Two examples where I remembered the pages: >page 22
" (...) Support multicultural activities through sports, music, arts, culinary festivals, volunteering and other social events that will facilitate mutual understanding and appreciation of migrant cultures and those of destination communities"
>page 23
" (...) stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants.
Sounds pretty hardline. Just another step in forcing their bullshit through
Connor Collins
And of course Cuckmenistan is on board. Fuck this country.
Brayden Diaz
Born too late to explore the Earth, born too early to explore the stars, born just in time to see western Europe turn into the third world
Chase Ramirez
What a time to be alive
Zachary Fisher
History repeats itself. The fall of the Roman empire was followed by the medival dark ages.
Grayson Thomas
It's non-binding though, so it will be just like every other empty UN promise ever signed. Still, fuck any country signing that with a rake. Speaking of which, why isn't Canada signing this shit?
I hope we opt out or else all hope is lost in this country.
Charles Wilson
Notice how There`s not a single african, middle eastern or asian country except Israel and the Koreas.
This means that those countries can pump out niggers and in case of a crisis in Europe or somewhere else, they are not obligated to do shit, while eurocucks have to lick Jamal`s cum. This is unbelievable.
yep a nigger can simply fuck off from his shithole country to europe for the easy money and women that is instead of fixing his shitty country europe, truly a magnetic colonialism
Justin Ward
Just to give little bit more precise information on the subject, only countries that actually "opted out" were usa and hungary, usa completely leaving talks of creating gcm and hungary not accepting it when the final form was ready. Only way to not agree with it is to not participate on ceremony in Marakesh, where it will be accepted by consensus and every country having its deputy just present there (head of state, government, foreign minister etc.) will be considered as signatary of the pact.
Thats what is happening in Slovakia right now, while most of the coalition mps and even some opposition mps are against the pact because population doesnt want migration, our foreign minister, who is one of the creator of the pact and known soros loyalist is trying to trick parliament to send him to Marakesh anyway, what will mean that Slovakia will accept the pact despite pm saying Slovakia doesnt agree with it.
Connor Jenkins
What the fuck we didn't agree to shit yet they're still fighting in parliament. Fix your map
Blake White
Except Shorten agrees with the current immigration policy. He's a shady character but generally sticks by his beliefs
It's politically binding. Every country signing this, will agree to implement political agendas to support the goals of UN migrations pact.
But I'm all for it, the faster we get more migrants, the faster we will see a civil war.
Alexander Parker
>have signed in? it's signed on December 11th
Jonathan Rodriguez
no one in canada will look like that in 50 years
Lucas Bailey
it's your fault jew, fuck you.
Nicholas Russell
What swiss watch would you recommend under 300 eur?
Jaxson Cooper
yeah everything is my fault
Daniel Nelson
I don't wear watches sorry, it's probably hard to find a good one below 300eur. I heard IWC Schaffhausen is a good brand, don't get a Rolex.
Jaxon Bell
Last time i checked Norway is still undecided, but will most likely say no. I very much doubt Frp wants any part of that pact. That will be very unpopular for their loyal follower base.
Grayson Campbell
BE CAREFUL! While not legally binding, it absolutely is politically binding and countries also vow to create mechanisms to control fulfilment of the pact, which will introduce legal leverages.
Actually parliament should be talking today about it and they will be voting on Lajcaks counter proposal too. Basically if Lajcak (or anyone else) goes to Marakesh, it will mean that Slovakia agrees to the pact whatever pm told/tells/will tell to media.
tldr countries agree to the pact by presence of their deputies in Marakesh, not by pms saying to journalists they agree or not
Ian Morales
I coloured Slovenia initially red. But this comment string made made me change the colour to blue: >Follow the answers. That user delivered a source.
Dominic Turner
>About to agree to the pact Our government is pretty adamant about commiting sudoku over not signing it. We're voting in May, and the current ruling parties know they're fucked if they agree
Andrew Morales
The refugee crisis is without a doubt your fault. Who's pushing for American intervention in the middle east? It's you. Who's still doing air strikes on Syria? you Who's pushing for war with Iran? you Who's financing NGO's that bring refugees to Europe? you Who's not letting in any refugees even though they're the cause of it and a neighbouring country? you I hope Iran actually has nuclear weapons, like you people are claiming, and bombs the shit out of you.
