How is it possible that you can´t openly critize immigration without being branded a racist by the left...

Fpbp

You could bring up facts like how resettling Germans into occupied territories during WW2 was literally considered a war crime at Nurnberg, I suppose. But honestly, there's no reasoning or logic with these people.

What kind of information?

Attached: bishop-mueller.jpg (637x275, 89K)

I wrote this article (in French, so for France, but it works for all Whites) on the topic. Here's a crappy translation:

«Break the magical power of the enemy: be racist or die, you must choose».

If the Whites of Western Europe - so of France - want to survive, they must logically want to live in the first place. This is not happening now. Morbid impulses and behaviors are so widespread that it would be difficult to list them all.

The white masses evolve between sado-masochism and the desire for self-destruction, an attitude that expresses, in order to be socially acceptable, compassionate humanitarianism for all everything that effectively destroys white society. Whether it is physically, by the foreigner invasion and the promotion of abortion, or psychologically and morally, by the guilt and shame of belonging to the white race.

This mental cancer makes everything that protects the white life instinct an evil and what kills it a good. The complete inversion of the vital order.

The guilty education produces psychological ravages of a nature to completely destroy the society.

A study summarizes:

According to the psychoanalyst Serge Tisseron, shame is an attack on all the bonds that a person can weave, it is a threat of dissolution of human existence. Indeed, the loss occurs at different levels of being, on the three pillars which underpin its identity: self-esteem, emotional bonds and sense of belonging.

Whites fed on leftism reject their group of belonging. They become sociopaths and, for the most virulent, declared enemies of their race and society. The only rewarding status offered to them is anarchist hateful of himself and the social order.

The caricature of these insanities is the antifas and other negrophiles in search of a rewarding identity, next to a scale of values established negatively by the subhumans.

Faced with the creative Aryanity, now banned, is celebrated the omnipotent negro, redeemer of the sin of racism. It is here that the apology function of miscegenation comes into play: the exit from the curse whose the white race is afflicted by genetic liberation.

Of course, there is an alternative discounted path of "liberation". That of the figure of the oppressed in search of a symbolic master to hate to paradoxically better testify to his most perfect democratic conformism.

More often, whites are only infected and suffer this poisoning passively, content to absorb this destructive energy and regurgitate it during social gatherings.

Democratic superstition

We have to deal with a real religious system which has a coherent worldview. If we break the element that is the basis of this religion, this whole system collapses infallibly. For Christian Europe, atheism and agnosticism have shaken and destroyed its religious system by annihilating it at its epicenter. Without faith in God, the authority of the Pope and the divine right power of kings is no longer necessary.

For the (((religion))) that concerns us, the democratic and socialist religion, the myth to be destroyed is that of equality. This belief in the coming of a universal peace as soon as all the hierarchies and limits, generating "oppression" and stress, will have been abolished.

It is a rebellion that nothing ever satisfies, like Lucifer, the rebel.

This religion has the human rights as its "Ten Commandments". It has its rites and holy mass, commemorations of the Holocaust, reminiscence of Auschwitz, "alt-Golgotha". It has its definition of the pure and the impure and its subsequent list of sins to be expiated: colonization, slavery, world wars, pseudo-discriminations, nationalism.

If the Christian West has collapsed, the French live nevertheless in a superstitious society governed by a clergy, with ill-defined contours, composed of journalists, political leaders and mythified figures.

>branded
kek. it's name calling, like children do. that's all they have. walk it off.

The White, to expiate his responsibility in the misfortunes of the world - negatives of colonial Eurocentrism obliges - is morally constrained to work for his own destruction.

This is precisely the function of what is called the left. The political left is boiled down to the over-exploitation of a bad conscience created from scratch by its care, thus offering him the domination of the hearts and minds in search of forgiveness. The left is the anti-church par excellence and the monkey in everything.

And the last stage of this forgiveness is of course the total racial expiation.
This is what Jean-Paul Sartre summed up perfectly: "To defeat a European is to kill two birds with one stone, to suppress at the same time an oppressor and an oppressed person: remain a dead man and a free man."

The destruction of whites, the raison d'être of democracy

In the democratic religion, as in its radical wing of Socialo-Marxism, the destruction of hierarchies is an existential, messianic necessity. It never stops looking for new boundaries to cross, such as the abolition of races and genders.

Paradoxically, whites, in order to legitimize their immediate existence, consider that to work for their long-term destruction is a moral obligation.

As long as whites, faced with any choice, preferentially opt for their death in order to meet the requirements of the prohibitions of their religion, they will advance towards their annihilation. As long as they choose others before ours, their conscience will be relieved to be orthodox.

This cannibal nihilism is the ideological heart of the enemy we face and who thrives in our people. That is why, as during the religious wars of the 16th and 17th centuries, we are in a civil war. Our prior enemy, existential, is not external but domestic: it crosses families and villages, a phenomenon that is further aggravated by the ethnic intertwining of the various racial groups and the social links thus generated.

