Fascism general

In a fascist society, would different ethnicities ever be able to coexist equally?

I'm positively sure that it works in the same way as Socialism, like how the government regulates and controls production.

TRADITIONALY, Mussolini made fascism all about unity through natinality, so if those diffrent ethnistitys where say born citizens of a fascist nation it would be fine

>coexist equally
in a fascist society, everything's about right-wing superiority (racially)

Not at the nation scale. It would work internationally if the different ethnicities have their own sovereign fascist countries, though.

Wrong
It works much the same way as your bog-standard capitalism except there is a much, much larger element of protectionism involved. The general premise is that every individual company and business is allowed a degree of autonomy to run things as they see fit, the market will decide what works and what doesn't, and competition is encouraged however every single business needs to do what is right by the state and the people first and foremost.

So, for example, lets take an American company: Nike. Nike hire people which is good, they make money for the state, but under fascism they can fuck right off with the sponsoring of anti-American ideals and people like Colin Kapernicuck. They would be forced to do what is right by the American government, people and nation, or they would be taken over.

Attached: swoosh-default.jpg (630x1200, 51K)

Truly a great economic system, i wish this was implemented in real life

It would be preferable to the current shit we have. Right now a company's only allegiance is to its shareholders which is madness, especially considering the scope of these companies, the influence they hold and how intrinsic they have become to every day life. There needs to be more done to force them to care for the people before themselves.

Socialism fails because the state takes over every aspect of business.
Capitalism fails because the state lets businesses do what they want.

The third position is the winner. It strides the balance between freedom and regulation.

Attached: d89.jpg (236x306, 13K)

Agreed, although i’m sure the corporations would have a absolute fucking conniption if we tryed to pass that kind of legislation

Whats the difference between Fascism and National Socialism economically?

>IF WE COULD TURN BACK TIME

Attached: 1200px-Flag_of_the_Lehi_movement_(blue_on_white).svg.png (1200x873, 57K)

I'm working on becoming the king of Austria. Then it's on to rebuilding das Reich

It's all gonna be sababa, chabibi.

fascism and national socialism don't have strict economic doctrines, the form of the economy is guided by national circumstances and ideology.

so it ends up being slightly different everywhere

Fascism is state controlled capitalism.
National Socialism is statism+socialism. They respect private property rights.

Protectionist state capitalism. The Chinese model is one example, but each people have different traits and needs, so the extent and specifics depend on the particular nation.

Nope, Holy Roman Empire will prevail.

I just envy the parallel timeline where Lehi succeeded and pic related is supreme leader of greater judea which rules over all land between the two rivers

Attached: F171030YS12.jpg (2048x1365, 779K)

hmm explain how to do this.

It's the same with national socialism. Half the battle isn't economics or social policy, it's proving the holocaust was false.
Fascism suffers a similar situation, because boomer TV and comics all taught people that fascism is the dark dystopian authoritarian shithole.
Most people aren't intelligent enough to come to their own conclusion and wil hold their existing opinion that was given to them. It's an unnecessary uphill battle over semantics when real issues could be tackled.
I hate to be the opticsfag though. But whatever new term is created will just be hindered by age-old rhetoric, so it's pretty pointless in the end. It's probably better to just accept it so the rhetoric washes off.

Based and redpilled

Not within the same state. The state is just a tool for the nation (as in the group of people of similar ethnic and cultural makeup) to work towards the interests of that nation, so others would not be represented equally.

A multi-nation state is called an empire, and no empire is equal. This is why self-determination for nations is so important. Whether it's Kurds, or Germans, or Kenyans, or Japanese, it doesn't matter. Unique peoples cannot be guaranteed protection from exploitation or invasion in a multi-nation state under any government system.

Your opinion on Avraham Stern?

Had good ideas but made some dumb fucking decisions
The irgun could have easily been turned to fascism if he wasn't so autistic about wanting to bomb civilian Anglo targets

I envy an ethnically homogeneous Israel in some other timeline.

Our timeline is fine senpai , it just could be much better without people like barak and sharon

Attached: Flickr_-_Israel_Defense_Forces_-_Nahal_Recruits_Give_Their_Oath_to_the_IDF_in_Jerusalem.jpg (1280x632, 242K)

How about “neichze-isim”

Named after the man who inspired its creation

Everytime I see pictures of crowds of Israelites all I can think of is mortar rounds.

Attached: F6D638A4-F04F-4535-AB2D-6F4E548304CC.png (680x497, 122K)

>some other timeline
Wtf why not just envy an ethnically homogeneous United States in some other timeline??

Great idea, if you want the speed at which Nietzsche is spinning in his grave to hit unprecedented levels.

fucking tired as shit lads see ya later

Well, I call myself an integralist. I don't shy away from fascism as a label though, but saying something like integralist throws them off and suddenly they're curious and ask and so you list off the beliefs and it turns out they're being sympathetic to literal fascism.

Goodnight OP

>Unique peoples cannot be guaranteed protection from exploitation or invasion in a multi-nation state under any government system.
That's not true. The issues with multi-nation states revolve around self-determination and conflicting values.

Attached: .png (1034x1010, 728K)

National Socialist Discussion Discord

No muslims, atheists, satanists, SIEGE larpers, MAGAtards, libertarians or similar alt-kike quazinatsocs. Most Aryan religions welcomed as long as they are compatible with national socialism.

Small server with serious discussion and occasional banter. Long anti-shill vetting procedure, don't bother sperging about cia niggers because we don't care.

Attached: 1515251387316.jpg (777x1126, 166K)

Forgot link
>:*******.gg/wg4gSux

link suka?

>ask and so you list off the beliefs and it turns out they're being sympathetic to literal fascism.

This is really true and it shows how shallow and stupid people actually are. They don't question their own beliefs and they take everything the television tells them for granted.

Do you think the state should ensure companies put the interests of the people first?

>Oh yes, definitely

Do you think the state should ensure that the people are well take care of in terms of education, health and law-enforcement?

>Why ofcourse! I can't think of anything more eminently reasonable.

Do you want to live in a country in which people, and yourself, feel proud of, a country that does everything it can to strive for national pride and dignity?

>My God this all sounds amazing, where do I sign up?

Fantastic! If you'll just follow me to the national-socialist headquar-

>NATIONAL SOCIALIST? NAZI'S? FASCIST? EURGH NO, OY VEY, THE 6 GORRILION!

Attached: 1472812200648.png (600x700, 25K)

In Spanish Falangism yes. But it was unique in that regard.

Far as I'm aware, Italian Fascism was also civnat, and German National Socialism was actually unusual for its significant racial element

Mussolini wasn't super hardcore about races or Jews until Hitler goaded him into it. Granted, he Cared. But hardly on a Nuremberg Laws level

In terms of fascisms, racialist forms have traditionally been in a severe minority.

Attached: 124332.jpg (500x358, 30K)

I dont trust edgy faggots