How is this even allowed?

people in america see themselves not as an exploited middle-class but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires

>wake up retards

Attached: 1476306108781.png (309x433, 57K)

IT ISNT REAL COMMUNISM!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Attached: B2EE683F-B18E-4A0B-BF95-0F43AC4C574C.png (800x600, 116K)

>people are rich because i'm poor

Attached: 1540210916393.gif (267x199, 397K)

Look (((who))) has the wealth. You will see it is only kikes who move money around

>of so jew

Attached: 1519669499380.png (254x256, 125K)

What is the problem? Do we need more representation in the giga-rich? MORE WOMEN AND POC!!!!

Attached: (((richest men on earth))).png (1089x4677, 1.72M)

also think about this for a moment; after reaching a specific level of income you are taxed 50+% of your income. So that would mean that Bezos isn't 150 billion rich but more like 500 billion rich, how is that possible or allowed? When someone makes a billion they should be taxed 90% of that income.

How gov't allows that is beyond me since with that kind of net worth you can easily control multiple countries around the world

communists (jews) think this is reasonable

Stop worrying about the top 8 and start worrying about the top 8,000.

They hide their wealth by distributing it amongst large families.

>8 men as rich as half the world's
Most of the planet has a networth of 0 and many a negative networth. If you have 1 dollar you are wealthier than half the planet. This is a sensationalist headline.

Attached: igbog.jpg (500x500, 97K)

You mean they are taxed 0% because all their money is placed into non-taxed NGOs and charities

thanks bog

For fucks sake stop blaming the Jews. Most of these guys are from the Americas. They give a lot of money to life saving charities as well.

Quit projecting

Attached: 614_v9_bc.jpg (1080x1440, 430K)

There's more Jews in America than in Israel....

That is why there is only one solution

>For fucks sake stop blaming the Jews.
Hahahahahahahaha.
No.

Attached: 1378182458458.jpg (495x495, 85K)

except nothing you said is true and you can't back it
you just tell yourself story to accept your slave life

military is on their side user, its over

Attached: IMG_0622.png (648x4055, 807K)

>they give a lot of money to charity
Cant buy a soul.

KEK, honest mistake user

Attached: HA.jpg (950x475, 51K)

chicagotribune.com/business/ct-richest-people-in-the-world-20160121-story.html
To be among the wealthiest half of the world last year, an adult needed to own only $3,210 in net assets (minus debts), according to the data.
The bottom 20% has negative net wealth.

meant to reply to

capitalism

Zuck wasn't any of those things. He just screwed over the white adonis Winklevoss twins.

Someone should find George Soros and kill him.

Attached: 10202016_color-1-hillary8201_c0-0-2464-1436_s561x327.jpg (561x327, 29K)

Because most of the world is inhabited by literal savages who make less then a dollar a day. The average person is a million times richer then the average cavenigger why would you even compare industrial modern states with public zoos in the first place?

if giving a tiny portion of their money to charity is virtuous then how about not stealing it from people in the first place through their labor?

Thats a bad idea, Soros is like the store keeper for the deep state, hes literally the messanger

because wealth is just a number on paper, if it were distributed and being spent by 6 billion people it'd be worthless, there simply isn't enough assets of value in the world to be bought.

>Doesn't post names of these men
OP is a faggot spreading fake news

>How is this even allowed?
Agreed, four of them should be womyn

>there simply isn't enough assets of value in the world to be bought
Not an economics major, eh?

>I have $2, makes me richer than much of the world
>Jew bankers have hundreds of billions
This is fine

A real man would take the jew's ill-gotten gains and buy some guns with it
telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/8119805/Confiscated-Jewish-wealth-helped-fund-the-German-war-effort.html

Attached: silversteinon911.jpg (544x408, 190K)

it just prove half the world is slave to the usury system ?
you just used an article written for the Washington post by a kike who work for the jewyorktimes
it doesn even make any sense in the context since the article you point to use totally different metric to calculate the outcome

it's even worse than they admit

Attached: rothschilds 5.png (1089x4677, 1.42M)

>I buy a hotdog from you for 4$
>I give you 4$
>I didn't give you 5$
>This means I am stealing from you
???

Attached: You lost me.jpg (275x275, 28K)

>billionaire
>pimping
How?

How are they a slave.
Living in poverty is the default, you only need to look at history to see this.
The question isn't when slavery was invented, but when freedom was invented.

All statistics like this are garbage.
It's calculated on marginal valuation and extrapolated to pretend that if one of these eight faggots wanted to liquidate everything into cash, the rest of the world would fully cash him out at the marginal valuation.

