Why did she do it?

Why did she do it?
I need help Pol, I am writing a story.
Falsely accusing someone of rape is wrong. People do things wrong all the time, being a murderer is wrong, it’s just a little more extreme than what she did. But it’s still wrong.
I think on some level she has to know that she is lying, but how can she justify it?
A lot of times when people do something wrong it’s because they are acting out, maybe they didn’t get what they needed when they were younger. I understand there are a number of other women that came forward to claim they were raped by kavanaugh, all without any basis in reality; so obviously there are others who are willing to try to do this.
I heard blasey ford teaches at a university that is 80% female, I heard it is very women centric sjw type of place. How does this whole thing work, what would compel someone to do something so blatantly wrong? Some people say that they think she’s just crazy but I think that writes it off too fast. We can never truly know what is in her mind but I want to speculate here for my fictional story.

I was just doing some research on her online: I find it so strange that she is married.

I will post a photo of her husband. She also has two teenage children. Why would someone do this? Her husband does kind of look like a pencil neck beta geek but how can he really support her in this lie?
It seems obvious that the internet (google) (them) is suppressing information on this.

I heard a rumor that when she was in high school she was gonna try to be cool and she was giving it away to some sports jock older cool guy, but when it came time for him to acknowledge her at the party and bestow the status on her, he did not do that. Now she says that the boys that went to the party were from an “elitist” school not an elite school but an elitist school.

Attached: 2920B515-7B5F-445C-9753-0E2D1C0B7C7A.jpg (735x769, 230K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=OyjkdeDS4aM
themillenniumreport.com/2018/09/deep-state-agent-christine-blasey-ford-and-her-familys-deep-relationship-with-the-c-i-a/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

She is a roasty who does roasty things

For a pay check

>I have concluded that she is lying. Now, help me find some reasoning and evidence to support my conclusion.
Good lord you're stupid.

She has put a considerable amount of effort in to psychology and being able to pass lie detector tests, does she see herself as some kind of social justice warrior doing what is right? Is she still status seeking within her group, trying to stick it to the alpha male society represented by trump that denied her while ironically going after a beta male like kavanaugh ?
Please help me to understand what is really going on here Pol because I feel I am missing something.
What would a person like her really want that they could get that would make it all alright and make them not be a bad person by doing something so wrong like make false accusations. And, is there any chance that kavanaugh really did do it?

Attached: B1853526-ED65-4874-8EFE-D53AB93E5C30.jpg (470x270, 48K)

Is 600k enough motivation?

If I came to you and told you, you can sell this story, milk the fuck out of it and suffer no consequences by someone or somebody's.....that have charisma 18 out of 10, you would do it.

For my story i am really trying to discover what could be the origin of what turned her in to a person that would do something so morally wrong if in fact she is lying

600k is actually not a lot in the world she operates in yet there seems like there would be lasting, status lowering shame about lying like that. Unless of course, they are not shaming her over it but instead lionizing her. But could they really do that??? Over a fuckin lie, she’s gonna go on and all these people who are mechanical engineers (her husband) and professors don’t know in their heart of hearts that she lied?!
Is her husband just a betamale, settle for guy and she is trying to strike back at the heart of Chad cock that denied her?

I'd accuse you of molesting me for 600k.

The left's propaganda and rhetoric. They put feminists into frenzy literally saying Kavanaugh will be the end of abortion and women will literally die if he gets in. So then say, you have a fuzzy memory of an assault and while telling the story in therapy your husband says the attacker looked like Kavanaugh.

Bring in Democrat lawyers and Diane Feinstein and you have yourself a useful crazy person more than willing to do whatever it takes to take that man down.

It is very obvious she acted and used a little girl voice and pretty pose to get sympathy and it almost worked. She declined to continue pressing charges after he was confirmed. Aka, shit guys we didnt stop him its over.

Here's just some speculation:

>Lots of roasties have 'disordered' minds, they've never really been held responsible for anything and have lived privileged lives and this in itself creates neurosis..
>Lots of roasties FEEL that they've been 'wronged' by a man or men in some way, and so they take it out on men they perceive to be emblematic of the man or men they feel 'wronged' them.

In this case from what I've seen, she originally made the accusation thinking that all she'd do is make it anonymously and that nobody would hold her accountable or draw her into public exposure - so she may have thought she was doing something 'good' by making up a lie about someone she perceived to be bad\evil or to be allied with bad\evil... and then she was dragged into this position of having to testify. I know that in many cases of false rape allegations, women are drawn into it by pressure from outside or from their own lies early on which they think are going to be relatively inconsequential (at least to them), but then things get out of hand and they feel forced to go along.

