Can someone please translate this for me? Thanks. I will post the reaponses to HIM
Can someone please translate this for me? Thanks. I will post the reaponses to HIM
Sounds like Foucault. Of which was a homosexual faggot, and funded by Jews to undermine political confidence.
His idea was to equate the government to the likes of a phallus that people mindlessly go with.
The part that universities leave out is the part where they substitute one authoritarian government for another (communism).
What does this mean
white man bad
> "fact"
"I disagree publicly about the psychological outcomes of an globalist society, particularly relating to the primitive sexual drive I feel deep inside my being. PLEASE NOTICE MY OPINION."
>muh patriarchy
There's no real translation, it's some faggot stringing big words together knowing that the only people who respond are other faggots who will pretend to understand.
Where do I go to learn this?
Translation: a bunch of buzzwords that have a semantic content of zero.
I've never seen a more pretentious load of shit in my life. Is she seriously implying that having structured...anything...in business or government is somehow sexist and oppressive? they just repeat the same buzzwords over and over and I really don't think they understand at all what they're saying. the amount of women in high level positions of business and government is at all time highs.
The person probably just read Foucalt for the first time.
en.wikipedia.org
It's a theory, and not proven.
As stated, the only desire that Foucault had was to subvert the confidence of the US political system (he was hired as a professor in California).
Foucault believed everybody was a homosexual and he intended on turning anyone into a homosexual.
Just tell him/her that they're only mimicking what their professor told them to say and think.
Foucault and many other political philosophers of the 20th century wished to subvert the government entirely and replace it with a form of Communism.
>female values
>manifestations of psychic prisons of male repressed sexual desires
It’s always delicious to hear middling intellects try to sound lettered.
>everything I don't like is some weird sexual innuendo
Thanks Freud!
That's what psychoanalysis was all about.
Subverting the integrity of the bourgeoisie.
>ELI5
when I dumb this down it comes out something like 'the top dog wants a harem and no one else can'. amirawng?
(You)
>having a boss to answer to is the male gender secretly desiring to be dominated by another alpha male, and has nothing whatsoever to do with business being more efficient when it's run by a group of people specializing in certain fields, and coordinated by someone who specializes in coordinating groups.
I think the gist of it is that, if men were not sexually repressed, free to act out sexually, we wouldn't have bureaucracy, and women would be free.
I'm pretty sure that's what he said.
So can this "thoughtful" individual tell us, how things should be done with "female values" in mind?
Hierarchies are created to impose order, not any psychobabble about male sexual desire. It says a lot more about that faggot's desire for power over others and the fetishization of misandry than it does about bureaucracy.
So, basically, women have no structure and just run amok doing things in ways that lack all logic and efficiency? Sounds about right.
Wow AWKWARD
no established pecking order, nothing gets done, everyone runs around in circles gossiping and calling HR on eachother, company fails
And that's why business structures are the way they are
Ask him if the same is true for a Cheeracracy
Civilization = thot control
>I just read the works of a retard and quoting it makes me feel smart.
obviously they weren't such a retard.
The fag is mimicking him.
How about something like, 'Foucault: A Very Short Introduction'. Cheap, too.
Your library probably has books, too:
worldcat.org
It's almost like I'd rather live in a soceity with rules than one that is a shit fest of emotions and other crap.....
Bureaucracy is not a manifestation of psychic prisons they are just systems of organization that do well enough. Darwinian models of analysis offer much better explanatory power than whatever bullshit system he is jerking off to.
It looks like projection at its finest, men who are not trapped in a psychic prison don't see repressed sexual desire everywhere. Also female values are diametrically opposed to systems of merit and competence. There is a reason that an amazonian society did not rise up and create a utopia in ancient china.
>ants have hierarchies
>bees have hierarchies
>wolves have hierarchies
>lions have hierarchies
>mice have hierarchies
>crows have hierarchies
>women have hierarchies
>Hierarchies are human men's fault
I think he is referring to dominance heirarchies and their use by men to status signal and attract females. He seems to believe these hierarchies are predicated on values that alienate females because of patriarchy and not because of different proclivities between men and women. Also seems to think we can substitute male values in these fields like competence, competition and industriousness, with female values like talking while not working.
substitute male values in these hierarchies*
Thanks
>Men bad women good. We make women wear bras and shit!!!
Basically his argument
Schizophrenic way of saying "patriarchy"
>female values
Thanks, Jow Forums.
ok shill scum
"Thing are the way they are because fuck bitches, get money."