Why do the women transform the freedoms we gave into total degeneracy?

>degeneracy is fun

enjoy eternal damnation

True, but some things really are morally wrong, even if we can't give a logical explanation as for why. Like bestiality, you can do it without hurting anyone, or even raping any animals (they can fuck you), but it's clearly still degenerate behavior to any average person. The problem is where to draw the line between what is degenerate and should be shunned, and what is simply innocent fun that should be allowed. It all ties back to the fascist idea that anything you do will influence those around you, so if you don't want certain degenerate behaviors to exponentially spiral out of control, they have to be banned.

A real world example would be "rapid onset gender dysmorphia" where people without gender dysmorphia start taking hormones because of social pressure put on by their friends
sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180822150809.htm

Because they're emotionally driven creatures with very little sense of responsibility. Being disciplined is a male characteristic. Deep down every woman knows that there's a man in her life ready to bail her out should she fuck up. Whether that man is her father, husband or the government doesn't matter, what matters is that she's ultimately not responsible for her actions.

Attached: TheNewFamily.jpg (719x737, 76K)

its not things we dont like. its things that are degenerative to both individuals and society at large we we have to oppose and mitigate to ensure the continuation of a healthy civilization

Exactly. Libertarians ideals sound nice until you look at a world where everyone does whatever the fuck they want simply because it's enjoyable. Civilization is the culmination of differed gratification

Daddy.

because they have an instinctual desire to act out against authority regardless of why that authority exists or how it came to be in the first place
they're basically children

Attached: modern women.png (1200x1751, 1.14M)

its in females nature, like a shitest, ancients warned us for them.

Gentlemen, I give you the exhibit: the degenerate

fucking love how based most ruskis are

Attached: 1543105711888.jpg (745x500, 174K)

They've confused freedom with slavery. Not having self-control, letting emotions or temptations dictate your life is not freedom. Kind of like every man who masturbates, views pornographic material, has premarital sex, has no sexual principles etc.

The right to vote cost families their freedom from corporations. Before feminism, the men voted in the interests of their families. Men also listened and understood women more than now, since the wife's input gave the husbands meaning towards a higher purpose. Now, it is every man and woman for themselves. There is less obligation towards families, and more towards preserving the self. Large corperations will study and market off of what they view their customer's base interests lie, and they discovered it was profitable to advertise products that encourage individualism, and exploit the natural instinct women have towards belonging to a group (which used to be primarily a family).

Degeneracy is the base state of man. It is divine to rise above it. Some require religion or philosophy. Some do it through shear will power and the inherent knowledge of universal right.

Sadly many men are devolving back to an animalistic state and falling further away from humanity. I'd argue giving women power is the largest factor, as it detracts from the importance of men and women coming together to love and support the other as they raise their children into the world. Ultimately, the only way to maintain a civilized society is to give people incentive into maintaining healthy and happy families.

Attached: thetruth.jpg (1280x855, 613K)

That graphs a meme.
The study was done with children aged 11-13 so the girls had a leg up with puberty.
If you did IQ studies with adults men would clearly dominate.

because the background culture is already degenerate

jebana kurwa

What is parenting and the "princess" treatment

Basically this. You are a degenerate.

Because the vast majority of them lack imagination and ambition. Freedom is mostly wasted on women because they usually can't think of anything particularly productive to do with it, they just see it as a license to screw around until they get old and lonely, or get stupid body piercings and dye their hair stupid colors.

Because they don't want those freedoms to begin with. Turning them into degeneracy and self-destruction is their way of:

#1 - coping with what they perceive to be abandonment.
#2 - self-harming.
#3 - punishing men for abandoning them.
#4 - ruining everything men have sacrificed for, because they have no love for men anymore so why should they love men's creations?

when women are unhappy they never communicate it forthrightly, they always project it in an immature and amplified manner. because women, archetypally speaking represent chaos and chaos untamed is inherently destructive. this is why women need men, they need us to bring order to chaos. and we need women because without chaos we would stagnate. as order without chaos always stagnates.

for example, women's rights / votes for women was a mistake because the main issue was that men became hedonistic, passive, neglectful and lazy. one of the main quarrels women had with men was that men were having affairs left right and center.

the solution was obvious. to retain the cohesiveness of the family unit men should've refrained from their degenerate ways. but instead, they gave women the opportunity to indulge in the same behaviours and they gave the state permission to take on board the responsibilities of men so men could then be even more passive, lazy and hedonistic. and women have been punishing men for this ever since.

they never wanted the vote, they never wanted equal rights. they wanted men to make them feel safe and attended to. they wanted men to put them in their place.

it's amazing how after what, around a hundred years or so we've still not learned this.

Do you have source? Not that don't believe it, just need a proof to show others. This graph is being used too often.

I had a girlfriend for a while who I left to pursue a career that ultimately went nowhere.

For about a week I tested out the concept of giving her control over the relationship.

