Which country is the closest to anarchism?

Which country is the closest to anarchism?
I would imagine it's some African shithole, but which one exactly?

Attached: 481.jpg (259x194, 18K)

Probably south sudan

the one most developed by europeans(women and men) and then given over to the indigenous population through kikery(kissinger) so south africa?

Somalia

Lunchtime already?

Somalia is somewhere at the top of that list. Hasn't had a real government in 30 years.
Also inhabited by the worst kind of niggers.

Why are you asking?

Somalia, but selective anarchism also is in place in many western countries.

Central African Republic. Colonial infrastructure is mostly gone. Large portion of the country has gone back to the neolithic.

Ukraine

this picture needs a "if only you knew how bad things really were" caption

the Central African Republic is basically the stone age with AKs and RPGs

West Sahara?

Most African countries have a form of fascism mixed with democracy,

not real anarchism

NOT AN ARGUMENT
but seriously any ungoverned space in Africa, Latin America, Asia etc is technically anarchism.

Some parts of Lybia are state of the art Mad Max.
But I think the Democratic Republic of Congo still holds the title.

Attached: youmaywonder.jpg (964x594, 131K)

>it's some African shithole
Those countries definitely have hierarchies
Anarchism is just another retarded leftist fantasy like communism that can never actually exist

This
t. zimbabwean

Attached: 1513448550379.png (600x700, 140K)

OP you're probably confusing anarchy as a a political ideology with a chaotic shithole

the only common thing between them is that technically there is no central authority

true anarchism cannot exist

anarcho capitalism can exist, but anarcho communism is a fantasy.

Somalia

ancap is just a dumb meme fantasy well, but at least it's not an oxymoron

Is white anarchism different than black anarchism?

And that western anarquistes produce hell-on-earth lower scale shitholes anytime they have the chance.

Not really in the hic et nunc, but on perspective, the white one tends to resolve in an organized ruling (maybe from a foreign power). The black one, tends to perpetuate itself in a glorious shitfest.

Zimbabwe has 90% unemployment rate. Only a matter of time before it's goes full retard..

none, because political Anarchism isn't merely the absence of the State, and niggers can't into voluntarism.

Slavery has been reinstated in Libya so probably that.

anarcho-anything is an oxymoron

But there is no shortage of warlords to rule over you, so it isn't really anarchism. Probably closer to feudalism desu

its hardly capitalistic though

>niggers can't into voluntarism
if whites could, it would have become the norm a long time ago
Ironically it's niggers' universal inability to strategically organize their power struggles that bring them closest to achieving any kind of anarchy, albeit unintentionally

The United States is a simple magdump from a genuine shooting civil war.

And it is only a matter of time...

Either Libya or Somalia

You're giving Feudalism bad rep. At least Feudalists were able to provide for themselves whereas most of these niggers need aid from white countries to survive

>t. memeflags who only talk to each other in every fucking thread

Rojava and the Zapatista Municipalities.
Spoiler Alert: They're not shitholes

Isn't that just what happens when you have anarchy? Who's going to stop the warlords from taking over?

Haiti. Those subhuman pagans cannot grasp laws or order of any kind, they practice human sacrifice and cannibalism, rob, steal, murder and cut down and burn everything green thing in sight. They use charcoal as a form of currency to buy dirt cookies they make by salting the fucking ground and ruining the most fertile land on earth. Anarchy is the most destructive form of government in existence.

idk OP, Tanzania maybe? I'm honestly just here lurking for a rare flag or two for my collection.

Attached: 1536608272887.jpg (480x360, 12K)

Not saying that its feudalism, just saying that its probably closer to that then anarchism.

>Who's going to stop the warlords from taking over?
A well armed populace of enlightened men that that disagree on many things but agree on coming together to kick the shit out of any one man that tries to grab power and enrich himself on the expense of others.

But yeah, that's usually what happens. Could work if you only had decent people around though, its not like most people need the state to tell him to not kill people or dump their sewer on their neighbors lawn. Most people can go their entire life without ever bothering any one, its just a few retards that fuck up everything for us.

Key word here being people, as in humans.