The argument for Lolicon seems pretty simple to me: No victim, no crime. Living breathing human beings need protection...

The argument for Lolicon seems pretty simple to me: No victim, no crime. Living breathing human beings need protection, constructs of the mind do not. If I imagine in my brain right now a fictional character named Sarah, does she exist? Does she have legal rights? I now imagine myself shooting Sarah, am I a murderer now? As I type this, I am physically drawing a picture of Sarah and a picture of myself shooting her. Has the transmission of my thoughts to paper made me a murderer? Is there a crime if I imagine and depict myself raping Sarah? Does the concept of "rape" result in a more emotional response, such that it must be a crime for me to think these thoughts? I do not believe anyone can reasonably say as much, thus I do not believe it is just or moral to send men with guns to kidnap or kill a man for sitting in his basement looking at lines of ink on paper or pixels on his monitor.

The most common response is "Loli is a gateway drug! Lolicons will eventually become rapists as a result of consuming loli media!" to which I ask this: How do we punish people for crimes they *might* commit? How do we objectively determine that an individual is a latent criminal? Do we measure their Crime Coefficient(犯罪係数) like in Psycho-Pass? Do we take the existence of genitals on a male as proof of him being a latent rapist like SJWs on tumblr? If someone talks about firearm rights, is he not more likely to own and carry a firearm, and since he carries a firearm is he not more likely to commit a crime with a firearm than someone who does not carry a firearm? Should we not ban guns to prevent these future crimes? What about people who consume porn with simulated rape or incest, are they guilty of crimes? Are the actors in these adult films criminals? This sounds like prosecution of thought crimes to me, and such a practice can only lead to abuse, even if the original intention is thought of as just.

Attached: Cirno on the PC.png (400x450, 20K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=qFKfk0ZfJH8
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Based OP

Attached: 1542571077194.png (1447x2046, 1.87M)

Agreed, no victim, no crime.
Still, remember to keep it away from the streets, even if it is just a drawing watching a full grown men lusting over a toddler is still pretty disgusting desu

Attached: 1481754917765.jpg (600x542, 46K)

Lolicons should march in the streets for their rights.

Computer run program Barclay rape dungeon alpha and summon a 2 year old Ocampa.
Now, increase her pain threshold in 200% and lock the holodeck for the next 3 hours.

Attached: barclay2.jpg (451x549, 29K)

Gas

Unfortunately only anonymous people really defend it. Anyone else is too afraid to put their name to anything like that. It's kind of depressing.

kys pedo.

I will make a youtube video expressing my views in the future. I will put my face to the arguments and force people to address them.

Absolute based man

Based

It's just another unfortunate case of NPCs hardcoded to react a certain way.
Orange man bad, lolicon disgusting, diversity good.

Whatever you say, you pedo fuck.

Notice how any disagreement is a low IQ post with no rebuttal? This is the power of the facebook boomers that inhabit Jow Forums in 2018.

I'd say it goes a bit deeper. Because not only they will reject lolicons, but the left constantly flirts with pedophilia, they were just waiting a moment to start pushing it down on society. But if they are ok with kids getting fucked, why they reject lolicons? Well, (1) lolicons don't hurt anyone and don't push their destructive agenda; (2) lolicons are social outcasts, can't be mobilized - most will even refuse to side with them - and don't want to be exposed, even if it is to "gain rights"; (3) ironically, lonely virgins who masturbated to japanese cartoons became one of their biggest enemies.
So yes, NPCs and mainstream media reject lolicons, but it isn't because no one put thought into it, but because it makes completely sense to do that based on their worldview.

Hey OP. Lolicon is pedophilia. Just because you aren't harming anybody doesn't mean you aren't getting aroused by little girls. Just because it's fictional doesn't give you a free pass. Lolis are for loving not fucking. Hang yourself with barbed wire.

Attached: blues-clues.png (335x478, 181K)

Nope, its still fapping to little children.

Attached: 71BDAF97-D0DC-4F3A-B86C-8237C6E149C9.jpg (462x418, 81K)

It's not a crime but it's some kind of psychiatric malady. You are jerking off to imaged that depict children. Whether they are real or simulated is secondary to this. So yeah, maybe jail isn't the place for you but neither is the street. Maybe have you committed to a psychiatric facility.

>Hey OP. Lolicon is pedophilia. Just because you aren't harming anybody doesn't mean you aren't getting aroused by little girls.
So what? Is being a Pedophile a crime? I don't think so.
>depictions of* little children

>but neither is the street
So you want people to be kidnapped or killed for neutral actions that don't hurt anyone. At least be honest.

>Is being a pedophile a crime?

