G*lf Rum*rs are that wildfires only attack human homes

Kiln dried lumber and vinal siding catches and burns faster than live trees fool.

sage

Attached: fool1.jpg (753x707, 42K)

who was Erica Blasberg?

how did the fire get there though unburnt forest?

Directed energy weapons

This. The narrative is flying embers but is at the very least singe and TOUCH the surrounding foliage and trees. But it literally reduces the houses to rubble and ash.. very sus to me

>nugetian meat cycle
just looked it up, what the hell is this and why am I not alone in this forum?
973-eht-namuh-973.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10152

Attached: 1447789438284.png (427x583, 474K)

The fire also destroys the concrete and rebar used in the construction. Wildfires can't melt rebar beams.

The foliage between the houses look singed and brown to me in OP's pic. what do you see?

Making way for high speed rail

Attached: 1542636522382.jpg (1006x911, 133K)

Oy granny.

>no tibet incident

The trees and lawngrass have water in their stems and leaves. The houses are dry wood and flammable plastics. Which do you think is easier to ignite?

What about the unburnt grass and the burning houses not catching the trees on fire

One can only hope it's God's punishment for liberals.

>no brick walls

>neckbeard has never been camping
It does eventually burn after the water steams out. So is this fire just hot embers blowing in the Santa Ana winds from subdivision to subdivision?

that's worth a save

Drop the meme flag, eurotrash
No True Southerner would ever question timber framing.

If i had witnessed this with my eyes it would be rather convincing. But what im looking at are lo-res photos of something unkown in an unknown location. How can I know these are not photos of missile strikes in the Middle East or the
Ukraine. I love a good theory but im a skeptic. Give some evidence i can really sink my teeth into. You proposed the theory, its on you to prove, not on everyone else to disprove.

even in a drought the trees are still moister than the house wood
the ground under the trees is burnt but the trees survived because the fire moved through the forest floor quickly bit the flat walled houses created spots for embers to well up like snow drifting and the went up
also it looks like the fire came from the dead end of the road and was stopped so the foreground of the picture is probably less burnt than the background

I see you

Attached: glowintheday.jpg (480x360, 18K)

SEE ALL THAT GREEN SHIT ON THE TREES AND SHRUBS?
YEAH, THAT SHIT DOESN'T BURN WELL AT ALL.

100% agree still think it's worth keeping for later
Remember I saved a picture of a tanker splitting in half mid-journey, later found out that it's not possible for it to split in half like that
I thought it was an epidemic, but people's saying the trees don't burn, the grass don't burn, then how does the fire move around. How is there ever a wildfire if the trees don't burn

still could have been lit by laser wherever it started
but OPs pic isn't as supernaturally weird as for example

HAHAHAHAHAHHA!!

it's all the dead wood on the ground like branches
some standing dry dead trees burn but most decent sized live trees can hang on if the fire Burnes past quickly which is more likely with strong wind

>THAT SHIT DOESN'T BURN WELL AT ALL.
And bridge burn better?

Attached: 440D48E9-B950-4FDE-B551-38A64AC73668.png (720x960, 1.07M)

I bet some people are burning their houses down for the insurance money.

So is the gov purposely burning down California with lasers?
Based if true

So the unscathed homes are reptilians??

Really makes you think

tar burns great when you warm it up
and it gets gooey
theres a lot of black under the bridge too so most of it may have collapsed but not burnt so much

Yeah ok

Attached: F5D90759-9637-4C1B-8CF2-CC418AE00307.jpg (480x708, 58K)

i can just smell the betamale paid shill energy in that post. All it's missing is a few "y'alls"

Pretty much. High winds blow out the fire before they burn most trees. but burn all the underbrush and embers land on/in houses and cars, which easily burn due to being enclosed.

So burning tar next to shrubs melted I beams on bridge but did not burn shrubs

Attached: 2DD461EC-2DC1-4191-A17C-33ACB48BBD15.jpg (504x345, 101K)

you just came up with that on the spot, didnt you? but were the conspiritards...

its a kike

This is what actual Forrest fire looks like Yellowstone

Attached: 3759BD03-61A4-4CC5-8FE2-EE660DAF801E.jpg (620x403, 109K)

WTF. IT just occured to me. Spontaneous Human Combustion was just the initial trial run for DEW's . To verify its usefulness .

Imagine laying down in the middle of that court and gazing into maelstrom of smoke, fire and ash above while all around you the world burned away.

Do you think there might be some sort of geographic reason behind this?

Kek

Attached: C85FB731-A406-439C-91D5-10788565FFEE.jpg (695x431, 64K)

I don't see the shrubs you're talking about just trees on the far bank but depth of field isn't great on this pic
I don't see anything unburnt in the close vicinity of the collapsed section of bridge
if it went up that road tar should have burned like a tire fire
it was probably very hot for very long and with wind to fan it it should be more than enough to forge or in this case bend some steel

also in this pic there's a fire vehicle in the driveway
somebody may have died to save that trampoline

strange how nothing that gets watered burned down. like the grass in the yards, why wouldnt that burst into flames line a Michael Bay movie???

obviously a conspiracy

>Do you think there might be some sort of geographic reason behind this?
Yes, eminent domain can get costly when buying up lush California neighborhoods. Does anything natural make straight lines ie. river that runs perfectly straight is probably a canel

Attached: F1A44D1B-AA9E-49EF-981A-B7763A054DDE.jpg (800x480, 253K)

Odd plastics on trampoline didn’t melt so close to 1/2 burned tree

>melted I beams
Does tar burn hot enough to melt steel beams?

