FGM Legal in the United States of Mutt

women wanted to be treated equal

If it was passed through the commerce clause, the judge is correct.

>a Jew defending genital mutilation

EEEEEEEMAGEEEENNNEEEE MY SHOCK

Well the case doesn't create a precedent since she's getting off on a technicality. What kind of idiots charter such a law under commerce law? Shame.

No it won't, less chicks will be able to ride the cock carousel

This instance involved interstate commerce, though. They trafficked the girls from Minnesota to Michigan to have their genitals mutilated, for which they paid money. That is interstate commerce.

Civil War when?

We need to burn this fucking country to the ground, kill all the weak liberals, non-whites, and Jews, and build it back up from scratch.

Attached: witch.jpg (933x960, 125K)

fake tweet moron

good, we told them if they didnt make MGM illegal then we would make FGM legal
you can either have them both illegal or both legal, stop fucking bullshitting around, do you want equal rights or not you fucking jackass feminists?

if you want to kill weak liberals, block the roads
the jews and the establishment already have too much power
literally blocking roads and probably to the extent of fucking with electricity in shitlib cities can make these baizou faggots be the pets of the ones they concern shilled for, more so than already

Attached: 1542096763587.png (400x201, 125K)

Do you think euthanasia should be promoted as a solution to the eternal white male incel epidemic?

Someone cut off a little girls labia!
>OH NO, IT'S THE PATRIARCHY, KILL HIM!

It was a muslim!
>OH. THAT'S DIFFERENT.

Correct

Thot status: patrolled

This is actually a major victory for anti-MGM activists. Women do not empathize with men, so the only way to get women to support a ban on MGM is to make it so that you can't ban FGM without also banning MGM. As long as MGM remains legal in the US, you shouldn't give a fuck about girls getting their roasts cut up, especially since it is a much more minor procedure than MGM.

Attached: 1537214096231.jpg (1189x755, 151K)

It's an opportunity to get women to give a fuck. ACCELERATE

it's not just some skin dude, it's the whole, visible clit.

Someone needs to cap this ho. Im in California, but if some shit like this happens in my area, I will shoot that shitskin!

Oh well LMAO

DETROIT YES

The whole, visible clit is a few millimeters in length and has between 5000-8000 nerve endings, depending on whose numbers you use. The foreskin, in maturity, is a couple centimeters in length and has between 20000-40000 nerve endings, depending on figures I only vaguely remember and can't be bothered to reference. Male and female genital mutilation aren't equivalent, but the imbalance is in the opposite direction; men lose objectively more.

.. /that's/ the judge? Well whaddaya know, a muslim. Why the FUCK are they allowed to be .. well in the US, even?

I'm starting to think I won't really miss society that much

Attached: 1541064133027.gif (600x600, 1.82M)

She's basically bitter old childless hag now, past reasonable child bearing years. It's why she obsessed over rendering men infertile. She probably wants bto sterilize women, too, but saying that would get her in trouble.

K...

Attached: 1447788987395[1].png (500x425, 274K)

My opinion on this is split.
On one hand I despise the Abrahamic religions practicing FGM.
On the other hand these people dont care at all about MGM.
They should both be banned but if they will only ban one then they should both be legal.
It violates the equal protection clause of the constitution to ban one and not the other.

>Judge Bernard Friedman

Attached: 4D66434E-76D0-44EA-8D59-259429D1CDE2.gif (333x358, 1.83M)

Fake. There's no way she'd give away that sort of fetish fuel for free.

I think that's the doctor. The judge is Jewish and logically consistent in his beliefs as well as upholding of the law.

Hello, roastie. Unlike what most of your fellow roasts like to parrot, FGM is generally the amputation of the "clitoral hood" (the skin that surrounds the clitoris). This skin is the anatomical equivalent to the male foreskin. However, there is much less clitoral hood skin than there is foreskin on the male penis. Not to mention, that there are far more nerve endings in the male foreskin as well.Therefore, MGM is objectively worse than FGM, yet MGM is perfectly legal in the West (thanks to the Jews) whereas FGM is illegal in most Western countries.

This is correct. Both Jews and Muslims are sub-human, but if the Jews are allowed to mutilate boys than Muslims should be allowed to mutilate girls.

