Can the irreperable damage this cretin has done be reversed ?

this cretin is systematically erasing thousands of years of tradition

Attached: antichrist.jpg (1280x853, 80K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_Fátima
youtube.com/watch?v=Le7IpH80OCA
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I honestly don't even think he's a Christian in private

Me either.

If you truly feel that way, then you'll understand that what the Vatican is today isn't worth preserving anyway.

There were shit-tier popes in the past who did far worse stuff than he did

Catholic - Christian

Choose one

Catholics are a branch of Christianity numb nuts

Neither, he's a Jesuit :^)

Just your typical subversive Christcuck

He's the essence and logical end
point of the Catholic Heresy of 1054.
Not sure why people are surprised after 1000 years of this

He's a jew

- Cult of Mary
- Believe the Pope acts on God's behalf on earth
- Believe men can absolve you of sins
- Believe you can confess to a man
- Think some dude mumbling Latin turns bread into flesh and wine into blood
- Impose celibacy on depraved humans and act confused when they abuse their positions and rape boys/girls/each other
- The Velvet Mafia
I could go on...

Catholics are heretics. I feel for those born into it as they are being deceived. Its not too late to repent and follow Christ, user.

It can and will be.

>when you hate Christ so much that you make up lie after lie about His Church.

Point out the lies...I'll wait :)

Stop disrespecting the Holy Father. The Vicar of Christ deserves respect, otherwise you are just a revolutionary. The Holy Father is teaching us a valuable lesson of what happens when you try to modernize the Church. I'm sure the Cardinals can see the results and because of said results will vote according to them for the next Papacy. God bless Pope Francis.

Did you expect anything less of the Roman church? It's never been a bastion of Christianity.

Much of their doctrine only draws relevance from previous Papal encyclicals or teachings and not directly from the Bible; where it does draw from Scripture, a good chunk of it is abstraction from a verse and not a clearly-understood teaching.

You have yet to discredit the Church. You just listed things you are uncomfortable with. Faith is not supposed to be comfortable, and we are tasked to serve the one true Church, which traces it's origins to Peter, the apostle that Jesus entrusted with His Church.

>the Holy Father

Sounds like heresy to me. There is only One worthy of that name.

>misreading that verse this hard
>founding an entire doctrine of faith upon it

Nice.

wouldn't be the first jew thats infiltrated the vatican

>founding an entire faith on rebellion against the apostolic churches and ransacking them for 500 years

>Imagine not believing the office of Pope itself is the Antichrist and the Whore of Babylon isn’t the Roman Catholic Church.
>Stay mad, papist fags

You could say the same for Roman Catholics but change the 500 to 1000 years

>Point out clear heresies
>gets response with typical strawman from someone that can't defend their beliefs
Please try a little bit harder user. I really am interested in your response to those specific issues. I'm not uncomfortable with them because I'm not a Catholic - I continually worry for the souls of my Catholic brothers and sisters and pray they'll turn from deception and follow Christ and Christ alone. I feel the same way about other heretics - Mormons, JW's, Christadelphians, etc.

Peter himself wrote that the church isn’t lead by anyone but the Trinity.
“you also, like living stones, are being built into a spiritual house to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.”

How can they ransack something that's rightfully theirs? How can they ransack when only those who took a vow of poverty were allowed to control these properties? The Orthodox Churches were led by a literal Emperor during the Byzantine era.

He's not a cretin, he's just a whore that does what his pimp tells him to do.

>founding an entire faith upon presupposed supremacy based upon a lie
>continuing to reinforce that faith by systematically purging it of free inquiry
>disliking said inquiry, leading to said rebellion
>losing to the rebellion

>How can they ransack something that's rightfully theirs? How can they ransack when only those who took a vow of poverty were allowed to control these properties?
The Catholic Church is the one that changed doctrine without convening a council. They are heterodox and heretics and have changed doctrine to suit their worldly needs since the time of the schism. They are not the original church.
>The Orthodox Churches were led by a literal Emperor during the Byzantine era.
So is the Roman Catholic church right now what's your point?
t. not orthodox

Yes, Aristocrats stealing lands from the Church and controlling the doctrine as a way to gain support from illiterate farmers is totally what God wanted in His last Testament. Also, disprove Peter holding the keys of the Church, or do you guys just throw out that book like you did with 7 others.

The vast majority of protestants dislike Catholics. Most evangelicals think all Catholics go to Hell.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_Fátima
kek the absolute state of it

Your "Church" has been infiltrated with child molesters, homosexual apologists, sodomites, liars, deceivers and thieves.

No place to go but down for you faggots.

You're acting as if though this is a slam dunk. Do sinners not exist? Does evil not persist? Do you reject truth and virtue whenever a sign of adversity pops up.

Fuck the stupid catholic church. religion is a way to control the masses. anyone or anything that imposes celibacy on humans is FUCKED. then they wonder why priests rape and molest children. catholics are morons.

also, im not going to repent to another man. fuck that and fuck the church.

