Jordan Peterson has constantly criticized attacked and exposed the flaws of: Feminism, leftist academia, cultural marxism, postmodernism, social-constructionism, Islam, leftist identity politics, porn industry, hedonism, mainstream left-wing politicians (Trudeau, Democrats)...
And he has defended: Western traditionalism, Christianity, the superiority of Western Civilization, individual responsibility, hierarchies, aiming for excellence, dedication to noble causes, Stoic perseverance, the nuclear family...
I'm not opposed to his views but there's something off about the guy IMO
Bentley Murphy
This man is full of shit.
Jaxon Phillips
Peterson's support for individualism, his biggest flaw at the moment, is fundamentally dangerous to western civilization. Individuality has it's place in a racially homogeneous world. Hell...it's probably even preferable. But not right now. Not when the barbarians are already beyond the gate and into the cities. We as a race need to group together more than we ever have, because if we don't, humanity will perish on this rock, never venturing to the stars. Everything Peterson does is an indirect attack against whites...and the worst part is that he is either too stupid or his mind too jew'd to see that. He's also a fucking moral coward, too greedy to support what he knows deep, deep down is the truth and what is right.
60% majority of Russians long for the Soviet Union and think Stalin was a great man. 3 Russians in 5 longing for the Bolsheviks after everything that happened in 1917-1991. Incredible degeneracy. And Peterson is one of the very few public Western intellectuals who equates Stalin's crimes with those of Hitler. No wonder he is not extending his speaking tour to Russia any time soon. Would probably pose a serious risk to his safety and health. Anna Politkovskaya, Boris Nemtsov...
>Everything Peterson does is an indirect attack against whites...
Of course Peterson doesn't "know deep down" that your moral and ideological degeneracy would be "the truth". There is no universality to your cultist ideology. There are, for you a person of considerably low moral character, the feelings of meaning and purpose and truth you project onto your meaning system. Peterson is far more intelligent, far more broadly read than you are and less biased, without your cultist mind-structures of motivated reasoning. He doesn't share your emotional structures that place projected ideological answers before questions, rehearsing and repeating and signalling, killing rational inquiry. There is no universality to your ideology. There is only your projected illusion of it. Peterson is a thinker, not a cultist like you. That is where your "analysis" goes wrong.
>ideology Think for more than 3 seconds, you useless eurotrash. Nice job putting words in my mouth there. I never mentioned ideology once. I'm talking about race and it's immutable factual characteristics Peterson seems intent on pretending don't exist.
Jesus Christ I knew Fins weren't the sharpest tools in the shed, but dude, you've got less reading comprehension than the most petrol-drunk abo.
Jackson White
statistics source: 'dude trust me...'
Daniel Scott
The source is linked in the comment. And you don't get a source more reliable than Pew Research Center.
Nathan Ramirez
yet another peterstein shill thread
Noah Martinez
>cultist ideology the irony of saying this when many Peterson followers are fairly cultish in their following themselves.
Peterson is okay. Good basic advice, very knowledgeable on clinical data. his 'deeper' ideas are often shaky, and he tries to redefine the meaning of words such as truth and god. I don't trust people who develop their beliefs based on the bastardization of words, that reminds me of neo-marxists. He also seems to lump all identitarian ideologies together. You don't have to be a white supremacist or hate anyone to feel a connection to people who share a similar background, there's nothing wrong for that and it's easy to see that much of western civilization has been based on such connections. His inability to tackle such issues with nuance, or to make any serious foray into biological differences between sexes/ races, or to even think about talking about Jewish supremacists just makes me think he's a coward. That being said, he's okay in my book.
I don't put words in your mouth. I expose your ideological psychopathology. I don't think you could write a comment that wasn't entirely predictable from the simple-minded dictums of your hiveminded and rehearsed ideology. Try it. You cannot surprise me. I could write your comments for you with meme-pictures embedded. You are a script, an act, a deindividualized performance of a role.
Dominic Reed
Why doesn't he have a good character then? Also, what is the implied thing that is better than character development? I want to know.
Ryder Collins
When it comes to religion he's as dumb as it gets. See Jordan Peterson exposed by Rationality Rules on YouTube.