Fuck off kike

What the fuck is wrong with you people?

checked

Attached: 5165165165161651652.jpg (1320x690, 351K)

>U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman

Attached: 1523911299557.png (720x715, 472K)

Good.
Thots need to get patrolled

What is it with Jewish women and their ranting about killing white men and cutting their balls off.

No wonder Jewish men are such tyrants. Look at their fucking women. Also its a Matriarchal society so they bassically control the Jewish race.

Orrrrrr nothing will be banned and every aspect of this country will continue to rapidly get worse.

White people never win anymore. Haven't you noticed that when looking at the last 60-300 years of Western history? Things just keep getting worse. It coincides perfectly with Jewish wealth accumulation, emancipation and influence via the various methods of propaganda dissemination that sprang up.

Hey America.
Remember when you mocked us when we said it'd happen to you if you didn't fight it?
Start fighting it before it gets worse.

Faggoty Gay Males have been legal for quite some time user.

You have it backward. Jewish women are such misogynists because Jewish men are abusive tyrannical assholes.

Jews.

Oh well? If American men have to suffer genital mutilation than American women should have to suffer it too.

Pic.

Attached: jew cucks.png (1849x307, 52K)

Labia Majora

This is a good thing because states are the ones with the power to make that shit illegal. Congress doesn't have the power to do a lot of shit it tries to do.

Attached: trump tower bathroom.jpg (640x480, 36K)

first they came for my foreskin but no one did a thing

Federal usurps state law, what the fuck are you talking about? They just have the right to make extra rules specific to the state as long as they don't violate federal rights and rules.

Congress has very limited powers. They can't just make shit illegal without specific things in the constitution giving them the power to. It's always good to see the commerce clause abuse get slapped down.

The true problem with women is how you raise them. Chopping their clit off is a barbaric solution for brainlets. The modern culture enables women to go through most of their youth without the need for introspection and that turns them into NPCs for so much of their life that they make huge mistakes and obsess over shallow stupid things with very little understanding of and empathy for those around them. People need to understand that women are very lacking in the introspection naturally and must be helped more to achieve emotional maturity milestones.

Teach any kid to introspect upon failure and you win. Don't and you'll end up with an NPC.

They can make whatever they want illegal as long as it doesn't violate the rights set forth in the constitution. They shot this down because of unequal application of the law against people practicing their religion. Either none of them can do it or all can, much like allowing religious symbols on government buildings, same shit. You aren't very good at law, don't quit your day job.

>U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman ruled that congress does not have the authority to make FGM illegal, which it had been classified as illegal under the Necessary and Proper Clause or the Commerce Clause

Bitch, please. Law is my dayjob.

Her attorneys argued that the act of FGM had no bearing on commerce, which judge Friedman agreed with in his opinion:

"That clause permits Congress to regulate activity that is commercial or economic in nature and that substantially affects interstate commerce either directly or as part of an interstate market that has such an effect. The government has not shown that either prong is met."

So they made a law under a statue that doesn't apply, so the judge denied it under the fact that it doesn't fall under "commerce clause". They still have every right to make it illegal as long as they evenly apply it or they will get jewed.

watching judge judy all day isn't actually a real job user.

Awesome. Now the double standards can stop.

PRAISE YAHWEH! THANK YOU FOR THIS YAHWEH!

Fuck you, yes it is.

Disgusting. But let’s not treat with the symptoms this weekend.

>They still have every right to make it illegal as long as they evenly apply it or they will get jewed.

No. It doesn't even get into that. Congress may ONLY exercise the powers that the Constitution grants it. Say, for example, congress tried to outlaw murder in the United States. That law would get slapped down since the Constitution doesn't give the federal government the power to do that. It has nothing to do with "evenly applying" anything.

The Constitution does allow congress to regulate interstate commerce. That's also why the jews in congress always try to claim that the laws fall under there. It gives them unlimited power to pass laws when it's not checked.

What the fuck are you blathering about? Murder is already illegal you literal dipshit. Are you fucking high?

The feds cant prosecute you for murder because there's no federal murder law. The states can.

wklaw.com/10-ways-murder-becomes-a-federal-crime/

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_(United_States_law)#Federal

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1111

kyfederalcriminallawyer.com/federal-murder-charges/

Attached: 1420595430106.gif (300x300, 1.49M)

U.S. District Judge Bernard (((Friedman)))
hmmmm
scribd.com/document/351436519/Muhammad-s-Inspiration-by-Judaism

Attached: 1449859425306.jpg (501x585, 87K)

Lol, women get to experience true equality now.

