LAS VEGAS SHOOTING ROLLED UP? >leaked indictments coincide with Las Vegas shooting >[shooting was 01 OCT 2017] first indictment 03 OCT 2017. Fed had no indictments for two days…? Or did gov't of Saudi Arabia request assistance from the US Fed on the 3rd? >DOJ separating indictments into “domestic” and “int'l” a message: SAUDI ARABIA REQUESTED ASSIST >wiretap requests for 18 USC 1001 & 1512, fraud & witness tampering. >two indictments prior, 50 USC 1705 (NatSec) and 21 USC 846 (conspiracy) SOURCE: dailycrusader.com/2018/11/doj-indictments-seem-to-lead-back-to-las-vegas-shootings-pizzagate-events-related/
This. Waiting for another verified source of the documents.
Nathan Walker
Your source sucks and you suck.
John Wright
Holy shit mods, ban this faggot and his faggot website
Fucking nigger begone. Collect your ad revenue sheckles elsewhere.
Adrian Ward
>dailcrusader.com >Seems legit
Not even. I'll wait until this shit actually happens, MAGAkike shill.
Julian Russell
Why doesnt Jow Forums talk about Dan Bongino more?
>ex secret service >exposes Democrat lies >understands what is going on in the mueller Probe >lays out the indictments and more >interviewed George P on the Russian setup.
I know it's morning but I'm tired as hell! Haha I definitely didn't get enough sleep last night. Did any of you? Probably not with all the excitement of the #ThotAudit haha.
Anyway, 'pedes, I'm going back to bed. You all should too so we have plenty of energy for any le habbenings haha!
>all sources are daily crusader holy shit how about a source for non-retards?
Angel Campbell
I'm triggered by Boomer faggots who think their blog is worth posting anywhere.
Jackson Perez
The guy who keeps making all these posts with nothing but that shitty site as a source.
Jordan Phillips
HE
Christian Williams
WILL
Matthew Ortiz
Kys you cum gobbler
Jaxson Martin
All press conferences will literally be nothing.
Nothing will ever happen. 2020 will come, Trump will probably get another term followed by 4 more years of nothing. Maybe if you are lucky you will get a new fence on the southern border.
if hillary can be compelled to testify then it means it's in regards to something she can't be held to trial on
nothing will ever happen to hillary, ever, she's invincible
Ethan Rivera
I watched the press conference. It has nothing to do with military tribunals.
It was about inmates in SC who were using contraband cellphones to entrap military servicemen with "underage nudes" then extorting them for funds in exchange for silence.
They were basically saying that we need to keep cellphones out of prisons by installing nets around them so nobody outside can throw them over the prison walls.
I laugh when I see that flag and a post like that. How's your PM doing?
Henry Morales
Oh poor baby
Carson Jenkins
What's dailycrusader? Never heard of it
Parker Sanchez
PEDOGATE CONFIRMED
THE MILITARY HAS ROLLED UP A SEXTORTION RING SENDING KIDDIE PORN TO RANKING MILITARY MEMBERS AND BLACKMAILING THEM
USING TRACFONES/OBAMAPHONES
false, Judge Sullivan ruled the questions were legal under discovery and Fed case law shows she can be held in contempt for refusing to answer. Perjury if she lies.
Robert Davis
> dailycrusader
I'm interested in the topic, but not from this shit source. Anybody got legitimate links?
Nolan Reyes
Nice meme. Jow Forums has been talking about this for days. The date has changed however. Any reasons giving for the expedited dates?
Michael Myers
NOT A DRILL. OP IS A HUGE FAGGOT!!!!!
David Thomas
That guy is not even a real attorney general
Jose Brooks
PEDOGATE CONFIRMED
THE MILITARY HAS ROLLED UP A SEXTORTION RING SENDING KIDDIE PORN TO RANKING MILITARY MEMBERS AND BLACKMAILING THEM USING TRACFONES/OBAMAPHONES
>Judge Sullivan stated that these questions are within the legal scope of discovery and therefore she can not plead the Fifth. If she claims she “does not recall” she will be held in contempt of court.
I'm a federal civil litigator and this is an objectively false statement.
anyone - at any time - can plead the 5th amendment right against self-incrimination. It doesn't matter whether something is within the scope of discovery. The retarded faggot journalist cites FRCP 37(a)(4) as his authority, but that has nothing to do with testimonial invocation of the 5th - what this FRCP deals with is bogus discovery answers, not the substantive, qualitative responses of someone testifying.
Secondly, "If she claims she “does not recall” she will be held in contempt of court" this is fucking delusional fiction.
Anyone testifying under oath can say "i can't recall" all they fucking want. the onus is on the plaintiff to establish the facts necessary to corroborate the requisite legal elements of the claim(s). Any defendant or witness, whenever they want, can say "I don't remember/recall" in response to a question under oath. If they can prove LATER that she does - beyond a reasonable doubt - indeed remember/recall what was being asked, then maybe she could be held in contempt, but that would be months later and not on the damn stand.
what a retarded faggot
Carter Scott
imagine thinking this post wasn't made by some goofball shilling his silly little blog, or that news from something called "the daily crusader" should be taken seriously
Luis Johnson
>anyone - at any time - can plead the 5th amendment right against self-incrimination. objectively wrong
you cannot be compelled to testify against yourself, but if you will not be held to account for your statements you absolutely 100% can be compelled to testify
Hudson Davis
NOT
Isaiah Thomas
This is the twentieth time they claimed they got her, I'll wait till the court trial before I give a fuck.