>When it comes to religion he's as dumb as it gets. of course you think that. He is a smart guy when you agree with him but really dumb when you don't.
Jeremiah Ross
He's a retard sometimes, he talks about postmodernism but doesn't understand it. Also he conglomerate and makes general statements about postmodern neomarxists, yet when asked if there are Marxist who want to debate him he is dishonest and lies, which is probably the worse offense for someone who claims to be for truth. He pussied out with the debate of Dough Lane, I just hope one day Žižek takes the time to debate him and highlight the stupidity of Peterson.
Adam Brooks
>He pussied out with the debate of Dough Lane Don't forget the time he stopped Faith Goldy from talking at a free speech convention, directly because it would have offended some jew there that Peterson was sucking off at the time.
>His inability to tackle such issues with nuance, or to make any serious foray into biological differences between sexes
That is complete nonsense, but other than that I agree with most of what you wrote. Peterson is far from my favourite thinker. I am defending his positive overall impact and underlining how deranged, collectively narcissistic, out of all proportion and in terms of reality (cf. Overton window) self-defeating the white-nationalistic (or more accurately indirectly anti-semitic) criticism of him is. The collective psychopathologies of SJWs and white nationalists are strikingly similar in their patterns. Woke and redpilled, directing collective personal attacks on those who violate their religion-like dogma. They perform adopted hiveminded roles that give them meaning, everything else is secondary. They are rational and productive actors only in their delusional self-image.
Everything he discusses is meaningless because they are all ethnically European concepts, yes I'm sure you'll find one based black man who cares about stoic philosophy but you don't move to Haiti to live in a rich neighborhood with rocket scientists for neighbors and a well paid job, why? You know why.
The only thing that truly matters is survival. And maximising survival requires action, not talk shops.
If the "west" continues down the path of Total Africanization can you really say it's "superior"?
He also specifically argues against the group action of the very demographic which built and sustains his worldview. He is meaningless.
Jayden Ward
HE is a fucking degenerate money grubbing cuck. Take a look at his daughter, his own creation & tell me he isn't mentally ill
Ayden White
internet celebrities which no one heard one fucking peep about until someone dared to oppose hillary he's the most perfect manifestation of controlled opposition Ive ever seen: slither into your ranks, and then quietly ensure you never do anything useful, or learn anything useful I can't even imagine what kind of swamp they pulled him out of, where do you even find someone that lies this effectively
Ayden Sullivan
He's a consultant for the UN and Trilateral Commission. His intention is to move 20-something males from "alt-lite" to socialism. I'd argue he's the most vicious snake in the grass of all.
Logan Thomas
just look at how hes siting hes gay as fuck!!
youre the faggot who needs a man to tell you what to do
The only thing I've seen Peterson talk about in regards to sexual differences, is big 5 differences and how in Scandinavia biological differences in the sexes are more pronounced. Has he ever talked about the variability of intelligence in men and women? I haven't seen him talk about race in depth, but I don't pretend to claim I've seen everything he has written or said. I agree with you in your assessment of collectivists, I still think it's a strong point that he fails to acknowledge the role of racial identity in the history of the west. I like other cultures, and when it comes to work and academia I believe merit is most important regardless of race, religion, and culture. That being said, I think it's perfectly fine for people to have an affinity for or prefer people that are similar. I understand it's bad optics for him to discuss such things, but if he's unwilling to take on that controversy at some point, he's simply a milquetoast thinker that does little to challenge the status quo. Sure, he does good work in combating marxism, neomarxism, and postmodernism, but if that means people return to neoliberalism it doesn't do people much good in the long run.
A Peterson-cultist calling other people cultists? Imagine my shock. I can't deny, I fell for his charisma for a good while and consumed dozens of lectures from him. Watched all episodes of his online course. He's still a bullshit artist, and you fell for him too.
How does Peterson define truth? Can you answer that? Is Peteron a christian, does he believe in God?