Attached: 1506363011045.gif (353x234, 2.28M)

Pedophilia s a state of mind. Thinking thoughts is not a crime.

>There is no difference between thought and action.
Big brain here folks.

Attached: whattheheck.jpg (640x630, 32K)

Thanks for this insightful post. I'll send it to all my friends!
t. James Alefantis

Go back to facebook, you pizza LARPer.

I'm just calling it as I see it broski
˚+᷀ົཽ≀ˍ̮᷀ົཽ+˳༚

Attached: 36B181B8-F5FC-496D-9C26-5ACFB7A0EDCD.jpg (798x809, 60K)

As am I. I hope your countrymen rise up and gain freedom one day.

>Thoughtcrime detected. You go to Gulag now.
Umm, try again Sweetie.

What if you wanted to be the little girl instead and not actually attracted to children?

What would the term be then?

Attached: Anime_girl_thinking_3.jpg (240x320, 22K)

Gay.

Can ur pet dog lick your nutsack out in the public square while smoking a fat doobie?!

Yeah didn't think so!! You have no idea what real freedom is boy

Attached: C2445B6D-6F1E-43BA-98A2-7F4FD326B4A4.jpg (720x720, 79K)

End all victim-less crime.
End all laws that purport to protect somebody from themselves.
Your rights end where other's rights begin
That is all that needs to happen.


Oh and race war now; gas the kikes

Nothin you say matters you should be burned at the stake with green wood

But aren't all gays pedophiles?

Legal lolicon isn't as sexy. Illegal boners are far more stiff.

Can you march down the street in an SS uniform with a fully automatic AK over your shoulder and yell over a bullhorn about how the holocaust never happened, but it should have? Don't make me post Canadian scarecrows and get you arrested, boy.

>Can you march down the street in an SS uniform with a fully automatic AK over your shoulder
No because a proper Ubermensch would never use shitty russian guns.

You know from personal experience I take it?

Attached: dafuq.png (589x394, 317K)

Jokes on you, my AK is Chinese.

youtube.com/watch?v=qFKfk0ZfJH8

Actually yeah lol. There's nothing you wrote that's illegal about that. However I dunno if thats a good idea... I may build too large of a following with me.

Attached: 27FDF564-8312-49A3-9CBD-BF51A09B8666.png (512x467, 208K)

Decapitating dogs' heads and fucking the stump is still disgusting even if it's only in fantasy
Shit-eating is still disgusting even if only in fantasy
Communism is still disgusting even if only in fantasy
Homosexuality is still disgusting even if only in fantasy
Lolicon (pedosexuality) is still disgusting even if only in fantasy

All of the above deserve to be executed, or at the very least deported to Israel

Attached: 1538521945601.gif (695x392, 2.24M)

>You deserve execution because I say you're icky
You're a joke, kid.

Attached: are_you_that_rarted.png (428x384, 200K)

>Comparing the act of cutting off a dog's head and fucking the stump to a sensual and loving caress of a loli's body in the ultimate display of affection

user what the fuck.

How is that a straw man?
>X is disgusting
>all of the above deserve to be executed
Are you retarded?

I would fuck this nigger so goddamn hard.

Attached: 1534696492525.png (326x306, 243K)

pedos, furries, and necrophiliacs have substantial overlap. See Kero, who has apparently done the referenced act.

He's not wrong. Both are malicious acts of preying on something inherently weaker then them and at the mental capacity to not comprehend the situation.
>loli isnt real
Nigger I have been to the second dimension before. Loli's definitely exist.

>there's overlap
>so that means everyone I don't like is digusting
Kero ate food too. Guess that means everyone who eats food is a disgusting subhuman and deserves death.

But what if the loli consents tho?

> acts of preying on something inherently weaker then them and at the mental capacity to not comprehend the situation.
t. homosexual

This is always how it is when you fuck a woman

>making love to a loli is a malicious act of preying
next you're going to tell us that all men are rapists

Congresspeople defend it not verbally but by voting no and sending bills like this to committees for edit/review from which they never leave.

It's like you "people" don't even know how to read

Attached: are_you_that_rarted - Copy.png (428x380, 228K)

Not with that kekistani flag its not. You're getting pegged if you support that shit, the female knows you're a beta bitch boy who likes prostate prodding and being a sub

>says the leaf

Attached: 765474575467.jpg (600x315, 16K)

Imagine living in a country where police arrests you for loli lmao.

Attached: Not+exactly+but+ok+_75172685cae52f9e42933793a1d19a19.jpg (1300x990, 370K)

Yep says the leaf, the one with the best knowledge of feminine numales that are into this.

Where being just a "normal" guy is a refreshing taste from all the faggotry here

Go die not reading your paragraph of wanting to suck shota willy

what's your opinion of lolidom, oh wise leaf?

