It's said that this was used to "end" gerrymandering, but who benefits the most from this map?
This is a Congressional map generated by a computer, who would this benefit
Carter Edwards
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Andrew Ortiz
>computer generated to optimize yaaaasqueen
Try again cityfag
Henry Thomas
doesn't look like anyone wins to me
Jayden Bailey
Democrats and their poverty vote plantations.
Every time Shiniqua pops out a little bastards nigger while on welfare adds another nigger head of cabbage to the field.
Camden Richardson
>getting cucked by machines
Owen Brown
Makes absolutely no sense to me, just looking at iowa i can tell you're splitting counties into fractions.
Jace Moore
There is literally nothing wrong with gerrymandering
Blake Davis
>but who benefits the most from this map?
The American People.
Though a way better solution than this is to end districting all together and have proportional representation.
Daniel Smith
>a way better solution than this is to end districting all together and have proportional representation.
...and where do you draw the borders, user?
Ethan Williams
In proportional representation if a party won 57% of the vote they'd get 57 seats
Samuel Rivera
>generated by a computer
it's to nobody's benefit. it's a simulation with a fraction of the required data to make any meaningful observation.
William Gomez
existing state borders
Sebastian James
So, you're just talking about the Senate? Which candidates would get the seats? Where would they come from? How would you choose that? Do you really think that people in coastal cities should be dictating the policies of everyone in every other environment of the country?
Nicholas Mitchell
>So, you're just talking about the Senate?
No, Senate should not be voted on, Seventeenth Amendment needs to go
>Which candidates would get the seats? Where would they come from? How would you choose that? Do you really think that people in coastal cities should be dictating the policies of everyone in every other environment of the country?
That's the biggest problem with proportional representation, you don't choose the candidate on the national level, you just vote for the party and the person in your district and local election. So if you voted for Republicans odds are you would get many John McCain's under that system. We should strive to find a system that benefits us more.
youtube.com
This video explains it better
Camden Cooper
>video
I don't understand what happened with the banana party? There's a 5% threshold all of a sudden? What happens if my party wins zero percent of the vote, but 7 electorates win? Are 7 seats just added on to parliament, and if so, how does that affect the percentages of parties winning seats in parliament?
Aaron Long
Those are usually called hanging seats and they do add a seat or two
youtube.com
Alexander Nelson
Historically gerrymandering has benefited Republicans more than Democrats. I like to think this is because Republicans are smarter and better at math so we know how to gerrymander correctly. Just look at how liberals behave: they crowd themselves into one city and think they’re better off for it because they’re “with like-minded people”
The hive mind liberals die with the hive
Hudson Davis
>fell for the voting meme
Jayden Sanders
Well I don't know how you're going to change the system, user.
Eli Hall
Democrats still use gerrymandering to benefit themselves in a number of states. Trump got 41% of the vote in Connecticut, but Democrats hold all five House seats there. Same in Massachusetts, where Trump got 31% of the vote, but Democrats hold all nine House seats.
Ryan Lopez
Dems could probably take Texas with the computer drawn map
Colton Gutierrez
I figured there'd be something off
Eli Anderson
>Who benefits from this map?
If Indianapolis gets 4-5 Congressional seats and Greater Gary gets two, where is this computer so I can set on fire?