On this day, 55 years ago, John F. Kennedy was shot and killed in Dallas, Texas. One question still remains unsolved...

Who benefited from JFK's assassination?
̶s̶o̶v̶i̶e̶t̶s̶
̶c̶e̶n̶t̶r̶a̶l̶ ̶i̶n̶t̶e̶l̶l̶i̶g̶e̶n̶c̶e̶ ̶a̶g̶e̶n̶c̶y̶
̶ ̶m̶i̶l̶i̶t̶a̶r̶y̶ ̶i̶n̶d̶u̶s̶t̶r̶i̶a̶l̶ ̶c̶o̶m̶p̶l̶e̶x̶
̶ ̶c̶u̶b̶a̶n̶s̶
̶ ̶i̶t̶a̶l̶i̶a̶n̶ ̶m̶a̶f̶i̶a̶
lyndon johnson
israel
jews

That's 2 questions.

Attached: 1521972849269.jpg (490x427, 72K)

Who killed JFK? Those who his place

took*

Attached: 560918410.jpg (315x400, 20K)

This, throw the CIA in there too if JFK threats on scattering them to the winds were true.

CIA, Rothschilds, Israel, deep state, all the bad actors wanted him gone. He was pushing back against their agenda hard.

Executive Order 11110, June 4 1963 against FED
Pulling out of Vietnam
Inspecting Israel's nuclear program
Threatening to destroy the CIA

Attached: 15d20ab0ebba0d6b3056eac734294ba2fb72780f729e21b3f6ce94622dd21512.jpg (1080x735, 123K)

The Cuban Govt whacked him in retaliation for the Bay Of Pigs Invasion and other meddling in their internal affairs by the Deep State, the documents that were de-calssified in 2017 by President Teump demonstrate this. Furthermore, the cover up was initiated by Robert Kennedy when it became clear the evidence pointed to Cuban Govt involvement and J.Edgar Hoover was ordered to covee this up so as to prevent calls for a US invasion of Cuba and a potential nuclear war with its ally the Soviet Union.

I dont think johnson did it personally, though he was a piece of shit. I have no idea why you cross off the CIA and the military industrial complex and the mafia though. They benefited plenty.

>CIA
JFK used the CIA in a lot of countries.
>Military Industrial Complex
JFK supported military action, he wasn't a problem to war profiteers unfortunately
>Mafia
lol? How did they benefit from having the feds hawk down and investigate them?

CIA is an incredibly rogue agency, with foreign assets and streams of money. Media assets, drug money, weapons trafficking, human/organ trafficking, mind control, etc. JFK called it a "state within a state."

Your post is totally idiotic, I dont have much to say to you. JFK, "used" the CIA in a lot of countries? So therefore theres no way that his actions were opposed to the aims of the powerful people in the CIA? That makes no fucking sense you dumb faggot. JFK butted heads with the CIA all the time, notably during several key flashpoints such as the fucking BAY OF PIGS. Have you even h eard of that?

JFK also explicitly stated he intended to COMPLETELY dismantle the CIA. Your post is insanely low effort and reflects vast ignorance.

JFK supported 'military action'? When? Where? How? Do you even know what you are fucking saying, retard? Or are you actually this fucking dumb that you think this is a meaningful and sensible statement.

> lol? How did they benefit from having the feds hawk down and investigate them?
Are you fucking retarded? I said they benefited from JFKs ASSASSINATION, not any subsequent investigation which you imagine took place. Even an ignorant faggot like you must know that ultimately Oswald took sole blame for the killing, so what do you imagine was a negative for CIA affiliated organized crime?

Me, I didn't like his faggy hair

the jews
because jews

JFK didn't give the CIA air support in the Bay of Pigs, that was about it. Sending bombers to Cuba would be disastrous and the CIA probably knew that too.

>JFK wanted to dismantle the CIA
doubt it. why would he even use them in Laos, Brazil, Vietnam, and Cuba if he wanted to abolish them?

