Evolution isnt real

this must be one of those missing links in the evolution from ape to man.
i didnt know a single one of those even existed. guess I was wrong. BTFO me

Attached: if-the-theory-of-evolution-were-true-and-millions-of-28638243 (1).png (500x566, 154K)

Attached: darwins-evolution-a-fake-9-638.jpg (638x479, 119K)

Attached: Charles Darwin was wrong eye quote.jpg (1440x900, 129K)

there aren't any of our ape ancestors left, we didn't evolve from chimps, they are our cousins

>there arent any left
how convenient

it's called evolution

youtube.com/watch?v=knoJEOqaq0E
the reason dinosaur bones and skin are able to survive is because they were buried quickly.
if left on the surface to rot we would have nothing.
proof of a global flood which we see across the globe.
>Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox. 16 Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly. 17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. 18 His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron.

Attached: kb-600x450.gif (600x450, 163K)

The roaches live!
youtube.com/watch?v=6GlNQzjii1c

niggers

i didnt know evolution made all evidence of evolution magically disappear.
now that is some trick. tell me more

Same here. Pretty nice mutation compared to alot of the others.

top drawings were made by an evolutionist to prove humans have gills at birth, somehow this is evolution.
then bottom pics came out, he was proven as a fraud and jailed because of it.

yet years later still today, text books use his fake drawings in schools to prove evolution. astounding

Attached: embriyoing.jpg (450x356, 40K)

no evidence? no problem. millions of years.

Attached: evolution_is_a_lie_there_is_no_evolution.gif (324x249, 4K)

Yes of course it seemed absurd at the time. That doesn't mean it's not true.

>something as complicated and intelligent as an eye came about by random chance
>oh it was just absurd at the time.
why do you fools always hide behind time?
>ITS CURRENT YEAR
SJW nonsense.

No one here has claimed that it came about through random chance. Calm down.

evolution is not scientific, as it cannot make predictable, repeatable, verifiable and falsifiable claims.
It's a hodgepode of goofy metaphysics pushed as science that breaks down on close examination by appeas to reductionism.
for example:
> "how did animals evolve eyes?"
> "they first evolved light sensitive cells, which later developed into eyes."
> "So light sensitive cells... aren't they already eyes?"
> "..."

a mystical force of intelligence perhaps. the evolution god, always eluded too but never mentioned.

>single cell organism magically poofs one day into a tadpole with organs, eyes, and immune system and innate instincts to survive (1 in a trillionth trillionth trillionth trillionth trillionth trillionth trillionth trillionth chance of happening)
>this happens twice on the same planet. in the same spot on this planet, in the same lifetime as this tadpole, the same species poofs into being only this time it has female reproductive organs and is perfectly harmoniously able to physically reproduce with the male tadpole, and such was the beginning of life

The modern mammalian eye is highly derived from simpler forms. The first "eyes" were simply patches of photo-receptive cells that could distinguish between light and dark.

This post alone takes the burger education meme to a whole new level

pottery

argument not found

I get gaia adds that talk about Atlantis and temple complexes in Antarctica and 4 million old human footprints from some prehistoric era

Are you trying to suggest those embryos do not show similar structures?

>similar structures
blind deaf and dumb are we?

Attached: 8nRqoXW.png (800x729, 48K)

user...

Attached: 1534362289780.png (709x1018, 382K)

big if true

I majored in genetics at the top program in the world, and you're a fucking moron.

Holy fuck this is huge

I bet youre telling the truth.
so show me one example of a mutation ever adding new information to the genome. and explain how random duplication of already existing information is "evolution".

then explain how the duplication of existing chromosomes can turn a tadpole into a monkey

>evolution is not scientific, as it cannot make predictable, repeatable, verifiable and falsifiable claims.
>predictions
Evolution can make predictions, for example evolutionary biologists predicted that bacteria would develop antibiotic resistance web.archive.org/web/20180331001640/https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1945/fleming-lecture.pdf
Furthermore, evolutionary biology is used extensively in selective breeding, where it can make useful predictions that allows breeding to be done more effiently than before.
>repeatability
Evolution has been observed accross all species and across time. Changes through natural selection and genetic drift has been seen both through fossil records, direct observation and direction genetic observation in many, many species. Mutation, natural selection and thus evolution is completely consistent and repeatable. Furthermore to look at predictive repeatability, quantatative genetics is used through evolutionary theory to accurately and repeatably predict changes in populations.
>verifiable and falsifiable
What are you talking about? The basic premise of evolution is change of biological organisms through natural selection, genetic drift and mutation. This is a fully testable hypothesis.

Nothing that you mentioned has anything to do with the basic premise of evolution, and never in my days have I seen an evolutionary biologists make such a claim. Stop grasping at straws and engage in the actual argument!

Im just curious. What do you think happened?

>selective breeding is evolution
>bacteria adaptation is evolution
>evolution is observed across all species
where? name even one example and you will prove evolution right now. name one single example.
just one is enough, even one. do it.

2 and 8 have an extra chromosome, judging by their faces

>the basic premise of evolution
the fuck do you think it is? do you even know what you pretend to believe in?

yeah its called duplication of existing genes.
which isnt adding NEW information.

MRSA.

>single cell self-replicating organism becomes a multi-celled super complex organism that requires an opposite sex to reproduce

Attached: 1542506429856.jpg (336x280, 30K)

>bacteria resistance is evolution
haha kill yourself

What are dogs?