I am no longer a leaf I have morphed into a burger for I am now in the states

now that its legal .. smug loli's is best loli's

It's a crime against public morals not an individual you moron..

Objectively define "public morals" and what actions constitute a breach of said "public morals"

Why?

I asked because I know you can't. Thanks for proving me right.

Attached: Based.jpg (258x457, 32K)

You could literally use same argument with bestiality
>It's not fucked up, it's love!

Watch 100 hours of trap porn and tell me you dont have a bigger urge to fuck a trap or have a dick in your ass.
Jow Forums on one hand says jews influence us with porn, traps, blacked shit, etc.
But on the other hand claims watching tons of hours of loli porn doesnt influence the mind whatsoever. Be real here bro, the more you watch that shit, the more you will fantasize about re-enacting this shit in real life

What do you need a definition for? We all know what they they don't require a definition any more than Colour or the smell of onions does.

A dog is not a loli you fucking toilet cleaner.

>We just KNOW who needs to be killed, we don't need laws!
Very low IQ post.

A pedo in denial.

Another low IQ response with no rebuttal. Go back to facebook, please.

What do laws have to do with anything? It's easy to agree upon pornography being a crime against public morals and write it into law as all countries had done prior to 1966/68

@@194936587
>What do laws have to do with anything?
Filtered.

So you don't have answer

>Anyone who doesn't like raping children is low IQ
We are truly in the presence of a genius

Attached: 1529556340555.jpg (252x249, 22K)

Porn causes men who would otherwise date women to become virgin shut ins that don't socialize. Sort of a desirable result in the case of pedos, that is if you consider sex with children wrong.

>2 year old Ocampa
Nigga that's an adult! Every month for an Ocampa is a year.
What you meant to say is a 9 month old Ocampa!

>It's a crime against public morals
>What does law have to do with anything?
You should read what you write before posting it

This thread is not about raping children, it's about lines of ink on paper. Go back to facebook.

Are you lefthanded per chance?
>Doesn't know the difference between moral and legal crimes
Ink on paper arousing child rapist tendencies.

Attached: Pedophiles majority lefthanded.png (652x560, 65K)

This was around yesterday. Fuck off.

>2d pedophilia is just lines on paper, baka
And raping children is just bunches of atoms. Nothing wrong with bunches of atoms, lol

Attached: 1539799495603.jpg (1024x597, 103K)

Right.... Almost every male watched porn in their lives, are they all virgin shut ins?
My point is that if you watch too much degenerate porn it WILL influence you, potentially change your sexual preference. And you WILL have a bigger urge to re-enact it.
Tell me, do you not think a guy who watched hundreds of hours of lolicon wont at one point look at a little girl in real life and get sexual thoughts? Because thats become the norm for him

I hope you don't play violent video games or watch violent films.

>lefthanded
You're actually posting this unironically. How can you look at something like that and think yeah that makes perfect sense seems totally logical.
The study that finding was based on was debunked many years ago.
>Ink on paper arousing child rapist tendencies.
Actually the opposite is true. Lolicon provides an outlet so that they do not go out and have sex with children in the real world.

>pixels and lines are living beings

I base my understanding of the connection between porn consumption and sexual avoidance on facts and data, not armchair psychology.

>The study that finding was based on was debunked many years ago.
Prove it. Also not the only mental defect associated with wronghandedness. Mental defects tend to cluster.
>Actually the opposite is true. Lolicon provides an outlet so that they do not go out and have sex with children in the real world.
No it cultivates a pedophillic desire. Just like heroin simultaneously satisfies your need for heroin and culvinates your ongoing need.

Attached: Lefties are schizos.png (698x560, 169K)

I know, it was a weak bait

Attached: barclay.jpg (596x740, 244K)

Loli here. You guys are funni.

Attached: Herobrine.png (640x1095, 27K)

>The argument for Lolicon seems pretty simple to me
It doesn't hurt anyone, it isn't real and I find it arousing, that's the only argument that I'll ever need

>Just like heroin simultaneously satisfies your need for heroin and culvinates your ongoing need.
Let's say I live in California where weed is legal. I smoke it regularly. Does it make me want to take more dangerous, illegal drugs after some time?

It hursts you, your family and society by making you a disgusting lolicon.

Makes you more likely to be a braindead pothead

Si senor.

Attached: 63333861_p0_master1200.jpg (400x606, 81K)

I don't see how I'm hurting anyone by fapping to drawings, but go ahead, virtue signal away.

ru rikey rawricorn boi?

AHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: D95F89CF-7E18-4E29-A42D-1A2C9D616743.gif (250x300, 85K)