>Where did JFK support military action
When he escalated US involvement in Vietnam

>The assassination and subsequent investigations of potential suspects are not related
Fuck off shill. Cosa nostras don't go after fucking US presidents.

forgot my pic

Attached: 1531404202287.png (452x467, 14K)

> JFK didn't give the CIA air support in the Bay of Pigs, that was about it. Sending bombers to Cuba would be disastrous and the CIA probably knew that too.
Dude, you know nothing about the bay of pigs. And its not just that you're ignorant, its that you're an arrogant fuckwit too. Tell me, why would the CIA STRONGLY ADVOCATE FOR AND BASE THEIR ENTIRE PLAN AROUND kennedy relenting and sending in air support, if they thought it would be a disaster and not help them reach their ends? You are wasting my fucking time.

> doubt it. why would he even use them in Laos, Brazil, Vietnam, and Cuba if he wanted to abolish them?
Look up what the CIA is and what they do to find the answer to this question. Also, look up actual history surrounding those events to see exactly why and how he interacted with the CIA in the manner he did.

> When he escalated US involvement in Vietnam
Are you insane? Kennedy's 'escalation' was nothing compared to what Johnson and Nixon ended up doing. Kennedy was about to fully withdraw from vietnam before he was killed.

I dont think the cosa nostras did it, all I said was that organized crime benefited from JFKs (and RFKs) assassination. Why do you struggle so much with basic reading comprehension?

a couple rouge parts of the intelligence community promised promotions and then killed just like jfk to keep it secret

Attached: 1535934259411.jpg (788x699, 54K)

I already made this thread 14 hours ago
or so

>lyndon johnson
>a Jew.
>Gun runner to Israel.
>Ordered USS Liberty sunk.

Sounds like the plot of "Childhood's End"

Attached: nup-172037-0004.jpg (640x360, 33K)

Johnson was the prime mover. He had the most to gain from Kennedy's death and the most to lose from Kennedy's life. Johnson had a long history of corruption inside Texas to include rigging elections and murder. Johnson wasn't going to run on the 1964 ticket and was likely facing prosecution for his connections with Billy Sol Estes et al.

Johnson planned the route of the motorcade through Dallas. He also had a friend of his, Malcolm Wallace, perform at least one of the shots.

While Johnson made the call he didn't work alone. He had the support of the Secret Service, CIA, Dallas police, FBI, and more.

Super long documentary that makes that clear.
youtube.com/watch?v=BHb5X3fFhPw

Jim Garrison: The New Orleans cell
youtube.com/watch?v=xMD7lWYkmf4

Mark Lane
youtube.com/watch?v=HCsupa7DzCk
youtube.com/watch?v=aUA7-Z9dRbs

L. Fletcher Prouty
youtube.com/watch?v=BJ0zLoy9FKM

Richard Belzer: Other Oswalds
youtube.com/watch?v=ETvZ0p9FiHw

Peter Dale Scott
youtube.com/watch?v=0Vxom5JQODY

Ron Unz
unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-jfk-assassination-part-i-what-happened/
archive.fo/iC5mr
unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-jfk-assassination-part-ii-who-did-it/
archive.fo/uR9MX

Attached: JFK calming LBJ.jpg (550x477, 53K)

If you study the life of Lee Harvey Oswald you easily come to the conclusion he acted alone, it's very clear.
If you are a biased researcher you can find any culprit that fits your world view.

Drumpf obviously

I'm just glad stuff like that doesn't go on in this modern age happy thanksgiving

That's why the State Department loaned him money to return to the US after renouncing his citizenship. That's why the CIA had no pictures of him visiting the embassy in Mexico City. That's why Oswald, who couldn't drive, test drove a car and said that Soviet cars were better. That's why the description of the shooter matched his FBI informant description, but not his actual description. That's why the Fair Play for Cuba committee's address went right back to that Office of Naval Intelligence PI's office in New Orleans.

Attached: Lee Harvey Oswald Hypnotized.jpg (1024x837, 112K)

Lmfao, what a stupid fucking post. If you study the life of Lee Harvey Oswald you discover he was a CIA employee who was in Dallas entirely because the CIA ordered him to go there, and they set him up with a house and a job and several CIA contacts.

Study the life of Oswald and you learn about a man who defected to the soviet union and likely gave them crucial information about the radar signature of the U2 spy plane, returned to the US & saw no consequences for his actions. Instead of going to prison for treason and espionage against the US, the CIA is giving Oswald monetary rewards for his action and being given a new life and cover for him and his wife.

Nah forget that though lets just play pretend! Its so clear he acted alone! Only a biased researcher wouldn't ignore the above facts!