>Be individalist, goy. Nationalism and patriotism is evil Yeah, nah
Luke Fisher
this tweet is a great example of Peterson's hypocrisy. he pushes individualism and criticizes collectivism, but is willing to throw an individual to the horde to potentially save the collective. Kavanaugh was defended by collectives, conservatives, Christians, etc who saw him as being treated unfairly. The collectives that opposed Kavanaugh did not allow him to defend himself, his merit was ignored and his power as an individual was rendered useless.
I don't see how Peterson is a Christian, like you are basically pointing out. He may be influenced by 'judeo-christian' values, but I don't see how you can claim to believe in Christ if you have to play word games to justify your beliefs. I have a friend who is a Peterson fan, I had to tell him that I think he and Peterson are playing word games with concepts such as god and transcendence because they are materialists trying to convince themselves they aren't.
Jp is (conop), that's all. He's work though, is in our advantage.
Jacob Bell
You're heart is lead true, AUS! CONOP, he is.
Ethan Reed
Still waiting.
Easton Adams
I believe our Ruski user needs a meme change, to crypto kike (communist)!
Jace Taylor
People have gotta realize that to keep his platform he can't just go around saying Jews control the wealth and blacks have low IQ. This is the platform he uses to drop huge redpills. He understands tribalism (and if you understand this, you realize he is certainly anti globalist), and he shits all over socialist ideologues in the west, pointing out the flaws in their shitty equity proposals.
Michael Walker
martial law reeeeeeeeeeee. go to local hardware store and buy rope! go to the gun store and buy guns and ammo and kit! reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
"And so we've got the bloody Marxists indoctrinating the universities into this...what would you call it...(twists his hands around) reckless-ideology-that-promises-to plunge-us-all-into-chaos. And don't FOR A SECOND dare think that this stops at the universities, BUCKO. They're all over Hollywood, for Gawd's sake. These ideologues are fundamentally opposed to what people striving on the path of GOOD are aiming for. And then there's the question: What are we aiming for? What SHOULD we aim for. And (voice falters) I think it should be pretty obvious. It's been in our bloody faces for the past...suffice it to say its been pretty damn obvious for a long time. Christ talked about it, Nietzsche talked about it, Dostoevsky and Jean Piaget all talked about it. AND IT'S ABOUT TIME WE TALK ABOUT IT BEFORE ITS TOO GODAMN LATE! And - and we've got to start somewhere - even if it's as simple a thing as washing your goddamn asshole. You may laugh - but if you think washing your asshole is trivial, well - think again, BUCKO. But then there are those who want to fool us - the trickster figure that Carl Jung talked about. Keep your eyes open. Remember the goddamn Nazis - ha! Now there were some masters of asshole-washing. But that was for the purpose of TOTAL AND COMPLETE EVIL. And if you think that killing 6 million Jews is okay because your asshole is clean enough to eat a bloody schnitzel off - you're WRONG. That's not a game we can play - NO. So....well...(shakes his lowered head)...that's that."
UPROARIOUS APPLAUSE MR SHAPIRO AND MR RUBIN ON THEIR FEET CHEERING
If, this can be vetted true, it would explain Jp's, war upon degeneracy.
Nicholas Hernandez
>I understand it's bad optics for him to discuss such things
Start with that. He has millions of followers. He has done a highly impactful job exposing the ideological corruption of leftist academia. He is aware of the racial differences in IQ. But if he had made that a part of his overall message he wouldn't have anywhere near the amount of listeners he now has. He hasn't lied about the topic, he has just avoided it. He is opening the eyes of millions of people to the wider picture of leftist intellectual corruption, the roots of which are in the academia. That intellectual corruption IS the main fault line in the currently decaying structure of Western Civilization. He is exposing the biggest source of decay there is, and doing it effectively. Do you think that his overall impact would be more positive if he was instead talking about race to an audience of a 100 000? Or just more re-affirming and self-validating to those who have projected their sense of identity and meaning around it?
It is easy to criticize him from a position outside of the real world of real impact made or not made. If Peterson is not doing it right, and he supposedly could do it right (he couldn't as argued), then where are the white nationalists doing it right? Circle-jerking to audiences less than 1% of Peterson's. I mean look at people who have come to Jow Forums for years to rehearse and signal the same memes over and over again to experience a sense of belonging and meaning. Achieving nothing but a mental spiralling down to a cultist firing of synapses, which one day will be impossible to undo.
