How is it even possible to ban porn in the ethnostate?

exactly my point. how would you feel if someone banned any art that resembled the picture you just posted because they called it porn. its all subjective to different people on what should be banned.
you will regret it. you think you're on the moral high ground but you're just going to shit on white peoples rights because your snowflake feelings might get hurt.

Attached: What-A-Bitch-Quotes-006.jpg (480x480, 13K)

Go be a degenerate with the niggers we don't need you or your poz.

you're free to refute me if i'm wrong, but your name calling doesn't dismiss the value of internet freedom to me. now im all for banning stuff like blacked porn or lgbt porn because its a clear violation what a white ethnostate strives for, but those are very clear examples.

Attached: 1530187899933.png (2000x1499, 241K)

I thought you were talking about the ethnostate, not the incelstate.

Faggots like you should keep to r9k

Boner inducing does not equal porn

some would disagree.

As it stands now, there's no lower limit to the depravity.

>what separates a renaissance drawing of females from porn?
Art appeals to aesthetic interest, while porn appeals to animal interest. Art does not need to put sex on display, as the suggestion is enough when properly executed. Porn must put everything on display, as this is its only appeal. Of course there are many things which are neither porn nor art, such as the pictures you have used in your comments. Only porn needs to be banned.
>what is that difference in terms of what could be considered sexual on an individual or collective and subjective basis in that which could be easily put into legal terms and be enforced regarding a white ethnostate?
This is really easy. If it exhibits any sex act it is porn. If it merely alludes or makes reference to sex it is not porn.

Attached: Van der Werff.jpg (1163x1600, 327K)

Would probably work. I'd still like to see pornographers get the rope though.

Attached: 1541629688699.jpg (922x1200, 151K)

You ban its production, possession, distribution, advertisement, solicitation, purchase and sale.

>are you telling me you cant tell the difference between this image and a scene from blacked?
No, what I'm telling you is that I could fap to that image if I had to. Easily.

and what constitutes a sex act? penetration? you're solving a subjective problem with a even more subjective answer.

I dont wanna be part of any ethnostate without porn.

Attached: 1528377152477.jpg (1944x2592, 398K)

exactly
and what will the penalty be for the husband who uploads a picture of his wife sun bathing near his pool wearing a bathing suit.
does that count as porn?
because people are going to be sharing it and fapping to it online.
people do it fucking daily on /b/

>not even one step made towards an ethnostate
>already debating about 2D/3D porn

Attached: 1509329273015.jpg (1080x1600, 214K)

audible kek

>renaissance drawing of females

Attached: fb6c754b43f2a43533ee5aef1eefe0ac--matchbox-art-print-design.jpg (484x700, 50K)

>and what constitutes a sex act? penetration? you're solving a subjective problem with a even more subjective answer.
This is a well defined legal concept, as it would be impossible to prosecute rapists and sexual abusers without a clear definition. You might consider learning how law actually works before lecturing others on subjectivity.

18 U.S. Code § 2246 - Definitions for chapter
(2) the term “sexual act” means—
(A) contact between the penis and the vulva or the penis and the anus, and for purposes of this subparagraph contact involving the penis occurs upon penetration, however slight;
(B) contact between the mouth and the penis, the mouth and the vulva, or the mouth and the anus;
(C) the penetration, however slight, of the anal or genital opening of another by a hand or finger or by any object, with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person; or
(D) the intentional touching, not through the clothing, of the genitalia of another person who has not attained the age of 16 years with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person;
(3) the term “sexual contact” means the intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person;

zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-23/china-offers-86000-reward-snitching-porn

>After sentencing a writer of erotic stories to 10 years in prison in a high-profile case, China has doubled the reward for reporting the illegal publishing of pornography to about 600,000 yuan ($86,500), according to Abacus. The regulator in charge of enforcing the policy is called "Clean up the Pornographic, Strike the Illegal". It will also reward citizens who expose publishing of anything that "endangers ideological security, cultural security, physical and mental health of minors."

I'm asexual and personally I think we should allow open but if one was inclined to ban porn just ban all art and photos that expose the nipples, vag or asscrack. Simple.

Just ignore fringe fetishes at that point everything can be a fetish since some people are aroused by automobiles