Checked. I had the same thought.

regime change. the united states lost a fight to cuba and couldnt live it down so they rebranded america under a change in leadership. its standard practice now for companies.

despite the fact he had zero input into what would happen militarily speaking on the ground you simply say it was his fault and replace him then claim it wont happen again because we have a new boss

the state department and fbi were curious about him and figured him to be a russian double agent, that is why they didn't arrest him upon his return.

you can cherry pick anomalies just as you could in any murder, but you somehow neglect all the evidence that points directly to oswald being the shooter

most intelligent people who looked into assassination also believe he acted alone.

see what the soviets said about him

about how he cried at the cuban embassy

he was a nobody and a loser, not some master spy or double agent, everyone who had contact with him since he was a child says the exact same thing about him

Lmfao, the FBI KNEW Oswald was a CIA agent based off the information they were getting on him from the CIA and the fact that he was on the CIA payroll, associated with CIA contacts, and was involved in known CIA programs.

There are RECORDINGS of Hoover telling LBJ that it was well known that Oswald worked for the CIA. You are just a fucking liar, dude. Fuck off.

Trump rides in Dallas

Attached: trump-kennedy 22 nov 1963.jpg (618x348, 38K)

> Unsolved

Hello CIA

youtu.be/l5tqG9wCfRo

Attached: 60C5703A-A495-464F-B9F3-19F2AA161B0E.jpg (1164x852, 713K)

Bush Sr. Was there too

he was no CIA agent you fucktail

get your head out of your ass and read about people that actually had contact with him, read about his life, no how no way no chance was he a cia agent. and that is precisely what the kgb concluded when they interviewed him. They thought at first for sure he was cia, why else would an american defect to russia, then after interviewing him they saw that he was just an idiot.
he even attempted suicide while in russia.

get your ass off your computer seat and stop watching youtube conspiracy videos

You have no actual historical knowledge. You are just making shit up and uncritically repeating something that you heard, without having any facts to back up your statements. Thats why you never cite any relevent historical events or documents and just make vague and bland claims.

By the way, if you look at what the Soviets said on the matter, you'll find that they said it was a high level conspiracy involving extreme right elements in the US government, military, and intelligence agencies. The KGB literally regarded the assassination as a right wing coup. Not the act of a lone nut. Source:
record number 178-10003-10131, series CHURCH COM, file number 7602957

No one said he was a master spy you dumb faggot. Most people (including Oswald himself) claim he was a retarded patsy, a fall guy.

you're are too dumb to be an idiot

yes the kgb believed it was a right wing conspiracy, as i said you can find any culprit you want in this assasination and that's who the soviets feared most.
but they did come to the conclusion about oswald being worthless after interviewing him, that is fact

Whatever dude, you can shove your fingers in your eyes and throw a tantrum all you want. Fucking J Edgar Hoover himself is on the record telling fucking President Lyndon B Johnson that his agency knew that Oswald was a CIA agent for years before the assassination. Your tantrum doesn't change that fact.

bullshit

F.
youtube.com/watch?v=oWJ7p7O0Z2M

of course, a youtube link

citation needed

he killed himself

I don’t think he acted alone user, he was a Cuban spy that was part of a plot to assassinate Kennedy in retaliation fir the Bay of Pigs Invasion.

>bay of bigs

Attached: Spurdo.jpg (1600x900, 105K)

and btw, lyndon johnson is on record saying he believed it was castro who killed kennedy out of revenge for the bay of pigs.
like i said you can find your own culprit

lmfao, do some fucking research. Hoover and johnson were talking on the phone only 22 hours after the shooting and hoover told johnson all about the incident at the mexican embassy and what a botched cover up it was, and that oswald was a CIA asset. The FBI knew he was CIA for years because the CIA wasn't corroborating the information the FBI was learning about him in the intelligence memos they exchanged routinely on POI in the US. Not only does he tell hoover that oswald is a CIA asset, he implies that the CIA was behind the assassination because they are covering it up. Thats when they start planning on how to cover it up.

bullshit, idiot

what kind of stupid ass research do you do?

i was very into the jfk assassination as it is quite a mystery, i studied oswald's life and ruby's life, and would bet my life on the fact that oswald acted alone

I haven't read any of it and I'd bet my life on the fact that you're starting to glow

Not relevant. Johnson is also on record stating the need for a cover up in light of the fact that it was a CIA assassination. See his taped conversations with earl warren and hoover. Use your fucking brain.