Another thing to note is the reference to her seeing a psychologist and telling them about having been raped at some point, in response to an argument with her beta husband over a fucking door. So maybe part of this is a fabrication she concocted to explain away her roastie past to her hubby and\or to win an argument with him.

All I know is that she LOOKS more insane than even the average roastie.

Dafuck, OP have you never heard of psychopathy?

1) If she wanted some level of fame, this is her avenue, if she was the woman who took him down she'd be praised by the left for a very long time, the woman who "Took down the man who would ban abortion". If the government isn't breathing down her neck for prosecution, I promise you she's writing a book right now as we speak. A movie will be made (Anita Hill's is coming out soon), and the press and the lefty media will always paint her as a civil rights heroine who fought against a rapist (who never infact was, but that's not the point) Soon she'll have gigs and speaking arrangements, and the right-wing hate will eventually move on to something else leaving nothing but positives.

A career move with short term loses in exchange for a long term positive gain.

2) She's a ideologue, that even if it's a lie or not she feels the cause of stopping him is so important, "whatever it takes" is in play and even if she goes to jail later (she wouldn't be thinking that far ahead) one woman's sacrifice of public-self is worth the greater good.

3) It's not entirely her fault. She says these traumatic memories were brought up during her therapy sessions. Be it a repressed memory, or she convinced herself it was a repressed memory. Doesn't have to be Glow-In-The-Dark level shit where ((they)) convinced/inserted this memory into her head, essentially creating a traumatic memory that never actually existed or twisted an existing one to suit their needs.

3.5) That she wanted to be a victim and then created it herself, faint memories of the judge who screwed her mother in court, him becoming a villain a second time in her life, either creating the event in her mind or imposing the Kav over the person who actually did it. (figuring I heard someone did come forward and say it was them... I'd actually buy this idea might be the IRL one)

Either way, hopefully these three all give you some good ideas. If you do use it, throw in a Jow Forums reference in so we know

A belief system that men have power and have used that power to repress and enslave women and that the means justify the end.
That, and they tend to be much nastier little cunts than most men.

Money. She's a sociopath, and took joy from it. Her ex testified to it, she had previously scammed for money and manipulated. The final senate report of the hearing got released recently and they clearly indicate there was no truth to her claim, same with FBI's final report, which have lead them to go after all the other fake claims as well now.

Very good insight here.
Listening to ex boyfriends letter.
This is christine’s Best friend Monica l McLean. Is she trying to to Monica, you know those rape fantasies, I actually got raped, top that

Attached: 7BBB9B22-7DC2-4007-BA3B-7BA17C1A0EB2.jpg (593x937, 127K)

Where do I read\listen to the exes letter?

Not entirely sure what you're saying. You were raped? Story?

OMG the stupidity in that over there country...
Studying psychology doesn't make you able to pass a fuckin' lie detector test you fuckin' retards.

For money and political power of course

>Why did she do it?

Attached: hmmwhy.jpg (252x68, 12K)

m.youtube.com/watch?v=OyjkdeDS4aM

No I was saying, look at christines bf, nobody is raping that. Yet rape novels are one of the best sellers in women’s fiction. What if this is a 1 up tactic to forever btfo of her best friend. They talked about rape fantasies and she told her friend, well, I actually got raped and you didn’t. To win, even tho she is lying

Now, is that a picture of Brett Kavanaugh acting as a tranny?

Is there anyone real here still? Feel like everyone is a bot.

Years ago I wrote a short story about a women falsely accusing a man of rape. It ended with her suicide. But I knew my professor was not going to like it so I’m the end I changed it to the guy actually did rape her and got away with it. The catch is the women what a white hires name and the man was called Tyrone. It really divided my feminist writing class.

I’m not a bot faggot

P.S. When people confronted me about the name choices. I said that Tyrone is the most common rapist name.

MKULTRA

MKULTRA

Pol, you have helped me immensely. I am ready to finish this story. This is very dark and it is a comedy but it will make a good story. I thank you all.

Exactly how a bot would respond

They were previously openly accessible via googling it, not sure how many sites still have them posted up, but you may be able to find them on certain archive sites.
The full FBI report is available in the usual location, same as always.

/thread

She had high "security" expenses

I am a bot

Because she’s a mentally ill, immoral liberal bitch who’s willing to commit treason for a stack of “federal” reserve notes.

Too long didn't read. OP is a faggot as usual

Attached: dex.gif (300x168, 795K)

>bump-stocks

Maybe she was telling the truth? She just didn't have evidence.

Not saying that I know who is telling the truth. Maybe he did attempt to rape her, maybe he didn't. Accusations are nothing more than that without proof, and I would have voted to confirm him due to the lack of evidence of the claims,

But that isn't the question here, the question is why would she come forward, and I think a legitimate possible answer is that she was telling the truth. And initially she was anonymous, but shithead dens outed her for political reasons.