And the same dynamic applies to the poor.
For example every dirt poor family on a touristy Caribbean island lives in a house on land that would be worth at least $100K if not $1MM+ if they were willing to sell it and move somewhere else instead.

> How is this even allowed?
Holocaust

It's OK if they're white because then their empathy will result in generosity for us all

>the 8 richest men are also the ones funding neomarxist groups
really makes you think

Hitler wouldn't have allowed this..just sayin'.

Because it'll stop people from striving to be billionaires thus hurt entrepreneurs who want to improve society. I'm a young and ambitious 19 year old who has been working since he was 15 my ultimate goal is to become a billionaire. Currently work in a software company making 45k while studying but I'm getting there.

freedom come with progress you suppose to get more as the society progress but we strangely accept to stay in a status quo where a small percentage of the population should have the inerrant right to profit from everyone else life of work for no reason

What does progress mean?
Was the adoption of lobotomies progress, or was the subsequent removal of them progress?
Or were both progress? If so, to what?

you probably know well i was talkin about a large range of progress that is suppose to ease life
technological, scientific, medical
strangely those are all monopoly controlled by the exact same people
no progress isn a byproduct of slavery

and the plebs will still end up fighting each other instead of hanging the elites

I don't know what you mean, that's why I asked.
The adoption and retraction of those technologies make me wonder what progress was actually accomplishing.
Would we have been better off it was never introduced? And if so, how does this play into the idea of progress

globalrichlist.com/
I earn 11k/year.

Attached: Screenshot_2018-11-25 Global Rich List.png (688x533, 26K)

This is someone that earns minimum brazilian wage.

Attached: Screenshot_2018-11-25 Global Rich List(1).png (744x815, 33K)

>We should all strive to be billionaires.
god i hate this idea

Gas the kikes.

I have enough IQ that I realize that someone having more money doesn't mean that I have less. However, many people don't.

Also, I do have a problem when these Jews use their inordinate amounts of wealth and power for nefarious purposes.

Because we fought a world war against the last guy who tried to solve it.

Attached: adolf.jpg (500x579, 46K)

I noticed it right away. Wasn't that the whole thread?

Exactly. Nothing. Nobody going to do anything about that. Nobody that is against this has any leverage or power to do anything about that.

LOL. Hitler was a Rothschild's agent. German, British, Swiss and American bankers and industrialists supported and funded Hitler.

thank you. I feel so much better about my life now. (just barely made the cut)

Very nice, OP. You are honorary straight.

>Would we have been better off it was never introduced?
the question is legitimate but the answer probably not as simple as word written on a basket waving forum
i do think that progress serve a plutocracy and not the majority, if it was used for the better of the majority and used TO serve the majority and not what it is today(ie:programmed obsolescence, artificial scarcity, pollution for profit) the human kind would be far more developed so yes i do think that if progress was never introduced to human kind we would be worst
could we be better
yes
your bullshit website prove nothing and has been proven propaganda so what ? do you even search your source favelamonkey ?
GLOBALRICHLIST.COM fucking kek

Every year the 10 richest men get executed on live tv, that will allow the money to keep trickling down at a faster rate (must have a net worth of over 1 billion to be eligible for the death squad)

better yet, any individual or family combined that has a net worth in excess of $100 million is executed annually.

>answer probably not as simple as word written on a basket waving forum
That was a yes/no question. The answer, whatever it is, is pretty simple.

As for the rest of your post, you seem to lack historical perspective. Average people in the modern first world enjoy higher standards of living than kings have for nearly all of human history. This is due to technological and societal advancements that have increased productivity and incentivized average people to be productive and innovative. Sure, rich people have gotten richer, but the "poor" people in the first world are much richer than nearly every human to have ever lived, including most of those alive today. You know that YOU, personally, can profit from others by offering a good or service that they're willing to pay for, right? That's not something exclusive to rich people, and many of them got rich in the first place by doing that.

So the point is this: Modern capitalism isn't perfect, and there is of course room for improvement. However, it works much better (for everyone, rich and poor alike) than every other system that has ever existed. If you want to improve things, knowing that and the reasons for it is important. Vague sentiments about what "progress" is supposed to mean are not useful.

and they all vote democrat

based

>This is due to technological and societal advancements that have increased productivity and incentivized average people to be productive and innovative.
you work with the assumption that this would have not happen in an other context then the oligarchic/plutocratic system it grew in and that's where i think you're patently false
progress is not a byproduct of slavery it would have happen anyway and who know where we could be right now
we can talk about the difference between life quality of the king from now and then same for the slave i don't think the proportion is that different
no capitalism didn bring any of this to life it slowed it, controlled it, prevent it to reach full potential turned it into sophisticated profit machine
you just lack the imagination needed to see what the world could be

checked satan

Freedom of the press.

