Where the Native Americans peaceful or savages?

Did the evil white man wanted to wipe them out?

Attached: native-american-sepia.jpg (1280x720, 90K)

They were prehistoric savages. Not an exaggeration they didn't have writing. Or any of the other basics of civilization like agriculture or domestic animals or beer. They killed all the fucking horses. They were stone age retards.

they had incest sex for 10000 years and then died of the first cold they didn't catch from their sister. That's the history of native americans in its entirety,

Tribals have no right to exist.

white man don't listen to OP, this land is your
land.

Attached: my real home.jpg (1835x633, 552K)

>no agriculture
Injuns grew crops my dude, not every tribe was midwest/western nomads chasing buffalo herds.

AHHH native Americans, probably the worlds #1 experts at torture and deception. They Rightly earned the title "Savages" for the extreme brutal tortures they did to captured enemies. "Indian giver" was a term used for someone who sold you and item then later wanted it back.

They had no roads, no technology beyond cave man levels, internal cruelty to their fellow man was unheard of at the time. This describes the "northern" Indians the south American ones were even worse.
We should all thank god each day that that the the common European diseases killed most native Americans.

They were inspirational. Thats why Skull and Bones are worshipping Geronimos skull

>Where the Native Americans peaceful or savages?

Depends entirely on the tribe. There were dozens of tribes throughout the united states. Some of them like the Iroquois were pretty damned civilized others like the Apache or the Seminole were little more than bandits who survived by raiding white settlers and other Indian tribes.

Attached: Turn in your weapons.jpg (512x392, 56K)

Most readily converted to christianity, so id say they were and still are filthy savages.

>The historian T R Fehrenbach, author of Comanche: The History Of A People, tells of a raid on an early settler family called the Parkers, who with other families had set up a stockade known as Fort Parker. In 1836, 100 mounted Comanche warriors appeared outside the fort’s walls, one of them waving a white flag to trick the Parkers.
>‘Benjamin Parker went outside the gate to parley with the Comanche,’ he says. ‘The people inside the fort saw the riders suddenly surround him and drive their lances into him. Then with loud whoops, mounted warriors dashed for the gate. Silas Parker was cut down before he could bar their entry; horsemen poured inside the walls.’
>Survivors described the slaughter: ‘The two Frosts, father and son, died in front of the women; Elder John Parker, his wife ‘Granny’ and others tried to flee. The warriors scattered and rode them down.
>‘John Parker was pinned to the ground, he was scalped and his genitals ripped off. Then he was killed. Granny Parker was stripped and fixed to the earth with a lance driven through her flesh. Several warriors raped her while she screamed.
>‘Silas Parker’s wife Lucy fled through the gate with her four small children. But the Comanche overtook them near the river. They threw her and the four children over their horses to take them as captives.’
>So intimidating was Comanche cruelty, almost all raids by Indians were blamed on them. Texans, Mexicans and other Indians living in the region all developed a particular dread of the full moon — still known as a ‘Comanche Moon’ in Texas — because that was when the Comanche came for cattle, horses and captives.

No it was well recorded that the reason they got btfo was because every tribe was against every other tribe and they couldn't mount any sort of uinited defense and the only group that managed to put their differences with their neighbors for any extended period of time sent wave after wave of soldiers to round up everyone else to sacrifice on a giant pyramid

Attached: apocalypto4-e1411435550805[1].jpg (1528x831, 248K)

Their werent any indians.

A few thousand maybe tens of thousands thats it. The place was empty.

They unironically genocided the norse settlers of greenland so fuck the lot of them desu

American Indians were brutal and savage. Very few tribes practiced any diplomacy toward other tribes. They constantly battled and raided each other. There was no peace.

This desu, fuck the skraeling.

Both. It depends on the tribe/group and what part of the continent they were on. The Comanche and Sioux were nasty mofo's. Choctaw and Chickasaw were happy earth going peeps.

May I submit that the true indigenous people were the mound builders. i.e. Serpent Mound.
But WTF happened to them? Were they pushed out and slaughtered by the feather wearing savages we romanticize about and call American Indians?
The mound builders work has been carbon dated to be a much older culture than the savages called Indians. Mound builders made large societies with infrastructure and artwork as well as the mounds for which they are known. These mound builders lived in regions and there are few archeological studies that give evidence that they would battle the neighboring societies.
But along came the horse back savages that chose war over peace. It's a fact that the mound builders lived organized and peacefully.
By the 1200's the mound builders were all gone. Only the pow wow native Americans were left.

Cahokia.

Attached: CahokiaMounds-Timeline-6-1500x575.png (1500x575, 835K)

>May I submit that the true indigenous people were the mound builders. i.e. Serpent Mound.
>But WTF happened to them? Were they pushed out and slaughtered by the feather wearing savages we romanticize about and call American Indians?
Yeah


Same thing is happening today. Asiatic bugs are a plauge worst than niggers.

Attached: 7000BC oldest mummies south america chile aryans vikings.jpg (1928x2374, 2.63M)

Truthfully they mostly interbred.

No more and no less peaceful as any other subsistence farming/hunting people ever. Which means to say, not particularly peaceful.

So long as you weren't near them, sure, they were peaceful and went on to sling arrows at deer and fuck and just exist. Because far as they would wager, you probably had about as much shit to steal as they had (bow, arrow, occasional shiny shell or rock, collection of pretty feathers, and a couple meals of meat or gathered berried ect; not worth dying over. Unless you proved to them you had something worth them stealing, like Comanches when they'd see another tribe's horse. That sure worth the risk.

Until you came into their turf. Then they'd want you dead. They'd steal your shit if they thought you were a weak punk. Same as any tribal ever. It's what humans do.

There's literally nothing special about Indians. They're shitbags. They were comparatively technologically primitive shitbags. But they're shitbags in the same way all humans are shitbags. So what greater amount of pity do they deserve for losing? Not a great lot really.

Attached: IMG_3542.jpg (3000x4000, 2.37M)