I would not offer any suggestions because she would always immediately go with them.
This led to many an awkward silence after questions of what to do or where to even eat.

I started to get really frustrated, but then I just decided to let it go and take the initiative again.
I was happier, and she was happier for it.

I thought she was just an idiot I liked until I started browsing pol, but it seems that women in general just don't know what they want.

After reading your post I had to ask myself the question, can I trust user to know what women want. No I dont think i can, and you base alot of your argument on the fact you know women. But I'm inclined to believe you're an autist, incel or autistic incel.
>#1 - coping with what they perceive to be abandonment.
Assuming you know women
>#2 - self-harming.
Doing something you dont like
#3 - punishing men for abandoning them.
Punishing you by not touching you or doing something you dont like
>#4 - ruining everything men have sacrificed for, because they have no love for men anymore so why should they love men's creations?
So you're mad that they're destroying everything men built... but men only built what your referring to because those men kept their women on an tight leash.

I'll have to crunch the numbers user but I'm gonna suggest suicide

it's not that they don't know what they want. they want everything at once all the time. because they're hardwired to seek as much as they possibly can in order to maximise their potentiality for consistent safety.

so naturally they default to transferring this dynamic to their "man" and deferring their self-authority and autonomy to him. focusing on him and his needs in return for him making her feel safe. this is the true nature of relationships.

>women don't want to think about what they want.
>they want what they want to be what you want.
>they want what you want, to be what they want.
>they want you to impose your wants and needs on them as if they are their own.

the less they have to think for themselves, the happier they are. this is the nature of submission.

you have so much to say but you're saying little to nothing at all.

Hey same to you. Enjoy the incel life, I hear so many wonderful things

Incels don't exist. Only people who lack original thought proliferate this nonsensical meme.

Attached: 1536034636765.png (1042x518, 119K)

Yea, anyone can get women. Just look at the sex ratio ond much more men live in celibacy.

The first step is denial. Go to the gym or work on your personality a bit.

I mean if you can find a female who will take that pill then more power to you. But she'll probably have to be autistic too, or maybe really ugly?

evrytime someone critcizes women gets a label incel.. If you are a woman i can somehow understand this, but if you are a guy kys

Eleutheros, the biblical Greek for freedom; is of legitimacy or of licentiousness, eleutheria.
That these are indistinguishable to nearly all women is.

everytime* criticises*

all you have to do is go outside and you'll see the lowest quality men you could ever come across with equally as low spouses.

crackheads have girlfriends. fat bastards have girlfriends. toothless tramps have girlfriends. the homeless have girlfriends.

every dude has opportunities, if he's not getting sex it's because he doesn't want the opportunities available to him.

>being so up your own arse you think you can magically observe a person's life over a mongolian basketweaving forum

> the freedoms we gave
> we
You weren't even a possible cum stain on the bed sheets when better men had actual power. You gave women nothing because you have nothing to give them, they don't owe you anything.

>why can't I recognize capitalism when I'm staring straight at it
Probably malnutrition and exposure to syphilis during birth

a shittest.

yo source?

>criticism
>3 post incel rant
Theres a difference user. Why is ever guy that doesnt think women are worthless trash a white knight?
>every dude has opportunities
Yeah any dude can get a 2 or 3 no toothed fuck. What you even do with a 4+ on a date?
>"So you might not know this, but you actually dont want your freedom"
Ahahahhah. You mean to tell me that line doesnt get you decent women?

the funny thing is that I talk openly about these things with women all the time and they admit them to me. the problem is though that because I know these things they can't manipulate me. which makes them feel unsafe around me. they always end up going for saps they can easily manipulate through pussy or other means.

they stick around for a while but they always go absolutely manic eventually when they realise after everything they don't have a hold on me at all. so they default to going back to easier more reliable resources. and why wouldn't they? most men are submissive as I said, and women want safety, and they think the easy option will make them feel the safest because they get instant gratification from the easy men who allow them to manipulate them. whereas with me they have to feel uncomfortable for a while until I bring them into my frame and it sinks in that I'm worthy of leadership. they already know, it's just sunk in deep enough because they haven't allowed it to and it's not like I can force them to because if I push too hard. false allegation.

1. he didn't say women are worthless trash
2, why you defend women in the first place? if they are equally capable let them protect themselves huh?

Why are you even on this board?

This

1. I never said he said I said you said me said
2. This is a board of freedom
Go to incelchan if this triggers you user
Wait so are the women that openly admit they dont want freedom the same ones that are looking to manipulate men? Honestly confused. In my experience they're separate beasts

>This is a board of freedom
you can get banned for little things so not really

well yeah, because they'd rather control men than be controlled by unworthy men.

but if they had the choice between controlling men and being controlled by a worthy man they'd pick the latter any day of the week. well, they might not because overall faith in men in so low that even if they came across a man worthy of that kind of leadership / control they'd probably still run a mile because it'd be too good to be true.