>US has sharia law now
AHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHA you bunch of cucks lol

I was trying to think up an example to show you how it works. Basically, if I walked up to you and shot you in the face right now, the federal government couldn't do a thing about it since generic murder is not a federal crime. The ones in all those examples have commerce clause add ons that give the feds jurisdiction over it.

Read some general basic conlaw stuff to get an understanding on it.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powers_of_the_United_States_Congress

Also read some on the 10th Amendment and powers that are reserved for the states.

Diversity is our strength.

The cornell link is literally the US code making murder illegal. I think you are making shit up at this. He said they can't prosecute you federally for murder, i gave examples of how they do that and I can find tons of cases where people were, it is fucking easy.

That cited statute defines what murder is. Read it; it doesn't make murder illegal at all. There are other statutes of the USC that will make certain types of murder illegal, but they add additional requirements like location (on federal property, at sea, ect), victim (certain federal employees), or killing someone while committing another federal crime.

Plain jane murder, robbery, burglary, ect are left to the States to deal with since the feds don't have jurisdiction to mess with it.

Commit federal murder, how do they prosecute it? For example, let's say an ambassador is killed or someone is killed on federal property, a military base, etc., how is that prosecuted? I can tell you it is done federally, not at the state level.

Yeah that's because it's a federal crime (probably a state one too) and they feds get control over it. Federal prosecutors will take it to whatever local federal district court and go from there.

But when jamal kills tyrese for fucking his mama, it's a state crime and not a federal one.

I wasn't 100% sure this was fake until I got to the sissy hypno part. Then I knew this was written by some mountain dew chugging auteest.

Right, so they clearly have a way to press federal crimes, it isn't magic. He literally said they can't federally prosecute you for murder, that is wrong.

>cutting off the roast beef at birth
Why is Jow Forums opposed to this?

Attached: 2chg.jpg (640x384, 216K)

Labia Majora

>Men not recklessly nutting inside degenerate skanks
>problem

The roblox facebook memes are real though.

bbc.com/news/technology-44697788

Attached: motionless.png (580x461, 372K)

The 14th Amendment requires all Americans be equally protected under the law. States cannot legalize mutilation as it violates the Constitutional rights of American citizens, in this case little girls. That Judge is a pedophilic degenerate and should be impeached.

O SAY CAN YOU SHART, IN THE LOCAL WAL MART.
WHAT SO PROUDLY EXPELLED FROM ANUS LAST LEAKING
WHOSE BROAD STREAKS AND BROWN STAR THROUGH THE PERILOUS BLIGHT
O'ER THE AISLES WE WATCHED, SHIT GALLANTLY STREAMING
AND MUTTS NAPPY HAIR, NEGROES EVERYWHERE,
GAVE PROOF THAT OUR RACE IS A MONGREL DISGRACE
O SAY DOES THAT SHITE SPANGLED BUMMER YET CUT
O'ER THE LAND OF THE SHART AND THE HOME OF THE MUTT

Attached: 1510229497679.png (541x463, 35K)

>t. doesn't read actual reason it got shot down

Labia Majora

It was shot down because "muh state's rights".

Technically it was shot down cause it wasn't considered interstate commerce which is how they wrote the law. If anything, blame the retard who wrote it.

Labia Majora

It says nothing about interstate commerce.

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/116

It was their argument for why they could do it and the judge said it wasn't valid. Read the actual judgement.

This isn't even about commerce. It's not relevant. This is about human and civil rights. It's a 14th Amendment issue. A state cannot legalize mutilation and the federal government has the full authority to outlaw it, just as it outlawed slavery. The judge is a retard.

Then I guess they should have argued that, cause they didn't.

top keks
> The judge is a retard

Attached: the-ride.png (502x259, 166K)

Look down at the scar on your dick where your foreskin was. Did that stop you from masturbating?

Attached: kellogcutting.jpg (924x685, 95K)

Most things are chartered under that commerce law in the Constitution.

>[The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

Money was exchanged in the course of the medical procedure thus it's under the purview of the commerce clause. Even if the operation was done for free the victim would have a lifetime of issues stemming from the procedure that would require exchanging of money. The Commerce clause can be applied almost anything if you want to get super anal about it. It's a catchall solution and the judge is wrong, this can and should be sent to the Supreme Court.