I find that I like the idea of JP more than any of his actual content.
I really liked his comfy appearances on JRE, particularly the one with Bret Weinstein. I find his writing unreadable and his lectures boring.
In many ways he is a perfect academic for the YouTube generation, it’s all about the compilations of epic slams and 3-min insights. Not enough substance there though.
Still I would rather have a figure with mass appeal who’s advocating reading and cleaning your room, I think this is overall a net positive.
Justin Taylor
>People have gotta realize that to keep his platform he can't just go around saying Jews control the wealth and blacks have low IQ Yes. Sure. But it's the fact he goes around parading himself as some sort of paragon of truth and some moral arbiter. It's blatantly hypocritical to a laughable degree, even if I did believe your "for the greater good" shite, which is almost certainly false.
Peterson has done little to suggest he is antiglobalist, and there is evidence to suggest that he might be a globalist. The only thing I can think of him saying that could be considered anti globalist is he's talked about how not every culture is compatible with western values, and that is worth considering in the immigration debate. That's all I've heard. On the other hand, he has links to the UN and he will be speaking at a Trilateral Commission event soon, and while it could be for any reason, that is an organization that is commonly viewed as being globalist in nature.
Easton Sanders
>CAM ON WHITE MAN LETS UNITE yeah, no thanks
David Turner
Peterson is one of ((them))
Xavier Clark
you hit the nail on the head. we're so eager to rally around a "public intellectual" that we tend to give them undeserved credit.
Elijah Wood
Kek'd
Lincoln Hill
There's a whole list of things that are better than character development. Staying hydrated, breathing fresh air, the list is endless
Ryan Robinson
>equality of outcome is bad >unless it's about only the alphas scoring the pussy, because that's somehow different
I was all behind and for everything he said. Until... >we know right wingers have gone too far when they claim racial superiority He's a gigantic fucking idiot at best, but since hes shown himself to be absolutely intelligent, hes an absolute leftist liar. I firmly believe hes totally misleading the public into a final "dont be racist, be docile instead" pill, as he sees it. Germany and germans never felt any racial superiority any more anecdotally and pocketted than america today. My grandmother had black skinned dolls along with all of her friends for example. Nobody cared about race. They cared about judaist extremists revolting in the societies around them. Bolshevism is to Judaim as ISIS is to islam. Christianity now remains the only uncorruptable religion where the more faithful you are the less extreme you get. No others can say that.
Hitlers mistake? Grouping moderate jews in with the faithful extremists. NOT RACISM, you stupid fucking useless 150 IQ having bitch. Studied totalitarian systems for years my ass. He picked a side and hes trying to subvert the other one now, period.
Anthony Hernandez
he isn't saying anything new. he is basically speaking of classic virtues and presenting them in a modern format for our post-industrial world. I give him a lot of respect for doing that and putting himself out there to do that, but people shouldn't think all of his thoughts are unique. Read some older literature (Plato, Bible, etc.) and you'll see he is just sharing timeless truths that seem to have been buried under our modern day garbage.
Carson Sullivan
Here is one circle-jerk white nationalist:
Theodore Beale, a 50-year-old moon landing denying creationist, who spends his time combing everything Jordan Peterson has ever said or written, nitpicking on the smallest of details and blowing and strawmanning them out of all proportion in outbursts of irrational anti-semitism fuelled rage, while simultaneously sucking his own cock in one of the most odious shows of narcissistic self-love you will ever encounter on the internet. It's like every fucking white nationalist had a personality disorder on top of being an ignorant idiot. And they call their ignorance, paranoia and narcissism red-pilled and never even suspect any fault with their own thinking. It's endless, blind circle-jerk with odious head-figures. It's absolutely disgusting.
