucked up too much in life to better themselves
they don't want to better themselves its not capitalisms fault.

Gonna need a citation on that one, senpai.

Explain to me how it is you believe these capitalists came to own the means of production

sorry, I suppose it would be a very authoritarian democracy

But the point still stands. There were officials who were put in place to run those areas. With that there are rules one must follow. therefore they cannot be considered "anarchist societies" (at least not 100%).

Right, obviously every homeless person is at fault for their own situation. Obviously zero outside factors can influence someone's situation negatively. I hope you never fall on hard times.

Are you a commie cos you can't get laid and you think that communism is the only way to get laid because once you're in power you intend on telling women their cunts are not private property but property of the state and the means of (re)production, therefore should be shared with every man without rejection?

Sounds pretty awful.
"Central Planning" always stuffs up because they can't keep all the plates spinning on their own.

And as soon as you decentralize, fragmentation begins to set in.

The USSR and China didn't really get along, despite engaging in certain cooperative programs against The West, like "Comintern" their joint agent training programme - they both had pretty heavily secured borders with one another, and much of their disagreement was based on coming from different schools of Communism.

So much for "International Communism".

stop dodging the point you chicken shit. why are you a government worshiping cuckold who is too stupid for individual thought?

britannica.com/place/Ukraine/The-famine-of-1932-33
>At the same time, a law was passed in August 1932 making the theft of socialist property a capital crime, leading to scenes in which peasants faced the firing squad for stealing as little as a sack of wheat from state storehouses. The rural population was left with insufficient food to feed itself. The ensuing starvation grew to a massive scale by the spring of 1933, but Moscow refused to provide relief. In fact, the Soviet Union exported more than a million tons of grain to the West during this period.
Don't dodge the Question. How will Your communism avoid this from repeating?

>What's the homeless population of western, capitalist nations?
In Denmark for example, they are offered free money every month, but they still can't get their shit together.
But at least they aren't dying by the millions.

Attached: do reconsider.png (680x680, 827K)

How's bad is ur relationship with ur dad and other authority figures in ur life?

I know you're not going to change your mind on communism tonight, but just know that smarter, more motivated groups of people than you have considered it, have tried to implement it and have all failed

Eric Blair (''George Orwell') as a young man was a socialist.
As a middle-aged man he warned against socialism in his books, Animal Farm and Nineteen-Eightyfour.
Why?

>Communism: a stateless, classless, moneyless society.
Question.

How will your Communist paradise stop another country from destroying your people and steal your land/resources?

Attached: 1452006209801.jpg (337x290, 56K)

>can't read
Clearly it says "most of them" sure there are some that fell under misfortune but that is a fact life. Life is unfair even in your communist society. For instance if someone is born paralyzed they will never be able to experience the life a normal person would and nothing can change that. Homeless panhandlers will not benefit a communist society they dont have anything to offer because they do not want to work. Unless you force them to build roads like Stalin.

Common misconception. Orwell remained a democratic socialist until he passed away.

How big is your member and is it circumcised

Pretty high in leftist run cities that flaunt socialism and welfare like commie retards

By not doing it, I suppose. Cuba, China and Yugoslavia didn't do this, so why focus so intently on this one unfortunate factor of Soviet history?

Flatly incorrect but okay.

Not only that there is nothing stopping rebel subgroups of a communist nation from forming and going to war with commies and then taking power.

There will always be adversary there is no fucking peace.

I notice you're dodging questions which actually challenge your assumptions

>Pretty high in leftist run cities
San Fransisco literally has shit in the streets.

Because Cambodia did this, and China did this too.
Why run another risk of millions of people dying just to sate your desire for absolute power?