You can't name a reason why a one-world government wouldn't work

Oh, it will work. Not because of human will, but by the will of God.
>pic related

Attached: 43A149A1-E46D-4250-90E3-CB9FDD3E96E4.jpg (1216x1615, 599K)

Care to prove any of these?

Fpbp australian not shitposting. I am proud user

Jews

fuckoff cunt

That's a platitude. You can't actually string a real political opinion with stuff like that.

mulatto hellscape

people have stated reasons as to why it wont work, why dont you give us a few reasons as to why it will and we will argue against that

The burden of proof isn't on me at all. You should have to prove why it's a bad idea because you'll fight anyone trying to impose it.

this is why nothing productive gets done on pol because people like you start arguments but arent willing to argue but il give it a shot anyways in hopes of you trying to formulate a proper argument.
I honestly think it wont work because
-the risks are massive as one user said earlier single counties arent at risk of failure but the entire world is
-this kills competition i dont care what you say because it does the only force the government is working against is its own people
-genetic diversity will be destroyed

Attached: 1542983299139.png (624x937, 24K)

No objective, honest person can consider racial sentiment a real political issue or believe that politics are intrinsically corrupt. Both these things simply aren't actual concerns.

that does not dispel my argument about genetic diversity which is a very real thing

Accountability

Yes I can, the united states would stop this bullshit.

If the majority of the world decided this was the way to tackle the future, how exactly would the US stop it?

IF is a powerful word dont use it too lightly

It's no longer a one-world government.

Are all german's this retarded?

Yes you can you fuck. Centralisation of power is a real political concern.

If the majority, say, two thirds of US citizens wanted to join the global republic, would you have a moral mandate to deny them their wish? Because I don't see it.

not american but it depends on their government aswell it may verywell end up in a massive civil war if people are hellbent on joining OWG

>Germany
Of course you retarded kraut, you never see any reason not to do anything that causes global wars. Nobody wants you idiots in power.

It would work but it would resemble the hunger games on a global scale

Certain races are more productive than others
What happened when the less productive proletariat seized power? 100 million dead
Evolution kills every form of communism

Kill yourself. One government means total tyranny and no where to escape. Literally a dystopian hell

History proves it and so does psychology/philosophy. Eat shit Kraut.

>giving the satanic pedophiles in charge dominion over the world is a good idea
There is only lne suited for the position, that is christ and noone is in the position to claim dominion over the world but him. Everyone else just leads to ruin

Decentralization creates its share of problems. Time and time again, decentralization has lead to a loss of authority and subsequent lawlessness. It's not some political miracle formula.

human nature, you ever realized why rome fell apart? yeah, you could make a one-would government nowadays and make the case "modern technologies" will keep everyone in line, but niggers gonna nig

No sane US citizen would want to join a global republic.

I would take up arms against this type of bullshit. I know many other people who would fight this too.

it's communism and it doesn't werk

Have you ever allowed yourself the suspicion that the whole satanic pedophile space lizard thing is actually a very obvious hint that nationalists have no arguments and need to make stuff up?

>posting an image from an anime in which the World Government is presided over by corrupt turbo kikes that make literally everyone they encounter or effect in any way live in abject misery

o i am laffin

Attached: 1368067826367.jpg (600x485, 32K)

Subhumans would run everything. Developed world would revert to shitting in the water supply.

>less authority
>lawlessness
>this is bad somehow
explain. Unless you think that less regulations inherently is good, in that case, get a job for a few months and you'll see for yourself how useful 'regulations' tend to be.

>No sane US citizen would want to join a global republic

Why not?

Too much opposing goals and beliefs among the people of the world for any unified government to work.
And it would just be abused by the most powerful to oppress the less powerful, guaranteed.
The smaller the government the better, because that means they are less capable of fucking me over.
On the other hand, we do need government to keep corporations from fucking me over instead, so it's a fine balance.

One world government doesn’t mean anything. Most nations would vote to execute trannies and ban homosexuality. This would be ignored in favor of the progressive agenda like it already is. A one world government would be nothing more than a fancy logo and slightly less paperwork

Because your picture doesn't include Donald Trump as Emperor of Earth

Ok, now this is retrospective.

no one world language. no one world culture. no one world religion or philosophy. It would fall apart very quickly or better yet it will never happen in the first place, people prefer their freedom. And if you think this would be a republic, that just means that chinese and Indians would rule the world because they get the most votes

Of course lawlessness is bad. Are you 12?

and to create a world gov you need a worldwar and when the world gov falls apart again you get another world war from the fractures. 2 guaranteed world wars by idiots who want to persue this

Attached: 393cfad6725f6405e9152d6c70567c117a5317c5_hq.gif (500x270, 458K)

Explain Singapore

I dunno, here's a few reasons...

I have to ask again, are all Germans this stupid?

Attached: iu[1].jpg (1862x1048, 190K)

I pick these at random. The federation from Starship Troopers is up next. I actually do want to know exactly what it is about world government that gets Jow Forums so upset.

>no one world language
English
>no one world culture
Being smart
>no one world religion or philosophy.
Getting good grades and being smart

Lack of conflict and an other. A one world government would have to tear it self apart. Look at both the right and the left they both need an other to define themselves and measure themselves up against.

Low effort troll pls go away.

People could still have conflict, just not outside of parliamentary frameworks. If that's bad, we might as well aim to give up statehood altogether, and if that's what you want, you're honestly just another Marxist.

jews

too many nigger

We already have a one-world government which pretends to be many quarreling countries to keep the proles in line.