And in an episode of you couldn't make this shit up a half-Jewish gay man (I have nothing against gays but it has meaning in this context) known for flaunting his degeneracy in theatrics of deliberate provocation has written the foreword for the antisemite's deranged book, Jordanetics. It's such a sad piece of bitter, jealous and narcissistic self-pitying, and Milo got a friend in SJW-like woe-is-me victimhood in the fake-catholic look-at-me, just read:
>Goldy has since been physically assaulted by protesters as Canadian media companies sat back and filmed. She has been scrubbed from every online payment service, making it impossible for her to support herself. Ads for her Toronto mayoral campaign have been banned by Rogers and Bell Media. Her life has been destroyed. By Jordan Peterson. She is shouted at in public and assaulted in the street while he tours the world, showered in riches and acclaim.
>Peter denied Jesus, just as his nominative descendent Peterson has denied me and others. Both Peters did it for the same reason: fear and self-interest. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Peterson denied me in Aspen...
I'm not even mad, I'm impressed that you can script your narrative to the extent that you have. However the fun ends here and It's time to deconstruct your pseduo-intellectual drivel:
> Only degenerates oppose him >Jordan Peterson has constantly criticized attacked and exposed the flaws of: [things] >And he has defended: [other things] Which is why "the Right" hasn't gone after him, not really. I've been saying it since the beginning: It's easier to let JBP dismantle the dogmatists of the Left and then convert his conversions to our side once they're not stuck in a self-deluding rut. That does not mean however that because he stands opposed to groups/movements/ideas that I stand opposed to that I stand with him. He is for the moment a temprorary and probably unwitting ally, but his worldview has so many flaws and logically falty conclusions to stand up to reality
>cultist mind-structures >cultist ideology >cultist like you
Repeating yourself over and over doesn't make it any more true. You speak of "cults" and yet the pseudo-intellectualism that has been created by JBP in some areas has formed a personality cult around him. Those, such as yourself, that suck up whatever he says like it's some kind of scripture and borderline worship him are the closest things to cultists here. You clearly don't know much/anything about Jow Forums or otherwise you wouldn't call people here in general "cultists". You want to know what rules here? Not abstractions, not personalities. The anonymous and short-responses make sure that there are neither. Facts, strong rhetorical capacity and well formed arguments rule the day here. You think that people here were all rightists before coming here? We were shown the reality by rejecting personalities and embracing facts. You do the opposite.
>ad hominem You need to try better than that. Here you respond to the argument, not the person you're arguing against.
The groups who conspire against him are /leftypol trying to subvert opinion and /stormfags who I generally agree with getting it wrong because they can’t see the forest through the trees (being their own principles) and the confused people who find that to be on target. He’s done more for western civilization than anyone in recent times.
Ryder Reed
Every word in his voice. Shine on you beautiful abbo.
Jackson White
In some respects his word games have merit, because concepts like a full vision of the concept of God, especially connecting it with Truth is a difficult concept to flesh out. It is still wise to admit when you just can't fully articulate the depth of something but through learning about a subject really begin the realize the depth it has.
However, I've been able to see through following his behavior and of course the examples he publicly displays how off Peterson has become. He likely did not bother to get fully up to speed on the Kavanaugh case, which is irresponsible for his current position in society. He has fully decided to defend and use the Jew as some kind of outstanding social example while not daring to give light to the nefarious nature they or other groups are exerting. That small collective are the ones fully manipulating our cultural and societal strings, which is ironic as Solzhenitsyn even wrote on them. The behavior of his daughter and the fact that he never really sorted himself out either (even since he can't now with all his riches) makes it more pathetic.
Frankly there is no way he will change to really push forward the truth, so he is best just going back to academia and doing the Bible lectures and seeing if he can come up with anything else like Maps of meaning. He's done with any other purpose.
Jeremiah Hughes
wrong, idiot.
Logan Long
Peterson hasn't done shit for the western world. His psychological advice is terrible, which isn't surprising considering that he's a "psychologist" who calls himself a "christian", and says he "doesn't believe in god", but "is afraid that god might exist". That and we waxes Jung ad nauseum, even though Jung has been irrelevant for decades. Name one fucking thing that he did that wasn't bullshit shilling and hypocrisy.