Whatever faggot, let me know if you have an argument instead of just whining about how you're a dumbass who can't research properly. You don't know shit about the assassination.

This speech is too shit-tier to be one of JFKs. Sounds like a HS kid trying to sound inspirational.

For all that you've "studied" you can't come up with a citation to save your life. Not even a bullshit one. Instead you just insult people who disagree with you. Do you understand why we doubt you?

Attached: Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald Band.jpg (600x680, 86K)

This. It was Jews.

That conversation between Hoover and Johnson is where the idea for the Warren commission came from by the way. Both men realize the CIA orchestrated the assassination, and that if that information reaches the public, the United States will totally collapse. They realized they needed to cover that fact up or everyone was going down, and thats where the Warren Commission came from: a need to lie to the public.

Naming the jew and standing between Israel and their nuclear weapons.
Look up his speech "the president and the press" and the case of the dimona plant.

Are you a bot or just plain retarded?

Here is a transcript and the actual fucking recording of the phone call this guy claims doesn't exist. He probably ran off now since he stopped replying, not like he cares about the facts anyway:

history-matters.com/archive/jfk/lbjlib/phone_calls/Nov_1963/audio/LBJ-Hoover_11-23-63.htm

By the way, (((someone))) attempted to erase the contents of this tape and about 14 minutes of it are missing, much analysis has been done to try and determine what the contents of the missing 14 minutes are, read into it, very interesting work.

Lee Harvey Oswald.
So he would be dead.

A lot of people wanted him out, Oswald got there first. I really wonder how strong his legacy would have been if he did two terms.

Good find. J. Edgar Hoover also wrote a letter to "Mr George Bush of the CIA" on that day which was long before he offically joined the CIA.

nytimes.com/1988/07/11/us/63-fbi-memo-ties-bush-to-intelligence-agency.html
archive.fo/iOKF1

Hoover was watching the CIA closely because even though he was a degenerate evil bastard, he was a pretty sound investigator and counter spy, and he knew the CIA was totally rotten and unsalvageable after the fiasco relating to the infamous french connection. There is much reason to believe that Hoover told Johnson MUCH LESS than he knew about the CIA's involvement due to the huge amount of info the FBI had on Oswald and his CIA ties, as well as the CIA's cagey reaction to the FBI's inquiry into the mexican embassy incident.

Hoover's aim on the phone call was to tell Johnson that the CIA had fabricated evidence to make it seem as though Oswald was in mexico city fucking around asking about a KGB assassinations director who was infamous among western intelligence circles at the time, and completely botched the entire operation, including fucking up their own timeline and using a lousy look alike. Hoover essentially caught the CIA red handed but just told Johnson the basic facts and let him piece it together. Both men concluded they needed to cover up for the CIA or their would be a revolt.... these are all basic facts of history which you can hear for yourself in the recordings.... but for some 'historians', its too much to handle.

Historians are mostly garbage. If you listen to any WW2 historian today discuss the same subject matter as David Irving they are lost. You get rewarded for finding approved conclusions in history, journalism, and science. Good work is hated.

Yeah, this is a big red pill about history... the hardest work you do in researching history is working around the fact that many things are being actively suppressed and buried. And in History in particular, you put yourself at risk if you acknowledge certain facts which are not pre-approved by the prevailing establishment. My understanding was nothing until I decided to read and come to grips with the "fringe works"

>One question still remains unsolved, who killed him and why?
That's two questions.

Attached: macho_man.jpg (736x736, 109K)

god those irish genes are fucking disgusting.. looks like a fucking bug eyed mannequin. i almost thought he was a spic for a second

in my opinion its only one because he used the word 'and'. Note how there is only one question mark.

Neocon Jews, because he was threatening the MiC and “the plan” and and because Jews hate smug Catholics.