Overall only 5 mio population of which are: Chinese (76.2% of the citizen population), Malays (15.0%), and ethnic Indians (7.4%) making up the population.

Singapore is basically a chinese city state. if chinese manage to become 75% of the world population maybe we will indeed get a world government under them. And then it also must be held together by extreme high standard of living and wealth, like Singapore. Singapore would get serious problems is they are poor and the ethnic makeup shifts more against chinese

Attached: basedKoala.jpg (641x380, 91K)

how fucking stupid can one person be. you must be a ultra low iq african invader. governments don't work now how the fuck will a global government work

>using anime symbol of world govt. to validate a point
>in that same anime, their world is facing much trials for having the same one world govt.
Hitler is rolling in his ashes

jews

We don't want it to work so it wont work u brainlet faggot

So you're saying Singapore's excess wealth has an ethnic reason behind it?

Are you correct in not wanting it to work? Do you know for sure it won't assist you in your cause?

eat shit cunt

Attached: cunt.png (1412x925, 1.6M)

>governments don't work

That statement is as bold as it is demonstrably false.

a single government system has not survived in history. not even once.

So all those SATAN-II missiles you illicitly aim at us are for pretending? Are they filled with confetti?

>no objective, honest person can disagree with me

Attached: laughing muslimahs.jpg (272x272, 88K)

Not even primarily. More like this: quote:
The economy of Singapore is a highly developed free-market economy.[15][16] Singapore's economy has been ranked as the most open in the world,[17] 7th least corrupt,[18] most pro-business,[19] with low tax rates (14.2% of Gross Domestic Product, GDP)[20] and has the third highest per-capita GDP in the world in terms of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)

They are the freest most pro Business economy in the world.
And then this:

Singapore when central business district office rents tripled in 2006.[citation needed]

Banking
In the 2017 Global Financial Centres Index, Singapore was ranked as having the third most competitive financial centre in the world after London and New York City

Politics aren't intrinsically corrupt. Fascist dictatorships aren't for instance. But politics in a supernational government have to be, for it to work at all, because it requires national governments to work for the interests of the internationals (which entails doing their part in holding it together) and against the interests of their nation. That's what all the nationalism vs globalism shit is for. Do you think a national governnent should enrich the people of their own nation? Then you're a nationalist, at the very least a civic one. Do you think they should enrich a handful of international power brokers instead? At the expense ofs their own people? Then you're a globalist.

That doesn't even go into the effects of diseases further spreading, dysgenics, the unststainability of mass production of goods in the wake of an evergrowing and needy world population, the catastrophic long-term consequences for the environment, the reasons against it never end. Unless you're in the worldwide top 0.01% income bracket, it's retarded to be in favour of a world government, because the fallout is going to affect you sooner or later. And the later it does, the harder it hits you.

Democracy has prevailed since 300 BC

These 2 anons get it:
...but my own objections to any one-world-state is based upon many years studying Imperial Rome (which, as the mightiest Empire ever to have existed, is the closest thing to your one-world-state). Let us imagine that you DO achieve this Utopia (and we all know Utopias only exists in fiction, right?), and your monolithic Empire is ruled by some wise, benevolent sage-philosopher, along the lines of Marcus Aurelius... so far so good.

ONE bomb - ONE gun, ONE stroke of a blade - and we now have a Caligula, a Nero, or Commodus ruling us all.
Having all your power concentrated in one organization is folly, and only strong nationalism can prevent this happening.

No government is a better option

your iq just got 10 points lower

It shouldn't be that hard to formulate a response that's not a variation of
>muh race
>government bad

That's precious, you're actually saying nationalist countries are the less tyrannical ones?

The economy would flip over and die trying to take care of shithole third world countries, Africa and the middle East would turn into money sinks for the whole world. My local interests aren't the same as a chink or Arab. Nationalistic divides would cause more wars, tanking the global economy more. Simple political affairs could and would be catalysts for civil world wars.
>tl;dr
>fuck off commie

How is one person supposed to govern another when they’re on complete opposite sides of the world?
>Hey this law passed on the other side of the world you have to follow it
>>No. Fuck you.

jews. the jews would pit anyone against each other so they can exploit them both

It takes just a few hours to get from one side of the world to the other.

Yeah, cause the EU is working so well right?

73 years of unprecedented economic growth as a direct result of Europe-wide free trade (including but not limited to the EU) say otherwise.

Unironically yes.

Attached: 800x-1.jpg (800x533, 41K)

check those bad boys again. you are having a hard time tonight achmad

Attached: cunt2.jpg (640x621, 113K)

Attached: 1537070187954.png (1860x1830, 2.18M)

If you have to ask this question, you’re lost.

Niggers and Jews

Yes, Mohammed

Attached: Duck of Death.jpg (640x360, 20K)

You niggers can't even make a one-Europe government work

Stay mad, and try not to ruin Europe for the 4th time in 100 years

*ahem*

I have an announcement

FUCK FISHNIGGERS
FUCK FURRYNIGGERS
FUCK DEVILNIGGERS

Attached: pepe tuxedo - Google Search.285.jpg (334x506, 42K)

It would work just fine pal

Attached: ANP.png (2000x1200, 66K)

>Europe-wide free trade (including but not limited to the EU) say otherwise
>Europe-wide
I wonder why trade between relatively wealthy countries would work?
Or did you ignore the bit where Greece nearly tore the EU apart because their economy tanked so bad. Now imagine half the world being Greece.

You can't enforce one rule over 7.7 billion vastly different people.

While global dictatorship wouldn't be the worst outcome, Nazis only know how to lose.