No reason to ruin a guy based on unsubstantiated accusations, but among the reasons people have already listed should be the possibility that she was pissed that this guy was about to be appointed to a lifetime position of power.

she never accused him of rape though

the left has controlled the supreme court for a long time, and they were willing to do anything to keep control.
Roe v wade is one motivator
It's why the killed scalia.

>Why did she do it?
To get something she wanted. She knew there would be no negative consequences for herself either way, so why not become a hero to the Left and get what you want?

I love your power...

Attached: 89.jpg (783x1038, 130K)

>Studying psychology doesn't make you able to pass a fuckin' lie detector test you fuckin' retards.

She actually TAUGHT how to resist lie detector interrogations to CIA recruits, her ex says. She DID the recruiting from her students. She is from a long-time CIA family: grandfather, father, brother....

Her Kavanaugh sabotage was Deep State directed, you bet.


themillenniumreport.com/2018/09/deep-state-agent-christine-blasey-ford-and-her-familys-deep-relationship-with-the-c-i-a/

Ambition instilled by a lifetime in "elite" institutions coupled with a lack of personal merit or orthodox patronage.

lie detectors are pretty easy to beat. if you stick to your story they don't have any way to prove you wrong.
they have limited value, and only when they're well prepared in advance by a professional. The administer of the test wasn't given advance notice and had no time to prepare. (on purpose since the test was her own idea, no one asked her to take the test)
the test was just a way to boost her credibility among the uneducated.

God, what a fucking ugly bitch
She looks like a transexual alien

Attached: DeNiro Bump.jpg (604x558, 139K)

Attached: Rob DeNiro's Bump.png (224x237, 20K)

technically the CIA plants the stories, creates the sources, drives the news and propaganda like this but still looses? but god are we dangerously close.

Attached: presidential buddy bump.png (336x327, 109K)

Actually, it is a lot. Someone like her is probably making 300k a year, and that is being generous. So if someone offered you two years pay for less than a month of work you would probably take that. And that was just the money that she got from the go fund me, imagine how much the Democrats gave her under the table.

Perhaps not, many criminals have done it who had no knowledge of Psychology. However, even if you can maintain a regular heart rate body language is also studied during a test, and guess who would know what body language people typically display when lying? A Psychologist!

Therapists can implant false memories. She probably truly believes her narrative and went through all that cause she is a leftist.

I think ford thought she could derail the scotus nomination with her 'anonymous' letter, and she didnt expect feinsteins goblina to expose her name as soon as things got shaky. the subsequent accusations by other liars were bought & paid for by dems (probably goblin girl again) for the sole purpose of making ford look more credible. and it almost worked.

Fourth post, best post.

It's so fucking simple. She saw Kav as a threat to women because of all the "muh abortions" shit the femocrats were spitting. This was her misguided attempt to save women.

I love how the Left claimed she was the next rosa parks but now she is forgotten. It's all so stupid and obvious

alt-lite threaten to kill her so until they are not a threat shes in hiding for her safety

>Why did she do it?
People really only do things for a couple of reasons
1.) Neet bucks
2.) Sex
3.) Lulz
You tell me from the video.

Attached: FinancialHelp.gif (304x171, 3.79M)

IIRC the Mueller accusers were promised large sums of money by Wohl, so 'pile of cash' is one possible motive. (Their failure to show up at the press conference probably has something to do with their having figured out that they were already outed as fake and Wohl probably didn't have the money.)

False accusations of rape predominantly fall into three categories. Underageb&s lying because their parents would honorkill them if they knew Daddy's little girl had let another man put his cock in her pooper, and people trying to ruin others' reputations. The latter group tends to make extreme accusations - at a minimum, it was a brutal and violent rape, and sometimes it wanders off into qanon-tier shite. Crazies also make false accusations, though, again, those are often extreme.

IIRC the most lurid accusation (full forcible rape with, I think, threats?) against Kavanaugh was retracted - however, it didn't actually show up in the news AT ALL until after the complainant retracted it, which makes me wonder if it was a righty-run false flag.

"Carrying a personal grudge against Kavanaugh from the time he tried to rape her" makes the most sense, especially since his defense was all appeals to emotion rather than reason or evidence.

>Please help me to understand what is really going on here Pol because I feel I am missing something.

You feel like you're missing something because the available evidence does not prove Ford was telling the truth - but it DID show that Kavanaugh was lying a lot.

Attached: DqyJRMAWkAEuQxH.jpg:large.jpg (1536x1357, 250K)