They all have significant similarities, especially if you take a look at images where you can actually fucking see something

Attached: Fish.png (850x632, 620K)

you're wasting your time on this retard. he could have picked up a biology book at any time in his life and answered his own questions but he already decided he knew the truth.

uhhhhhh fucking humans? More noticeably dogs.

I meant that they look like downies

absolute retard.

Attached: download (3).jpg (299x168, 10K)

not an argument
>humans exist, therefore evolution
so this is the brainpower of evolutionists

That's what meiotic recombination is for. Sometimes things don't go how they exactly should, repeat this process enough times and you have a more "fit" organism that can propagate more.

>passing on survival traits to offspring
>offspring more likely to survive

come on man

a result of selective breeding. AKA not evolution

you're asking for a full course of biology on an image board. you'll never be worth it.

>passing on survival traits
so mike tysons son is a pro boxer because his father was?
you do realize all animals on earth adapt to danger you fucking retard? this doesnt require genetic transformation.
bacteria DUPLICATES itself.

People were created from neanderthals by aliens. The neanderthals died out.
Bigfoot is real.

nylonase, antibac resistance

you dont have a fuck clue about biology if you think a wolf turning into a chihuahua is evolution. end your life psuedo intellectual retard kid

not an argument
not evolution

Sounds like you don't understand what evolution is

This nigger doesnt read books. Only the bible for this guy!

huh? I love arguing with retards on the internet. Do you think god made pugs as a little side project? da fuck is wrong with u

you dont have a fucking clue about biology full stop.

Eh, I wouldn't get so worked up about it and start calling them names as they do. They are quite literally brainwashed.

evolution is not the duplication of existing genetic information or the subtraction of it.
which is the only thing a mutation has ever induced.

Attached: EVILution.png (500x5655, 2.72M)

>selective breeding is evolution
Yes
>bacteria adaptation is evolution
Yes
>evolution is observed across all species
Yes
>where? name even one example and you will prove evolution right now. name one single example.
>just one is enough, even one. do it.
If you want an example of evolution viewed "live" so to speak, in direct experiments:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3060078/

Evolution is literally selected breeding. The "selection" is the impartiality of survivability and fitness with regards to the current ecosystem

argument not detected. more neckbeard edge and feigning of intellect.

WHAT DOES HE SEE

Attached: MMAgloI.jpg (500x301, 40K)

Im not sure you understand how genes work user

IMAGINE PHALANGES, PELVIS AND SPINE
WELDED TO MANDIBLES THAT ONCE HAD BEEN MINE

Attached: fly_eyes_on_legs.jpg (490x438, 23K)

They don't always perfectly duplicate themselves, otherwise there would be no differentiation between bacteria at all. Also, imperfect duplicates in turn duplicate themselves, etc., etc.

Read a book, nigger.

Antibiotic resistance is evolution. You do understand that the changes are genetic, right? It is not the same bacteria becoming resistant, it's that each generation becomes more and more resistant.

>yes
oh, then yes, 2 strong couples will produce a strong offspring.
thats evolution? lul. doesnt prove theres no God, nor does it prove millions of years. nor does it prove a dinosaur can turn into a chicken.

>bacteria adaptation is evolution
doesnt prove your gay theories or that one species can turn into another
>bacteria adaptation is evolution
kek.
so what youre telling me is, evolution isnt real.
because none of these things result in new information being added to the genome

Where did pugs come from u fucking retard. this is your last you.

>a wolf turning into a pug is an example of evolution

an evolution just flew over my house

>2 strong couples breed to produce a stronger individual
>this is evolution
they are still the same species and still contain the SAME genetic information as the parent.
AKA not evolution

YES!!!! nobody wants a fucking wolf in their house. You dont feed a fucking wolf. U feed a cute little pug!

It's a waste of time arguing with this guy. The only people left on the internet who try to argue against evolution are trolls or willfully ignorant fundies. It's almost as if they've been naturally selected to be impervious to understanding.

Trolls are fun. I think it helps in communication skills irl

>never question anything!
>dude it's widely accepted! your argument is invalid!
Seems like reddit is more your speed, man.

>gets destroyed and ignores all arguments
>HES A TROLL
no new information ever added to genome.
so what youre saying is you subtracted certain genes from the dna of a wolf by breeding it to be weak and short, snd this is evolution.

no.
this is subtraction of existing genes which anyone can fucking do you god damned idiot. NO NEW INFORMATION ADDED

Also, you're a dipshit. Selective pressures cause the accumulation of beneficial genetic traits, detrimental genetic traits and benign genetic traits. Evolution tends to produce the successive loss of detrmental traits. There is also a successive accumulation of beneficial traits. Genetric traits are not necessarily proportional nor are they necessarily suited to current selective pressures.

>evolution
>change in alleleic frequency over time
I don't think enough time in high school is devoted to the understanding that single genes generally don't encode traits; they only encode for proteins.

teh troll is impervious to all dangers

>detrimental traits
wait so they evolved detrimental traits in the first place?
thats not evolution.
from single cell organism to detrimental traits? given 60 million + years youd think those wouldve been gone by now

new information is created through duplication errors and random duplications of existing data.

A computer code that adds more information will have bugs. The less information the better. Humans have one of the shortest dna info in the animal kingdom. And thats evolution. And guess what. We rule the fucking world.

>you won't waste your time debating established scientific truths with me gb2reddit the earth is flat btw

if thats all that evolution is then I agree with it. and it doesnt prove that we come from monkeys but the exact opposite.
because given this process, yoi can never add new information to the genome and so will always be the same species.
way to prove creationism

endless pain and lovecraftian horror