Jews did, he didn't like Israel stealing our nukes and not signing the NPT

hoover was covering his ass, plain and simple, he might have seen an opportunity to abolish the cia and merge it with the cia which is what he had proposed years earlier

no way oswald was cia, again all the intelligent people who looked into this think as i do, all the historians as well

ask yourselves, why after so so much scrutiny, all the investigations, why no evidence implicating any one individual or organization, you guys still can't agree who was behind it.

no chance in hell a conspiracy to murder a sitting president could withstand that kind of scrutiny and not be uncovered, everyone in government will tell you this to be so

Recommend some history books, please. Some of those 'fringe works'?

It was the jews
Try and prove me wrong

Clever

>no way oswald was cia, again all the intelligent people who looked into this think as i do, all the historians as well
All the smart people (who you don't name), all the evidence (which you don't cite), and all the logic (which you don't explain) supports your conclusion? bullshit

the deep state new world order killed him because he said "The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the Americans' freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the Citizen of his plight." -- John F. Kennedy (D) speaking at Columbia University, 10 days before his assassination

Jackie F Kennedy killed him.

lmfao, you don't even make sense you sputtering fuckwit. Hoover was covering his ass by implicating a rival agency?

Lets sum up the argument:

I claim oswald was a CIA asset. To support this claim, I cite:

- the recorded words of president lyndon b johnson and FBI director J edgar hooever, who are conversing about their findings regarding the CIA's actions immediately before and after the assassination
- the fact that the fbi internally recognized oswald as a cia asset due to the incongruities in their own investigation of oswald and the info they were getting from CIA cables which are routinely shared on POI to the two agencies.
- the fact that the oswald was a marine who worked as a radar operator on an airbase in the south pacific from which the U2 spy plane was operated. Afterward he defected to the soviet union and likely gave them intelligence on the U2.
- the fact that oswald returned to the US and received no punishment or consequences for committing treason and engaging in espionage against the US
- the fact that upon his return, oswald immediately met with a CIA affiliate who directed him to Dallas Texas, where he was provided a home and a job working for a CIA contractor that processed photographs from U2 spy planes.
- He then established contact with another CIA asset who directed much of his actions in dallas and ultimately directed him to new orleans.
- the CIA gave him a job, a home, and even set him up with some friends. And he say no legal repurcussions for committing one of the most serious crimes a US citizen can commit.

You claim that Oswald was not affiliated with the CIA. To support this claim, you cite:
- your own belief that every smart person in the world agrees with you

Is there anything else to say? You are just wasting everyone's time

The I.W.W.
Did it
((( Jack Rubenstein))) lee Harvey Oswald and the tramps on the grassy knoll that included Ted Cruz's dad were all I.W.W. members.

Prove me wrong you cant

regarding the JFK assassination, "JFK and the unspeakable" is a really fantastic introduction.

I also really like the historian michael hoffman, though is work is unrelated to JFK, he's just a fantastic researcher who has been totally ignored by the academic establishment... check his shit out

Carlos Marcello
The guy proceeded to kill the 1 and 2 in Chicago Mafia because they were in on it.

You already curbstomped him, but that's good for the lurkers. 3/4 people here never post so explaining this for them helps a lot. You should check out the McKinley thread. I think you'd enjoy it.

the Bush crime-family knows; that's why one of the first thing Dubya did in office was to extend the period for the declassification of those materials.

Attached: JFK You.png (412x479, 337K)

The guy was protected throughout his whole life.

This the Jews had the communist I.W.W. members do the deed.

The iww was a antifa like thing in its day trying to bring bolshevism to America.

spotted the jew

Attached: a52.gif (250x189, 2.07M)

He did the murder alone but he was a iww. Member just like (((Jack Rubenstein))) who silenced him.

Even the tramps were young antifa style iww. Members.

The iww. Still exist they even have a office near the white house.

Another amazing assassination researcher is Jim DiEugenio. He is unbelievably meticulous and blows my mind with his level of knowledge on the subject... not just on the history, but also on the history of the field itself. My only problem with him is I hate his way of writing for some reason. There's something about it where its just incredibly dry or something. He is very meticulous and precise with his language. Not a bad thing at all for a historian, I just find it a little dry to read. Others may have no problem with it though.

Either way I consider him the top of the field

It could happen again I.W.W. Member Dylan petrohilos could assassinate Trump then fellow I.W.W. Member (((Alex Rubenstein))) would just kill Dylan to hide the connections to communist and Jews.

The secret service is very aware dylan petrohilos wanders around white house property but they let him.