Juan Cooper
people who go around screeching about things like he does are almost always doing everything they tell everyone else not to do. e.g, he is probably a flaming homosexual
Evan Hernandez
>Facts, strong rhetorical capacity and well formed arguments rule the day here. You think that people here were all rightists before coming here? We were shown the reality by rejecting personalities and embracing facts.
Absolutely not. I have studied rationalism and groupthink for 20+ years, and can make a rational and detailed analysis that Jow Forums falls under the latter. It is rational only in the delusional collective self-image. Just like SJWs, highly similar in group-psychological patterns. Of course you don't want to see yourself as irrational while you adopt, rehearse and signal meme-deep ideological structures you resonate and identify with and then gradually mould into your worldview and sense of meaning.
I sketched a short outline of this just a few days ago, so not to rewrite it all I'll paste it into the next comment...
Anthony Garcia
lately ive been hearing nothing about him but horseshit about his diet and completely unrelated debates.
he's slipping and needs to focus on his core stuff again.
The personality profile of a stereotypical Jow Forums user is highly atypical. While 2-3% of all white males are on the autism spectrum, for Jow Forums it is approx. 50%. And unfortunately I have to agree with Baron-Cohen and others who have studied it, lack of empathy is one of the key diagnostic characteristics. This most fundamental trait of Jow Forums is heightened by three additional factors.
1. Empathy is very much an ingroup feature, and was group-selected for. Outside of close kin we project it onto a group (tribe in EEA) we identify with. In a polarized ingroup-outgroup confrontation, which can be a fully imaginary reality of the human mind (cf. the famous studies showing this), empathy for the ingroup is projected into hatred for the outgroup (thus the ever present warfare in human past). To make it worse polarization has a tendency to feed itself and spiral out of control. As it is rewarding. The bigger the projection of the Devil you are up against ("der Ewige Jude", "the Patriarchy", "the Kuffar"), the more important your cause in reflection. It leads to ideologically selective categorisation of information, resulting in unyielding sense of certainty over real world complexity, variation, nuance.
2. In an anonymous environment social norms and inhibitions pertaining to civility are severely weakened. A very small minority here would say with their own name and face what they say on Jow Forums from behind the mask of anonymity. This eradicates restrains on feeding extremism.
3. The autistic people and other social outcasts on Jow Forums come to identify Jow Forums as a surrogate peer-group, something they can refer to as 'we' and 'us'. It's something most here have lacked and found it difficult to function in in the so-called real world, and people on the autistic spectrum aren't entirely hermits by nature. Jow Forums has attraction, whether conscious or unconscious, to many of these people in its offer of a replacement peer-group to fill the longing.
>Absolutely not. I have studied rationalism and groupthink for 20+ years, and can make a rational and detailed analysis that Jow Forums falls under the latter. It is rational only in the delusional collective self-image.
Once again you're showing you have no idea what Jow Forums is. There is no "collective self-image" here with the exception of reddit newfags that use the Trump general. This board has no sense of identity because there are no usernames, organized groups, or anything that ties any people together. Everything that is stated can be responded to without real restriction. The various groups that frequent this board (Such as Fascists, National Socialists, Libertarians and Anarcho-Capitalists, etc.) often have very little to nothing in common and disagree on virtually everything and argue constantly. The free access to posting, lack of usernames/personalities and open conversational structure means that anyone at any time (including you) can post here. Now what do these core elements mean exactly? Simple. There is no group that dominates another, there is no individual that dominates groups or thought or action. There is only the ability to argue a point, present facts, and apply rhetoric. It is the strength of the argument alone that determines success or propagation of ideas. This is the absolute opposite of a place/group that is deluded, the opposite of what people like you come here to call an "echochamber". Here you are guaranteed only division and disagreement. You cannot tell me that the most intellectually unrestricted place on the internet is a hive mind or has a collective self-image.
>psychologist at harvard >he's one of us guys lmao read up on your CIA, counter culture movement, the birth of psychiatric institutions and the evolution of the DSM over the years and come back
Jeremiah Fisher
faggot. You've somehow figured out a way to spout even more baseless pseudo intellectual nonsense than Peterstein. That's quite impressive.