>2018
>still expecting Jow Forums to be redpilled
>expecting Jow Forums to even read a headline before replying
>expecting Jow Forums not to just be low IQ niggers kike and leftists who can't read
Which version of Jow Forums do you think you're posting in?

Attached: come on now.jpg (624x624, 51K)

Fun fact: Before the Haber process allowed the ready fixation of nitrogen via natural gas feedstock, the human population on earth sat at a stable 1.5billion. 5.5 billion of you faggots are only alive because some jew figured out how to crack earth farts and make ammonia on the dirt-cheap.

Attached: 1510524833613.jpg (1080x1080, 212K)

Traditionally, all that wealth has been held in the hands of ONE person, known as "King" or "Queen," depending on gender.

The wealth being in the hands of multiple people, let alone an entire World Bank, is one of our greatest advancements in the War on Poverty.

She legit put her bikini top on upside down. I'm fucking dead.

Attached: 1542244347047.jpg (200x200, 11K)

>I own the capital to make the hot dog.
>Sell a hot dog for 5$, because that is what the market allows
>Pay people who made hot dog a grand total of 1$
>Become very wealthy and buy more hot dog producing wealth

>vigilante mobs need to hunt down and eliminate their bloodlines completely.

Success breeds jealousy

I don't like stinking rich people too, but the played the game. I just wish that countries implemented a "fair play" law, the essentially means you can be super rich, but you have to bear a larger contribution to the countries your revenue is sourced from. No tax evasion or off-shore banking.

We can in Zimbawie

Some people work and are good at it, i know this is hard to understand for a retard.

Your comparison is meaningless. So because modern people get houses while the best cavemen got caves, that means people are too entitled nowadays? It's about their situation relative to other people. If people feel like they have to work 60 hours a week just to barely keep afloat, when do they have time to enjoy their king lifestyle? I can probably bet that even compared to peasants, nowadays some people have it worse. I saw a study that showed people back then only had to work less than 40 hours to survive, and they didn't have the modern drudgery of working in factories. Plus they probably got to spend more time around their families rather than a boss who is always on their case to be busier and make more money for the company and shareholders. It's kind of sad if the peasant lifestyle of the middle ages is the new baseline for the proponents of capitalism

Neither the leftists or conservatives in this thread have a critique of FINANCE captial, just of productive capital. None of you ever stop to wonder if bankers are the problem, not capitalists who actually produce things. Why are modern currencies based on debt instead of more meaningful measures like "the amount of productive laborers in the country"? Answer: because we live in a world dominated by bankers and money men, not producers or laborers.

Attached: feder how does the economy work.png (1280x720, 211K)

But most capitalists will argue that they are one in the same. Where do they productive capitalists get their loans from? The banker capitalists. I would argue the problem isn't a differentiation between the two, but is more a systemic issue. As a society we reward money and greed and have a winner take all mentality. It doesn't really matter how the winners won, as long as they are rewarded abundantly.

Subtle.

>But most capitalists will argue that they are one in the same.
As will most marxists. That was my point. They aren't the same, but conflating them is part of the finance capitalist's survival strategy. We all need productive labor, but we also need the incentive schemes of ownership and relative (but fair-as-possible) inequality, because that's how we evolved. Total egalitarianism leads to a collapse of society, just as slavery is degenerate -- both are extreme and distorted ends of a spectrum. The communist and the financial capitalist are two sides of the same destructive un-natural coin. A nation built around the premise of producer-centered capitalism is the natural third-way.

youtube.com/watch?v=V_IYBF2XD30

Attached: How Hitler Tackled Unemployment and Revived Germany's Economy - Mark Weber alt.png (1571x5683, 1.03M)

kek, you dumb kike

Also:
>Where do they productive capitalists get their loans from?
Where did the Soviets get their constant inputs of capital (loans) from? The same bankers financing capitalism. When the loans stopped, communism collapsed.

nytimes.com/1984/05/17/business/31-western-banks-lend-250-million-to-moscow.html

Attached: file.png (793x814, 208K)

>Hitler was a rothschild's agent
Is this the new "Hitler was a jew"? Jesus, you kikes aren't smart enough to meme

Without studying your two sources yet, how do you propose we finance loans or business ventures then? I would argue to get rid of the federal reserve except for private loans under a certain amount and mortgages, while have a government bank for the bond market. All investment banks I think should follow strict guidelines and there should be investment credit unions that would be community owned rather than private owned that allow business loans but for for people that own below a certain amount of wealth. But I can guarantee some people would think my ideas are too radical

womans should be forced to use different monies

Ok, now take out children, women, and niggers (all of africa) out of that equation.