Carter Long
Fingers crossed, our gov is changing quite fast nowadays anyway, let that fuckface leave
Brayden Ross
I don't get what these fuckers expect to happen when you import the sub-100 iq 3rd world.
Hell, you already see it happening now they're asking for 1000x more.
>It's non-binding though Macron and his cronies keep saying this, but if that's true, why are they so hell bent on getting people to sign it?
Dominic Lewis
I need a VERY legit source on that to include it into the map because I don't speak your language, nor do I know someone who speaks norwegian. I know nothing about norwegian politics as well.
Noah Jenkins
The Bright Blue Cuckxis of Evil
Oliver Allen
yeah i did all of this how can i forgat just this moring i ate 4 children and made mazut with them how can you be so fucking dumb and blame us for everything?
John Peterson
> Surely with another 10 million Muslims that will kickstart the 4th Reich!
Doesn't work that way Hans
Jackson Foster
If its not legally binding then why would anyone bother with it?
Oh, because nobody can enforce "legally binding" treaties anyway which rely on soft power to ensure they are enforced, so in the end its the same thing. Nice trick to make people think they aren't really signing up to anything with consequences when in reality they are.
He's talking about fucking how many percentage they got in the election in March. Three parties in our parliament, SDS, SNS and NSi are all opposing the referendum and they make up the majority they outnumber the left wing coalition by quite a bit. Our prime minister there doesn't need to be one because it encourages "hate speech" or in other words they're afraid of a referendum because they know 80% will say no. No one agreed to sign it yet they're still fighting for a referendum
Pretty much. thats all a treaty really is anyway. Thats all most international law really is actually.
David Hill
oh shut the fuck up melonpan, or I'll burn your loli collection
Noah Wright
This.
Ayden Edwards
>how can you be so dumb and blame us for everything
So adorable your parasitic race is still on the defensive when you've been literally exposed from every single horrible event behind mankinds suffering.
Hang yourself before we drag you and yours into the street.
yes, but only in Israel. You push FOR it in other countries. Netanyahu himself that Israel should deport its niggers to countries like Germany, UK and Canada.
Gabriel Phillips
> " (...) stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants.
sounds a little bit like censoring. "oh you are not pro refugee? no free money for you"
Isaiah Morgan
Well, some countries have laws that say any international commitment is legally binding for them, so if you are one of these countries... With some judge activism it could probably still forced through even in countries that dont have such laws, it is really dangerous.
Noah Wright
To his defence, he said that because Germany would gladly accept them
Elijah Cruz
Lurk more, fucktard, how fucking new can you be here
Cooper Nguyen
Not talking about "israelis", i'm talking about (((european))) politicians who made their personal crusade to implement multiculturalism in Europe while staying silent whenever you kikes bomb Gaza or whatever you do for fun.
Why don't you call them out? Why don't you rabbis attack them? Why don't you focus your hasbara on painting them as a traitors?
>type into google "support refugees" >click first website (www.supportrefugees.org.uk) >look at the top left
Brandon Walker
yes, because they've been brainwashed by jews after WW2, because of the """"holocaust"""
Nathan Price
Yeah even when a treaty is "binding" it's not like other members are going to send boots over if you don't apply this or that. They'll apply as much pressure as they can and use shaming and guilt-tripping in the media
John Sanders
been on this site for years now been bating them like this since forever
it is, since your sklavenmoral is fit for people not less greedy than you, that is you alone. the european soul was just too big to use christian "morality" as you use your gross judaism, therefore we died of that sickness. this is the actual story of europe: minoan civilization > phoenicians & mycaenean savages. greek civilization > chistianity & goths. rinascimental and modern civilization > check your privilege & german nazis.
Jacob Wright
Tell me one thing the nazis did that was bad, I'll wait. Protip: killing jews doesn't count, because it was a good thing.