Thanks user, I thought everyone knew what forest fires do.

Sure just like kerosine melted structural I beam in WTC and aluminum aircraft cuts through structural steel and concrete.

Attached: 5ED4B774-A2AD-488B-8219-04BE9106D679.jpg (589x469, 95K)

wind direction could have something to do with it
or good firefighting
also the tree right next to the tramp isn't quite as charred as the other ones that are labeled

ITT a bunch of faggots that don't know what a forest fire looks like. The green trees survive, as is the point.

Nah, look it up. You might learn something.

That's a intense, hot fire. The Camp Fire is a fast moving, low heat fire. Trees like the eucalyptus and ponderosa pine in CA don't burn well. Trees like the Engelmann spruce and subalpine fir in Yellowstone burn very easily. If you've ever been to Yellowstone you'll se places where the fire burned all of one kind of tree, and then suddenly there's a line where all of the trees are still there, because they are a different species. Hell, you can see the treeline in your picture.

looks like the flight 93 crash zone. selective burning

one of those is a picture of a missile making touchdown in syria/saudi arabi/yemen, i forget which, perhaps it was the time that a missile struck riyadh

those beams aren't twisted or cut at clean angles like WTC either
it's just a gentle bend downward with gravity where the fire burned hottest
I feel like if this was some cool space weapon there wouldn't even be steel and it would just be a clean hole like in terminator

Attached: terminator1-625x350.jpg (625x350, 43K)

Fire produces radiant heat regardless of wind direction. Reason why your face gets hot while your back is cold standing in front of camp fire. FYI there are 3 ways to conduct heat
Convection moving medium
Conduction touching
Radiant IR radiation

That looks like it was cut with a blowtorch because it was. That picture was taken while they were removing the rubble and cutting up the big pieces.

the trampoline has it's least surface area exposed to radiant heat
if it was on it's side it'd be gone

Or thermite

Radiant heal also heats up surrounding air

It didn't burn the creek either.

this looks like the path of a tornado

No, it was literally taken weeks after the incident when they were cleaning up. Look it up.

Why are conspiracy theories so afraid of looking up facts?

who would attack commiefornia tho
god?

>implies that California has water

that's where the wind direction comes in
if all the hot air was headind towards the bottom left corner of the pic it wouldn't be near the tramp to catch it
>select all bridges
???

I'm at a loss to understand even a fraction of the things said in that thread.

Attached: 2c5.gif (500x202, 257K)

you sir, are a dirty liar

>moister

yo*r m*m i* f*cking g*y

I bet that whole street would still be standing had they had non-flammable walls and roof cladding.

Hey, I'm the one telling people to go look up information, not the one telling them to believe unsorted pictures of "facts" made in ms paint and posted on Jow Forums.

Attached: Debunked Angle Cut Column 2.jpg (1200x627, 365K)

Attached: 1540356695081.jpg (640x934, 55K)

That’s not fucking true.

Almost every tree you see in this photo is a eucalyptus.

Eucalyptus trees get a bad rap because some say they make forest fires worse, and can lead directly to the loss of property because they go up like candles.

It's all a myth. Eucalyptus aren't any more combustible than pine trees or any other drought tolerant tree species.

As you can see here, eucalyptus trees right next to burning houses didn't go up. The eucalyptus forest remains unscathed.

A lot of envirofags want to cut all these trees down but the bottom line is that there are no fast growing drought tolerant trees that would thrive there. Your best bet would be pine trees and those are probably even more combustible and far less attractive.

houses are made of dried wood and chemicals along with a bunch of furniture and car shit. Makes sense that they’re burn before a green tree ya brainlet.

nigger eucalyptus is some of the most flammable wood there is, it's nearly explosive

this, modern serf huts are fuel clad fuel with built in air pockets and vertical flame channels.

look at OP pic again. the trees are still standing and have intact upper foliage, but their lower halves are visibly denuded. the fire spread through the (probably entirely unmanaged) brush and then jumped over the wet lawns (probably deliberately soaked by the owners) to the tinderbox serf huts.

WTF that is fuckin weird The whole "directed energy weapon" theory doesn't seem so strange anymore...

Ho boy, kid doesn’t know about gelf rumars

Obviously it's the people from Alpha Centauri.

Man there's something comfy about everyones house in your neighborhood burning but yours. Think of their shot eating grins when they're alone and their fake sympathy for their neighbors who they've probably hated for years

>Canadian education
Look it up, leaf; eucalyptus trees are fire resistant. They'll burn in a forest fire, but they're no more combustible than most trees.
Feel free to check it out and learn something.

>fire resistant
>no more combustible than most trees.
>wood is fire resistant
no, they're saturated with flammable volatile oil to the extent of being nearly explosive when burning. they have evolved reproduction strategies to quickly recover from fires, they aren't "fire resistant". stop being a retard.

>high speed rail is in the middle of the central , along the 99 corridor
>fire is in the foothills and mountains

At least I know you've never been to California or passed geography.