Nice work pulling that 50% out of your ass, too. I would be shocked if the actual number exceeded 5%.
That's a rather obfuscated way of saying Jow Forums is an ideological echo chamber, which isn't remotely true. Jow Forums is probably one of the most ideologically diverse places on the internet right now. There are lolbertarians, natsocs, commie fags, anarchists, christians, jews, muslims, atheists, hindus, buddhists, and people from various countries around the world.
And most of us agree that Juden Peterstein is a sellout, a hypocrite, and a cult. If you have to use big words to look smarter than your intellectual opponent then you're probably a fraud.
Mason Nguyen
wash your penis
Noah Murphy
>Stop talking bad about the jews, fellow goyim. They're the good guys! Fuck off you nigger kike. You forgot the third option: That Jow Forums is always right.
>When the caffeine finally kicked in, Alex told me that for many years, his father had not been eager to advertise his Judaism because “this was something he was almost killed for.” But he had always “identified firstly as a Jew,” and his philanthropy was ultimately an expression of his Jewish identity, in that he felt a solidarity with other minority groups and also because he recognized that a Jew could only truly be safe in a world in which all minorities were protected. Explaining his father’s motives, he said, “The reason you fight for an open society is because that’s the only society that you can live in, as a Jew — unless you become a nationalist and only fight for your own rights in your own state.” nytimes.com/2018/07/17/magazine/george-soros-democrat-open-society.html
>While 2-3% of all white males are on the autism spectrum, for Jow Forums it is approx. 50%. >[citation needed]
Based upon what some call "astrology" in regards to the Meyers-Briggs test (no I don't and have never claimed it to be accurate, only giving you an idea of what and why of personalities), Jow Forums has a massively high concentration of function pair NT's (e.g INTP), meaning mechanically minded rather than emotionally minded. You are right in that this place has a higher concentration of such people. To say that a pursuit of facts and data over emotional concerns is purely autistic is total and utter rubbish.
>1. Empathy is very much an ingroup feature
That one can be empathetic to others, particularly others of members of the outgroup, disproves this entirely. One look at that Swedish SJW who prevented a plane from taking off because a criminal Refugee was being deported is an example. There was Swedes of her demonstratable ingroup who had lost out because of that scum and she still chose to side with him despite knowing nothing about him. Because he was the exotic needy other, the absolute opposite of the ingroup.
>In an anonymous environment social norms and inhibitions pertaining to civility are severely weakened. A very small minority here would say with their own name and face what they say on Jow Forums from behind the mask of anonymity. This eradicates restrains on feeding extremism.
The ability to say the truth without limitations, to state uncomfortable facts and not have to worry about repercussions (such as a complete American moderate Tucker Carlson getting his house attacked by ANTIFA "protesters") is what allows the maximum utility of conversation here to cut through the bullshit. The anonymity is what drives this place away from group identity, dogma and pseudo-intellectualism because the ONLY thing that you can stand on is the strength of your argument.
1/2 continued...
Brandon Price
>unless you become a nationalist and only fight for your own rights in your own state Best part is Soros can't even do that because he's too jewy for even jewville.
>The autistic people and other social outcasts on Jow Forums come to identify Jow Forums as a surrogate peer-group, something they can refer to as 'we' and 'us'.
People as individuals can claim whatever they want. I can claim that I am apart of an international reptillian conspiracy, that doesn't make it true. I don't know anyone here and neither does anyone else as a general rule, I am utterly incapable of seeing people here as my "peer group", nobody is capable of that. That there are a small minority of disafected teenagers who are deluded enough into thinking this place creates "belonging" is irrelevant. You find people of that kind literally everywhere. You will find a significant number within the Jordan Peterson Personality Cult. Taking fringe outliers and using them as a realistic measurement of anything is utterly retarded.
>hive-minded environment. Forced lack of identity, forced anonymity and unrestricted dialogue make this Jow Forums the absolute furthest thing from a Hivemind or an echochamber, as highlighted here: Points for effort, though.
Chaos has been transubstantiated in the metaphysical representation of that which is what you might call “the feminine.” If that isn’t some embodiment of truth then what else is there?