This explains the religious and sacred dimension of the immigration issue. It is a topic that is treated in absolute terms: yes or no, good or bad, in favor or against. It allows the members of a society to situate themselves in relation to the forces currently in power. The practical consequences are of no interest to anyone in "smart set".

The language of democratic superstition

The etymology of the word "taboo" comes from the Polynesian "tapu" which means "sacred prohibition". It was Captain Cook who, in 1711, reportedly brought him from Tonga, and until the beginning of the 20th century, this term will retain its meaning of religious prohibition:
"System of religious prohibitions applied to what is considered sacred or impure; ritual prohibition ".

Dominated by some religious, it has become logical for society to see language become more and more "performative". An utterance is performative when it does not limit itself to describing a fact but "does" something itself.

This is what happens when someone blasphemes. By outraging God or something sacred, the blasphemer does not describe anything: he commits an act that, in itself, radically questions the very foundation of truth and morality.

Once we understand this -speech is an act- we must conclude the following: it is futile to want to act in the -sacred- semantic limit which is imposed by the religious we fight.
To act otherwise means by definition that one recognizes in the last instance their authority, therefore their power to define the norms of reality. It is to admit that we still bow to the religion that feeds on our destruction. It's agreeing to be slaves too.

But we are Aryans, therefore free men.

Not to yield to it makes us, automatically, heretics from the enemy's point of view. Either we accept to be a "heretic" in his eyes -and we assume what we believe in- either we condemn ourselves to survive in a society governed by the lie hoping not to be identified, waiting for our forfeiture.

In this religious struggle, words are obviously the stake of power. It is not for nothing if the power forbids heretics -that is, whites- from expressing themselves. It is not a coincidence that, through the recourse to guilt and shame that I have spoken of, slaves and the power erected over their worldview forbid the reestablishment of hierarchical notion as of preferences based on unsurpassable affiliations.

Taking on heresy: we are racist and we want to be racists

So is the word "racism". To understand what the word "racist" means today, one only has to study what the word "antiracism" means. Anti-racism refers to the fight against whites in Europe until they disappear. This total and messianic religious expiation of which I spoke above.

In the USA, this project is openly and totally assumed by the cohort of slaves: racial groups, Democrats and Marxists.

Although the only legitimate owners of Europe -it is in the name of legitimate ownership that the Africans and Moslems have claimed their decolonization- the Whites are prohibited of any exclusive property of their continent. This questioning of their legitimacy has for long been recognized in the constitution of Western democracies.
As a reminder, Article 1 of the Constitution of the French Republic:
"France is an indivisible, secular, democratic and social republic. It ensures equality before the law of all citizens without distinction of origin, race or religion."

This proclamation, ignoring the dynamic context of humanity, expropriates the native French of his country. And offers him to the mass of Negroes and Muslims who colonize it gradually. It is democracy which guarantees Islamists to build mosques and negroes to sue the whites in justice.

Compare.

The -gigantic- power of the Church seemed endless. But determined writers, intellectuals and speakers, systematically using humor and irony, destroyed the prestige of Catholic authority to impose their own world's vision. What became an open war during the French Revolution, then under the Third Republic.

Any refusal to consent to the invasion and the outrageous pretensions of the Negroes and Muslims is worth the charge of "racism". The signified of the word racism is negative and perceived as evil by the masses because of a permanent work by the (((democratic))) religious power, in accordance with the criminalization of any life will from Whites.

Sooner or later, the French will have to choose between France on the one hand and democracy and its window that is "the republic" on the other hand.

Break the magic power of the enemy

The accusation of "racism" is not based on a faithful description of the truth but on the moral and psychological ascendancy that one hopes to earn to the detriment of his victim.

The Sandniggers or Negroes use this accusation to excess, knowing that it offers them a psychological leverage over Whites. Like a magic formula that paralyzes and destroys their will. They do even more willingly because they also know that if the white man wakes up, they will be swept away.

Negroes and Arabs see anti-racism as a lottery to which they win all the time. And the democratic power invariably supports its auxiliaries in this behavior.

This word is, as we have seen, sacred. That is to say, it has magical power only if the victim consents to grant it. And he only gives it as long as he submits to this religious system.

As long as whites fear to be assimilated with racists -so, in fact, whites who want to live- they will offer themselves the worst torments.

Be racist or die, you have to choose.

At the moment when the Europeans decide to break this power by taking back the racist term to make it a title of glory, the charm collapses. The white man stops sinking into the infernal cycle of self-destruction for that of the counteroffensive, of the affirmation, of the will.

And so it is with all the sacred or demonized terms.

This is also why, according to the idea that this language is performative, we absolutely want to use the words struck of forbidden such as negro, métèque, crouille, bougnoule, bamboula (note: french words for shitskins), etc.

And it works absolutely.

The standardization of these terms is absolutely crucial.

You can't because NPCs have been told that being against unlimited, open borders immigratio is "racist".
Fuck them and the (((media))), everyone with a functioning brain knows you're right

First, books, pictures, nationalist information, and then statues, artifacts.

Attached: folk1-1.jpg (1840x1493, 1.16M)

Take off your memeflag fren.