Jow Forums unilaterally cannut refute this

I sexually identify as an attack helicopter and you need to check your vehicle privilege.

>feminist theory

Theories require proof, of which there is none.

Lets say in the future, its possible to just pop a pill and overnight look example like a man or woman, whats between your legs doesnt change though
would you call these people who look EXACTLY like women in every way "he" or "him" etc? would you really insist on that?
pic semi related

Attached: 20181109_165306.jpg (3024x4032, 870K)

>Gender can be anything you want, it's much like a name in that it's simply the designation you want someone to call you.
Feminists like Boogie admit their gender pronouns are made up bullshit. Boogie accidentally kneecapped them a year ago.

Attached: 1542522648055.jpg (500x382, 42K)

>living in fantasy
like i said

You're insisting the way you look is the most important thing about a person. Stop being a shallow fag. You are what you are and there is no way to change that.

How is it a fantasy? It is a reality. I'm not talking about BELIEVING you're a woman. I'm talking about LOOKING exactly like one, people change clothes, get tans, bald guys wear hats, is that all living a fantasy?
You're not understanding there are two types of transsexuals, those which TRULY believe they are a woman on the inside, and those that know they aren't, but prefer to look exactly like a woman & be treated as one.

>is that all living a fantasy?
yup, make up is great in porn, not so much irl

Im not at all, in fact the opposite, as bisexual I have the capacity to like or love or fuck anyone because I focus on whats inside the person, their core, their personality, not their status or physical looks, including genitals
I believe these people may actually just be higher IQ, able to break the conditioning (similar to religion) of a stigma, being raised & everyone around you making it clear its taboo & wrong to like or love or fuck with someone who has the same parts as you

there's only one type of transsexuals, a mentally ill one

>women are different than men, biologically so there are only 2 sexes
how can the left even cope lmaooo :D
Fattyfuck says you can call yourself a women but biologically your either a man or a woman, can't see how this wasnt called out as "problematic" in the comments

You're a brainlet
If in the future it becomes possible to go to the doctor and in a single day get a FLAWLESS vagina, and look EXACTLY like a woman, thats suddenly living a fantasy? a fantasy is walking around looking ike a man and saying you're a woman
Trust me, the same way people get different hair styles, in the future changing from looking like a man to a woman or vice versa will be like changing clothes

>You're a brainlet
funny you say that
see

>yup
>ya
>makes a good point he does
>I honestly agree with I do
>is important it is
did you have an aneurysm while typing this shit? fucking faggot

Attached: libcartoonsocialconstruct.png (978x538, 25K)

Is Boogie a Goylem?

We also have a word for blacks but people still use other ones.

Attached: 1521547931123.png (460x334, 176K)

>sex and gender are two different things
Yup - sex is when you fuck something and gender is if you are straight or gay

How would boogie know? He is so fat he would have to peel back his pubic mound to see what his genitals looks like.

lol they are separate words that happen to synonyms. the theory of gender was made up by some dude in the 20th century. do people really believe the words sex and gender didn't both exist before the 20th century and refer to the same thing ?

>faggot psychologist makes up the idea of gender
>Is adopted and is used to mean sex
>left fags up and pushes tranny shit
>gender is now their sleeper cell word or some shit
The easiest way to counter this shit is literally the attack helicopter meme or denying its validity outright and talking about sez

He’s just Irish. Get cultured, fag.

>That's why we have 2 different words for them
look up the word synonym

>I believe these people may actually just be higher IQ
Babby's first understanding that things are not absolute and immediately he gets a big head.
Yeah, to a degree you are right. genders are somewhat artificially constructed and as such they tend to be arbitrary, and of course this can be troublesome for unique individuals, but the reason this construct exists is for the good functioning of society, and while social there is also a biological and undeniable basis. You may dislike how the world works, but that's no reason to break it.