>irreperable
>reversed
american education

>t. low IQ wignat

Your "Church" hides these things from it's followers until it gets out then they try to pay hush money or LIE to cover it up.
Do you condone the leader of your "Church" covering up the crimes of the papacy?

Maybe it can maybe it can't!

>literally the leader of a pedophile ring
what fucking damage can he do to an organization dedicated to fucking kids ?

Attached: 1542598118513.webm (1366x768, 2.76M)

Frankly, I don't care. Only the Church possesses the Truth and it's faithful followers will purge the Church from within. Why subject it to the modernist inquisition of secular society that has actively tried to subvert the Church and destroy It? Many of which have expressed publically that they use these scandals to lead people away from God and His Church.

I mean, the Roman church doesn't exactly have a habit of practising what God wants anyway, so it wouldn't surprise me if they started as they supposed to continue.

How would I entreat the Scripture of "Peter holding the keys". The first thing to do is look at the context: if you read it properly,—by which I mean take that particular verse in its entire context, i.e., the chapter,—then you'll read that the "rock on which [Christ]" founded the church is the admission and recognition of Christ as the Son of God. That is the key difference, is not, between Jews and Christians? It is upon that very authority—the recognition, acceptance, and admission of Christ as Son of God and saviour—that the Christian church was founded.

Now, knowing that Peter was not the first to admit this, where can we turn? Personally, I would turn to the fact that Christ was merely exposing a particular doctrine—i.e., that a core tenet of being a discipline is in making the admission aforementioned. He did not hand keys to Peter, nor did he begin the fabricated chain of "apostolic succession", and so forth.

Nothing he listed is actually true. He's your typical protestant... completely clueless what The Church actually teaches and believes. He probably gets most of his "information" from pastor Heehaw down at the haybale Baptist church.

The absolute state of my grammar. Apologies.

Some corrections:

*is it not

*being a disciple

it was jesus bringing the bants to an arrogant self righteous peter without being mean.

My parents have met him (when he came to our church) and said he was an ass to everyone
I have talked to other people that have met him and they told me the exact same thing

They already did that in the Fourth Crusade

Yes, the Church has a way to deal with this. Call an ecumenical council and declare him a heretic.

Oh wait, Cathcucks can't because muh papal supremacy. Sucks.

it will stand. it's a promise. It has a foundational stone not made by human hands. Every terrenal force is not enough to destroy it.

what game is this?

The Church will stand, but Rome is not the Church.

Attached: mark of ephesus.jpg (826x1023, 607K)

I'M SURE YOU AND THE PEOPLE SURROUNDING YOU ARE FACHITOS, NO WONDER HE WAS AN ASS TO THEM

literaly a kike who sacrifice kids for moloch

Do you think euthanasia should be promoted as a solution to the eternal white male incel epidemic?

probably dead air but could be any of a bunch of stalker mods . go to /vg/ stalker general if you like this shit there's a sticky
youtube.com/watch?v=Le7IpH80OCA

thanks jew bro

Wasn't he labelled a fachito to begin with? He was an ass before being pope and was mean to people.

I politely disagree. There are many churches and many of them ceased their activity. When something stands against many odds, superior enemies, child molesters, pure corruption, internal enemies... and still stand. Well you can be sure something is defying entropy.

I disliked this prick from the beginning. His parents were Italian, therefore although he was born in Argentina (derr he's a hispanic pope derr) the guy is basically Italian, the italians got control of the church again.

Fuck this guy, Irish Pope Now.

CATHOLICS PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS

Course
John Paul II and based Benedict are the only two Pope's to ever exist that deserved respect
But if you think about it that means that you'll have to wait another 8-9 centuries before you get another pope worth a shit
if you actually give a fuck about the church though you're worse than Jews and should hang with the other traitors to our people

>Catholics are heretics.

Jesus: Hey Peter, lead my church bro.
Peter: Okay. [Becomes Pope]

Make more lists you protestant cuck.

are you Orthodox or what?

It was never worth preserving, literally a shrine to a foreign religion founded on the principle of controlling and destroying the white man

Hes coming back fellas

Attached: C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_2018-02-07_Benedict.jpg (810x450, 223K)

>>Can the irreperable damage this cretin has done be reversed ?

Yes.
It would help though, if he was first neutralized.

>Founders of your like religion as it's known today
>Heretics
You're just like Muslims that like to pretend the crusades weren't their doing

Why dont you guys choose the one true religion?

Attached: 437ae879eb394b93b80a58dcd0a47c77_18.jpg (1000x562, 488K)

> anyone or anything that imposes celibacy on humans is FUCKED
Have you not got any discipline in you to behave better than an animal? lmao

Peter was the bishop of Antioch, not Rome

>Jesuit
>spreads degeneracy
Who could have foreseen this?

Attached: jesuit-books-oath-end-justify.jpg (547x410, 108K)

I'm a Calvinist
Yet another strawman. Still waiting...

Oh, and talking of Peter:

1 Peter 3:15
"but in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect,"

Catholics can't seem to do this when their heresies are laid out in front of them.

That's like asking if my foreskin will grow back.