>a person can only understand what it is like to be themselves
>a male can therefore only know what it is like to be a male if they are born a male
>for a male to assert that they know they are a female is illogical
>following someone else's flawed logic based on their hedonistic desires, and baseing society of it, is immoral
>therefore we should not allow trannies to exist
How hard was that? All points are valid and logically follow from one another. Go read Husserl if you think you can know what it's like to be a woman as a man

Race is a social construct
Age is a social construct
Species is a social construct
Space is a social construct
Time is a social construct

>there's a word for it so it's true
>t. unicorn
t. Napoleon

>if in the future you can get a perfect vagina in a day
Using fantasy to dismiss reality, while calling reality fantasy
You're a special kind of stupid

missing the point retard
if someone looks exactly like a woman, which they can, TODAY, and decide to keep their dick either because they like it or due to vag surgery tech not yet being flawless
the surgery will improve, in 10 years or so it will be flawless, so "muh gash" is irrelevant
theres nothing about living a fantasy, you're just fucking choose how you look, like getting a fucking earring

Attached: 1526827225378.png (932x944, 241K)

>"Gender is a social construct. I was born a different social construct. I need extreme corrective social construct corrective surgery"

Attached: 1530286783452[1].png (803x655, 498K)

>surgery
not all get any, except tits, which women get too
you're making it seem as if all do the same stuff and are all the same

Why argue when we can just hang you dead? Arguing with the brainwashed of either side will get no one anywhere.

we understand how you say it works and we are saying no, thats not how it works. i understand you think just because the mainstream establishment defines so and so as meaning such and such that it is simply fact. but we disgaree. there is just men and women

just men, and women. thats it

The people who originally introduced the ideas of sex and gender being distinct things that they were social constructs, Alfred Kinsey and John Money were both pedophiles.

Transgenderism is essentially putting on one of those novelty foam vests with fake muscles bumps on it, and wanting to be considered strong by everyone around you. And thinking that if you make a more believable fake muscle vest then it's the same as actually having those muscles. Maybe people act polite and humor you, maybe they are fooled, but you don't actually have those muscles, and if you try to lift something heavy, they do sweet fuck all.

>unilaterally
I think you meant to put literally. Right kiddo?

Checked
I understand entirely.
One is scientifically proven fact
The other some bullshit sociology experiment gone wrong.
Glad to discover we see eye to eye on this user.

Attached: Look ma ima Unikin.jpg (480x694, 60K)

I don't think I've ever seen a post that's made me as angry as this one.

If you make up a "gender" that is not male or female I am not associating with you because you are mentally ill, narcissistic and not worth my time.

Attached: 1534555314246.jpg (640x365, 34K)

imagine the smell

Feminist theory REEEEEEE vs scientific fact?
Fuck off fatty science has proved being fat is unhealthy end of story. Feminist feelings don't matter facts do!!

Attached: 1542831600340.png (634x336, 143K)

>He seems to be implying that the idea of gender is of no salience or utility
Correct. Gender only had use when it was tied to roles based on biological realities.
Gender as a "social construct" is nothing but an empty label.

I don't think anyone really cares about the semantics about this, the issue is that the ambiguous nature of the "social construct" concept should render it politically useless but its still a pillar of the left wing ideology and mostly as a way to propose things from a supposedly scientific perspective that don't necessarily derive from agreeing that gender is a social construct.

Easily refutable. Always ask why four or more times.

Why were sex and gender "once" considered synonymous?
Answer: because gender is based on sex.
Why was gender based on sex?
Answer: Because there were only two sexes, male and female.
Why were there only two sexes:
Because there are. Either God or evolution or both decided that in order for mammals to reproduce there were going to be two sexes. The only reason for sexual differences is reproduction.
Why did feminist theory need to change the definitions?
Answer: Because feminists wanted to be what they were not, i.e. men. Women could not be men physically so they needed a categorization that ignored biological reality.

Answer to four is this guy's conclusion. The problem is he seems to embrace the feminist rationale. The problem with the feminist rationale is that it is not grounded in reality. Things not grounded in reality either ignorantly or intentionally lead to catastrophic consequences.

This